Influence of MAFLD and NAFLD on arterial stiffness: A longitudinal cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This cohort study investigated associations of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) with risk of increase in arterial stiffness (AS), measured as brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants who had health examinations between 2006 and 2019 were analyzed for fatty liver and increased baPWV using liver ultrasonography and automatic volume plethysmography device. Participants were classified based on presence of MAFLD or NAFLD and further divided into subgroups: no fatty liver disease (reference), NAFLD-only, MAFLD-only, and both NAFLD and MAFLD. Subgroups were additionally stratified by sex. Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to analyze the risk of developing baPWV ≥1400 cm/s in participants without baseline elevation of the baPWV. The NAFLD and MAFLD groups exhibited higher risks of increased baPWV (NAFLD: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.35 [95% CI, 1.29-1.42]; MAFLD: aHR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.31-1.43]) compared to group without the conditions. Incidence of NAFLD or MAFLD were higher in men than in women but aHR of developing the increase in AS was higher in women. In subgroup analysis, the MAFLD-only group presented the strongest associations with increase in AS (aHR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.43-1.64]), with the trend more pronounced in women than in men (Women, aHR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.08-2.46]; Men, aHR 1.45 [95% CI, 1.35-1.56]). CONCLUSIONS: Both NAFLD and MAFLD are significantly associated with elevated AS. These associations tended to be stronger in MAFLD than in NAFLD, in women than in men.

Comparisons of an automated oscillometric device with a hybrid manual auscultatory device for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

This study evaluated an oscillometric device (OD), Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB, and a hybrid manual auscultatory device (AD), Greenlight 300TM, to determine a suitable blood pressure (BP) measurement device for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in a mercury-free context. Adhering to the 2018 Universal Standard's suggested consensus, the study involved 800 subjects (mean age 51.2 ± 17.5 years; 44.3% male), who underwent triplicate BP measurements following 5 min of rest in a randomized order (OD-first: 398 participants; AD-first: 402 participants). BP difference was calculated as OD value minus AD value, with results stratified by measurement sequence. The overall BP difference and tolerable error probability were -1.1 ± 6.5/-2.6 ± 4.9 mmHg and 89.2%/92.5% for systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP), respectively. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.907/0.844 for SBP/DBP (OD-first/AD-first: 0.925/0.892 for SBP, 0.842/0.845 for DBP). The overall agreement for hypertension (BP ≥ 140 and/or 90 mmHg) was 0.71 (p < 0.0001), and the OD underestimated the overall hypertension prevalence by 5.1%. Analysis of the AD-first data revealed a lower level of agreement compared to the OD-first data; however, the observed blood pressure difference adhered to Criterion 1 of the 2018 Universal Standard. Microlife met the Criterion 1 of 2018 Universal Standard but underestimated the prevalence of hypertension. The BP discrepancy increased with higher BP levels, male sex, and smaller AC. With increasing age, the discrepancy decreased for SBP and increased for DBP.

Association Between ECG Abnormalities and Mortality in a Low-Risk Population.

BACKGROUND: The ECG is a simple, noninvasive screening method for cardiovascular disease and arrhythmia. The impact of ECG abnormality on mortality is not certain in low-risk populations. To address this, we evaluated the association between ECG abnormality and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively assessed baseline ECG and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in 660 383 patients presenting for medical check-ups. Baseline ECG abnormalities were classified according to the Minnesota Code. Among the total 660 383 participants, 23 609 (3.6%) had major and 110 038 (16.7%) had minor ECG abnormalities. All-cause mortality occurred in 7751 patients (1.1%) and cardiovascular mortality in 1180 (0.18%) over a median follow-up period of 8.8 years. Major ECG abnormalities were associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95%, 1.03-1.2]) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.63-2.27]) compared with no ECG abnormalities. All-cause mortality was associated with right atrial enlargement (HR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.1-4.07]), left atrial enlargement (HR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.1-2.84]), sinus tachycardia (HR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.15-2.01]), complete atrioventricular block (HR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.05-4.2]), atrial fibrillation (HR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.26-1.84]), and left ventricular hypertrophy (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.02-1.3]). Cardiovascular mortality was associated with left atrial enlargement (HR, 4.52 [95% CI, 2.15-9.5]), atrial fibrillation (HR, 3.22 [95% CI, 2.33-4.46]), left ventricular hypertrophy (HR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.35-2.19]), major Q-wave abnormality (HR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.08-2.39]), and major ST-T abnormality (HR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.01-3.04]). CONCLUSIONS: ECG abnormalities, including left atrial enlargement, left ventricular hypertrophy, atrial fibrillation, and major Q-wave and ST-T abnormalities, were associated with cardiovascular mortality in a low-risk population.

