Do We Need a Urine Culture Before Cystoscopy? Time to Shift Away from Routine Testing.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if cystoscopy could be safely performed without a urine culture by analyzing 2 prospectively cohorts of patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopy, 1 without urine culture and the other cohort screened and treated for ASB as per protocol. We aim to report the rate of symptomatic UTI and the rate of urinary sepsis within 30 days of cystoscopy. METHODS: All patients who underwent cystoscopy between 2021 and 2022 were invited to participate. Patients were prospectively recruited in a 2:1 ratio. Cohort A: patients who did not require urine culture before cystoscopy. Cohort B: patients who were required to have sterile urine before the procedure. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of symptomatic UTI ≤ 30 days after cystoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were recruited, 316 for cohort A and 145 for cohort B. Fifteen patients had symptomatic UTIs between both groups, 8 in Cohort A and 7 in Cohort B. The overall rate of symptomatic UTI was 3.2%, 2.5% for Cohort A and 4.8% for Cohort B. We had only 1 case of urinary sepsis in Cohort B. The RR for developing UTI in cohort B was 1.91 in the univariate model and 1.74 in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Routine urine culture before outpatient cystoscopy is unnecessary. In asymptomatic patients, subsequent UTIs are rare and can be easily treated. Avoiding routine urine culture helps prevent misuse of antibiotics, reduce cancellation rates, and ease the burden of patients that get cancelled because of ASB. The low risk of symptomatic UTI after the procedure must be discussed with the patient.

Predictive capacity of self-rated health on all-cause mortality in Spain: differences across sex, age and educational level.

BACKGROUND: Published evidence on self-rated health's capacity to predict mortality and its variability across subpopulations lacks consistency. Our objective is to evaluate this predictive association and whether/how it varies by sex, age and educational attainment at the population level in Spain. METHODS: Data came from a prospective longitudinal study based on 42 645 individuals aged ≥15 years who participated in the 2011-2012 and 2014 Spanish Health Surveys. Median follow-up time for mortality was 5.4 years. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle and chronic disease variables were used to estimate the predictive capacity of self-rated health on mortality. RESULTS: Self-rated health was associated with mortality with a dose-response effect (p value for linear trend <0.001). Compared with respondents who rated their health as very good, those rating it as very poor presented an HR of 3.33 (95% CI 2.50 to 4.44). Suboptimal self-rated health was a stronger predictor of mortality among 15-44 year-olds (HR 2.87; 95% CI 1.59 to 5.18), compared with the estimate for 45-64 year-olds (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.45 to 2.39) (p value for interaction=0.001) and for those 65 and older (HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.36 to 1.68) (p value for interaction <0.001). Regarding educational attainment, the association was stronger for individuals with university studies (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.67 to 3.76) than for those with only primary or no studies (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.48) (p value for interaction=0.010). No statistically significant differences were observed between men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Self-rated health may be considered a good predictor of all-cause mortality in the population of Spain, although the magnitude of this predictive association varies by age and educational level.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma of the native kidney in a renal transplant recipient: Revisiting the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors - Case report.

Patients who receive solid organ transplants are at higher risk for developing cancer, which is attributable to chronic immune suppression. Less than 8 cases of metastatic RCC (mRCC) have been reported until now. The aim of this article is to present the case of a 77-year-old male with mRCC of the native kidney and discuss treatment options including targeted therapy, which appears to be the treatment of choice, even in the era of immunotherapy.

Inverted urethral flap reconstruction after partial penectomy: Long-term oncological and functional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Penile aesthetics after partial penectomy (PP) for penile cancer (PC), significantly affect a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-esteem, and sexual function. Satisfactory reconstruction has become a major milestone in the treatment of these patients. METHODS: Clinical charts of all patients that underwent PP and reconstruction with an inverted urethral flap (IUF) were reviewed. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) which were graphically represented by Kaplan-Meier estimates. The key secondary endpoints were Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), erectile function, and lower urinary tract symptoms. RESULTS: Between May 2007 and December 2019, 74 patients with PC underwent PP and IUF reconstruction. The median age was 62 years (IQR 52-76), median follow-up was 72 months (IQR 38-121). Twenty-nine patients (39.2%) underwent inguinal lymph node dissection, 62 (83.8%) underwent dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, RFS, and PFS showed a 6-year OS of 86.5%, 6-year RFS of 90.5%, and a 6-year PFS of 85.1%. Regarding functional outcomes, we found a mean global health score of 84.6% ± 10.4 at the EQ-5D-3L-VAS. The mean Voiding score of the ICIQ-MLUTS was 1.7 ± 3.2 and a mean IIEF-5 score of 17.3 ± 7. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, we report the largest cohort in the literature of PP with IUF reconstruction. These results are important since early-stage PC is the most common stage at diagnosis. In carefully selected patients' preservation of a longer urethral stump to allow for the inverted flap is safe and does not compromise oncological outcomes while preserving HRQoL.

