Transperineal Repair of Secondary Perineal Hernia Using a Mesh with a Memory-recoil Ring.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of transperineal repair of secondary perineal hernia (SPH) using a mesh with a memory-recoil ring. Methods: Seven patients with SPH who underwent transperineal repair (TPR) between July 2010 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. TPR was performed using a mesh with a memory-recoil ring. Results: All SPHs developed after abdominoperineal resections in patients with anorectal malignancies. The median longitudinal and transverse diameters of the hernia orifice were 8 (7-10) cm and 6 (5-7) cm, respectively. In all cases, the mesh was fixed to the ischial tuberosity, residual levator muscle, coccygeus muscle, and coccyx after thorough dissection of the sac. The median operation time was 154 (142-280) min. Perioperative complications occurred in 2 cases (29%). One was enterotomy, which caused postoperative mesh infection requiring extraction of the mesh. The other was vaginal injury, which resulted in vaginal fistula but closed spontaneously. The median postoperative length of stay was 9 (5-14) days. No recurrence was observed during a median follow-up of 35 (9-151) months. Conclusions: TPR using a mesh with a memory-recoil ring is safe, feasible and promising technique for SPH repairs.

Primary upper lumbar hernia repaired by transabdominal preperitoneal approach technique using a self-expanding mesh with a memory-recoil ring, report of a case.

BACKGROUND: Upper lumber hernia is a rare entity which can cause obstruction and strangulation. Laparoscopic technique has been considered effective for such hernia repairs; however, there is no report of use of the self-expanding mesh. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old woman visited to our hospital complaining of a bulge of about 5 cm in the left lumbar dorsal region while standing. Abdominal CT and MRI scans showed a fascial defect in the left lumbar abdominal wall and confirmed the presence of a hernia, in which retroperitoneal fatty tissue and the descending colon protruded. Transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) was performed and the operative findings revealed the hernia orifice, 3 × 2.5 cm in diameter, between two intercostal nerves. To avoid nerve injury or entrapment, the number of mesh fixation was desirable minimum; therefore, a self-expanding mesh with a memory-recoil ring was used. The mesh, 9.5 × 13 cm in diameter, was placed and tacked to the abdominal wall at two points, 1 cm ventral and dorsal to the hernia orifice. The postoperative course was uneventful and no pain or recurrence was observed with follow-up of 6 months. CONCLUSION: We herein present a case of upper lumber hernia successfully repaired by TAPP with a self-expanding mesh.

Emergency transanal total mesorectal excision for perforated rectal cancer: a two-case series.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for perforated rectal cancer is technically difficult because of paralytic dilatation due to generalized fecal peritonitis, the presence of a bulky tumor, and fecal retention due to obstruction. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is the latest minimally invasive transanal technique pioneered to facilitate difficult pelvic dissections. It can provide a good surgical field linearly from the perineal side and reduce manipulations from the intraabdominal side. Here, we present two cases of emergency TaTME performed for perforated rectal cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: The patients were a 38-year-old female and a 75-year-old male. They were diagnosed with perforated rectal cancer and were in a state of septic shock. Emergency Hartmann's procedure was performed in both cases. Intraoperative findings showed fecal contamination of the entire abdomen and dilated intestines and bulky tumors with perforation. The female patient had multiple uterine fibroids, and the male patient had an enlarged prostate. For both patients, dissection of the mesorectum to the anal side of the tumor and transection of the rectum on the anal side of the tumor via a linear stapler were considered difficult because of the insufficient surgical field of view into the pelvis. Therefore, a two-team approach with TaTME was adopted. En bloc resection of the rectum was completed by collaboration of the abdominal team and the transanal team, and the autonomic nerves were successfully preserved. Finally, the specimens were resected, and the anal edge of the rectum was closed with a purse-string suture by the transanal team. Although these two cases were emergency surgeries in difficult situations, the cancer lesions were successfully and safely removed without involvement of the resection margin. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of emergency TaTME. Although these cases were emergency operations in a situation where it was difficult to pursue radical resection-and often times in these situations, the operation may end with only stoma creation-the specimens were safely resected. Emergency TaTME is a useful procedure for treatment of perforated rectal cancer.

Feasibility of using a tailored mesh in laparoscopic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: In parastomal hernia (PH) repair, laparoscopic Sugarbaker technique (LS) is considered the best practice; however, meshes specific for LS repairs ceased to be available. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate feasibility of using a physician-modified mesh (tailored mesh: TM) in LS. METHODS: Thirty-three patients who underwent LS for PH between June 2012 and September 2021 were examined to compare surgical outcomes between LS with TM (n = 11) and with a ready-made specific mesh (SM, n = 22). All meshes were coated plastic meshes. Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: We compared the outcomes of TM with SM in LS for similar hernia types during median follow-up periods of 23 (range, 2-29) and 74 (range, 36-110) months (P < .0001), respectively. The median operation times were 146 (range, 45-423) for TM and 193 (range, 65-386) minutes for SM (P = .2301). Perioperative complications were observed in one TM patient (9%) and two SM patients (9%) (P = 1.0000). The lengths of postoperative stay were similar. Recurrence was observed in two cases in the SM group (9%) within 1 year after the operation. CONCLUSION: In LS, TM seems to be a feasible mesh comparable to SM within short- and mid-term follow-up.