The Risk of Coronary Artery Calcification according to Different Lipid Parameters and Average Lipid Parameters.

AIM: We compared the association between the baseline and average lipid parameters over time and the coronary artery calcification (CAC) risk. METHODS: Participants who underwent annual (biannual) health examinations and coronary artery computed tomography to measure CAC at least twice between March 2010 and December 2019, with a baseline CAC of 0, were included. The levels of apolipoprotein B (ApoB), Apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA1), ApoB/ApoA1, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), TG/HDL-C, and TC/HDL-C were measured or calculated. The remnant cholesterol (RC) levels were calculated. The average lipid parameters before study entry were calculated using data from 2002 to 2010. The participants were divided into quartiles (Q) according to the parameter values. Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusted for confounding factors, compared the CAC risk of the highest quartile to the lowest quartile. RESULTS: Among 29,278 participants (mean age, 39.19±5.21; men, 88.27%), 2,779 developed CAC ＞0. The highest quartile of ApoB showed a numerically strong association with CAC risk, compared with the lowest quartile of ApoB (Q1: reference; Q2: HR,1.41, 95% CI,1.25-1.59; Q3: HR,1.97, 95% CI,1.75-2.21; Q4: HR,2.72, 95% CI,2.41-3.07). RC showed a modest association with CAC risk (Q1: reference; Q2: HR,1.13, 95% CI,0.99-1.28; Q3: HR,1.3, 95% CI,1.15-1.47; Q4: HR,1.7, 95% CI,1.51-1.91). The strength of the association was comparable between the parameters at baseline and the average lipid parameters over time. CONCLUSIONS: A high ApoB level showed a strong association with CAC risk compared with the lowest ApoB quartile. The baseline lipid parameters can predict CAC development as effectively as the average of multiple measurements can.

High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Is Associated With Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Coronary Angiography.

BACKGROUND: Systemic chronic inflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology of both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. This study aimed to investigate whether serum hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) levels were associated with the future risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalization in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study enrolled consecutive individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and normal left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent coronary angiography for suspected coronary heart disease. The study population was subdivided into non-HF, pre-HFpEF, and HFpEF groups at baseline. The study outcome was time to the first hospitalization for HF. In 10 019 middle-aged individuals (mean age, 63.3±10.6 years; 38.5% women), the prevalence rates of HFpEF and pre-HFpEF were 34.2% and 34.5%, with a median serum hs-CRP level of 4.5 mg/L (interquartile range, 1.9-10 mg/L) and 5.0 mg/L (interquartile range, 2.1-10.1 mg/L), respectively. Serum hs-CRP levels were significantly higher in the pre-HFpEF and HFpEF groups than in the non-HF group. HF hospitalizations occurred in 1942 (19.4%) patients over a median of 3.2 years, with rates of 3.7% in non-HF, 20.8% in pre-HFpEF, and 32.1% in HFpEF, respectively. Cox regression analyses showed that patients in the highest hs-CRP quartile had a ≈4.5-fold increased risk of being hospitalized for HF compared with those in the lowest hs-CRP quartile (adjusted-hazard ratio, 4.42 [95% CI, 3.72-5.25]). CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of baseline pre-HFpEF and HFpEF in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and suspected coronary heart disease. There was an increased risk of HF hospitalization in those with elevated hs-CRP levels.

Arterial Stiffness and Incident Diabetes.

