Preclinical Modeling of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis Inhibition to Describe Pazopanib Clinical Effects in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The objective was to leverage tumor size data from preclinical experiments to propose a model of tumor growth and angiogenesis inhibition for the analysis of pazopanib efficacy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. We analyzed tumor data in mice with RCC CAKI-2 cell line treated with pazopanib. Clinical tumor size data obtained in a subset of patients with RCC were also analyzed. A model accounting for the processes of tumor growth, angiogenesis, and drug effect was developed. The final tumor model was composed of two variables: the tumor and its vasculature. Our results show that, both in mice and in humans, pazopanib exhibits a dual mechanism of action, and parameter estimation values highlight the inherent difference between mice and humans on the time scale of tumor size response. We developed a semimechanistic tumor growth inhibition model that takes into account tumor angiogenesis in order to describe the effects of pazopanib in mice. Analyzing rich preclinical data with a semimechanistic model may be a relevant approach to facilitate the description of sparse clinical longitudinal tumor size data and to provide insights for the understanding of the drug mechanisms of action in patients.

Relationships between pazopanib exposure and clinical safety and efficacy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pazopanib, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)/platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)/c-Kit, is approved in locally advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Data from trials in advanced solid tumours and advanced/metastatic RCC were used to explore the relationships between plasma pazopanib concentrations and biomarker changes, safety, and efficacy. Initially, the relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and increased blood pressure were investigated, followed by analysis of steady-state trough concentration (Cτ) and sVEGFR2, safety, progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and tumour shrinkage. Efficacy/safety end points were compared at Cτ decile boundaries. RESULTS: Strong correlation between increased blood pressure and Cτ was observed (r(2)=0.91), whereas weak correlation was observed between Cτ and decline from baseline in sVEGFR2 (r(2)=0.27). Cτ threshold of >20.5 µg ml(-1) was associated with improved efficacy (PFS, P<0.004; tumour shrinkage, P<0.001), but there was no appreciable benefit in absolute PFS or tumour shrinkage from Cτ >20.5 µg ml(-1). However, the association of Cτ with certain adverse events, particularly hand-foot syndrome, was continuous over the entire Cτ range. CONCLUSIONS: The threshold concentration for efficacy overlaps with concentrations at which toxicity occurs, although some toxicities increase over the entire Cτ range. Monitoring Cτ may optimise systemic exposure to improve clinical benefit and decrease the risk of certain adverse events.

Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel in combination with pazopanib and lapatinib in advanced solid malignancies.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR) and dose-limiting toxicities of pazopanib and lapatinib in combination with weekly paclitaxel, and the effect of pazopanib and lapatinib on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Patients received intravenous paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle concurrently with daily pazopanib and lapatinib. Dose levels of paclitaxel (mg m(-2))/pazopanib(mg)/lapatinib(mg) were 50/400/1000, 50/800/1000, 80/800/1000, and 80/400/1000. At the MTR, additional patients were enrolled to further evaluate tolerability, and the potential effects of pazopanib and lapatinib, inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, a CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 substrate. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities at the MTR (80/400/1000) included grade 4 thrombosis and grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation. Other toxicities included diarrhoea, neutropenia, fatigue, and liver enzyme elevations. Coadministration of pazopanib 400 mg and lapatinib 1000 mg increased paclitaxel maximum plasma concentration (38%) and area under the curve (37%) relative to paclitaxel alone. One patient with a salivary gland tumour had a partial response; three patients had stable disease (⩾6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Pazopanib 400 mg per day and lapatinib 1000 mg per day can be combined with paclitaxel 80 mg m(-2) in 28-day cycles. Coadministration of pazopanib and lapatinib, weak inhibitors of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, had an inhibitory effect on paclitaxel clearance.

