RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This manuscript is coauthored by 15 young adult Patient RESearch partners (PARES) with lived and living mental health experiences and three institutional researchers across Canada involved in a patient-oriented research (POR) study called the HEARTS Study: Helping Enable Access and Remove Barriers To Support for Young Adults with Mental Health-Related Disabilities. We share our reflections, experiences and lessons learned as we grapple with the field of POR for its lack of clarity, hierarchical structures, internalized ableism, and accessibility challenges, among others. To mitigate the difficulties of POR, we started by laying the groundwork for equality by embracing the principle of Primus Inter Pares: First Among Equals as the foundation of our approach. In this way, we began with what we know for certain: the inherent worth and dignity of young adults as equal partners, recognizing their expertise, worldviews, creativity, and capacity to contribute meaningfully and intentionally to the research that affects their lives and futures. MAIN BODY: The manuscript underscores the need to reconceptualize meaningful engagement in POR, advocating a shift from traditional, biased paradigms that fail to address the complexities faced by young adults with mental illness. It introduces what we have termed Adaptive and Differential Engagement, underscoring the necessity of tailoring participation to individual preferences and circumstances alongside a Tripartite Compensation model that promotes fair and holistic remuneration in research collaborations. Then we discuss the approaches we have conceptualized, such as Equitable Dialogue, Trust Architecture, Community Continuum, Unity in Diversity, Shared Stewardship, and Agile Frameworks that collectively aim to overcome barriers like language intimidation, power imbalances, framework fatigue, consultation burnout, trust deficits, and systemic discrimination and exclusion. The manuscript does not seek to prescribe any universal or standardized solutions; in fact, it seeks the opposite. Instead, it offers a thoughtful and transparent contribution to the POR canon, providing resources for young adults eager to engage in research and institutional researchers aspiring to collaborate with them. CONCLUSION: This manuscript is a product of our collective learning and critical self-evaluation. By integrating theoretical insights with practical strategies, we present a justice-oriented blueprint for an inclusive and egalitarian approach to POR. We advocate for applications of POR that are responsive to the individualized contexts of young adult PARES, ensuring their perspectives are central to the research with the resources to take the lead should they choose.
Together with a graduate student, co-supervisors, and 15 young people from across Canada who have experience with mental health challenges, this paper looks at how research involving young adults as patient research partners can be better. We feel that the types of research that are supposed to include us are often not clear enough and make it hard to join, especially those with unique life situations and health issues. So, in this paper, we suggest a few new ways of doing things where everyone is treated equally. We call it Primus Inter PARES: First Among Equals. This means young people are just as important as anyone else in research.We want to change the old ways that do not consider our unique experiences as young people with mental health issues. We came up with new ideas like 'Equitable Dialogue' and 'Trust Architecture' to ensure everyone understands the research and feels that they can trust the process. We also suggest ways to make sure different voices are heard and that everyone has a fair chance to contribute.We do not just offer a one-size-fits-all solution; instead, we share many ways to improve research to help young adults who want to be part of research and for the researchers who want to work with us. Our paper is about making research fair and including everyone's point of view. We hope this will make the research better for everyone, especially for young adults.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: T-cell clonality testing by T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement is key to the diagnosis of T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders such as T-cell large granular lymphocytic (T-LGL) leukemia. Benign clonal T-cell expansions, however, are commonly found in patients without identifiable disease, a condition referred to as T-cell clones of uncertain significance (T-CUS). In practice, T-cell clonality testing is performed for a range of reasons and results are often challenging to interpret given the overlap between benign and malignant clonal T-cell proliferations and uncertainties in the management of T-CUS. METHODS: We conducted a 5-year retrospective cohort study of 211 consecutive patients who underwent PCR-based T-cell clonality testing for suspected T-LGL leukemia at our institution to characterize the use of T-cell clonality testing and its impact on patient management. RESULTS: Overall, 46.4% (n = 98) of individuals tested had a clonal T-cell population identified. Patients with a monoclonal T-cell population were more likely to be older, have rheumatoid arthritis and have higher lymphocyte counts compared to patients with polyclonal populations. The majority of patients eventually diagnosed and treated for T-LGL leukemia had rheumatoid arthritis and lower neutrophil counts compared to untreated patients with monoclonal T-cell populations. A diagnosis of T-LGL leukemia was made in only a minority of patients (n = 48, 22.7%), and only a small proportion were treated (n = 17, 8.1%). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that T-cell clonality testing most commonly identifies incidental T-cell clones with only a minority of patients receiving a diagnosis of T-LGL leukemia and fewer requiring active treatment. These finding indicate an opportunity to improve utilization of T-cell clonality testing in clinical practice to better target patients where the results of testing would impact clinical management.