Diabetes may induce multiple organ damage; therefore, early detection of individuals at high-risk of incident diabetes is important for timely risk assessment and intervention. Arterial stiffness (AS) occurs as a result of functional and structural changes in the arterial wall. Growing body of evidence suggests that AS is a risk factor for incident diabetes. Although each study could use different indicators for AS (ex cf-PWV, baPWV, etc.), they came to similar conclusion that AS was associated with higher risk of incident diabetes. The underlying mechanisms for the relationship of AS with risk of diabetes remain to be elucidated, but there could be several potential mechanisms. Diabetes and AS are expected to share common risk factors and influence each other, but recent research showed some evidence that AS can directly increase the risk of diabetes. The link between AS and incident diabetes has important clinical implications. First, it suggests that AS might be a useful marker for identifying people at high risk for developing diabetes. Second, it suggests that reducing AS may prevent or delay the onset of diabetes. Early detection and possible slowing of the vascular stiffening process with pharmacological agents and lifestyle interventions may reduce associated risks for diabetes.

Increased Blood Pressure Variability Over a 16-Year Period Is Associated With Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in a Population-Based Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is often associated with elevated blood pressure (BP). It is prevalent among hypertensive patients. Additionally, increased BP variability has been linked to LVDD. However, the precise connection between LVDD and BP variability within the general population remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate this association in a general population. METHODS: A total of 2,578 participants(1,311 females) with a mean age of 47.8 ±â€…6.7 years who had echocardiographic data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology study with 16 years of follow-up were analyzed. LVDD was identified through the last echocardiography during the follow-up period. BP variability was assessed using mean, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variance (CV). RESULTS: LVDD was detected in 249 individuals. The cohort was divided into an LVDD group and a normal LV diastolic function group. The LVDD group had a higher percentage of females, more advanced age, higher body mass index (BMI), higher BP and BUN levels, lower heart rate, lower hemoglobin, and lower serum creatinine than the normal LV diastolic function group. Remarkably, LVDD was associated with higher BP variability. In the multivariate analysis, LVDD was associated with increased age, female sex, increased BMI, hypertension, and increased BUN. Elevated mean systolic and diastolic BPs, SD of systolic BP, mean pulse pressure (PP), SD of PP, and CV of PP were significantly linked to LVDD even after adjusting for other significant variables in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: LVDD was identified in 249 (9.7%) participants. Increased long-term BP variability was significantly associated with LVDD in this population-based cohort.

Standardized protocol of blood pressure measurement and quality control program for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is crucial for hypertension detection and management. The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) assesses the health of Koreans using representative cross-sectional data. BP measurements were historically done with mercury sphygmomanometers for participants aged ≥10 years. However, KNHANES transitioned to Greenlight 300TM (mercury-free auscultatory device) in 2020 for participants aged ≥6 years and used dual devices (Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB and Greenlight) in 2021-2022. To ensure consistency, KNHANES will adopt Microlife as the unified BP device with Greenlight for device validation from 2023. Under the new protocol, participants aged ≥6 years will have their BP measured three times at 30-second intervals after a 5-minute rest under ambient temperature (20-25℃) and noise ≤65 dB. The average of the 2nd and 3rd readings will be used as the representative BP value. The quality control (QC) program involves four trained examiners passing the "quality control and assurance of BP measurement program" three times annually, and undergoing "video monitoring of weekly calibration process" once a year. Additionally, the QC team will conduct "on-site evaluations of BP measurement" at mobile examination centers three times a year. A Five-Step QC process for BP devices was also developed. This document outlines the standardized BP measurement protocol and rigorous QC program in KNHANES, aiming to ensure accurate and reliable BP data for epidemiological research and public health policymaking in South Korea.

Statement on chronotherapy for the treatment of hypertension: consensus document from the Korean society of hypertension.

Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) has been shown to have a significant predictive value for cardiovascular disease. In some cases, it has a superior predictive value for future cardiovascular outcomes than daytime BP. As efficacy of BP medications wanes during nighttime and early morning, control of nocturnal hypertension and morning hypertension can be difficult. As such, chronotherapy, the dosing of BP medication in the evening, has been an ongoing topic of interest in the field of hypertension. Some studies have shown that chronotherapy is effective in reducing nocturnal BP, improving non dipping and rising patterns to dipping patterns, and improving cardiovascular prognosis. However, criticism and concerns have been raised regarding the design of these studies, such as the Hygia study, and the implausible clinical benefits in cardiovascular outcomes considering the degree of BP lowering from bedtime dosing. Studies have shown that there is no consistent evidence to suggest that routine administration of antihypertensive medications at bedtime can improve nocturnal BP and early morning BP control. However, in some cases of uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension and morning hypertension, such as in those with diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive sleep apnea, bedtime dosing has shown efficacy in reducing evening and early morning BP. The recently published the Treatment in Morning versus Evening (TIME) study failed to demonstrate benefit of bedtime dosing in reducing cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension. With issues of the Hygia study and negative results from the TIME study, it is unclear at this time whether routine bedtime dosing is beneficial for reducing cardiovascular outcomes.

