Evaluating the WISE (Women in the South-East) Telehealth Network: A Model of Healthcare and Health Promotion at Rural Libraries.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the WISE (Women in the South-East) Telehealth Network. DESIGN: A follow-up survey design was used to determine the impact of the program on access to healthcare. SETTING: WISE provided preventive care to women and gender expansive people at local libraries and the Mobile Library in the rural South Carolina Lowcountry. SUBJECTS: In 1 year (February 2021-2022), WISE reached 523 individuals with 151 agreeing to participate in the study. Most participants identified as white (66%) or Black (22%). INTERVENTION: A Community Health Worker provided health education, connection to telehealth services, referrals, and connected individuals with community and social services. MEASURES: The Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ), changes in knowledge, satisfaction with WISE, Acceptability of Intervention measure (AIM), and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Participants with a high telehealth usability score were significantly more likely to be under the age of 35 (OR 4.60 [95% CI 1.21-17.52]), married (OR 10.00 [95% CI 2.19-45.64]), or white (OR 4.00 [95% CI 1.06-15.08]). The intervention earned a high acceptability score 4.46 (± .61)/5.0 by helping participants obtain necessary medical care and resources, as well as meeting their educational needs. CONCLUSION: This study offers practical suggestions to expand the use of telehealth initiatives to improve health outcomes by engaging libraries in rural communities.

"A Victim of Our Own Success:" Testing Jenny's First Sleepover's Dark Satire to Improve Attitudes Toward Childhood Vaccination.

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in substantially lower uptake of childhood vaccinations in the U.S. As vaccination rates struggle to rebound, childhood vaccine hesitancy continues to grow. Addressing vaccine disinformation and increasing catch-up vaccination is an urgent public health priority. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of "Jenny's First Sleepover," a darkly humorous satirical book about childhood vaccinations, to influence attitudes of vaccine hesitant parents. This study implemented a randomized pretest - posttest experimental design using a web-based survey with one intervention and one control. "Jenny's First Sleepover" improved attitudes toward vaccination among vaccine hesitant parents. Negative emotions were an important mediator of attitudes toward vaccinations. Findings identify mechanisms that increase effectiveness of satirical approaches, including the presentation of novel information about serious vaccine-preventable diseases with a dark narrative twist. Health communicators may consider a darkly humorous satirical approach to improve attitudes toward childhood vaccination among vaccine hesitant parents.

Condoms on Campus: Understanding College Students' Embarrassment, Self-Efficacy, and Beliefs About Distribution Programs.

BACKGROUND: Condom distribution programs are a structural-level intervention implemented on college campuses to reduce sexually transmitted infections and unplanned pregnancies. Understanding students' beliefs about these programs and attitudes that can affect condom use is critical. METHODS: Students at 6 different universities (n = 2809) completed items related to beliefs about campus condom distribution programs and their personal condom embarrassment and condom self-efficacy levels. Surveys were completed both in classroom and online. T Tests and analysis of variance were used to examine differences based on demographics. Logistic regression was used to examine predictors of condom use. RESULTS: College students support the distribution of condoms on campus (97.4%) but express moderate levels of embarrassment in condom acquisition and possession (mean, 19.37). Lower rates of embarrassment were reported for condom negotiation (mean, 9.13) and actual condom use (mean, 8.48). Lower overall rates of embarrassment were reported by condom users, men and individuals in relationships compared with noncondom users, women, and single individuals. Heterosexual students were more embarrassed than bisexual students about acquiring condoms and negotiating condom use. Condom users, men, and individuals in relationships had higher rates of condom self-efficacy compared with nonusers, women, and single students. There were no differences in self-efficacy based on sexual orientation. Embarrassment about acquiring and actual use of condoms, condom self-efficacy and demographics were all significant predictors of condom use. CONCLUSIONS: Campus condom distribution programs are supported by college students. Interventions to address embarrassment and increase condom self-efficacy need to be tailored to different students based on gender, experience with condoms, and relationship status.

"Do you want a period?" Launching and evaluating a brief contraceptive decision-making educational intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Do you want a period? empowers people who menstruate to better understand their reproductive health and contraceptive choices through informed patient-centered contraceptive decision-making. METHODS: Researchers partnered with the WISE (Women in the South-East) Telehealth Network to design, implement and evaluate the Do you want a period? brief educational intervention. Participants completed a longitudinal research study, including a web-based survey at baseline and a mobile-optimized text-based survey up to 6 weeks following baseline. RESULTS: Do you want a period? was believable (93%, n = 79), informative (89%, n = 76), and helpful (85%, n = 72). Participants who reported that the intervention was helpful were significantly more likely to be satisfied with the usefulness of information provided (OR 5.61 [95% CI 1.65-19.12]), the overall quality of services (OR 3.39 [95% CI 1.04-11.08)], and obtaining necessary medical care (OR 2.40 [95% CI 1.08-5.33)]. At longitudinal follow-up, participants who received contraceptive services reported high acceptability of intervention (4.51 (±0.53) out of 5). CONCLUSIONS: Do you want a period? envisions a new dialogue between women and clinicians, family, and friends. This brief educational intervention supports people who menstruate to determine if a safe and effective tailored contraceptive regimen is right for them.

