"New innovative QR code-based mobile audience response system (mARS) for panel discussion (PD) in a Indian Arthroscopy Society conference(IASCON) of 1102 registered delegates." - A cross-sectional study.

Purpose: The purpose is to determine the feasibility of Mobile based Audience response system (mARS) and the best time to get maximum delegate participation in panel discussion at a national Indian Arthroscopic Society conference(year-2022) with 1102 delegates by studying their engagement at various time schedules. Methods: Our institution-based software engineer set up mARS, and a separate URL, was purchased for recording the responses. 5 Panel discussions (PD) were moderated by senior national faculty, 3 were on knee topics, and 2 were on Shoulder topics. The audiences were engaged in ongoing PD discussion by displaying the multiple choice questions (MCQs) questions for 15-30 seconds & real-time response was collated, and poll results were declared in real-time during the conference. The data of each panel discussion was acquired from admin page & statistical analysis was done to determine the audience participation in Hall A (Knee) versus Hall B (Shoulder), Day 2 versus day 3 and pre-lunch session versus post-lunch session. Results: Maximum number of delegates (252) participated in Multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI)PD (day 2); however, percentage of response was higher for Massive cuff tear PD (day 3). Audience response was better on day 2, for shoulder topics and pre-lunch session PD than on day 3, knee topics and post-lunch sessions & this was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: mARS proves is an innovative and valuable resource, enhancing audience participation during PD at large gatherings. Real-time results aids not only active delegate engagement but also helps moderators/panellist in curating discussions to answer uncommon queries and unify the responses. The most suitable time for PD sessions utilizing mARS is the pre-lunch slot on day 2. Level of the evidence: Level 3 (Decision Analysis- Observational cross-sectional study). Study design: Cross-Sectional Study. Relevance: This article helps the organizers of larger meeting to time the panel discussion appropriately to obtain maximum audience participation and curate the discussion based on delegate centric responses. Key terms: mobile Audience response system (mARS), Audience response system (ARS), Panel Discussion(PD), Indian Arthroscopic Society conference (IASCON), Indian Arthroscopy society (IAS). What is known about the subject: Audience response system (ARS) in the smaller meeting and webinars are well known entity to have active participation in on-going discussion. "What are the new findings?": Response and results of innovative QR code-based mobile Audience response system (mARS) for Panel discussion (PD) in larger arthroscopic conference with 1102 delegates showed delegates were more interested in Shoulder topics and pre-lunch session and Day 2 response were better.

Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique).