An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on MAFLD and the risk of CVD.

BACKGROUND: Fatty liver disease in the absence of excessive alcohol consumption is an increasingly common condition with a global prevalence of ~ 25-30% and is also associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Since systemic metabolic dysfunction underlies its pathogenesis, the term metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed for this condition. MAFLD is closely intertwined with obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherogenic dyslipidemia, which are established cardiovascular risk factors. Unlike CVD, which has received attention in the literature on fatty liver disease, the CVD risk associated with MAFLD is often underestimated, especially among Cardiologists. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multidisciplinary panel of fifty-two international experts comprising Hepatologists, Endocrinologists, Diabetologists, Cardiologists and Family Physicians from six continents (Asia, Europe, North America, South America, Africa and Oceania) participated in a formal Delphi survey and developed consensus statements on the association between MAFLD and the risk of CVD. Statements were developed on different aspects of CVD risk, ranging from epidemiology to mechanisms, screening, and management. CONCULSIONS: The expert panel identified important clinical associations between MAFLD and the risk of CVD that could serve to increase awareness of the adverse metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes of MAFLD. Finally, the expert panel also suggests potential areas for future research.

Appropriate screening interval to detect the development of chronic metabolic diseases.

AIMS: We conducted a cohort study to determine the screening intervals of metabolic disorders. METHOD: Participants without diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), dyslipidemia, and abdominal obesity who underwent health examinations (2005-2019) in Korea were included. Participants were grouped according to baseline fasting glucose, LDL-C level, blood pressure (BP), and waist circumference (WC). The time to develop metabolic disorders and the percentile of survival time was assessed in each group. RESULT: The median follow-up duration was 4.94 years (n=222,413; mean age 37.13 ± 7.49 years). After 8.32(95 %CI 8.22-8.41), 3.01(2.89-3.31), and 1.11(1.03-1.25) years, 10 % of participants developed DM in fasting glucose levels of 100-110, 110-120, and 120-125 mg/dL, respectively. After 8.40(8.33-8.45), 6.33(6.20-6.47), and 1.99(1.97-2.00) years, 10 % developed HTN in BP 120/70, 120/70-130/80, and 130/80-140/90 mmHg, respectively. After 5.99(5.94-6.04), 2.84(2.77-2.90), and 1.36(1.30-1.44) years, 10 % developed dyslipidemia in LDL-C 100-120, 120-140, and 140-160 mg/dL, respectively. After 4.62(4.41-4.80) and 1.67(1.64-1.69) years, 10 % developed abdominal obesity in baseline WC < 80(Women;W)/85(Men;M) and < 85(W)/90(M) cm, respectively. CONCLUSION: In adults aged 30-40, the screening interval of metabolic disorders should be individualized based on the baseline metabolic derangement. An individual with borderline values may need an annual screening.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between third-dose triple and third-dose dual antihypertensive combination therapies in patients with hypertension.

We compared the efficacy and safety of third-standard-dose triple and third-standard-dose dual antihypertensive combination therapies in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. This was a phase II multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 245 participants were randomized to the third-dose triple combination (ALC group; amlodipine 1.67 mg + losartan potassium 16.67 mg + chlorthalidone 4.17 mg) or third-dose dual combination (AL group; amlodipine 1.67 mg + losartan potassium 16.67 mg, LC group; losartan potassium 16.67 mg + chlorthalidone 4.17 mg, AC group; amlodipine 1.67 mg + chlorthalidone 4.17 mg) therapy groups and followed up for 8 weeks. The mean systolic blood pressure (BP) reduction was -18.3 ± 13.2, -13.0 ± 13.3, -16.3 ± 12.4, and -13.8 ± 13.2 mmHg in the ALC, AL, LC, and AC groups, respectively. The ALC group showed significant systolic BP reduction compared to the AL and AC groups at weeks 4 (P = .010 and P = .018, respectively) and 8 (P = .017 and P = .036, respectively). At week 4, the proportion of systolic BP responders was significantly higher in the ALC group (42.6%) than in the AL (22.0%), LC (23.3%), and AC (27.1%) groups (P = .013, P = .021, and P = .045, respectively). At week 8, the proportion of systolic and diastolic BP responders was significantly higher in the ALC group (59.7%) than in the AL (39.3%) and AC (42.4%) groups (P = .022 and P = .049, respectively) at week 8. Third-standard-dose triple antihypertensive combination therapy demonstrated early effective BP control compared to third-standard-dose dual combination therapies, without increasing adverse drug reactions in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Association of Cardiovascular Mortality with Concurrent Coronary Artery Calcification and Physical Activity: A Cohort Study.