An exploratory study of condom sabotage and sexual health risk indicators in college students.

Condom sabotage is a form of sexual assault that violates bodily autonomy, increasing the risk of unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STI). The current study explored associations between reports of condom sabotage and sexual risk indicators among college students. College students (N = 466) completed a web-based cross-sectional survey. Students who reported experiencing condom sabotage were significantly more likely to describe themselves as single in comparison to students who described themselves as partnered (p = .002). After adjusting for relationship status, condom sabotage was significantly associated with reporting having multiple sexual partners (adjusted OR [aOR], 2.27; 95% CI, 2.22-42.28; p = .003), and being treated in the past 12 months for an STI (adjusted OR [aOR], 1,84; 95% CI, 1.82-21.98; p = . 004). The manuscript offers practical recommendations to develop health communication campaigns and public health interventions to prevent sexual assault, including condom sabotage, among college students.

Attitudes on breast feeding among persons with HIV who have given birth and their perceptions of coercion during counseling on safe infant feeding practices.

Persons with HIV can receive mixed messages about the safety of breastfeeding. We sought to assess if they felt coerced to formula feed when counseled about practices to reduce HIV transmission. Persons with HIV who had given birth were eligible to complete a survey to describe their experiences with infant feeding counseling and if they felt coerced to formula feed. An Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS) assessed attitudes towards breastfeeding. Qualitative analyses were performed on narrative responses. One hundred surveys were collected from sites in Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina. The mean IIFAS score (n, 85) was 47 (SD 9.2), suggesting relatively favorable attitudes toward breastfeeding. Thirteen persons reported feeling coerced to formula feed. When controlling for choosing to give any breast milk, persons with any college education were more likely to report feeling coerced (aOR 9.8 [95% CI 1.8-52.5]). Qualitative analyses revealed three themes: perceiving breastfeeding as unsafe, engaging in shared decision-making, and resisting advice to formula feed. Persons with HIV desire to be counseled about safe infant feeding practices and have their questions answered without judgement. We highlight experiences of persons with HIV that reflect a need for a nuanced approach to infant feeding counseling.

Perception of coercion during contraceptive counseling among individuals with HIV.

OBJECTIVE: Historically, individuals with HIV have reported feeling coerced during contraceptive counseling or experienced forced sterilization. The purpose of this study was to assess perceptions of coercion related to counseling and influence on postpartum contraceptive choice among individuals with HIV. METHODS: This is a mixed methods study conducted in Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina between March 2020 and June 2021. Participants completed a survey to assess their experiences with contraception counseling and perceived coercion. An Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning (IQFP) care score was calculated to assess quality of counseling. Qualitative analyses were performed on narrative responses. Bivariate and regression analyses were used to evaluate factors associated with perceived coercion and IQFP scores. RESULTS: 100 surveys were collected. The median age of respondents was 29 (IQR 24-35). The median IQFP score was 53 (IQR 44-55) and 45 % of individuals had a maximum IQFP score of 55. Most individuals (96 %) report that a provider "did a good job" explaining contraceptive options and 26 % report their provider's preference affected their contraceptive choice to some degree. Few (11 %) respondents felt pressured to use long-acting reversible contraception postpartum. This perceived coercion was more likely when a provider suggested a specific contraceptive method, aOR 6.1 [95 % CI 1.1-33.1] and such specific provider suggestions were reported by one-third of respondents. CONCLUSION: While perceived coercion was reported by few individuals with HIV, it was strongly associated with the provider making a specific method suggestion. Disproportionate provider influence in the final contraceptive decision occurred in one-quarter of individuals. More research is needed to discern to what extent provider preference compromises patient autonomy in shared decision-making.

