Outcome measures used in peripheral nerve surgery for symptomatic neuroma in upper extremity amputations: A scoping review.

Novel surgical treatments for painful neuromas are increasingly used, but determining which provides the greatest benefit has been difficult due to the inconsistent use of outcome measures. We mapped the current literature of outcome measures used to evaluate peripheral nerve surgery for the management of symptomatic neuromas in patients who underwent an adult-acquired upper extremity amputation (UEA). Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched for primary research written in the English language from inception to February 2023. The search yielded 1137 articles, of which 35 were included for final analysis. Studies varied in their assessment of pain, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), neurotrophic measures, psychological and sensorimotor function, highlighting a consensus on crucial domains but also revealing significant heterogeneity in the use and application of outcome measures among primary studies. Our findings highlight the need to establish common standards that reflect the best evidence and unique needs of the UEA population. This includes developing a core outcome set, utilizing multi-center trials, and maintaining flexibility to adapt to ongoing advancements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) research.

Clinical Insights and Optimization of Surgical Approach for Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Injury/Entrapment: A Comprehensive Analysis of 184 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Entrapment or injury of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) is being recognized with increasing frequency, often requiring a surgical approach to relieve symptoms. The presence of anatomic variations can lead to errors in diagnosis and intraoperative decision-making. METHODS: This study presents the experience of a single surgeon (T.W.T.) in managing 184 patients referred with clinical issues related to the LFCN. A comprehensive review of these cases was conducted to develop a prospective surgical management algorithm. Data on the LFCN's anatomic course, pain relief outcomes, comorbidities, body mass index, and sex were extracted from patients' medical charts and operative notes. Pain relief was assessed subjectively, categorized into "excellent relief" for complete pain resolution, "good" for substantial pain reduction with some residual discomfort, and "failure" for cases with no pain relief necessitating reoperation. RESULTS: The decision tree is dichotomized based on the mechanism of LFCN pathology: compression (requiring neurolysis) versus history of trauma, surgery, and/or obesity (requiring resection). Forty-seven percent of the patients in this series had an anatomic variation. It was found that failure to relieve symptoms of compression often indicated the presence of anatomic variation of the LFCN or intraneural changes consistent with a neuroma, even if adequate decompression was achieved. With respect to pain relief as the outcome measure, recognition of LFCN anatomic variability and use of this algorithm resulted in 75% excellent results, 10% good results, and 15% failures. Twenty-seven of the 36 failures originally had neurolysis as the surgical approach. Twelve of those failures had a second surgery, an LFCN neurectomy, resulting in 10 excellent, 1 good, and 1 persistent failure. CONCLUSION: This article establishes an algorithm for the surgical treatment of MP, incorporating clinical experience and anatomical insights to guide treatment decisions. Criteria for considering neurectomy may include a history of trauma, prior local surgery, anatomical LFCN variations, and severe nerve damage due to chronic compression.

Associations of urban versus rural patient residence on outcomes after burn: A national inpatient sample database study.

INTRODUCTION: Burn patients in rural areas may encounter poorer outcomes associated with barriers to care; however, residence has not been studied in a large sample. The association between rural-versus-urban residence and outcomes after burn was examined using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS: Using the 2019 NIS database, patients over 18 years with a primary diagnosis of burn or corrosive injury were included. Level of urbanization was categorized into six groups. Outcomes after burn such as in-hospital mortality, multifactorial shock, prolonged mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and total costs were analyzed after adjusting for demographic factors and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: We included 4671 records, which represented a weighted population of 23,085 patients. Rural residence was associated with higher percentage of prior transfer but not in-hospital mortality. Compared to the most urbanized counties, encounters from the most rural counties were associated with higher odds of shock (aOR:2.62, 99% CI: 1.04-6.56, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Burn encounters from less urbanized counties did not experience differences in mortality, rates of skin grafting, prolonged mechanical ventilation, length of stay, or overall costs. However, odds of shock were higher among the least urbanized counties. Despite improved triage and transportation systems across the US, disparities and challenges exist for burn patients from rural residence.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa Reddit Support Group: Finding New Meaning in Social Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can significantly impact quality of life. Reddit allows users with common interests, like HS, to form a community and share information. This has become increasingly important with pandemic-related social isolation. We administered a survey from May 2021 to July 2021 to characterize patients with HS use of Reddit and social media more broadly before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. An analysis of a popular HS support page on Reddit from January 2019 to August 2021 was also conducted, analyzing subscribers over time. The rate of subscriber increase was higher before the pandemic. Of 42 patients contacted, 20 patients enrolled (90% female, mean age of 32.4 years) and 18 of the 20 fully completed the survey that was administered. Participants were stratified into two groups: online support group users (n = 8) and nonusers (n = 12). There were no differences in sex, age, education level, antidepressant usage, and overall social media usage between these groups. However, there was a difference in Hurley staging, with more than four times as many users reporting a Hurley III staging compared to nonusers (p = .003). Nonusers ranked the following as desired features of a social media group more frequently than current users: bandaging/dressing boils, living with HS, medical advice from professionals, causes of HS, and diet (P = .047, P = .043, P = .043, P = .047, and P = .013, respectively). This study demonstrates that online support group use is associated with HS of higher clinical severity. Based on the needs/expectations identified in this study, recommendations can be made to providers to help fill any lacunae in clinical care.