Background: Increased coronary artery calcification (CAC) has been reported in individuals with high levels of physical activity (PA). However, the association between increased CAC in a physically active population and cardiovascular mortality has not yet been well-established. This study aimed to investigate the association between PA levels and the presence or absence of CAC and cardiovascular mortality. Methods: A cohort study was conducted from 1 January 2011 to 30 December 2019. Mortality data were updated until 30 December 2020. The study population comprised 56,469 individuals who had completed the International Physical Activity Short Form Questionnaire and had undergone CAC score evaluation using a CT scan. We divided the participants into four groups: physically inactive individuals without CAC, physically inactive individuals with CAC, moderately active and health-enhancing physically active (HEPA) individuals without CAC, and moderately active and HEPA individuals with CAC. The primary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. The Cox proportional hazard model with confounding factor adjustment was conducted. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-based marginal-structural modelling was conducted. Results: The median follow-up duration was 6.60 years. The mean (SD) age of the study participants was 41.67 (±10.91) years, with 76.78% (n = 43,359) men. Compared with individuals without CAC, individuals with CAC demonstrated higher cardiovascular disease mortality regardless of PA level (Inactive and CAC > 0, HR 2.81, 95% CI: 1.76-19.19; moderately active and HEPA HR 3.27, 95% CI: 1.14-9.38). Conclusions: The presence of CAC might be associated with cardiovascular mortality regardless of PA level.

Relative importance of potential risk factors for dementia in patients with hypertension.

Patients with hypertension are at higher risk for dementia than the general population. We sought to understand the relative importance of various risk factors in the development of dementia among patients with hypertension. This population-based cohort study used data from the Korean National Insurance Service database. Using the Cox proportional hazard model, R2 values for each potential risk factor were calculated to test the relative importance of risk factors for the development of dementia. Eligible individuals were adults 40 to 79 years of age with hypertension and without a history of stroke and dementia between 2007 and 2009. A total of 650,476 individuals (mean age, 60 ± 11 years) with hypertension were included in the analyses. During a mean follow-up of 9.5 years (±2.8 years), 57,112 cases of dementia were observed. The three strongest predictors of dementia were age, comorbidity burden (assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index), and female sex (R2 values, 0.0504, 0.0023, and 0.0022, respectively). The next strongest risk factors were physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and obesity (R2 values, 0.00070, 0.00024, 0.00021, and 0.00020, respectively). Across all age groups, physical inactivity was an important risk factor for dementia occurrence. In summary, controlling and preventing comorbidities are of utmost importance to prevent dementia in patients with hypertension. More efforts should be taken to encourage physical activity among patients with hypertension across all age groups. Furthermore, smoking cessation, avoiding and limiting alcohol consumption, and maintaining an appropriate body weight are urged to prevent dementia.