Pazopanib exposure decreases as a result of an ifosfamide-dependent drug-drug interaction: results of a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) pathway plays a pivotal role in solid malignancies and is probably involved in chemotherapy resistance. Pazopanib, inhibitor of, among other receptors, VEGFR1-3, has activity as single agent and is attractive to enhance anti-tumour activity of chemotherapy. We conducted a dose-finding and pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamics study of pazopanib combined with two different schedules of ifosfamide. METHODS: In a 3+3+3 design, patients with advanced solid tumours received escalating doses of oral pazopanib combined with ifosfamide either given 3 days continuously or given 3-h bolus infusion daily for 3 days (9 g m(-2) per cycle, every 3 weeks). Pharmacokinetic data of ifosfamide and pazopanib were obtained. Plasma levels of placental-derived growth factor (PlGF), vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), soluble VEGFR2 (sVEGFR2) and circulating endothelial cells were monitored as biomarkers. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included. Pazopanib with continuous ifosfamide infusion appeared to be safe up to 1000 mg per day, while combination with bolus infusion ifosfamide turned out to be too toxic based on a variety of adverse events. Ifosfamide-dependent decline in pazopanib exposure was observed. Increases in PlGF and VEGF-A with concurrent decline in sVEGFR2 levels, consistent with pazopanib-mediated VEGFR2 inhibition, were observed after addition of ifosfamide. CONCLUSION: Continuous as opposed to bolus infusion ifosfamide can safely be combined with pazopanib. Ifosfamide co-administration results in lower exposure to pazopanib, not hindering biological effects of pazopanib. Recommended dose of pazopanib for further studies combined with 3 days continuous ifosfamide (9 g m(-2) per cycle, every 3 weeks) is 800 mg daily.

A phase I study of the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of oral pazopanib with a high-fat or low-fat meal in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Pazopanib is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and cytokine receptor. This open-label, randomized, crossover, phase I study evaluated the effect of low- and high-fat meals on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients participated in either the lead-in cohort or randomized food-effect cohort. Patients in the lead-in cohort were administered a single dose of pazopanib 400 mg with a high-fat meal. Patients in the food-effect cohort were randomized to receive single doses of pazopanib 800 mg in fed condition (high- or low-fat meal) or fasting condition, in random sequence 14 days apart. After completion of the study, patients were given the opportunity to continue treatment with daily pazopanib 800 mg. Administration of pazopanib with both low- and high-fat meals increased maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) by approximately twofold as compared with the corresponding values when administered to patients in the fasted condition. Therefore, pazopanib should be administered to patients in the fasted state so as to minimize within- and between-day variability in the systemic exposure to pazopanib in patients with cancer.

An evaluation of the drug interaction potential of pazopanib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, using a modified Cooperstown 5+1 cocktail in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Pazopanib, an oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-kit kinases, inhibits multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes in vitro. This study in patients with advanced cancer evaluated the effect of pazopanib on CYP450 function by comparing the pharmacokinetics of CYP-specific probe drugs in the presence and absence of pazopanib. The probes used included midazolam (CYP3A specific), warfarin (CYP2C9 specific), omeprazole (CYP2C19 specific), caffeine (CYP1A2 specific), and dextromethorphan (CYP2D6 specific). The estimated ratios of the geometric means (90% confidence interval (CI)) for the area under the curve to the last measurable point (AUC(0-t)) for these probe drugs with/without pazopanib were as follows: midazolam, 1.35 (1.18-1.54); omeprazole, 0.81 (0.59-1.12); caffeine, 1.00 (0.77-1.30); and S-warfarin, 0.93 (0.84-1.03). The geometric least-squares (LS) mean ratio of urine dextromethorphan:dextrorphan ranged from 1.33 (0-4-h interval) to 1.64 (4-8-h interval). The data suggest that pazopanib is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 and has no effect on CYP1A2, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 in patients with advanced cancer.

Comparison of zafirlukast (Accolate) absorption after oral and colonic administration in humans.

