RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to understand the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting neurological deficits in traumatic lower lumbar fractures (LLFs; L3-L5). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Despite studies on the radiological risk factors for neurological deficits in thoracolumbar fractures, very few have focused on LLFs. Moreover, the potential utility of MRI in LLFs has not been evaluated. METHODS: In total, 108 patients who underwent surgery for traumatic LLFs between January 2010 and January 2020 were reviewed to obtain their demographic details, injury level, and neurology status at the time of presentation (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] grade). Preoperative computed tomography scans were used to measure parameters such as anterior vertebral body height, posterior vertebral body height, loss of vertebral body height, local kyphosis, retropulsion of fracture fragment, interpedicular distance, canal compromise, sagittal transverse ratio, and presence of vertical lamina fracture. MRI was used to measure the canal encroachment ratio (CER), cross-sectional area of the thecal sac (CSAT), and presence of an epidural hematoma. RESULTS: Of the 108 patients, 9 (8.3%) had ASIA A, 4 (3.7%) had ASIA B, 17 (15.7%) had ASIA C, 21 (19.4%) had ASIA D, and 57 (52.9%) had ASIA E neurology upon admission. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score (p =0.000), CER (p =0.050), and CSAT (p =0.019) were found to be independently associated with neurological deficits on the multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed that only CER (area under the curve [AUC], 0.926; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.860-0.968) and CSAT (AUC, 0.963; 95% CI, 0.908-0.990) had good discriminatory ability, with the optimal cutoff of 50% and 65.3 mm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, the optimal cutoff values of CER >50% and CSAT >65.3 mm2 can predict the incidence of neurological deficits in LLFs.
RESUMO
Introduction: This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to examine the role of modest systemic hypothermia in individuals with acute cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) regarding neurological improvement. Studies have shown that the application of hypothermia is safe and that it improves neurological outcomes in patients with traumatic spine injury. Hypothermia helps in decreasing a secondary damage to the cord. Methods: Twenty cases of acute post-traumatic cervical SCI with AISA were selected and randomly divided into two treatment groups: Group A-Hypothermia with surgical decompression and stabilization; and Group B-Normothermia with surgical decompression and stabilization. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor and sensory scores were evaluated at presentation; post-surgery; and at a 2-week, 6-week, and 12-week follow-up. Results: At the final follow-up, the change in ASIA motor scores of Group A was 46 (11.5-70.5) and Group B 13 (4.5-58.0), whereas ASIA sensory scores were 118 (24.75-186.5) and 29 (15.25-124.0) in Group A and Group B, respectively. ASIA scores between the two groups were statistically significantly different at a 2-week follow-up (ASIA motor p=0.04, ASIA sensory p=0.006), showing early improvement in the hypothermia group. There was no significant difference between the two groups on further follow-up. Conclusions: Hypothermia can be applied safely to subjects with acute SCI. Our study showed that hypothermia was beneficial in the early improvement of functional outcomes in acute cervical SCI.
