Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT): Considerations on Sampling and Markers (Hb and Hb/Hp Complex) of Fecal Occult Blood (FOB).

BACKGROUND/AIM: Formal demonstration of the efficacy of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in reducing CRC incidence and mortality is still missing. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of sampling and FIT marker in the recently implemented CRC screening program in Finland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Because only the index test [FIT hemoglobin (Hb)]-positive subjects are verified by the reference test (colonoscopy), the new screening program is subject to verification bias that precludes estimating the diagnostic accuracy (DA) indicators. A previously published study (5) with 100% biopsy verification of colonoscopy referral subjects (called validation cohort, n=300) was used to derive these missing DA estimates. Two points of concern were addressed: i) only one-day sample tested, and ii) only the Hb component (but not Hb/Hp complex) was analyzed by FIT. RESULTS: The estimated DA of one-sample testing for Hb in the screening setting had a very low sensitivity (SE) (12.5%; 95%CI=12.3-12.7) for adenomas, with AUC=0.560 (for CRC, AUC=0.950). Testing three samples for Hb improved SE to 19.4% (95%CI=19.1-19.7%) but had little effect on overall DA (AUC=0.590). For adenomas, one-sample testing for Hb and Hb/Hp complex provided higher SE than three-sample testing for Hb (SE 20.6%; 95%CI=20.3-21.0), and the best SE was reached when two samples were tested for Hb and Hb/Hp complex (SE 47.5%; 95%CI=46.9-48.1%) (AUC=0.730). CONCLUSION: The strategy of the current CRC screening could be significantly improved by testing two consecutive samples by Hb and Hb/Hp complex, instead of stand-alone Hb testing of one sample.

Awareness and Acceptance of Nicotine-free Smoking Intervention Methods (Acetium® Lozenge) Increased Among Health Care Professionals by Targeted E-training as Confirmed by Post-training Surveys.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To increase the awareness and acceptance of the new nicotine-free smoking intervention method (Acetium® lozenge; Biohit Oyj, Finland), targeted E-Training with accompanying surveys were conducted in 2018, 2020 and 2023. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The target groups were derived from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliant registers of Finnish physicians, pharmacy staff and nurses owned by Success Clinic Oy. The post-training surveys recorded 1) awareness of the responders on Acetium® lozenge, 2) their attitude to nicotine-free smoking intervention methods in general as well as 3) their readiness for recommending this new tool to their patients. RESULTS: The three surveys accumulated a total of 1.892 responders. There was a constantly increasing awareness on Acetium® lozenge, increased interest in nicotine-free smoking intervention methods in general and a substantially increased readiness to recommend Acetium® acceptance to the smoking patients. The impact of E-Training, as measured by the increased interest in nicotine-free methods (56%) and readiness to endorse Acetium® acceptance (58%), was most marked among nurses who had the least awareness on Acetium® lozenge beforehand, exceeding the respective increase among medical doctors by 20% and 10% and among pharmacy staff by 30% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This E-Training had a favorable effect 1) on the responders' interest in nicotine-free smoking intervention method in general, 2) on increasing the awareness of Acetium® lozenge as a novel innovative method to quit smoking, as well as 3) on increasing the responders' readiness to introduce the new device to their smoking patients who are motivated to stop smoking nicotine-free.

Serological Biomarker Test (GastroPanel®) in the Diagnosis of Functional Gastric Disorders, Helicobacter pylori and Atrophic Gastritis in Patients Examined for Dyspeptic Symptoms.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The GastroPanel® test (Biohit Oyj) is interpreted by the GastroSoft® application distinguishing eight biomarker profiles, of which five profiles have a morphological equivalent in the Updated Sydney System (USS) classification of gastritis, and 3 others specify functional disorders of the stomach: 1) high acid output, 2) low acid output, and 3) effects of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication. This study evaluated the prevalence of these biomarker profiles in dyspeptic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed to assess the point prevalence of these biomarker profiles in a random sample of 500 subjects derived from our archives of GastroPanel® samples. RESULTS: Reflux symptoms were reported by 35.2% and use of PPI medication by 36.8% of the study subjects. Biomarker profile 2 (high acid output) was the second most common GastroPanel® profile in this cohort; 31.2%, second only (33.6%) to profile 1 (healthy stomach). Hp-infection was detected in 25.0% of the subjects. Profiles related to use of PPI (low acid output, PPI effect) were found in 7.4% of the cases. AG was uncommon, diagnosed in 14 patients only (2.8%). CONCLUSION: These data are derived from the population with the highest frequency of dyspepsia, and the results might have widespread implications in diagnostic and screening practices.

