Urinary dipeptidase 1 and trefoil factor 1 are promising biomarkers for early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Currently utilized serum tumor markers and fecal immunochemical tests do not have sufficient diagnostic power for colorectal cancer (CRC) due to their low sensitivities. To establish non-invasive urinary protein biomarkers for early CRC diagnosis, we performed stepwise analyses employing urine samples from CRCs and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: Among 474 urine samples, 363 age- and sex-matched participants (188 HCs, 175 stage 0-III CRCs) were randomly divided into discovery (16 HCs, 16 CRCs), training (110 HCs, 110 CRCs), and validation (62 HCs, 49 CRCs) cohorts. RESULTS: Of the 23 urinary protein candidates comprehensively identified from mass spectrometry in the discovery cohort, urinary levels of dipeptidase 1 (uDPEP1) and Trefoil factor1 (uTFF1) were the two most significant diagnostic biomarkers for CRC in both training and validation cohorts using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. A urinary biomarker panel comprising uDPEP1 and uTFF1 significantly distinguished CRCs from HCs, showing area under the curves of 0.825-0.956 for stage 0-III CRC and 0.792-0.852 for stage 0/I CRC. uDPEP1 and uTFF1 also significantly distinguished colorectal adenoma (CRA) patients from HCs, with uDPEP1 and uTFF1 increasing significantly in the order of HCs, CRA patients, and CRC patients. Moreover, expression levels of DPEP1 and TFF1 were also significantly higher in the serum and tumor tissues of CRC, compared to HCs and normal tissues, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study established a promising and non-invasive urinary protein biomarker panel, which enables the early detection of CRC with high sensitivity.

Unanticipated pathological clearance in two cases of clinical T4b dMMR/MSI-h advanced colorectal cancer: the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors despite positive positron-emission tomography results.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for colorectal cancer consists of surgery and chemotherapy, which can be combined to improve outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a significant advancement in the standard treatment of metastatic, unresectable colorectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). However, limited data are available about the use of ICI in the neoadjuvant and conversion settings. Here, we present two cases treated with ICI. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: A 75-year-old male with a large, borderline resectable rectal cancer diagnosed as cT4bN1bM0 who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by combination ICI consisting of ipilimumab and nivolumab. After four courses of ICI, the tumor significantly shrank, but positron emission tomography still showed a positive result and R0 resection was performed. Pathological analysis revealed no residual cancer cells. The patient has been monitored without adjuvant chemotherapy, and no recurrences have occurred after one year. Case 2: A 60-year-old male with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab. The tumor partially shrank after three courses, and continued pembrolizumab monotherapy resulted in further tumor shrinkage which still showed positive positron emission tomography. Curative sigmoidectomy with partial resection of the ileum and bladder was performed, and the pathological outcome was pCR. There was no viable tumor in the specimen. The patient has been monitored without adjuvant chemotherapy for six months, and no recurrence has been observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports two cases, including a large, borderline resectable rectal cancer after failure of chemotherapy followed by combination treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab and one case of sigmoid colon cancer after pembrolizumab treatment, which resulted in pathological complete response. However, it remains unknown whether ICI therapy can replace surgery or diminish the optimal extent of resection, or whether adjuvant chemotherapy is needed after surgery in the case of achieving pCR after ICI therapy. Overall, this case report suggests that ICI before colorectal surgery can be effective and potentially a 'watch-and-wait" strategy could be used for cases in which ICI is effective.

Clinical Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor and Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker for Predicting the Curability of Endoscopic Resection in Ulcerative Early Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic diagnosis is essential for predicting the curability of early gastric cancer (EGC; R0 resection) before treatment, but the relationship between ulcerative lesions and clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) on the morphological changes of ulcerative EGCs and its relevance to the clinical outcomes. METHODS: Altogether, 143 patients with differentiated ulcerative EGC that were resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection were retrospectively identified and divided into the following two cohorts depending on their PPI/P-CAB administration status: PPI/P-CAB (n = 76) and non-PPI/P-CAB (n = 67) cohorts. Furthermore, in each cohort, the patients were further divided into the improved and unimproved subgroups based on the ulcerative changes. RESULTS: In the PPI/P-CAB cohort, the deep submucosal invasion and lymphovascular invasion rates were significantly higher in the unimproved subgroup than in the improved subgroup, resulting in a significantly lower R0 resection rate. Contrarily, no significant differences were found between the two subgroups in the non-PPI/P-CAB cohort. The significance of PPI/P-CAB administration was observed only in the ulcerative EGCs with open-type atrophy (R0 resection rate; improved vs. unimproved, 90.9% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.001). When the finding of improved ulcer with PPI/P-CAB administration was used as the indication of endoscopic resection in ulcerative EGCs with open-type atrophy, high sensitivity (78.9%) and accuracy (76.3%) rates for the curability were observed, which were higher than those of conventional endoscopic diagnosis alone (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: PPI or P-CAB administration might contribute to the potential selection of ulcerative EGCs, enabling endoscopic curative resection.

