Comparison of Subjective Global Assessment and Protein Energy Wasting Score to Nutrition Evaluations Conducted by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists in Identifying Protein Energy Wasting Risk in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 7-point subjective global assessment (SGA) and the protein energy wasting (PEW) score with nutrition evaluations conducted by registered dietitian nutritionists in identifying PEW risk in stage 5 chronic kidney disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study entitled "Development and Validation of a Predictive energy Equation in Hemodialysis". PEW risk identified by the 7-point SGA and the PEW score was compared against the nutrition evaluations conducted by registered dietitian nutritionists through data examination from the original study (reference standard). SUBJECTS: A total of 133 patients were included for the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR) of both scoring tools were calculated when compared against the reference standard. RESULTS: The patients were predominately African American (n = 112, 84.2%), non-Hispanic (n = 101, 75.9%), and male (n = 80, 60.2%). Both the 7-point SGA (sensitivity = 78.6%, specificity = 59.1%, PPV = 33.9%, NPV = 91.2%, PLR = 1.9, and NLR = 0.4) and the PEW score (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 28.6%, PPV = 27.2%, NPV = 100%, PLR = 1.4, and NLR = 0) were more sensitive than specific in identifying PEW risk. The 7-point SGA may miss 21.4% patients having PEW and falsely identify 40.9% of patients who do not have PEW. The PEW score can identify PEW risk in all patients, but 71.4% of patients identified may not have PEW risk. CONCLUSIONS: Both the 7-point SGA and the PEW score could identify PEW risk. The 7-point SGA was more specific, and the PEW score was more sensitive. Both scoring tools were found to be clinically confident in identifying patients who were actually not at PEW risk.

Comparison of the COBAS TaqMan HBV test with the COBAS Amplicor monitor test for measurement of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum.

Quantitation of low hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B is important for monitoring natural history of disease and treatment efficacy. This study aimed to compare the quantitation range and analytical sensitivity of the newly developed COBAS TaqMan HBV test (TaqMan test) with the COBAS Amplicor HBV Monitor Test (Amplicor test), using the Eurohep HBV reference plasma and serum samples from patients. Serial dilutions (2.7x10(1)-2.7x10(8) copies/ml) of the Eurohep HBV reference plasma and 50 serum samples from chronic hepatitis B patients were tested by both assays. The TaqMan test could detect seven (2.7x10(2)-2.7x10(8) copies/ml) of eight dilutions of the reference plasma, while the Amplicor test could only detect three of them (2.7x10(3)-2.7x10(5) copies/ml). The HBV DNA values measured by the TaqMan test correlated very well with the theoretical Eurohep standard values (r=0.998, P<0.001). There were good correlations between the HBV DNA levels measured by the two assays on both the Eurohep reference plasma (r=0.993, P<0.001) and serum samples from patients (r=0.904, P<0.001). Compared to the Amplicor test, the TaqMan test had a higher sensitivity (50 vs. 300 copies/ml), shorter assay time (6 vs. 10 hr), and wider dynamic range (8 vs. 3 logs), and was more cost-effective in a clinical setting. These data indicate that the TaqMan test is an excellent tool for HBV DNA quantitation.

Effect of lamivudine therapy on the serum covalently closed-circular (ccc) DNA of chronic hepatitis B infection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of 1-yr lamivudine treatment on serum covalently closed-circular DNA (cccDNA) level. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Serum total HBV DNA and cccDNA levels at baseline, week 24, and week 52 were measured in 82 lamivudine-treated patients, 17 of whom received 1-yr placebo and acted as controls. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the cccDNA levels from baseline (median 3.0 x 10(6) copies/ml) to week 24 (33,476 copies/ml) and week 52 (48,694 copies/ml) (p < 0.001 for both). The median reduction in cccDNA level at week 24 and 52 were 2.21 and 2.12 logs, respectively, which were significantly greater than those of controls (0.31 log, p < 0.001; 0.2 log, p < 0.001, respectively). Fifteen patients (18.3%) developed YMDD mutations by week 52. Compared to patients without YMDD mutations, patients with YMDD mutations had significantly less median reduction of total HBV DNA level (4.44 vs 3.65 logs, respectively, p= 0.02) and cccDNA level (2.27 vs 1.65 logs, respectively, p= 0.016) at week 24 and significantly less median reduction of cccDNA at week 52 (2.35 vs 0.8 logs respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One-year lamivudine treatment decreased serum cccDNA level by 2 logs. The chance of YMDD mutations at week 52 was related to the magnitude of viral suppression at week 24.