Background: Meniscal extrusion is a phenomenon in which a degenerative posterior horn tear, radial tear, or root tear results in displacement of the body of the meniscus medial to the tibial rim. The paramount function of the meniscus is to provide load distribution across the knee joint. Meniscal extrusion will prevent the meniscus from properly fulfilling this function and eventually leads to progression of osteoarthritis1. Thus, root repair accompanied by arthroscopic meniscal extrusion repair (by a centralization technique) has been suggested for restoration of meniscal function2-5. There are various techniques to correct meniscal extrusion, including a dual-tunnel suture pull-out technique2 (to address extrusion and root tear2), a knotless suture anchor4,6 technique, and an all-inside suture anchor repair7. The indications for extrusion repair are not consistently reported in the literature, and the procedure is not always easy to perform. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the ideal technique. In the present article, we describe the steps for successful combined medial meniscal root repair with extrusion repair and centralization. Description: Place the patient in the supine position with the knee supported in 90° of flexion and the feet at the edge of the operating table with foot-positioner support. First, meniscal root repair is performed with use of the suture pull-out technique, utilizing a cinch suture configuration to hold the root in place, and the suture tapes are fixed over the anterior cortex of the tibia with a suture button. Next, the meniscal body is arthroscopically assessed for residual extrusion from the medial tibial rim. Extrusion repair is indicated in cases with >3 mm of extrusion7-9, as measured on magnetic resonance imaging. In our technique, any extrusion beyond the medial tibial rim is reduced and secured with use of a double-loaded 2.3-mm all-suture type of anchor. Alternatives: Alternatives include surgical procedures in which the root repair is performed with use of suture-anchor fixation10,11 and the extrusion repair is performed with use of the transtibial suture pull-out method. Rationale: Root repair performed with the most common fixation techniques does not always reduce meniscal extrusion or restore meniscal function12,13. Consequently, several augmentation techniques have been reported to address meniscal extrusion3,14, including those that use arthroscopy to centralize the midbody of the meniscus over the rim of the tibial plateau. The rationale for this combined procedure is to restore the hoop-stress distribution and maintain meniscal function by repairing the extrusion of the meniscus. Addressing all intra-articular pathologies in a single stage is a challenging situation, and the sequence of the repair is important to achieve optimal postoperative results. Expected Outcomes: Several surgical techniques have been described for the operative treatment of extrusion repair with use of centralization sutures2,3,5,6, and each has its own distinctive pearls and pitfalls for each. To combine root repair and extrusion repair presents a challenge for surgeons. From our clinical experience, a methodical approach to understanding the pathoanatomy and sequential execution of repair techniques would yield desired results. Extrusion correction through the use of a peripheral suture anchor over the medial rim of the tibia and knot tying are relatively easier to perform than some other published extrusion-repair techniques. Although no consensus has been achieved yet regarding the best technique, recent literature has suggested that the use of centralization sutures is effective to restore the native biomechanical properties of the medial meniscus5.Mochizuki et al. assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of combined medial meniscal root repair and centralization in 26 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Both Lysholm scores and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores improved significantly after surgery, with a significant reduction in extrusion distance from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively20. Koga et al21 assessed the 2-year outcomes of lateral arthroscopic meniscal centralization, finding significantly reduced meniscal extrusion at both 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that centralization can improve meniscal mechanics and potentially reduce the risk of osteoarthritis. The centralization suture technique for extrusion repair has the theoretical advantage of restoring meniscal function following meniscal root repair; however, there are also concerns regarding over-constraint of the meniscus. We believe that the medial meniscus, being less mobile than the lateral meniscus, can withstand the constraint created by the use of centralization. Meniscal centralization is a technically demanding surgical procedure, but with a systematic approach and meticulous technique, we have observed good short-term outcome in our patients. Important Tips: A tight medial compartment is one of the most common problems encountered during a medial meniscal root repair. "Pie-crusting" of the superficial medial collateral ligament at the tibial insertion aids in improving the space, thereby reducing chondral damage during the root repair.It is challenging to achieve the correct inclination of insertion when inserting the suture anchor through a mid-medial portal. This limitation can be mitigated by utilizing a 16G or 18G needle before making the portal, as the needle direction, trajectory, and extent of accessibility within the joint will aid in proper portal placement and anchor insertion.Suture management is another technical challenge. Suture tape is first cinched to the root of the meniscus and then shuttled into the transtibial tunnel in order to discern the reducibility of the meniscus and the extent of possible extrusion correction. Then, extrusion repair is performed. This sequence allows the surgeon to avoid mixing of root-repair sutures and extrusion-repair sutures. Following insertion of the all-suture anchor, each suture limb is brought out through the anteromedial portal, passed through the nitinol loop from the lasso, and shuttled back through the mid-medial portal. Knot tying is performed through the mid-medial portal. Acronyms and Abbreviations: ACL = anterior cruciate ligamentPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentICRS grading = International Cartilage Research Society system for classification of cartilage lesionsKL grade = Kellgren-Lawrence system for classification of osteoarthritisMRI = magnetic resonance imagingMC = medial femoral condyleMPTA = medial proximal tibial angleLC = lateral femoral condyleHTO = high tibial osteotomyMCL = medial collateral ligamentAM = anteromedialKOOS = Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome ScoreMME = medial meniscus extrusion.

Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to elucidate the difference for tibial side PCL avulsion fixation: a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical, radiological outcomes, economic and technical differences for ORIF by cancellous screw fixation versus ARIF by double-tunnel suture fixation for displaced tibial-side PCL avulsion fractures. METHODS: Forty patients with displaced tibial-sided PCL avulsions were operated upon after randomizing them into two groups (20 patients each in the open and arthroscopic group) and followed up prospectively. Assessment included duration of surgery, cost involved, pre- and post-operative functional scores, radiological assessment of union, and posterior laxity using stress radiography and complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 33 months (27-42) (open group) and 30 months (26-44) (arthroscopic group). The duration of surgery was significantly larger in the arthroscopic group (47.8 ± 17.9 min) as compared to the open group (33.4 ± 10.1 min). The costs involved were significantly higher in the arthroscopic group (p- 0.01). At final follow-up, knee function in the form of IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) evaluation (89.9 ± 4.8-open and 89.3 ± 5.9-arthroscopic) and Lysholm scores (94.2 ± 4.1-open and 94.6 ± 4.1-arthroscopic) had improved significantly with the difference (n.s.) between the two groups. The mean posterior tibial displacement was 5.7 ± 1.8 mm in the open group and 6.3 ± 3.1 mm in the arthroscopic group which was (n.s.). There were two non-unions and one popliteal artery injury in the arthroscopic group. CONCLUSION: Both ARIF and ORIF for PCL avulsion fractures yield good clinical and radiological outcomes. However, ORIF was better than ARIF in terms of cost, duration of surgery, and complications like non-union and iatrogenic vascular injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Prediction of recurrence based on the patellofemoral morphological profile and demographic factors in first-time and recurrent dislocators.

INTRODUCTION: Prediction of recurrence in first-time patellar dislocation is an unsolved mystery. The purpose of our study is to compare patellar instability patients and normal control groups with anatomical risk factors and validation of newer parameters patello-trochlear index (PTI) and tibial tuberosity-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) and also to find the significant risk factors that help to predict the recurrence of dislocation in first-time dislocators. METHODS: This is a comparison study between 50 normal individuals as a control population (group-1) and 94 patients with patellar instability done between 2013 and 2017. Further, 94 patients (group-2) were divided into first-time dislocators (group-2A) and recurrent dislocators (group-2B) which include 39 and 55 patients, respectively. Demographic factors like age, sex, the age of the first dislocation, mechanism of injury, and laterality and MRI risk factors like trochlear dysplasia, patellar height, patellar malalignment, and lateralization of tibial tuberosity were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: All parameters used to measure each MRI factors showed significant difference with p value < 0.0001 between group 1 and group 2 except PTI (0.035) and TT-PCL (0.036). While comparing demographic factors between first-time dislocators and recurrent dislocator groups, patients with first-time dislocation < 16 years of age (OR-3.6) and bilateral involvement are associated with recurrence and among MRI factors, trochlear dysplasia (odds ratio OR-12), patellar tilt (OR-0.2), and patella alta (OR-4.9) were known to be associated with higher chance of recurrence. CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in anatomic risk factors between normal and patellar instability knees. PTI and TT-PCL are less significant than the previous parameters. Age < 16 years, the presence of trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, and bilateral involvement have a significant role as prediction factors in a recurrent dislocation in both adolescents and adults.

Ruptured Pseudoaneurysm of the Lateral Plantar Artery After Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion With Retrograde Nail-A Rare Complication.

We report a rare presentation of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm of the lateral plantar artery following tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with a retrograde nail at 1 month after the index surgery. Although case reports of pseudoaneurysms of larger arteries such as the anterior tibial artery and posterior tibial artery after ankle surgery (e.g., ankle arthroscopy, implant removal, Ilizarov application) have been reported, we report a rare complication of a pseudoaneurysm of the lateral plantar artery. We discuss the anatomic considerations of the lateral plantar artery in the foot and the entry point of the retrograde nail to avoid this unusual complication.