Osteopontin secreted from obese adipocytes enhances angiogenesis and promotes progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in obesity.

PURPOSE: Obesity is a risk factor and poor prognostic factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. METHODS: PDAC cells and obese visceral adipocytes (O-Ad) derived from mice and humans were used to analyze interactions between the two cell types, and human microvascular endothelial cells were used for angiogenesis assay. A xenograft mouse model with subcutaneously injected PDAC cells was used for animal studies. The relationship between visceral fat and prognosis was analyzed using resected tissues from PDAC patients with and without obesity. RESULTS: Conditioned media (CM) from O-Ad significantly increased PDAC cell growth and migration and angiogenic capacity in both human and mice cells, and blocking osteopontin (OPN) in O-Ad canceled O-Ad-induced effects in both mouse and human cells. In addition, O-Ad directly increased the migratory and tube-forming capacities of endothelial cells, while blocking OPN canceled these effects. O-Ad increased AKT phosphorylation and VEGFA expression in both PDAC and endothelial cells, and OPN inhibition in O-Ad canceled those O-Ad-induced effects. In the xenograft model, PDAC tumor volume was significantly increased in obese mice compared with lean mice, whereas blocking OPN significantly inhibited obesity-accelerated tumor growth. OPN expression in adipose tissues adjacent to human PDAC tumor was significantly higher in obese patients than in non-obese patients. In PDAC patients with obesity, high OPN expression in adipose tissues was significantly associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: Obese adipocytes trigger aggressive transformation in PDAC cells to induce PDAC progression and accelerate angiogenesis via OPN secretion.

A prospective cohort study of a new electrosurgical unit for preventing colorectal post-endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome (PECS) is a recognized complication of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, there is a lack of interventions for preventing PECS. We therefore conducted a prospective study to evaluate the utility of maXium, a novel electrosurgical unit, for preventing PECS. METHODS: This single-center, prospective cohort study prospectively enrolled patients undergoing colorectal ESD. The voltage and power of the electrosurgical units were measured. PECS was defined as a visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 30 mm, an increase of VAS ≥ 20 mm from baseline, body temperature ≥ 37.5°C, or white blood cell count ≥ 10 000/µL after ESD. PECS was classified into type I (without extra-luminal air) and type II (with peri-luminal air). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PECS. A sample size of 92 patients was required to ensure the upper limit of the 90% CI for the incidence of PECS was less than 15%. RESULTS: At resistances greater than 400 Ω, the maXium unit allowed submucosal dissection with lower power than with the VIO300D unit. Ninety-one patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final study analysis. The incidence of PECS was 16% (90% CI, 10-23%), comprising type I (11%) and type II (5%) PECS. Simple extra-luminal air without PECS was observed in 7% of patients. CONCLUSION: Use of the maXium electrosurgical unit did not reduce the incidence of PECS after colorectal ESD; however, the maXium unit had equivalent performance to a conventional electrosurgical unit used for colorectal ESD.

Reovirus combined with a STING agonist enhances anti-tumor immunity in a mouse model of colorectal cancer.