PURPOSE: This study characterized the gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of zafirlukast after oral and colonic administration in humans. METHODS: Five healthy subjects received zafirlukast solution (40 mg) orally and via an oroenteric tube into the colon in a randomized, crossover fashion. Two additional subjects were dosed into the distal ileum. Serial blood samples were obtained and plasma concentrations were quantitated by HPLC. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD pharmacokinetic parameters after oral vs. colonic administration were: AUC infinity of 2076 +/- 548 vs. 602 +/- 373 ng x h/mL, respectively, and Cmax of 697 +/- 314 vs. 194 +/- 316 ng/mL, respectively. Mean colon:oral AUCalpha and Cmax were 0.29 and 0.30, respectively. Median tmax values were 2.0 and 1.35 hr after oral and colonic administration. First-order absorption rate constants (Ka and Kac) were estimated from a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Kac:Ka was <0.5 in 4 of the 5 subjects dosed in the colon. CONCLUSIONS: Zafirlukast was absorbed at multiple sites in the GI tract. The rate and extent of zafirlukast absorption was less after colonic than oral administration. Zafirlukast was significantly absorbed in the distal ileum. This study demonstrated that gamma scintigraphy, digital radiography, and fluoroscopy can be used to track the movement and confirm the location of the oroenteric tube in the GI tract.

Regional gastrointestinal absorption of ranitidine in the rat.

PURPOSE: Ranitidine absorption from isolated segments of rat small intestine (duodenum, midgut, and terminal ileum) was investigated to examine the influence of pH and 50% bile, and to determine if ranitidine is absorbed preferentially from a specific region. METHODS: Ranitidine (50 mg/kg) was administered into each segment in pH 5 or pH 7 buffer, or in 50% bile. Venous blood was collected at various times for 40 min from the right jugular vein. RESULTS: When ranitidine was administered in pH 7 buffer or in 50% bile, Cmax and AUC0-40 were significantly greater after administration into the terminal ileum compared to the duodenum and midgut. AUC0-40 was significantly greater when ranitidine was administered in pH 5 buffer or in 50% bile into the duodenum compared to the midgut. Cmax was significantly different between administration into the duodenum and midgut only when ranitidine was administered in 50% bile. Ranitidine administration in pH 5 buffer significantly decreased AUC0-40 and Cmax after administration into the midgut, and AUC0-40 after administration into the terminal ileum compared to administration with pH 7 buffer or in 50% bile. Bile had no significant effect on AUC0-40 after ranitidine administration into the duodenum and midgut compared to administration in pH 7 buffer. However, bile significantly increased AUC0-40 and Cmax after ranitidine administration into the terminal ileum compared to administration with pH 7 and pH 5 buffer. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that ranitidine is absorbed from the entire small intestine. However, the terminal ileum is the optimal site of gastrointestinal absorption. Furthermore, bile enhances ranitidine absorption from the terminal ileum.

Gastrointestinal transit and distribution of ranitidine in the rat.

PURPOSE: Ranitidine gastrointestinal distribution was examined in the rat small intestine after oral administration to determine whether intestinal transit or secretion (exsorption) may influence the appearance of secondary peaks in ranitidine serum concentration-time profiles. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats received ranitidine (50 mg/kg) by oral gavage, and the mass of ranitidine recovered in all small intestinal segments (approximately 12 cm each) was determined 30, 60, 90, or 120 min after administration. In a separate group of anesthetized rats, the small intestine was divided into two segments of equal length that were perfused with normal saline in a single-pass manner. Rats received an escalating, zero-order IV infusion of ranitidine for 30 min, and venous blood and intestinal effluent were collected over 90 min to quantitate ranitidine exsorption. RESULTS: Thirty min after oral administration, > 50% of the recovered ranitidine mass resided in the lower half of the small intestine in all rats. Ranitidine mass in 5 of 16 rats displayed a bimodal distribution with significant amounts of ranitidine recovered from the stomach 60 to 90 min after dosing. Ranitidine exsorption was more efficient from the lower jejunum and ileum than from the duodenum and upper jejunum. However, intestinal secretion of ranitidine was minor (5% of the IV dose). CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine absorption from the lower ileum contributes significantly to systemic ranitidine concentrations before and during the time of the first concentration maximum. Separation of the drug mass into multiple boluses may contribute to secondary peaks in ranitidine concentration-time profiles. Exsorption did not contribute significantly to ranitidine distribution in the gastrointestinal tract.

Bile flow but not enterohepatic recirculation influences the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in the rat.