Outpatient 180 W XPS GreenLight Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: 7-Year Experience.

Purpose: GreenLight XPS Laser System (GL-XPS) photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) is not only noninferior to transurethral resection of the prostate, but also with shorter rates of hospital stay and length of catheterization. Scarce literature has been published about the feasibility and safety of performing GL-XPS PVP in an outpatient setting. Our aim is to report our 7-year experience with outpatient GL-XPS PVP. Methods: Medical charts of all patients who underwent GL-XPS PVP between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Patients were discharged after careful monitoring in the recovery room and the catheter was removed either at home or at a scheduled hospital visit. We used the Shapiro-Wilk test to assess for normal distribution, and the evaluation of homoscedasticity was performed with the SD test. For qualitative variables, the comparison between groups was carried using the chi-square test and for the quantitative variables we used the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Results: A total of 537 patients were treated, 517 in an outpatient basis. Median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 62-76), median prostate volume 50 cc (IQR 40-70). 22.8% were on anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy. Median operative time was 100 minutes (IQR 75-125), length of hospital stay 5 hours (IQR 4-6.45), mean length of catheterization 48 hours (SD 14.92). Readmission rate within 90 days of surgery was 11.7%, 58 (10.8%) for surgical-related complications. Median time for readmission was 4 days (IQR 2-24). Immediate readmission (within 10 days) was recorded in 7.6% of patients, urinary retention was the main cause. No significant differences were found trying to find perioperative predictors for readmission. Conclusions: Our experience suggests that outpatient GL-XPS PVP could be performed safely with a predefined outpatient pathway, with a low readmission and complication rate. (IRB number CEI-521).

Urological Cancer Treatment by a Multidisciplinary Teamthroughout the Covid-19 Pandemic: What Have We Learned? / Tratamiento del cáncer urológico por un equipo multidisciplinario durante la pandemia de Covid-19: ¿Qué hemos aprendido?

Introduction It is known that cancer care is best approached by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). This became specifically true in the Covid-19 pandemic in which choices for urological cancer treatment are influenced by many factors. In some cases, delayed treatment may have consequences regarding the patient's oncological outcomes. The aim of the present article is to report our experience throughout the Covid-19 pandemic treating patients with urological neoplasms at a high-volume center. Methods We used a convenience sampling method. Cases were evaluated and discussed on an individual basis at the MDT meetings, and, after a consensus regarding delaying or scheduling treatment, patients were scheduled according to the risk of postponing the procedures. The Medically Necessary, Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) scoring system was measured in each patient; all patients answered the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Covid-19 self-screening questionnaire prior to surgery. The Covid-19-free survival rate was estimated. Results A total of 194 patients were assessed by themultidisciplinary team and finally treated, with median follow-up of 4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.75 to 6) months. Only two patients had Covid-19 confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In total, 54 patients underwent oncological surgery, 129 were treated with radiotherapy, and 11 were treated with intravenous chemotherapy. Themedian age was 66 years (IQR: 59 to 94 years), and the median MeNTS score in the surgically-treated cohort was 35 points (IQR: 31 to 47 points). Conclusions The evaluation and treatment of urological cancer should be conducted by an MDT; this is of utmost importance, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data collected in our institution showed that most patients could be safely treated by taking all necessary precautions and discussing each case individually in the MDT meetings and performing a close follow-up.

Introduccion La atención del cáncer se aborda mejor con un equipo multidisciplinario (EMD), aspecto que se tornó más importante en la pandemia por Covid-19, en que las opciones para tratar el cáncer urológico están influenciadas por muchos factores. En algunos casos, el tratamiento retrasado puede tener consecuencias en los resultados oncológicos del paciente. El objetivo de este estudio es describir nuestra experiencia en un centro de referencia y de alto volumen para el tratamiento de neoplasias urológicas durante la pandemia por Covid-19. Métodos Realizamos un muestreo por conveniencia. Posteriormente, los casos fueron evaluados y discutidos de forma individual en las reuniones del EMD. Posterior a la obtención de un consenso sobre el tratamiento del paciente, los pacientes fueron programados según el riesgo individual de posponer el manejo. Se midió la puntuación de cada paciente en el sistema Medically Necessary Time-Sensitive (MeNTS, "Médicamente necesario, sensibles al tiempo"). Todos los pacientes respondieron el cuestionario de autoevaluación del Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 antes de la cirugía. Se estimó la tasa de supervivencia libre de Covid-19. Resultados Un total de 194 pacientes fueron evaluados por el EMD y finalmente tratados, con una mediana de seguimiento de 4 (rango intercuartil [RIC]: 2,75 a 6) meses. Solo dos tenían Covid-19 confirmado por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real (RCP-TR). Un total de 54 pacientes fueron sometidos a cirugía oncológica, 129 fueron tratados con radioterapia, y 11 fueron tratados con quimioterapia intravenosa. La mediana de edad fue de 66 años (RIC: 59 a 94 años), la puntuación mediana en el MeNTS de la cohorte tratada quirúrgicamente fue de 35 puntos (RIC: 31 a 47 puntos). Conclusiones La evaluación y el tratamiento del cáncer urológico debe ser realizado por un EMD durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Los datos recopilados en nuestra institución mostraron que la mayoría de los pacientes podrían ser tratados de manera segura, discutiendo cada caso individualmente y haciendo un seguimiento cercano.