18-year follow-up study of a prospective randomized trial of hepatitis B vaccinations without booster doses in children.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The long-term immunogenicity and efficacy of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination remain to be defined. We aimed to examine the long-term immunogenicity and efficacy of HBV vaccination with 3 different regimens over 18 years of follow-up. METHODS: A total of 318 Chinese subjects receiving 3 different regimens of HBV vaccination (2-dose recombinant vs. 3-dose recombinant vs. 3-dose plasma-derived vaccines) without receiving a booster dose were recruited. The HBV serologic markers, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), were determined at yearly follow-up. After 18 years, 88 subjects were still being followed up. RESULTS: Compared with subjects receiving the 2-dose regimen, subjects receiving the 3 dose regimens had a significantly higher geometric mean titer of anti-HBs and a higher proportion had anti-HBs titers > or =10 mIU/mL during the 18 years of follow-up. There were no differences in these 2 parameters between subjects receiving the 3-dose recombinant and subjects receiving the 3-dose plasma-derived vaccines. A total of 88 anamnestic responses were documented in 70 subjects (8 with initial anti-HBs titers <100 mIU/mL at 12 months and 7 with anti-HBs titers <10 mIU/mL before the anamnestic responses). No subject became positive for HBsAg. Three subjects had benign breakthrough HBV infection without leading to chronicity indicated by isolated anti-HBc positivity. CONCLUSIONS: There was less long-term immunogenicity associated with the 2-dose regimen when compared with the 3-dose regimens of HBV vaccination. Because of the highly effective anamnestic responses, a booster dose was not necessary at least up to 18 years after the primary vaccination.

Detection of intrahepatic hepatitis B virus DNA and correlation with hepatic necroinflammation and fibrosis.

Assessment of intrahepatic hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B is important in understanding the natural history of the disease and designing antiviral therapy regimens. However, there is no standardized method for the measurement of intrahepatic HBV DNA levels. We describe a convenient novel method for the measurement of intrahepatic HBV DNA levels based on a modified COBAS Amplicor HBV Monitor test for HBV DNA measurement and real-time PCR beta-actin gene detection for human genomic DNA (hgDNA) quantitation. Fifteen hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, 26 patients positive for antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe), and 8 control patients were recruited. The mean between-run coefficient of variation for the beta-actin real-time PCR assay was 15.4%. All eight control patients had undetectable intrahepatic and serum HBV DNA levels. All chronic hepatitis B patients had detectable intrahepatic HBV DNA levels, and all but one anti-HBe-positive patient had detectable serum HBV DNA levels. HBeAg-positive patients had higher median intrahepatic and serum HBV DNA levels than anti-HBe-positive patients (6,950 versus 676 HBV DNA copies/ng of hgDNA, respectively [P < 0.001] and 184 x 10(6) versus 6.65 x 10(6) copies/ml, respectively [P < 0.001]). The intrahepatic HBV DNA levels correlated strongly with the serum HBV DNA levels (r = 0.842; P < 0.001) and with the degree of fibrosis (P = 0.014). We conclude that the method that we describe is reliable and convenient for the measurement of intrahepatic HBV DNA levels and has potential clinical significance.

Quantitation of covalently closed circular hepatitis B virus DNA in chronic hepatitis B patients.

This study examined a signal amplification assay, the Invader assay, for the quantitation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in liver biopsies and sera. DNA was extracted from liver biopsy and serum samples were collected from 16 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 36 antibody-to-HBeAg-positive (anti-HBe-positive) chronic hepatitis B patients. The amount of total HBV DNA and cccDNA was measured using the Invader assay. Anti-HBe-positive patients had lower median total intrahepatic HBV DNA (P < .001) and intrahepatic cccDNA levels (P = .001) than HBeAg-positive patients. Intrahepatic cccDNA correlated positively with the total intrahepatic HBV DNA (r = 0.950, P < .001). However, the proportion of intrahepatic HBV DNA in the form of cccDNA was inversely related to the amount of total intrahepatic HBV DNA (r = -0.822, P < .001). A small amount of cccDNA was detected in 39 of 52 (75%) serum samples. Anti-HBe-positive patients had lower median serum cccDNA levels than HBeAg-positive patients (P = .002). Serum HBV DNA correlated positively with intrahepatic total HBV DNA (r = 0.778, P < .001) and intrahepatic cccDNA (r = 0.481, P = .002). In conclusion, the Invader assay is a reliable assay for the quantitation of cccDNA. Serum and intrahepatic total HBV DNA and cccDNA levels become lower as the disease progresses from HBeAg-positive to anti-HBe-positive phase, with cccDNA becoming the predominant form of intrahepatic HBV DNA.

