Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 25(5): 1207-1210, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37084018

RESUMO

Current guidelines recommend that physicians use a shared decision-making (SDM) approach to engage with patients on the potential benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening based on their individual risk. In a sample of 4,118 men aged 55-69 from the 2018 New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), we compared the frequency of screening recommendations and SDM conversations according to four race/ethnic groups. In logistic regression, we evaluated the likelihood of SDM conversations between race/ethnic groups. Our findings suggest that the odds of never having a SDM conversation with their healthcare provider were significantly higher among Hispanic men (OR 95% CI: 2.10, 1.11-3.99) and other/multiracial men (OR, 95% CI: 3.08, 1.46-6.52) compared to white men, while black men had comparable odds (1.52, 0.98-2.34). The lower frequency of SDM conversation among Hispanic and other/multiracial men suggest a missed opportunity for healthcare providers to guide informed screening decisions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , New York , Tomada de Decisões , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Prevalência , Programas de Rastreamento
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 29(7): 979-985, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28634623

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Surgeons use a variety of sutures and knot-tying methods during pelvic reconstructive procedures. We hypothesized that knot-strength integrity will be similar with regards to type of knot, type of suture, and the knot-tying process. METHODS: Using six different suture materials, flat square knots and slip knots were tied robotically and by hand by two surgeons. Knot integrity was evaluated using an Instron 5544 machine. We measured force and elongation at suture failure or knot slippage (whichever came first) as well as force at 3-mm displacement. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-two knots were tie; one unraveled before the analysis, and 431 were tested. Three hundred and ninety-two knots reached or surpassed tensile strength of 30 N, the force at which tissue itself will fail. Knots tied with polyglyconate suture achieved the greatest tensile strength and those with OO-polydioxanone had the lowest. Hand-tied knots, regardless of technique and suture material, had greater tensile strength but greater elongation than robotically tied knots. Slip knots and flat square knots have similar integrity regardless of the tying technique. CONCLUSION: Hand-tied knots had greater tensile strength than robotic knots, but the strength to break all knots required supraphysiological conditions. The decision to use a specific type of suture based on strength is not supported by our results, suggesting that surgeons may choose sutures based on other characteristics and personal comfort.


Assuntos
Diafragma da Pelve/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura , Suturas , Feminino , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Resistência à Tração
3.
Am J Prev Med ; 46(3 Suppl 1): S81-6, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24512935

RESUMO

Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. and more work is needed to decrease the number of new cancer cases and the number of cancer cases diagnosed at a late stage. In New York State, about 106,000 people are diagnosed with cancer each year, 37% of which are diagnosed in adults aged 45-64 years and 55% in those aged ≥65 years. State health agencies are in a unique role to support implementation of cancer prevention strategies at the local level that may have a large impact on the burden of cancer by changing the context in which an individual makes health decisions. The New York State Department of Health, with support through the CDC, is implementing an 18-month cancer prevention demonstration project in two counties aimed at increasing access to nutritious foods, promoting exclusive breastfeeding and decreasing barriers to obtainment of cancer screening. The specific activities being used by the two counties are highlighted, and promising results after the first 6 months of the project are described. Lessons learned from these projects will be reported at regular intervals and used to inform development of larger, statewide initiatives aimed at reducing cancer incidence and death in New York State.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Governo Estadual , Idoso , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Órgãos Governamentais/organização & administração , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Administração em Saúde Pública
4.
Birth ; 40(4): 237-46, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24344704

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Institute of Medicine revised gestational weight gain recommendations; revisions included body mass index (BMI) category cut-point changes and provision of range of gain for obese women. Our objective was to examine resident prenatal caregivers' knowledge of revised guidelines. METHODS: Anonymous electronic survey of obstetrics/gynecology and family medicine residents across the United States from January to April 2010. RESULTS: Overall, 660 completed the survey; 79 percent female and 69 percent aged between 21 and 30. When permitted to select ≥ 1 response, 87.0 percent reported using BMI to assess weight status at initial visits, 44.4 percent reported using "clinical impression based on patient appearance," and 1.4 percent reported not using any parameters. When asked the most important baseline parameter for providing recommendations, 35.8 percent correctly identified prepregnancy BMI, 2.1 percent reported "I don't provide guidelines," and 4.5 percent reported "I do not discuss gestational weight gain." Among respondents, 57.6 percent reported not being aware of new guidelines. Only 7.6 percent selected correct BMI ranges for each category, and only 5.8 percent selected correct gestational weight gain ranges. Only 2.3 percent correctly identified both BMI cutoffs and recommended gestational weight gain ranges per 2009 guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline knowledge is the foundation of accurate counseling, yet resident prenatal caregivers were minimally aware of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines almost a year after their publication.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Aconselhamento Diretivo/normas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pré-Natal/normas , Aumento de Peso , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Coleta de Dados , Aconselhamento Diretivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/educação , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/normas , Feminino , Ginecologia/educação , Ginecologia/normas , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Masculino , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Obstetrícia/educação , Obstetrícia/normas , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
5.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 21(4): 410-7, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22165953