HPV Vaccination Champions: Evaluating a Technology-Mediated Intervention for Parents.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination prevents 6 HPV-related cancers in men and women. Yet, rates of HPV vaccination among adolescents in the United States lag behind other developed nations, revealing a significant public health issue. This feasibility study tested a collaborative online learning environment to cultivate HPV vaccination champions. A 3-month training program recruited parents to serve as proponents and social media influencers to identify solutions to overcome barriers to HPV vaccination. A mixed methods study design included a pretest survey, three online asynchronous focus groups, a posttest survey, as well as a longitudinal follow-up survey at 6 months. Participants included 22 parents who self-identified as female (95.4%) and white (90.9%). Overall, there was a statistically significant difference in knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccination between pretest and posttest (p = 0.0042). This technology-mediated intervention increased parents' confidence and motivated them to speak more freely about HPV vaccination in-person and online with others in their social networks. Participants identified prevalent misinformation about HPV vaccination and learned how to effectively craft messages to address concerns related to safety and side effects, gender, understanding of risk, and sexual activity. Objective measures and qualitative open-ended assessment showed high intervention engagement and treatment satisfaction. All participants (100%) indicated that they enjoyed participating in the intervention. The effectiveness of this feasibility study suggests that social media is an appropriate platform to empower parents to counter vaccine hesitancy and misinformation through HPV vaccination information that is simple and shareable in-person and online.

Correcting HPV Vaccination Misinformation Online: Evaluating the HPV Vaccination NOW Social Media Campaign.

The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine provides protection from six HPV-related cancers. Approximately half of South Carolina adolescents have not completed the vaccination series, representing a missed opportunity to prevent cancer. The HPV Vaccination NOW: This is Our Moment social media campaign is an initiative of the South Carolina Cancer Alliance (SCCA) and Hollings Cancer Center at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). This statewide social media campaign aimed to increase parental awareness of and build vaccine confidence around HPV vaccination in S.C. The ten-week campaign was strategically implemented between June and August 2019 to encourage HPV vaccination at back-to-school medical appointments. A process evaluation showed that the campaign resulted in over 370,000 total impressions, reached over 33,000 individuals, and culminated with over 1122 followers. There were over 2700 engagements on Facebook and Twitter. A qualitative content analysis indicated that pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine comments were dominated by personal stories. Comments promoting misinformation about the HPV vaccine were often countered through peer-to-peer dialogue. Findings suggest that creating opportunities for the target audience to engage with campaign messages effectively corrected misinformation.

"I'm More Open to Talking About It": Women's Experiences With Sexual Abuse and Reproductive Health.

Approximately one in three women experience sexual abuse, which can result in negative reproductive health consequences. A history of sexual abuse may negatively impact health care seeking and experience. The purposes of this article were to understand how women perceived their sexual abuse experiences and how these experiences integrated into their overall reproductive health, reproductive planning, and health care access. As part of a larger study about women's reproductive health, researchers analyzed 16 in-depth interviews with women aged 18 years and older (range = 18-78) living in South Carolina (May-November 2016). A constant comparative method of data analysis was completed to explore women's sexual abuse experiences as they related to reproductive health and health care experiences. HyperRESEARCH 3.7.3 assisted in data organization and management. Limited bodily agency impacted women's ability to engage in family planning, particularly when partners utilized sexual coercion to maintain desired relationships and attain desired family size, regardless of women's preferences. In addition, limited sexual violence and abuse discussion in health care contexts impacted women's autonomy in reproductive health decision-making despite participants' desire to engage in these discussions with providers. Participants expressed a desire for communication about their sexual abuse experiences; however, results indicated women had to navigate stigma within families and communities, which deterred disclosure and open discussion. Negative health outcomes and desire to discuss these experiences within the health care context highlighted a need for patient-provider communication about sexual abuse history as one aspect of gynecologic care. Findings from this study offer practical recommendations to guide communication about sexual abuse within reproductive health care experiences to empower women in their reproductive health choices. As these experiences may impact overall health and reproductive choices, provider-initiated conversations with adolescents and women may improve care and assist in prevention efforts, including the prevention of negative health outcomes.

"Nobody's Ever Told Me That:" Women's Experiences with Shared Decision-making when Accessing Contraception.

Half of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended. Contraceptive methods are effective in reducing unintended pregnancy burden. The shared decision-making model serves as best practice when choosing among healthcare options, and may be appropriate when considering contraceptive options. This study examined women's experiences with shared decision-making in contraceptive use dynamics. Researchers analyzed 38 interviews with women of reproductive age (range: 19-50 years) living in South Carolina (May-November 2016). Researchers completed a constant comparative method of data analysis using HyperRESEARCH 3.7.3 to explore reproductive-aged women's contraceptive decision-making. Shared decision-making provided a conceptual framework for analysis. Gaps in contraceptive knowledge, especially method effectiveness, impacted participants' experiences with contraception. Although participants believed they had adequate information, findings suggest they may not be fully informed about existing contraceptive options. Participants wanted options; however, results indicated women may not be actively involved in choosing contraception. Nuanced beliefs about contraception demonstrated preferences for patient-provider communication within the broader context of reproductive health and individual lifestyle needs. Findings from this study offer theoretical and practical recommendations to guide shared decision-making during contraceptive consultations to empower women in making informed and lifestyle-appropriate contraceptive choices.