Inguinal lymph node density as a powerful predictor of cancer specific survival in patients with node-positive penile cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Penile cancer (PC) is an aggressive malignancy in which the most important prognostic factor for cancer specific survival (CSS) is the involvement of regional lymph nodes (LNs). Lymph node density (LND) could become a superior prognostic tool for CSS, by accounting for both extent of dissection and nodal disease burden. We aim to validate LND as a prognostic factor for CSS in a contemporary series of patients with PC treated and followed at a single high-volume center, treating more than 25 PC patients per year, over a 13-year period. METHODS: Clinical charts of all patients with PC who underwent surgical treatment between 2007 and 2020 were reviewed. Clinicopathological data was collected and analyzed retrospectively. We only included patients with ≥ 8 LNs removed in a unilateral ILND or ≥16 LNs when a bilateral approach was used. We attempted to find an optimal threshold for LND, capable of maximizing effect difference in terms of CSS and RFS between dichotomized groups. To determine this threshold, we used the chi-squared and the Mann-Whitney tests, and it was required to fulfill the proportional hazards assumption. We assessed different thresholds previously reported in the literature. In our study the optimal threshold for LND was determined to be ≤ 20% Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics, CSS and RFS were graphically represented by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Harrell's C index for CSS and RFS were calculated for LND and pN stage, to determine which variable has a superior predictive capacity RESULTS: We identified 110 patients with PC who underwent ILND at our institution, of these, 87 were node-positive and were included in the final analysis. Overall estimates of CSS showed a 3-year CSS of 43% (95% CI: 32-54), the estimated 3-year CSS for the patients with a LND ≤ 20% was 69% (95% CI: 50-82) and 26% (95% CI: 14-39) in the group with a LND >20% (Log-rank P = 0.001). The estimated 3-year RFS for the patients with LND ≤ 20% was 61% (95% CI: 42-76) and 30% (95% CI: 16-44) in the group with a LND >20% (Log-rank P = 0.009). The results of univariate analysis indicate that in patients with a LND >20% the risk for cancer specific mortality was increased (HR 2.68; 95% CI: 1.45-4.98, P =  0.002) compared with LND ≤ 20%. In the and Cox multivariate analysis after Adjusting for age and pN stage the association increased (HR 2.73; 95%, CI 1.38-5.40, P = 0.004). Harrell´s C index for CSS was 0.63 for LND vs. 0.54 for pN stage, suggesting a 9% higher concordance for LND and CSS. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node density stands as a promising tool for risk-stratifying patients with node-positive PC after ILND. In this retrospective study, LND was a significant predictor of CSS and RFS when using a LND >20% threshold, and also showed a superior predictive ability than pN stage. These results support the use of the LND parameter in clinical practice with a final goal to improve risk stratification, and individualized adjuvant treatment decision-making to patients with high-risk of cancer specific mortality.

Real World Data of Penile Cancer Treatment at a High-Volume Center in South America: Insights and Survival Trends.

OBJECTIVE: To report survival trends and oncological outcomes of penile cancer surgically treated patients, at a high-volume center, treating more than 25 patients each year, in a high incidence country. METHODS: Clinical charts of all patients that underwent surgical management for penile cancer were reviewed. The primary end points were cancer specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival, and local recurrence free survival. Kaplan-Meier plots were used for survival analyses. Multivariate analysis was performed using cox proportional hazard age-adjusted models to determine the effect of pN, pT, lymphovascular invasion for CSS. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were identified, with a median follow up of 96 months (IQR 49-133). Organ-sparing surgerywas performed in 72.7%, 56.9% underwent dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy, 110 patients underwent inguinal lymph node dissection, and 45 (21.5%) pelvic lymph node dissection. A total of 75 (35.8%) of patients relapsed, median time to relapse of 12 months (IQR 6-25). Overall estimates of CSS showed an 8-year CSS of 68.9%. Eight-year CSS was 90.5% for N0, and 32.8% in pN3 (P <.001). The Cox proportional hazard model showed that pN1-3, pT2-4, lymphovascular invasion and positive dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy were the variables associated with worse 8-year CSS. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, we report one of the largest cohorts on the survival outcomes of penile cancer surgical treatment, in a single institution, over a long period of time, were most patients are referred with high-risk, locally advanced or nodal disease.