Comparative Associations of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease With Coronary Artery Calcification: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In cross-sectional and retrospective cohort studies, we examined comparative associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and risk of having or developing coronary artery calcification (CAC). METHODS: Participants who had health examinations between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed. Liver ultrasonography and coronary artery computed tomography were used to diagnose fatty liver and CAC. Participants were divided into a MAFLD and no-MAFLD group and then NAFLD and no-NAFLD groups. Participants were further divided into no fatty liver disease (reference), NAFLD-only, MAFLD-only, and both NAFLD and MAFLD groups. Logistic regression modeling was performed. Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the risk of incident CAC in participants without CAC at baseline and who had at least two CAC measurements. RESULTS: In cross-sectional analyses, 162 180 participants were included. Compared with either the no-NAFLD or no-MAFLD groups, the NAFLD and MAFLD groups were associated with a higher risk of prevalent CAC (NAFLD: adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.34 [95% CI, 1.29-1.39]; MAFLD: adjusted OR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.39-1.48]). Among the 4 groups, the MAFLD-only group had the strongest association with risk of prevalent CAC (adjusted OR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.52-1.69]). Conversely, the NAFLD-only group was associated with a lower risk of prevalent CAC (adjusted OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.66-0.87]). In longitudinal analyses, 34 233 participants were included. Compared with either the no-NAFLD or no-MAFLD groups, the NAFLD and MAFLD groups were associated with a higher risk of incident CAC (NAFLD: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.43-1.99]; MAFLD: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.56-2.13]). Among these 4 groups, the MAFLD-only group had the strongest associations with risk of incident CAC (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.03,[95% CI, 1.62-2.55]). The NAFLD-only group was not independently associated with risk of incident CAC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.44-1.78]) Conclusions: Both NAFLD and MAFLD are significantly associated with an increased prevalence and incidence of CAC. These associations tended to be stronger for MAFLD.

Comparison of cardiovascular mortality between MAFLD and NAFLD: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A new diagnostic criterion of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed. However, only few studies have shown that MAFLD predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality better than non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Therefore, a cohort study was conducted to assess this relationship. METHODS AND RESULTS: Health examination data from health care centers in South Korea were assessed after excluding participants with missing covariates and cancer history (n = 701,664). Liver ultrasonography reports, laboratory and anthropometric data were extracted. Diagnoses of NAFLD and MAFLD were performed according to standard definitions. Participants were categorized based on the presence of NAFLD and MAFLD. In addition, participants were classified into five categories: no fatty liver disease (no FLD), NAFLD-only, MAFLD-only, both FLDs, and alcoholic FLD (AFLD) and non-MAFLD. Multivariable regression modeling was performed. The median follow-up duration was 8.77 years, and 52.56% of participants were men. After stratifying the cohort into no-MAFLD and MAFLD groups, MAFLD was associated with increased CVD mortality (adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28). When participants were divided into no-NAFLD and NAFLD groups, there was a non-significant trend towards an increase in CVD mortality in NAFLD group (adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95-1.21). When participants were divided into five categories, MAFLD-only group showed increased CVD mortality (adjusted HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.70) while NAFLD-only group showed no significant association with CVD mortality (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38-1.19). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, MAFLD is associated with increased CVD mortality in a relatively young Korean population.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and implications for cardiovascular risk and disease prevention.

The newly proposed term "metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease" (MAFLD) is replacing the old term "non-alcoholic fatty liver disease" (NAFLD) in many global regions, because it better reflects the pathophysiology and cardiometabolic implications of this common liver disease. The proposed change in terminology from NAFLD to MAFLD is not simply a single-letter change in an acronym, since MAFLD is defined by a set of specific and positive diagnostic criteria. In particular, the MAFLD definition specifically incorporates within the classification recognized cardiovascular risk factors. Although convincing evidence supports a significant association between both NAFLD and MAFLD, with increased risk of CVD morbidity and mortality, neither NAFLD nor MAFLD have received sufficient attention from the Cardiology community. In fact, there is a paucity of scientific guidelines focusing on this common and burdensome liver disease from cardiovascular professional societies. This Perspective article discusses the rationale and clinical relevance for Cardiologists of the newly proposed MAFLD definition.