You Have Options: Implementing and evaluating a contraceptive choice social marketing campaign.

Background: Up to two-thirds of pregnancies among young, unmarried women in the United States are unintended, despite increased access to highly effective contraceptive options. Aim: This study implemented and evaluated a social marketing campaign designed to increase access to a full range of contraceptive methods among women aged 18-24 years on a southeastern university campus. Methods: Researchers partnered with Choose Well and Student Health Services to design, implement, and evaluate You Have Options, a 10-week multi-media social marketing campaign. The campaign aimed to raise awareness, increase knowledge, and improve access to contraceptive options, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods among college women. A pretest-posttest web-based survey design measured campaign awareness and recognition, as well as attitudes, subjective norms, and behavior. Results: Participants demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge about intrauterine devices (IUDs) between pretest (M = 2.66, SD = 1.30) and posttest (M = 3.06; SD = 1.96); t(671) = -2.60, p < .01). Analysis revealed that frequent exposure to the campaign prompted participants to engage in discussions about LARC with friends (p < .05). In addition, 20- to 24-year-olds who reported seeing the campaign messages were more likely to seek out information (p < .01) and adopt a LARC method (p = .001) than 18- or 19-year-olds who saw the campaign messages. Conclusion: Findings from the study offer practical recommendations for implementing social marketing campaigns aimed at increasing access to LARC and reducing unintended pregnancy.

Evaluating a Technology-Mediated HPV Vaccination Awareness Intervention: A Controlled, Quasi-Experimental, Mixed Methods Study.

College-aged women and men are an important catch-up population for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination interventions. Limited research has explored technology-mediated HPV vaccination awareness interventions aimed at college students. The purpose was to evaluate a novel, technology-mediated, social media-based intervention to promote HPV vaccination among college students. A controlled, quasi-experimental, mixed methods study examined the feasibility of a technology-based intervention among two undergraduate classes (n = 58) at a public university in the southeastern United States of America. Classes were randomized to receive one of two cancer prevention programs (i.e., HPV vaccination (intervention) or healthy weight (control)). Both programs contained eight technology-mediated sessions, including weekly emails and private Facebook group posts. Participants completed pre-/post-test surveys and submitted weekly qualitative reflections. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic review for qualitative data. Knowledge improved among participants in the HPV vaccination intervention relative to those in the control condition. Participants (97%) interacted on Facebook by "liking" a post or comment or posting a comment. Participants demonstrated robust engagement and high treatment satisfaction. Results suggests that social media is an effective platform to reach college students with health promotion interventions and increase HPV vaccination awareness in this important catch-up population.

'It is our duty:' Understanding Parents' Perspectives on Reproductive and Sexual Health Education.

South Carolina ranks 16th in the USA for highest rates of teenage pregnancy. The South Carolina Comprehensive Health Education Act (CHEA) does not require medically accurate, unbiased, culturally appropriate materials, and varies greatly in compliance and implementation. This study aimed to better understand parents' perspectives in one county in South Carolina regarding reproductive and sexual health education. A total of 484 parents responded to a qualitative questionnaire, collectively representing 798 students. Researchers conducted a thematic analysis to organise data. Main themes identified include comprehensive reproductive and sexual health education as a duty; dispelling the myth of abstinence-only education; and the value of comprehensive reproductive and sexual health education. Parents described teaching reproductive sexual health education in public schools as a 'duty.' Furthermore, parents rejected the idea that abstinence-only education is effective and believed reproductive and sexual health education should be taught without the influence of religion. Parents valued inclusive reproductive and sexual health education, covering a robust set of topics. Findings from the study provide evidence for the need to update current reproductive and sexual health education materials and legislation to meet parental demands and reduce youth sexual and reproductive health disparities.