Helicobacter pylori (Hp) IgG ELISA of the New-Generation GastroPanel® Is Highly Accurate in Diagnosis of Hp-Infection in Gastroscopy Referral Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection affects a substantial proportion of the world population and is a major risk factor of gastric cancer (GC). The caveats of common Hp-tests can be evaded by a serological biomarker test (GastroPanel®, Biohit Oyj, Helsinki), the most comprehensive Hp-test on the market. The clinical validation of Helicobacter pylori IgG ELISA of the new-generation GastroPanel® test is reported. The aim of the study is to validate the clinical performance of the Helicobacter pylori IgG ELISA test in diagnosis of biopsy-confirmed Hp-infection in gastroscopy referral patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 101 patients (mean age=50.1 years) referred for gastroscopy at the outpatient Department of Gastroenterology (SM Clinic, St. Petersburg) were examined by two test versions to validate the new-generation GastroPanel®. All patients were examined by gastroscopy and biopsies, which were stained with Giemsa for specific identification of Hp in the antrum (A) and corpus (C). RESULTS: Biopsy-confirmed Hp-infection was found in 64% of patients, most often confined to antrum. The overall agreement between Hp IgG ELISA and gastric biopsies in Hp-detection was 91% (95%CI=84.1-95.8%). Hp IgG ELISA diagnosed biopsy-confirmed Hp (A&C) with sensitivity (SE) of 92.3%, specificity (SP) of 88.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.1%, with AUC=0.904 (95%CI=0.842-0.967). In ROC analysis for Hp detection (A&C), Hp IgG ELISA shows AUC=0.978 (95%CI=0.956-1.000). CONCLUSION: The Hp IgG ELISA test successfully concludes the clinical validation process of the new-generation GastroPanel® test, which retains the unrivalled diagnostic performance of all its four biomarkers, extensively documented for the first-generation test in different clinical settings.

GastroPanel® Biomarker Assay: The Most Comprehensive Test for Helicobacter pylori Infection and Its Clinical Sequelae. A Critical Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Several clinical conditions seriously hamper the diagnostic accuracy of the commonly used tests for Helicobacter pylori (Hp), 13C-urea breath test (UBT) and stool antigen test (SAT). The present communication is a critical review of the potential limitations of UBT and SAT, and describes the approach on how these can be avoided. Drawbacks of the Hp tests: False-negative results are most often due to low bacterial load in the stomach due to: i) use of proton pump inhibitor medication; ii) use of antibiotics; iii) presence of atrophic gastritis and hypoacid stomach; iv); bleeding peptic ulcer; v) gastric cancer (GC) and vi) mucosal-associated lymphatic tissue lymphoma. The UBT also gives false-positive results when urease-producing bacterial species, other than Hp colonize an acid-free stomach. Importantly, neither UBT nor SAT are capable of diagnosing atrophic gastritis, thus missing the patients at highest risk for GC. GastroPanel® (Biohit Oyj, Finland) circumvents these shortcomings with a serological test consisting of a panel of stomach-specific biomarkers: pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, gastrin-17 and Hp antibodies. GastroPanel® is a tool for non-invasive examination of i) dyspeptic patients for exclusion or diagnosis of Hp or atrophic gastritis, also disclosing the status of gastric acid output; ii) for screening of asymptomatic individuals at risk of GC; and iii) for comprehensive diagnosis of Hp infection. GastroSoft® application integrates the biomarker profile with the patient's medical information, accurately classifying the biomarker profiles into eight diagnostic categories. CONCLUSION: Given that Hp is the single most important risk factor of GC, the non-invasive diagnosis and screening of Hp should be based on more accurate and more comprehensive testing than UBT or SAT alone. The GastroPanel® is such test, being completely devoid of the known serious shortcomings of UBT and SAT.

Comparison of a New-generation Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) With Guaiac Fecal Occult Blood Test (gFOBT) in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasia Among Colonoscopy-referral Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with the traditional guaiac-based FOB tests (gFOBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 368 colonoscopy-referral patients were evaluated by i) the new-generation FIT: ColonView quick test (CV; Biohit Oyj, Finland) and ii) a conventional gFOBT HemoccultSENSA (HS; Beckman Coulter, USA). Three fecal samples were requested for both assays, and all subjects underwent diagnostic colonoscopy with biopsy confirmation. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under curve (AUC) were calculated for both tests using three endpoints: adenoma (A), advanced adenoma (AA) and adenocarcinoma (AC). RESULTS: Colonoscopy and biopsies disclosed normal mucosa in 90/378 (24.5%) subjects, early A in 108/368 (29.3%) cases, AA in 48/368 (13.0%) and AC in 37/368 (10.1%), and non-neoplastic conditions in the remaining 85 (30.3%). For the AC endpoint, the CV (Hb/Hp) test had 94.6% SE and 65.1% SP (AUC=0.799), while the HS test had SE of 75.7% and SP of 84.3% (AUC=0.800). For the A endpoint, the difference between CV and HS was even more pronounced; SE of 44.2% and 19.2%, respectively (p<0.0001). Hb and Hb/Hp complex of the CV test showed equal performance for all endpoints. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity (94.6%) of the ColonView quick test for the most reproducible endpoint (invasive CRC) far exceeded the pooled sensitivity (79%) estimated in a recent meta-analysis for 8 common FIT brands. As shown in a previous study, ColonView quick test is superior in SE to HemoccultSENSA test, making CV a perfect FIT for organized CRC screening.

