Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Dosim ; 44(4): e59-e63, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30846216

RESUMO

Cervical cancer patients may sometimes experience different types of uterine perforation by a tandem during brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to address possibly different management strategies regarding different tandem positions from a dosimetry aspect by evaluating radiation doses delivered to organs-at-risk (OAR) in order to help medical professionals handle different types of uterine perforation. Images and dosimetry data in cervical cancer brachytherapy with uterine perforation were reviewed. Uterine perforation was classified into anterior and posterior perforation according to their tandem positions. Radiation doses received by OAR, including D2cc and D1cc of the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon, were statistically compared with nonperforation. The doses of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) of cervical tumor and bilateral point A were also compared in order to assure that the plans had not compromised the treatment efficacy. A total of 21 applications were assessed, including 5 with anterior perforation, 4 with posterior perforation, and 12 without perforation. In anterior perforation, the bladder was the only organ that received a significantly increased dose about 30% at D2cc and D1cc. However, in posterior perforation, multiple OAR received significantly excessive doses: approximately 30% for the bladder, 37% for the rectum, and 100% for the sigmoid colon. The OAR dose assessment was based on a statistically equivalent cervical tumor dose. Different management strategies are possible for anterior vs posterior perforation during brachytherapy due to different detrimental extents on OAR dosimetry. The bladder warrants more attention in anterior perforation, without compromising target coverage in treatment planning. On the other hand, repositioning may be considered in posterior perforation due to relatively massive OAR detriments. This concept is a new one and is given for the first time.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Perfuração Uterina/etiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Posicionamento do Paciente , Doses de Radiação , Radiometria , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Radiat Oncol ; 13(1): 231, 2018 Nov 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30477511

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tangent-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (TIMRT) is a common adjuvant radiotherapy strategy for breast cancer patients. This study compared the dosimetric characteristics of tangent-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (TVMAT) and TIMRT for left breast cancer patients during deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free breathing (FB) techniques. METHODS: Fourteen patients with left breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery were included. The first arc started at 331.8-353.6 degrees and stopped at 281.8-315.0 degrees. The third arc started at 123.2-149.1 degrees and stopped at 88.0-96.0 degrees. The second and fourth arcs were reverse arcs of first and third arcs. DIBH-TIMRT inversing plans were generated using opposing tangential fields. Wilcoxon signed rank test and Spearman correlation were used to examine the significance of dose difference. RESULTS: Compared with FB-TVMAT, the mean heart dose of DIBH-TVMAT plans was reduced from 7.9 Gy to 3.2 Gy (p < 0.001). The average left lung volume receiving 30 Gy or more (V30Gy) was reduced from 12.9 to 5.7% (p < 0.001). DIBH-TVAMT plans resulted in a lower mean dose to the contralateral breast and lung (2 Gy and 0.7 Gy vs 3.4 Gy and 1.5 Gy, respectively) as compared to FB-TVMAT plans. Compared with DIBH-TIMRT, the average left lung V30Gy of DIBH-TVMAT plans was reduced from 8.5 to 5.7% (p = 0.031). As for low-dose areas, exposure of the left lung, right breast, heart and right lung volume with 10 Gy or more was not significantly different between the IMRT- and VMAT-plans. CONCLUSIONS: DIBH-TVMAT for left breast cancer treatment retains treatment plan quality similar to the DIBH-IMRT technique without compromising dose restrictions to the heart, right breast and right lung. DIBH-TVMAT increased left lung protection but still had higher V5Gy to right breast and substantially higher V5Gy to heart. For left breast cancer patients receiving treatment with the DIBH technique, DIBH-TVMAT provides better treatment quality and is a safe and feasible treatment strategy.


Assuntos
Suspensão da Respiração , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama/radioterapia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...