Screening of Family Members of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients can Detect Undiagnosed Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among Them: Is There a Genetic Link?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has multifactorial origin. Genetic and environmental factors lead to the biology of this complex disorder. In this study, we screened parents of cases with NAFLD and compared them with parents of cases without NAFLD to see its familial aggregation and the role of patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 (PNPLA3). METHOD: It was a cross-sectional study. Parents of probands with NAFLD and without NAFLD were screened with abdominal sonography, anthropometry, blood tests, transient elastography, and PNPLA3 polymorphism. RESULTS: We had enrolled 303 individuals: 51 probands with NAFLD, 50 probands without NAFLD, and their 202 parents. Parents of the NAFLD group had significantly higher metabolic risk factors as compared with parents of the non-NAFLD group. They had a significantly higher rate of fatty liver (P = 0.0001), mean serum aspartate aminotransferase levels (P = 0.011), mean serum alanine aminotransferase levels (P = 0.001),raised fasting and postprandial blood sugar levels, lower mean platelets (P = 0.033) and serum albumin levels (P = 0.005), and higher mean liver stiffness (P = 0.001) on transient elastography.Frequency of PNPLA3 polymorphism within NAFLD group was higher compared to the non-NAFLD group (mutant GG-13.3 vs 3.3%). Similarly, parents of NAFLD group had mutant GG in 15 % versus 5% in parents of non-NAFLD group, (P = 0.105, odds ratio 6), though it was not statistically significant but may be relevant. In this study, offsprings of parents with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis were likely to have GG homozygous allele. A NAFLD16 score based on parent's parameters was calculated to predict the probability of NAFLD occurrence in an overweight obese individual. CONCLUSION: Screening of parents of individuals with NAFLD will help in the identification of undiagnosed NAFLD cases and other metabolic risk factors among them as there is a familial aggregation of NAFLD. One can predict the occurrence of NAFLD in the next generation using the NAFLD16 score.

Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAd) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may help avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy (PB) with a limited risk of missing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; Gleason grade group [GGG] >1). OBJECTIVE: To define optimal diagnostic strategies based on the combined use of PSAd and MRI in patients at risk of prostate cancer (PCa). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis of the international multicenter Prostate MRI Outcome Database (PROMOD), including 2512 men having undergone PSAd and prostate MRI before PB between 2013 and 2019, was performed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Rates of avoided PB, missed GGG 1, and csPCa according to 10 strategies based on PSAd values and MRI reporting scores (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS]/Likert/IMPROD biparametric prostate MRI Likert). Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to statistically compare the net benefit of each strategy. Combined systematic and targeted biopsies were used for reference. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: According to DCA, the best strategy in biopsy-naive patients was #7 (PI-RADS/Likert 4-5 or PI-RADS/Likert 3 if PSAd >0.2), which avoided 41.2% PBs while missed 44% of GGG 1 and 10.9% of csPCa cases. From a clinical standpoint, however, strategies with a lower risk of missing csPCa included #10 (PI-RADS/Likert 4-5 or PI-RADS 3 if PSAd >0.10 or PSAd >0.2), which avoided 27% PBs while missing 24.4% GGG 1 and 4% csPCa cases, or #5 (PI-RADS/Likert 3-5 or PSAd>0.15), which avoided 14.7% PBs while missing 9.3% GGG 1 and 1.7% csPCa cases. Similar results were found in patients with a previous negative biopsy. This study is limited by its retrospective nature, and no central review of MRI and histopathological findings. CONCLUSIONS: Combined PSAd and MRI findings allows individualization of the decision to perform PB on the basis of the risk of missing PCa that both patients and clinicians are ready to accept to avoid this procedure. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared several biopsy strategies based on a combination of prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings and prostate-specific antigen density, providing a readily available tool for each center and practicing urologist to counsel patients about their individual risk of significant prostate cancer.

Multiple extra-splanchnic venous thromboses - an unusual vascular complication of acute pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammatory process of the pancreas with variable clinical presentations. Splanchnic venous thrombosis is a well-known vascular complication of AP and commonly present as thrombosis of the splanchnic venous system: splenic vein (SplV), portal vein (PV) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV), either separately or in combinations. Involvement of extra-splanchnic vessels is rare and associated with morbidity and mortality. Vascular complications are late phenomena and usually associated with local complications of AP, namely acute fluid collections, necrotizing pancreatitis and walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Pathogenesis of venous thrombosis is multifactorial in which pancreatic inflammation and systemic inflammatory response play a key role. At present, there are no consensus guidelines on treatment and use of anticoagulation for venous thrombosis in the setting of AP. Limited literature suggests the use of anticoagulation in presence of PV with or without SMV thrombosis and extrasplanchnic vessel involvement. Literature on extra-splanchnic vessels involvement in acute pancreatitis is sparse. Here we present two cases with multiple extra-splanchnic vessels involvement and their management.