Slow-release L-Cysteine (Acetium®) Lozenge Is an Effective New Method in Smoking Cessation. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Intervention.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Because of the major health problems and annual economic burden caused by cigarette smoking, effective new tools for smoking intervention are urgently needed. Our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) provided promising results on the efficacy of slow-release L-cysteine lozenge in smoking intervention, but the study was not adequately powered. To confirm in an adequately-powered study the results of the previous RCT implicating that effective elimination of acetaldehyde in saliva by slow-release L-cysteine (Acetium® lozenge, Biohit Oyj, Helsinki), would assist in smoking cessation by reducing acetaldehyde-enhanced nicotine addiction. On this matter, we undertook a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing Acetium® lozenge and placebo in smoking intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 1,998 cigarette smokers were randomly allocated to intervention (n=996) and placebo arms (n=1,002). At baseline, smoking history was recorded by a questionnaire, with nicotine dependence testing according to the Fagerström scale (FTND). The subjects used smoking diary recording the daily numbers of cigarettes, lozenges and subjective sensations of smoking. The data were analysed separately for point prevalence of abstinence (PPA) and prolonged abstinence (PA) endpoints. RESULTS: Altogether, 753 study subjects completed the trial per protocol (PP), 944 with violations (mITT), and the rest (n=301) were lost to follow-up (LTF). During the 6-month intervention, 331 subjects stopped smoking; 181 (18.2%) in the intervention arm and 150 (15.0%) in the placebo arm (OR=1.43; 95%CI=1.09-1.88); p=0.010). In the PP group, 170 (45.3%) quitted smoking in the intervention arm compared to 134 (35.4%) in the placebo arm (OR=1.51, 95%CI=1.12-2.02; p=0.006). In multivariate (Poisson regression) model, decreased level of smoking pleasure (p=0.010) and "smoking sensations changed" were powerful independent predictors of quit events (IRR=12.01; 95%CI=1.5-95.6). CONCLUSION: Acetium® lozenge, herein confirmed in an adequately powered study to be an effective means to aid smoking quit, represents a major breakthrough in the development of smoking intervention methods, because slow-release L-cysteine is non-toxic, with no side-effects or limitations of use.

Elimination of Cigarette Smoke-derived Acetaldehyde in Saliva by Slow-release L-Cysteine Lozenge Is a Potential New Method to Assist Smoking Cessation. A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Intervention.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Harmans are condensation products of acetaldehyde and biogenic amines in saliva. Like other monoamine oxidase inhibitors, harmans help maintain behavioral sensitization to nicotine and mediate the addictive potential of cigarette smoke-derived acetaldehyde. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that effective elimination of acetaldehyde in saliva by slow-release L-cysteine (Acetium™ lozenge; Biohit Oyj, Helsinki, Finland) blocks the formation of harmans and eliminates acetaldehyde-enhanced nicotine addiction in smokers. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing Acetium lozenges and placebo in smoking intervention was undertaken. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 423 cigarette smokers were randomly allocated to intervention (n=212) and placebo arms (n=211). Smoking-related data were recorded by questionnaires, together with nicotine dependence testing by Fagerström scale. The participants used a smoking diary to record the daily number of cigarettes, test lozenges and sensations of smoking. The data were analyzed separately for point prevalence of abstinence and prolonged abstinence endpoints. RESULTS: Altogether, 110 study participants completed the trial per protocol, 234 had minor violations, and the rest (n=79) were lost to follow-up. During the 6-month trial, 65 participants quit smoking; 38 (17.9%) in the intervention arm and 27 (12.8%) in the placebo arm [odds ratio (OR)=1.48; 95% confidence intervals (CI)=0.87-2.54; p=0.143]. Success in the per protocol group was better (42.9% vs. 31.1%, respectively; OR=1.65, 95% CI=0.75-3.62; p=0.205) than in the modified intention-to-treat group: 13.5% vs. 7.4% (p=0.128). CONCLUSION: If the efficacy of Acetium lozenge can be confirmed in an adequately powered study, this new approach would represent a major breakthrough in smoking quit intervention because slow-release L-cysteine is non-toxic with no side-effects or limitations of use.

Diagnosis of atrophic gastritis from a serum sample.

On the basis of the levels of serum pepsinogen I (S-PGI) and gastrin-17 (S-G-17) as well as Helicobacter pylori - antibodies assayed from a blood sample it is possible to establish with high sensitivity and specificity whether the patient has gastritis, whether the gastritis is atrophic or not and in which part of the stomach the atrophic changes are located. The test enables the identification of patients whose risk of gastric cancer, of the consequences of vitamin B12 deficiency (e.g. elevated levels of homocysteine) or of peptic ulcer is considerably increased and who can then undergo gastroscopy. It also facilitates the diagnosis of non-atrophic Helicobacter gastritis enabling treatment before endoscopy.