Moving Oral Contraceptives over the Counter: Theory-based Formative Research to Design Communication Strategy.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that oral contraceptives (OC) should be available over the counter (OTC). This study explored women's attitudes toward OC OTC in rural South Carolina. In-depth, individual interviews were conducted with 52 women ages 18-44 years old. Data analysis was informed by a reproductive justice theoretical framework and included an inductive, constant-comparative approach using HyperRESEARCH 3.7.5. Participants self-identified as either Black (62%) or White (28%). Participants believed that OC OTC would prevent unintended pregnancy by improving anonymity, convenience, and access to contraception. Many participants faced barriers to receiving a prescription, including time, transportation, cost, stigma, embarrassment, and clinician refusal based on religious reasons. Participants believed OC OTC would improve women's control over their fertility and emphasized the importance of health insurance coverage for OC OTC. Some participants expressed concerns about the risk of side effects, contraindications, and the potential for abuse. Some participants believed women, especially adolescents, required physician guidance and an annual exam to use OC. Findings suggest that a lack of knowledge and misinformation about the risks of OC serve as a barrier among some women in rural areas. Widespread acceptance of OC OTC will require messaging strategies to dispel safety concerns about OC OTC and empower women.

Correction: A characterization of personal care product use among undergraduate female college students in South Carolina, USA.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Preparing for A COVID-19 Vaccine: A Mixed Methods Study of Vaccine Hesitant Parents.

This study investigated vaccine acceptance of putative COVID-19 vaccines among a national sample of vaccine hesitant parents. Vaccine hesitancy and politicization of vaccine development has led to a pronounced distrust of COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. A total of 1,381 vaccine-hesitant parents participated in this study. Participants indicated a general unwillingness to vaccinate their children (M = 3.55, SD = 2.13) and themselves (M = 3.58, SD = 2.16) when a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available. More educated parents were more likely to plan to vaccinate themselves [F(5, 533) = 9.93, p < .05] and their children [F(5, 533) = 10.278, p < .05]. Understanding vaccine hesitant parents offers crucial insights as a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available for the general public and as we wait for a vaccine to be approved for pediatric use.

A characterization of personal care product use among undergraduate female college students in South Carolina, USA.

Some chemicals used in personal care products (PCPs) are associated with endocrine disruption, developmental abnormalities, and reproductive impairment. Previous studies have evaluated product use among various populations; however, information on college women, a population with a unique lifestyle, is scarce. The proportion and frequency of product use were measured using a self-administered survey among 138 female undergraduates. Respondents were predominately Caucasian (80.4%, reflecting the college's student body), and represented all years of study (freshman: 24.6%; sophomore: 30.4%; junior: 18.8%; senior: 26.1%). All respondents reported use of at least two PCPs within 24 h prior to sampling (maximum = 17; median = 8; IQR = 6-11). Compared with studies of pregnant and postpartum women, adult men, and Latina adolescents, college women surveyed reported significantly higher use of deodorant, conditioner, perfume, liquid soap, hand/body lotion, sunscreen, nail polish, eyeshadow, and lip balm (Chi Square, p < 0.05). More study is needed to understand the magnitude and racial disparities of PCP chemical exposure, but given the potential effects on reproduction and fertility, our findings of abundant and frequent product use among these reproductive-aged women highlight opportunities for intervention and information on endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC)-free alternative products and behaviors.

"My mama told me it would happen": menarche and menstruation experiences across generations.

The purpose of this study was to understand women's menarche and menstruation-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors across generations. Women ages 18 years and older (Mean = 49.13 ± 14.76 years; Range = 19-78 years) living in South Carolina were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews during May-November 2016. A total of 70 interviews were conducted, which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis using open and axial coding techniques from grounded theory provided the framework for data interpretation. Women described vivid menarche memories; however, most women had not received proper education or preparation for what to expect prior to onset. Participants discussed their experiences with menstrual products, oral contraceptives, and medical procedures to suppress, manipulate, or manage menstruation. Findings provide practical recommendations for health professionals to develop further effective and timely messaging related to menarche and menstruation across the lifespan. Messaging should inform women about what to expect with menarche, menstruation management, and health-related impacts, as well as methods to reduce menses-related myths and stigmas.

"People are struggling in this area:" a qualitative study of women's perspectives of telehealth in rural South Carolina.

Rural communities face disparities and barriers to health care access that may be addressed through telehealth programs; yet little research is available detailing rural women's attitudes toward telehealth. Researchers partnered with a women's reproductive health organization to conduct formative audience research to understand rural women's perspectives of telehealth in their communities. Qualitative research was conducted to improve understandings of women's perceptions of telehealth in rural South Carolina. In-depth interviews with 52 women aged 18-44 years were conducted in five rural counties in South Carolina during June - August 2015. Analytical techniques from grounded theory methodology were used throughout data collection and analysis. Participants believed a telehealth intervention would benefit the community by addressing reproductive health barriers, such as cost, transportation, and long wait times at local health care facilities. Participants' concerns included issues of confidentiality in a small town, discomfort with mediated communication, privacy, and the importance of relationship-centered care, including patient-provider communication and approachability of health care providers. Findings provide insight to design and implement telehealth interventions to improve women's health in rural communities.