Secondary peaks in oral concentration-time profiles following ranitidine administration may be due to discontinuous absorption along the gastrointestinal tract, postabsorptive storage and release, and/or enterohepatic recirculation (ER). The suitability of the rat as an animal model for studying mechanisms of the double peaks, and the relationship between ER and the occurrence of secondary peaks in ranitidine concentration-time profiles, were examined in the present investigation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received ranitidine by oral gavage (50 mg/kg), and blood was collected at various times for 6 hr after dosing. Eight rats with chronic bile duct and jugular vein cannulae received ranitidine with bile flow intact or interrupted in a randomized complete cross-over design. Bile duct-cannulated (BDC) rats were divided into two groups: four rats received ranitidine immediately after bile flow interruption, and four rats received ranitidine 3 hr after bile flow interruption. Blood and bile were analyzed for ranitidine by HPLC. The area under the ranitidine concentration-time profile, the maximum serum ranitidine concentration, the time of maximum concentration, the fraction of ranitidine absorbed at each blood sample, biliary clearance, and the percentage of the dose recovered in bile as ranitidine were determined. Results indicated that the rat is an appropriate model for studying mechanisms responsible for the double peaking phenomenon. Multiple peaks or plateaus were observed in the ranitidine concentration-time profiles of all rats after oral administration with bile flow intact. Secondary peaks were evident in only two concentration-time profiles of BDC rats when bile flow was interrupted. Less than 3% of the dose was recovered in the bile as ranitidine or metabolites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ranitidine does not alter adinazolam pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

Adinazolam is a triazolobenzodiazepine with anxiolytic and antidepressant activity. Adinazolam is metabolized extensively; the major metabolite, N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD), possesses significant pharmacologic activity. NDMAD is eliminated predominantly by renal excretion. Ranitidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, is also excreted renally and may compete with NDMAD for renal secretion. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and NDMAD. In a randomized, cross-over study, 12 healthy male volunteers received 300 mg of ranitidine orally followed by 30 mg of adinazolam 1 hour later (treatment A), or adinazolam alone (treatment B). Pharmacodynamic alterations were assessed using card sorting, digit-symbol substitution, and short-term memory tests. Venous blood samples were obtained over 24 hours for analysis of adinazolam and NDMAD by high-performance liquid chromatography. Urine samples also were collected and analyzed for NDMAD. No significant difference in adinazolam oral clearance (1,149 vs. 1,135 ml/hr/kg) was noted between treatments (A vs. B, respectively). Furthermore, the renal clearance of NDMAD (196 vs. 198 ml/min) and the cumulative urinary excretion of NDMAD (% dose; 61.2 vs. 62.3) were not significantly different. Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated no significant differences in psychomotor performance or short-term memory between treatments. Results suggest that ranitidine has no effect on adinazolam disposition, NDMAD renal clearance, or the central nervous system effects mediated by the drug.

Use of a pharmacokinetic model incorporating discontinuous gastrointestinal absorption to examine the occurrence of double peaks in oral concentration-time profiles.

Double peaks in the plasma concentration-time profile following oral administration have been reported for several compounds. A pharmacokinetic model incorporating discontinuous absorption was developed to simulate concentration-time profiles with double peaks. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract was divided into N compartments, with absorption occurring only from the second and Nth compartments. A two-compartment model was used to describe systemic drug disposition. The effect of gastric emptying and GI transit rate constants (Kl and K1, respectively), number of hypothetical gut compartments, and absorption rate constant at each site (Ka1, Ka2) on the time of occurrence of each peak (Tp1, Tp2), the theoretical fraction of the dose absorbed at each site (phi 1, phi 2), and the contribution of the second site to systemic drug exposure (expressed as phi 2rel) were examined. Simulated concentration-time profiles demonstrated that Tp2 was determined by Kt and N, while Tp1 was determined by K1 and Kt. Changes in Ka1 and Ka2 had no effect on Tp1 or Tp2. phi 1, phi 2, and phi 2rel were determined by Ka1, Ka2, and Kt, and simulations indicated that a secondary peak in the concentration-time profile will be evident only when phi 2rel is substantial. In addition, concentration-time data for ranitidine and cimetidine, which displayed double peaks, were fit with the model. The present model described both data sets well, and realistic pharmacokinetic and physiologic parameters (absorption rate constants, systemic bioavailabilities, GI residence times) were obtained.