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III study on the efficacy and safety of a combination treatment involving fimasartan, amlodipine, rosuvastatin in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who fail to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy involving fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who fail to respond to fimasartan monotherapy. METHODS: This phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted in adults aged 19-70 years. Patients who voluntarily consented were screened for eligibility to enroll in the study. Patients who failed to respond to 4 weeks of fimasartan monotherapy were randomized with a 1:1:1 ratio to the fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 10 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg (FMS/ALD + RSV) as study group, fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 10 mg (FMS/ALD) as control 1 group, and fimasartan 60 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg (FMS + RSV) as control 2 group. The primary efficacy endpoints were the change in the sitting systolic blood pressure and the rate of change in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level from baseline to 8 weeks. The adverse events, adverse drug reactions, physical examination findings, laboratory test results, electrocardiograms, and vital signs were evaluated to assess safety in the study. RESULTS: Of 138 randomized patients, 131 were conducted efficacy analysis, and 125 completed the study. For the change in LDL-C and sitting SBP (SiSBP) as primary efficacy assessments, the change in LDL-C at week 8 was significantly reduce in the FMS/ALD + RSV group than in the control 1 group (P < 0.001). The change in SiSBP at week 8 were greater reduce in the FMS/ALD + RSV group than in the FMS + RSV group (both P < 0.001). For the safety evaluation, there were no differences among the treatment groups in the incidence of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The fimasartan/amlodipine + rosuvastatin combination therapy can effectively and safely lower blood pressure and improve lipid levels in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who fail to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03156842, Registered 17 May 2017.

Direct comparison of an automated oscillometric device with an electronic auscultatory device for epidemiologic survey to evaluate the prevalence of hypertension.

Mercury-free sphygmomanometers are gradually replacing the traditional sphygmomanometers in clinical settings and epidemiological surveys for measuring blood pressure (BP) due to mercury toxicity. No direct comparative studies have evaluated BP differences and statistical errors of automated oscillometric devices (ODs) against electronic auscultatory devices (ADs) for epidemiologic surveys. Herein, we evaluated the validity of ODs for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) using the Universal Standard for BP device validation through a direct comparison with ADs as the reference standard. Four trained observers performed validation on 278 volunteers aged ≥ 19 years with a standardized BP measurement protocol. Agreement between the BP measurements recorded with an OD against those recorded with an AD was assessed by Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman's limits of agreement. To evaluate the agreement for BP classification, weighted kappa values were estimated. To explore the factors associated with BP measurement differences between the 2 devices, multiple linear regression analysis was performed. The average BP differences (OD-AD) were 2.6 ±â€…6.2 mm Hg for systolic BP (SBP) and -5.1 ±â€…5.6 mm Hg for diastolic BP (DBP). Lin's CCCs were 0.927 and 0.768 for the overall SBP and DBP, respectively. The cumulative percentage of absolute errors ≤10 mm Hg was 88.1% for SBP and 81.3% for DBP. The weighted kappa value for the Joint National Committee 7 BP classification was 0.75 (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.81). An OD overestimated the prevalence of SBP (0.3%, P = .0222) and underestimated the prevalence of DBP (1.8%, P < .0001). Multivariate analysis to identify the risk factors for BP difference revealed the arm circumference (AC) to be negatively associated with BP difference. Male sex was positively associated, while age was negatively associated with SBP difference. OD-DBP was positively associated with DBP difference and negatively associated for DBP absolute error. ODs met the accuracy requirements of the Universal Standard criteria against ADs for SBP but not for DBP. Thus, the DBP values may be underestimated by ODs in the KNHANES.

Deep Learning Improves Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease-Related Mortality and Admission in Patients with Hypertension: Analysis of the Korean National Health Information Database.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop, compare, and validate models for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and hospitalization with hypertension using a conventional statistical model and a deep learning model. METHODS: Using the database of Korean National Health Insurance Service, 2,037,027 participants with hypertension were identified. Among them, CVD (myocardial infarction or stroke) death and/or hospitalization that occurred within one year after the last visit were analyzed. Oversampling was performed using the synthetic minority oversampling algorithm to resolve imbalances in the number of samples between case and control groups. The logistic regression method and deep neural network (DNN) method were used to train models for assessing the risk of mortality and hospitalization. FINDINGS: Deep learning-based prediction model showed a higher performance in all datasets than the logistic regression model in predicting CVD hospitalization (accuracy, 0.863 vs. 0.655; F1-score, 0.854 vs. 0.656; AUC, 0.932 vs. 0.655) and CVD death (accuracy, 0.925 vs. 0.780; F1-score, 0.924 vs. 0.783; AUC, 0.979 vs. 0.780). INTERPRETATION: The deep learning model could accurately predict CVD hospitalization and death within a year in patients with hypertension. The findings of this study could allow for prevention and monitoring by allocating resources to high-risk patients.