Coronary artery bypass graft markers: history, usage, and effects.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most common procedures in the United States as many Americans suffer from coronary heart disease and undergo CABG each year. While CABG has been performed for decades, questions remain regarding the benefits graft marker placement provides for patient therapy and outcomes. Markers at the proximal graft anastomosis aim to improve the efficiency and reduce the risks of subsequent, post-coronary artery bypass grafting coronary angiography by decreasing fluoroscopy time and contrast volume used. Graft markers have been shown to reduce fluoroscopy time and contrast volume, but concerns exist regarding their potentially negative impact on patient outcomes by increasing procedural time and possibly affecting graft patency. The relationship between graft markers and graft patency has not been studied in depth, and there is little evidence to show that graft patency is determined by graft marker placement. Because of the potential benefits to patients and the limited risks, it is important to continue studying graft marker usage and their effects on long-term outcomes.

Left main coronary artery stenosis: severity evaluation and implications for management.

INTRODUCTION: The significant stenosis of the left main coronary artery is associated with poor outcomes and is considered a strong indication for revascularization. However, deciding whether the stenosis is significant can sometimes be challenging, especially when the degree of stenosis is intermediate, and can necessitate additional tests and imaging modalities. Areas covered: We did a literature search using keywords like 'left main', 'imaging', 'intravascular ultrasound', 'fractional flow reserve', 'computed tomographic angiography' and 'magnetic resonance imaging'. The most commonly used methods for better characterizing intermediate left main coronary stenoses are intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve, while optical coherence tomography is the newer technique that provides better images, but for which not as much data is available. The noninvasive techniques are coronary computed tomographic angiography and, to a lesser degree, coronary magnetic resonance imaging. Expert commentary: Accurately determining the severity of left main coronary stenosis can mean the difference between a major intervention and conservative therapy. The reviewed newer imaging modalities give us greater confidence that patients with left main stenosis are assigned to the right treatment modality.

Adjunctive anticoagulation during peripheral vascular intervention.

Endovascular techniques for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease are becoming an increasingly common alternative to open surgery, yet the degree of anticoagulation and choice of anticoagulant to optimize outcomes in these procedures remain uncertain. To date, few randomized trials have directly compared different anticoagulants for use during peripheral vascular interventions. It is also unclear if the approach to anticoagulation should be individualized to each vascular bed or if common principles are shared among them. This has led practitioners across different specialties to use a variety of different methods for anticoagulation, with most extrapolated from techniques used in percutaneous coronary interventions. In this review, we analyze the current literature for anticoagulation used during peripheral vascular intervention of the lower extremity, renal, carotid, and aortic arteries, with special consideration to the choice of anticoagulant used to maximize safe and effective procedural outcomes.

Contemporary antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

The proper use of antiplatelet agents in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is important for ensuring optimal results in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization. Understanding the mechanisms by which these drugs exerts their effects is important for both interventional and non-interventional cardiologists. The effects of these agents on platelet function can be assessed and monitored using a variety of commercially available laboratory assays but so far these tests have not been adopted in routine clinical practice. Currently, aspirin, thienopyridines and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are the primary types of antiplatelet drugs being utilized. The use of these drugs and of several newer antiplatelet drugs in the treatment of patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization in the cardiac catheterization laboratory will be discussed, especially in the light of the recently published guidelines.

Contemporary anticoagulation therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention.

The proper use of anticoagulants is crucial for ensuring optimal patient outcomes post percutaneous interventions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Anticoagulant agents such as unfractionated heparin, a thrombin inhibitor; low-molecular weight heparins, predominantly Factor Xa inhibitors; fondaparinux, a Factor Xa inhibitor and bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor have been developed to target various steps in the coagulation cascade to prevent formation of thrombin. Optimal anticoagulation achieves the correct balance between thrombosis and bleeding and is related to optimal outcomes with minimal complications. This review will discuss the mechanisms and appropriate use of current and emerging anticoagulant therapies used during percutaneous interventions.

Chest pain and ventricular tachycardia in a patient with surgically corrected anomalous right coronary artery from the left sinus of Valsalva.

We present a case of an adult patient who had anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (RCA) from the left sinus of Valsalva that had been treated surgically in the past and who presented years later with chest pain and runs of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Coronary angiography showed a patent unroofed RCA with appropriately repositioned origin and no obstructive coronary artery disease. This case presents angiographic documentation of a technically satisfactory repair of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery and suggests that potentially lethal arrhythmia can occur despite a technically satisfactory repair.