Significance of HBV DNA levels in liver histology of HBeAg and Anti-HBe positive patients with chronic hepatitis B.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels and total histologic activity index (HAI), necroinflammation (HAI-NI), and fibrosis (HAI-F) scores. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Liver histology and HBV DNA levels were determined in 94 patients with chronic hepatitis B. RESULTS: There was no association between HBV DNA levels and liver histology in hepatitis-B-e antigen-positive patients (n = 43). In anti-HBe-positive patients (n = 51), HBV DNA levels correlated positively with HAI-NI (r = 0.31, p= 0.014) and HAI-F (r = 0.33, p= 0.017) scores. Though the majority of anti-HBe-positive patients with HBV DNA levels <10(5) copies/ml had mild necroinflammation and no fibrosis, 14.3% had established fibrosis. Anti-HBe-positive patients with core promoter mutations had a poorer histology compared to those without. There was no difference in the histology between anti-HBe-positive patients with and without precore mutations. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level correlated positively with HAI-NI score. Patients with persistently normal ALT levels had a significantly lower median HAI-NI score compared to patients with either persistently or intermittently elevated ALT levels. CONCLUSIONS: In anti-HBe-positive patients, though HBV DNA level <10(5) copies/ml was associated with better histology, 14.3% patients had established fibrosis. Further studies to define a better cut-off HBV DNA level to differentiate low- and high-risk patients for disease progression are required.

Real-time PCR assay using molecular beacon for quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA.

Levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in the blood serve as an important marker in monitoring the disease progression and treatment efficacy of chronic HBV infection. Several commercial assays are available for accurate measurement of HBV genomic DNA, but many of them are hampered by relatively low sensitivity and limited dynamic range. The aim of this study was to develop a sensitive and accurate assay for measuring HBV genomic DNA using real-time PCR with a molecular beacon (HBV beacon assay). The performance of this assay was validated by testing serial dilutions of the two EUROHEP HBV DNA standards (ad and ay subtypes) of known concentrations. The assay showed low intra-assay (<7%) and interassay (<5%) variations for both subtypes. Its dynamic range was found to be 10(1) to 10(7) copies per reaction (1.0 x 10(2) to 1.0 x 10(9) copies ml(-1)). The assay was further evaluated clinically using serum samples from 175 individuals with chronic hepatitis B. The HBV DNA level measured by this assay showed good correlation with that measured by the commercially available COBAS AMPLICOR HBV Monitor test (r = 0.901; P < 0.001). The higher sensitivity and broader dynamic range of this assay compared to the existing commercial assays will provide an ideal tool for monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy in HBV-infected patients, in particular for those with low levels of HBV viremia.

Clinical evaluation of the digene hybrid capture II test and the COBAS AMPLICOR monitor test for determination of hepatitis B virus DNA levels.

The measurement of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is important for the assessment of liver disease and treatment efficacy. Most commercially available assays for the determination of HBV DNA levels have limited linear ranges. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of the Digene Hybrid Capture II (Digene HC II assay) and the COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor test (COBAS-AM assay), with special emphasis on anti-HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with low HBV DNA levels. A total of 425 Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B were recruited. A total of 107 patients were HBeAg positive, and 318 patients were HBeAg negative. The Digene HC II assay and the COBAS-AM assay had similar intra-assay and interassay variabilities. A total of 264 patients (62.1%) had HBV DNA levels undetectable by the Digene HC II assay, and 47 patients (11.1%) had HBV DNA levels undetectable by the COBAS-AM assay (P < 0.001). For the 161 patients with HBV DNA levels detectable by the Digene HC II assay, the HBV DNA levels obtained by the Digene HC II assay and by the COBAS-AM assay showed an excellent correlation (r = 0.95; P < 0.001). The linear ranges of the Digene HC II assay and the COBAS-AM assay marginally overlapped. Before HBV DNA levels could be determined by the COBAS-AM assay, predilution had to be performed for 158 of 161 patients (98.1%) with HBV DNA levels detectable by the Digene HC II assay and for 10 of 264 patients (3.8%) with HBV DNA levels undetectable by the Digene HC II assay. The cost for assaying each serum sample by using different strategies was calculated. The COBAS-AM assay was more sensitive than the Digene HC II assay and more suitable for monitoring low levels of HBV viremia.