Reovirus, a naturally occurring oncolytic virus, initiates the lysis of tumor cells while simultaneously releasing tumor antigens or proapoptotic cytokines in the tumor microenvironment to augment anticancer immunity. However, reovirus has developed a strategy to evade antiviral immunity via its inhibitory effect on interferon production, which negatively affects the induction of antitumor immune responses. The mammalian adaptor protein Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) was identified as a key regulator that orchestrates immune responses by sensing cytosolic DNA derived from pathogens or tumors, resulting in the production of type I interferon. Recent studies reported the role of STING in innate immune responses to RNA viruses leading to the restriction of RNA virus replication. In the current study, we found that reovirus had a reciprocal reaction with a STING agonist regarding type I interferon responses in vitro; however, we found that the combination of reovirus and STING agonist enhanced anti-tumor immunity by enhancing cytotoxic T cell trafficking into tumors, leading to significant tumor regression and survival benefit in a syngeneic colorectal cancer model. Our data indicate the combination of reovirus and a STING agonist to enhance inflammation in the tumor microenvironment might be a strategy to improve oncolytic reovirus immunotherapy.

A multicenter case-control study of self-expanding metallic stent versus trans-anal colorectal tube for stage II/III non-right-sided obstructive colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) and trans-anal colorectal tube (TCT) are alternative treatments to conventional emergency surgery for non-right-sided obstructive colon cancer (NROCC). However, the one with better short- and long-term outcomes remains controversial. Thus, this multicenter case-control study aimed to analyze and compare SEMS and TCT for NROCC. METHODS: Patients with stage II/III NROCC who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2019 at either of the eight selected Japanese affiliate hospitals were, retrospectively, reviewed. Baseline characteristics between the SEMS and TCT groups were adjusted by propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: Among 239 reviewed patients (SEMS: 76, TCT: 163), 180 were finally included in two well-balanced cohorts through PS: SEMS group (65 patients) and TCT group (115 patients). Technical success, clinical success, morbidity, and short-term mortality were not significantly different between the two groups. SEMS placement achieved significantly higher rates for primary resection/anastomosis without stoma (SEMS: 90.8% vs. TCT: 77.4%, p < 0.001) and laparoscopic surgery (SEMS: 64.6% vs. TCT: 43.5%, p < 0.001) than TCT placement. However, 5-year overall survival (SEMS: 83.7% vs. TCT: 86.4%; p = 0.822) and 5-year relapse-free survival (SEMS: 64.7% vs. TCT: 66.4%; p = 0.854) showed no significant differences between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both SEMS and TCT revealed similar long-term outcomes, but SEMS placement was better in achieving primary resection/anastomosis and laparoscopic surgery in patients with stage II/III NROCC.

Successful diagnosis and endoscopic submucosal dissection of a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor originating from the submucosal layer.

Video 1Endoscopic submucosal dissection for a gastric GI stromal tumor originating from the submucosal layer.

Combination Therapy With Ustekinumab Plus Intensive Granulocyte and Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis in Patients With Refractory Ulcerative Colitis.

There are currently no reports on the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with ustekinumab (UST) plus intensive granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) for the treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively evaluated the 10-week effectiveness of combination therapy with UST plus intensive GMA on refractory UC patients including two corticosteroid (CS)-dependent patients, two CS-refractory patients and one patient with loss of response to tacrolimus. Four patients were administered initial combination therapy of UST (6 mg/kg UST followed by subcutaneous injections of 90 mg UST every 8 weeks) plus intensive GMA. Of the four patients who received this combination therapy, two (50%) achieved clinical remission at 10 weeks. The rate of patients achieving endoscopic improvement (endoscopy subscore ≤ 1) at 10 weeks was 50%. In all cases, CSs were discontinued within 10 weeks. No adverse events were observed. Combination therapy with UST plus intensive GMA is helpful to reduce clinical disease activities in refractory UC patients and appears well tolerated.

The efficacy of maintenance therapy after remission induction with tacrolimus in ulcerative colitis with and without previous tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Tacrolimus (TAC) is an important therapeutic option for remission induction in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there is little evidence available on long-term outcomes and maintenance treatments after TAC therapy, especially in cases with previous tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor therapy. METHODS: Long-term outcomes and remission induction after TAC treatment were retrospectively examined in refractory UC patients with and without previous TNF-α inhibitor therapy. RESULTS: The mean disease activity index and the endoscopic activity index scores decreased significantly during the 12-week treatment after TAC therapy in both groups, showing a significantly greater decrease in the group without TNF-α inhibitor therapy than in the group with previous TNF-α inhibitor therapy. One year or more after TAC therapy, TNF-α inhibitor and/or azathioprine was used as maintenance therapy in most cases in the group without previous TNF-α inhibitor treatment, while azathioprine was primarily used in the group with previous TNF-α inhibitor treatment. Colectomy was performed in 45.5% (5/11) and 15.6% (7/45) of the groups with and without previous TNF-α inhibitor therapy, respectively, and the group without previous TNF-α inhibitor treatment had a better colectomy-free rate than the group with previous TNF-α inhibitor treatment after TAC therapy on Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSIONS: TAC is effective for remission induction in refractory UC patients with and without previous TNF-α inhibitor treatment. Maintenance medication after TAC therapy is an issue for the future, especially in UC cases with previous TNF-α inhibitor treatment failure.

Adalimumab Dose-Escalation Therapy Is Effective in Refractory Crohn's Disease Patients with Loss of Response to Adalimumab, Especially in Cases without Previous Infliximab Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Adalimumab dose escalation is one of the most important options in refractory Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab, since there are few reports of adalimumab dose escalation, especially in East Asia. METHODS: The clinical response to adalimumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab was evaluated retrospectively, using the Crohn's disease activity index score, serum C-reactive protein levels, and endoscopic analyses. RESULTS: Of the 203 Crohn's disease patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor, 14 refractory Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab received adalimumab dose-escalation therapy. The C-reactive protein level was significantly reduced from the start to weeks 12 and 52 of adalimumab dose escalation in the whole group, although there were no significant reductions of Crohn's disease activity index scores. Both Crohn's disease activity index scores and C-reactive protein levels were significantly reduced from the start to weeks 12 and 52 of adalimumab dose escalation in patients without previous infliximab treatment, although C-reactive protein levels were positive in all cases with previous infliximab exposure at weeks 12 and 52. Endoscopic mucosal healing was achieved with adalimumab dose escalation in 2 cases without previous infliximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab dose-escalation therapy is effective in refractory Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab, especially in cases without previous infliximab treatment.

Real-world efficacy of adalimumab and infliximab for refractory intestinal Behçet's disease.

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents are important for managing refractory intestinal Behçet's disease. Few studies have reported the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibodies for intestinal Behçet's disease due to its rarity. AIMS: The aim was to examine the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies for intestinal Behçet's disease in real-world practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of medical records at 4 hospitals in Japan. Global gastrointestinal symptom and endoscopic assessment scores were analyzed in intestinal Behçet's disease patients given anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents at 3 and 12 months after the start of therapy. RESULTS: Of 53 intestinal Behçet's disease patients, 22 received anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibody treatment. At the first line, 14 were given adalimumab, and 8 were given infliximab. After 3 and 12 months of treatment, 7 and 11 patients showed complete response of gastrointestinal symptom scores, respectively, and 5 and 9 showed complete remission of the endoscopic assessment score, respectively. Three patients switched anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents. CONCLUSION: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibodies are effective for refractory intestinal Behçet's disease in real-world situations. Switching anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents may be useful for failure of first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in some refractory cases.

Prospective comparison of preference and efficacy of adalimumab and infliximab for treating ulcerative colitis naive to antitumor necrosis factor therapy.

There have been few reports on 2 tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, infliximab and adalimumab, with respect to patient preference and efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC).We used questionnaires to evaluate the preference and reasons for drug choice between infliximab and adalimumab in UC patients naive to antitumor necrosis factor alpha therapy. We also analyzed the efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab prospectively and endoscopically before treatment and at 14 and 54 weeks.Of the 25 UC patients, infliximab and adalimumab were chosen by 10 (40%) and 15 (60%), respectively. Patients who favored infliximab considered "fear of syringes" (7/10, 70%) as the most important influencing factor, whereas patients who favored adalimumab considered "ease of administration" (10/15, 66.7%) and "time required for therapy" (10/15, 66.7%) as the most important factors. There were no statistical differences in remission induction and maintenance between the infliximab and adalimumab groups with regard to response, remission, mucosal healing, steroid-free, and steroid-free remission rates at weeks 14 and 54.The efficacy of adalimumab in remission induction and maintenance was equivalent to that of infliximab in UC patients naive to antitumor necrosis factor alpha therapy in this prospective study, but more patients preferred adalimumab.