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Institute of Medicine published revised gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines with changes notable for altered body mass index (BMI) categorization as per World Health Organization criteria and a stated range of recommended gain (11-20 pounds) for obese women. The goal of this study was to evaluate associations between maternal BMI-specific GWG adherence in the context of these new guidelines and risk of small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA) neonates. METHODS: Subjects were a retrospective cohort of 11,203 live birth singletons delivered at 22-44 weeks at a Massachusetts tertiary care center between April 2006 and March 2010. Primary exposure was GWG adherence (inadequate, appropriate, or excessive) based on BMI-specific recommendations. SGA and LGA were defined as <10th and ≥90th percentiles of U.S. population growth curves, respectively. The association between GWG adherence and SGA and LGA was examined in polytomous logistic regression models that estimated adjusted odds ratios (AOR) stratified by prepregnancy weight status, controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: Before pregnancy, 3.8% of women were underweight, 50.9% were normal weight, 24.6% were overweight, and 20.6% were obese. Seventeen percent had inadequate GWG, and 57.2% had excessive GWG. Neonates were 9.6% SGA and 8.7% LGA. Inadequate GWG was associated with increased odds of SGA (AOR 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-4.78 for underweight and AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.42-2.24 for normal weight women) and decreased odds of LGA (AOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.47-0.73 for normal weight and AOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.90 for obese women). Excessive GWG was associated with decreased odds of SGA (AOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.73 for normal weight and AOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.89 for overweight women) and increased odds of LGA (AOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.38-2.24 for normal weight, AOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.92-4.65 for overweight, and AOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.10-2.19 for obese women). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to optimize GWG are essential to reducing the proportion of SGA and LGA neonates, regardless of prepregnancy BMI.


Assuntos
Obesidade/complicações , Gravidez/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Obesidade/classificação , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Aumento de Peso , Redução de Peso
6.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 20(6): 837-44, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21510805

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to quantify how the 2009 revisions of the 1990 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines change women's body mass index (BMI) categorization and BMI-specific GWG adherence categories. The goal was to identify how provider counseling practices need to change on a population level. METHODS: A retrospective review of automated labor and delivery records from a tertiary care hospital in Central Massachusetts was performed. The study cohort included women who delivered singleton, live birth gestations from from April 1, 2006, to September 30, 2009. Records missing weight, height, GWG, gestational age (GA), and/or GA <22 or >43 weeks were excluded. BMI groups and GWG adherence were categorized according to IOM 1990 and 2009 recommendations. Adherence analyses included full-term gestations only. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 11,688 women, mean age 28.9 (±6.1) years and mean parity 1.0 (±1.1). By 1990 recommendations, 10.1%, 52.5%, 14.1%, and 23.3% gravidas were low weight, normal weight, high weight, and obese; and 19.8%, 33.3%, and 46.9% were undergainers, appropriate gainers, and overgainers, respectively. By 2009 recommendations, 3.9%, 51.3%, 24.5%, and 20.3% gravidas were underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese, and 16.7%, 30.8%, and 52.6% were undergainers, appropriate gainers, and overgainers, respectively. Differences in categorization by guideline year was significant for BMI category (p<0.0001) and GWG adherence (p<0.0001). Compared to 1990 guidelines, 16.7% of women were classified differently using 2009 guidelines, with fewer classified as underweight, normal weight, or obese and more as overweight; 17.1% of 1990 appropriate gainers would be classified as overgainers, given new guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in IOM GWG recommendations alter gravidas' BMI categories and, thus, the recommended GWG. As the amount advised is associated with actual gain, accuracy is paramount. GWG is a modifiable parameter associated with immediate and long-term maternal/neonatal health outcomes, and counseling can have a significant public health impact and should involve BMI determination, followed by BMI-specific GWG recommendations in accordance with current guidelines.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Sobrepeso/classificação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Aumento de Peso , Adulto , Peso Corporal , Estudos de Coortes , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Magreza/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos , Aumento de Peso/fisiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA