[A simple method for AV-delay determination in dual chamber pacemakers]. / Eine einfache Methode zur Bestimmung des AV-Intervalls bei Zweikammerschrittmachern.

The individual adjustment of the AV intervals is a prerequisite for the hemodynamic advantages of dual-chamber pacing. The methods for the optimization of the AV-Delay (AVD) applied so far are time intensive. A simple and fast method is the approximate adjustment of the AVD with the surface-ECG. The aim of this work is the conception and validation of this new method. The optimal AVD is given if at the end of the atrial contraction the mitral valve is closed by the ventricular increase of pressure. In order to achieve this with pacemaker patients, the individually different atrial and ventricular conduction times must be considered. The different conduction times can be determined from the surface-ECG. Intra- and interatrial conduction times can be defined by the beginning of the atrial spike up to the end of the p-wave. The beginning of ventricular pressure increase corresponds to the peak of the stimulated QRS complex (beginning of the Iso-Volumetric Contraction time, ISVC) and depends on the interventricular conduction time.¶ In the case of 100 patients, who did not receive a cardiac pacemaker, the interval at the end of the p-wave (left atrial excitation, EP) up to the peak of the r-wave (ISVC) during rest and exercise was measured and an age referred average value of 100ms determined; this serves as standard value if no AV-conduction is available. The approximated optimized AVD is given if the interval of the end at the p-wave to the peak of the QRS-Complex amounts to 100ms. By means of a simple algorithm, the optimized AVD can, thus, be calculated:¶ After programming a long AVD, the interval at the end of the native or paced p-wave up to the peak of the stimulated QRS-Complex (EP/ISVC) is determined. This value EP/ISVC is then taken from the long AVD, the 100ms standard value is added and one receives the approximately optimized AVD.¶ In order to validate the described method, 13 consecutive patients (2 female, 11 male, average age 67±7.8 years) were included, and received for different indication (7 sick sinus syndrome, 4 AV block III, 2 binode disease) a DDD pacemaker (Affinity, St. Jude Medical).¶ About 8 weeks after implantation all patients underwent a PA catheter investigation, in order to optimize the AV-/PV-Delay of the pacemaker regarding the maximum cardiac output (CO). For CO measurement the thermo dilution method was applied. Altogether 17 complete hemodynamic measurements (9 times with different PVDs, 8 times with different AVDs) were executed. The patients 10-13 could be examined both in the VDD and in the DDD mode.¶ The minimum determined CO amounted to 3.5 l/min, the maximal CO 7.1 l/min and the average value was 5.62±0.98 l/min. In all patients not only one optimal AVD was found but, moreover, a varied interval of AVDs with which optimal CO results could be obtained. The comparison of surface ECG optimized AVD with the PA catheter optimized AVD showed a statistically significant correlation (0.825PV, 0.982 AV, P<0.01). Sixteen out of seventeen measurements were at an interval which enables hemodynamic optimal CO or stroke volume. Only one AVD determined from the surface ECG was situated slightly (10 ms) outside of a hemodynamic optimal determined AVD. Despite the encouraging test results represented here, further studies should examine the value of the new algorithm in comparison with the other techniques for AVD optimization.

Clinical evaluation of a thin bipolar pacing lead.

The main disadvantages of bipolar pacing leads have traditionally been related to their relative thickness and stiffness compared to unipolar leads. In a new "drawn filled tube" plus "coated wire" technology, each conductor strand is composed of MP35N tubing filled with silver core and coated with a thin ETFE polymer insulation material. This and parallel winding of single anode and cathode conductors into a single bifilar coil resulted in a bipolar lead (ThinLine, Intermedics) with a body diameter and flexibility similar to unipolar leads. The lead is tined, polyurethane, with the cathode and the anode made of iridium-oxide-coated titanium (IROX). The slotted 8-mm2 cathode tip is coated with polyethylene glycol, a blood soluble material. We present the clinical evaluation results from four pacemaker clinics, where 47 leads (23 atrial-J model 432-04 and 24 ventricular model 430-10) were implanted in 25 patients and followed for up to 2 years. The lead handling characteristics were found to be very satisfactory. Electrical parameters of the leads were measured at implant and noninvasively on postoperative days 1, 2, 21, 42, and months 3, 6, 12, and 24. Mean chronic pulse width thresholds at 2.5 V were 0.14 +/- 0.05 ms in the atrium and 0.10 +/- 0.02 ms in the ventricle, pacing impedances 443 +/- 104 omega and 520 +/- 241 omega, while median electrogram amplitudes were > or = 3.5 mV and > or = 7 mV, respectively. Pacing impedances and thresholds were found to be slightly but statistically significantly higher in unipolar than in bipolar configuration--the findings are explainable by the lead construction. One of 47 leads failed 3 weeks after implant; the conductors were short circuited due to an error during the manufacturing process. We conclude that the new lead thus far has demonstrated appropriate mechanical and electrical characteristics.

Exercise induced sympathetic influences do not change interatrial conduction times in VDD and DDD pacing.

Using telemetry, right atrial electrogram (RA), and marker channel of atrial sense events (MA) in combination with the left atrial electrogram (LA), recorded by a filtered bipolar esophageal lead, interatrial conduction during submaximal exercise and at rest was examined in 46 DDD pacemaker patients. The RA-LA and MA-LA conduction times measured in the presence of atrial sensing (VDD) as well as the conduction time SA-LA from atrial stimulus (SA) to LA, determined during atrial pacing (DDD) were found to be individual constants independent of exercise induced sympathetic influences. Thus, having determined an optimal mechanical interval (LA-LV)mech/opt from left atrium to ventricle by other methods, the optimal AV delay for DDD as well as for VDD operation can be calculated by the sum of the appropriate interatrial conduction time (SA-LA, respectively MA-LA) and the (LA-LV)mech/opt interval. Due to the constant SA-LA and MA-LA, the difference between these two values (AV delay correction interval) is a constant as well, which remains unchanged during exercise. Therefore, in selecting the rate responsive AV delay, only hemodynamic and not electrophysiological measurements need to be considered.

Optimization of the atrioventricular interval during rest and exercise in DDR-pacing

Several studies have been performed to evaluate the hemodynamic benefits of the optimal atrioventricular (AV) interval in DDD-pacing. The different effective intrinsic conduction (PR) intervals during atrial pacing as opposed to atrial sensing have been shown. The delay from the atrial stimulus to the onset of atrial depolarization (AP-delay) depends on the type of atrial disease and the site of stimulation. Most DDD and DDDR-pacemakers have therefore a corrected AV-interval afeter atrial pacing ansensing. This AV-correction is fixed or in some pacers programmable, in addition you may program a rate response AV-delay, that means a shortening AV-interval with an increasing pacing rate in order to simlate the physiologic and exercise. The AP-dealys were evaluated in 34 patients with sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incopetence during rest and bicycle ergometer stress test at 25,50,75 and 100 watts (W). The AP-delay was defined as the difference between PR and atrial stimulated conduction (AR). nall patients a Synchrony DDR pacemaker (Pacesetter) had been implanted. A standard lead ECG and intracardiac PR + AR-interval was recorded during rest and exercise. The intracardiac signals weretransmitted via the implanted pacemaker. In 5 patients an esophagela lead was additionally recordded. In 34 patients during rest the mean PR-interrval was 186.9 ms, range 135-250 ms, the AR-interval was 263.8 ms, range 197-340 ms and the AP-delay 76.5 ms, range 45-134 ms. The mean AP-delay during exercise with alod of 25 W was 56.7 ms (n=24), at 50 w 45.4 ms (n=21), at 75w 22.1 (n=13) and at 100w 26.0 ms (n=7). In conclusion: the AP-delay vares from patient to patient, therefore a fixed AV-cirrection is not useful. The shortening of the AP-delay during exercise depends on the presence of catecholamines and the individual work load. An optimized AV-interval during rest and exercise, should be automatically adjusted to the AP-delay.