Risk of Outlet Obstruction Associated With Defunctioning Loop Ileostomy in Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Background: The outlet obstruction (OO) rate is 5.4-18.4% after defunctioning ileostomy (DI) following rectal cancer resection to reduce the incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage; OO affects a patient's quality of life and prolongs hospitalization. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent anterior rectal resection and DI for rectal cancer. Results: Among 100 patients undergoing anterior rectal resection with DI for rectal cancer, 28 (28%) developed OO. Anastomotic leakage and a rectus abdominis muscle thickness ≥10 mm on preoperative computed tomography were significantly associated with the risk of OO in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis also demonstrated that anastomotic leakage (odds ratio=4.320, 95% confidence interval=1.280-14.60, p=0.019) and rectus abdominis muscle thickness ≥10 mm (odds ratio=3.710, 95% confidence intervaI=1.280-10.70, p=0.016) were significantly risk factors for OO. Conclusion: When OO is observed, an anastomotic leakage should be suspected, especially if there is a high rectus abdominis muscle thickness.

Evaluation of Anastomosis With ICG Fluorescence Method Using VISERA ELITE2 During Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

AIM: In colorectal cancer surgery, the efficacy of intestinal blood flow evaluation with the indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence method using the VISERA ELITE2 system was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants in this study comprised 50 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery at the Department of Surgery, the Jikei Daisan Hospital. With the ICG fluorescence method, whether it was necessary to change the intestinal transection line for anastomosis was evaluated. RESULTS: For three cases of rectal cancer, the oral transection line determined from macroscopic observation was judged to offer insufficient blood flow according to the ICG fluorescence method. The transection line for anastomosis was changed according to fluorescence. None of these cases showed complications. CONCLUSION: The ICG fluorescence method may allow safe anastomosis in colorectal surgery for cancer.

Open mesh plug repair for inguinal hernia after femoro-femoral arterial bypass: Two retrospective case series.

INTRODUCTION: Reports on inguinal hernia repair after femoral arterial bypass are limited, and a recommended procedure has not been established. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Case 1. A 77-year-old man who had a history of femoro-femoral arterial bypass (FFB) for limb graft occlusion following endovascular aortic repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm presented with a left inguinal hernia. CT revealed an inguinal hernia and the FFB graft was identified in the subcutaneous plane. We selected mesh-plug repair under local infiltration anesthesia and his postoperative course was uneventful. Case 2. A 73-year-old man who had a history of FFB for occlusion the branch of the graft of endovascular stent for abdominal aortic aneurysm presented with a left inguinal hernia. CT revealed an inguinal hernia and the FFB graft was identified in the subcutaneous plane. We performed mesh-plug repair under general anesthesia and his postoperative course was uneventful. The patients are free of recurrence of the hernia or complication of the FFB graft as of 13 months and 30 months after the surgery, respectively. DISCUSSION: We herein report two cases of successful open mesh plug repair for inguinal hernia after FFB. CONCLUSION: The mesh plug repair is safe and useful for the treatment of inguinal hernia after FFB, for which preoperative CT is helpful for understanding precise anatomy which facilitates surgical planning.

CA19-9 Concentration After First-line Chemotherapy Is Prognostic Predictor of Metastatic Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate whether the serum levels of CEA or CA19-9 concentration is a useful predictor of survival in patients with metastatic colon cancer (mCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, 113 patients with mCC who underwent chemotherapy according to the Japanese Colorectal Cancer Treatment Guidelines at four Jikei University Hospitals were enrolled in this study. The two serum tumor makers, CEA and CA19-9 were measured before first-line chemotherapy and at four months thereafter. RESULTS: Serum CA19-9 concentration at four months after first-line chemotherapy (p=0.003, HR=3.761) and first-line chemotherapy including oxaliplatin (p=0.038, HR=0.312) were independent predictors of survival in patients with mCC. By excluding the transverse colon, only serum CA19-9 concentration at four months after first-line chemotherapy (p=0.005, HR=3.660) was identified as the predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: Serum CA19-9 concentration after first-line chemotherapy seems to be a useful predictor of survival in patients with mCC.

Surgical management of urachal remnants in children: open versus laparoscopic approach: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.

Urachal remnants (UR) represent a failure in the obliteration of the allantois, which connects the bladder to the umbilicus, at birth. Surgical management of UR in children is controversial. The traditional surgical approach involves a semicircular intraumbilical incision or a lower midline laparotomy. Recently, many reports have supported the laparoscopic approach (LA) for removing UR. However, there is a paucity of data comparing the benefits of LA those of the open approach (OA).We retrospectively reviewed all children (aged ≤16 years) with UR who underwent surgical procedures. Age at surgery, sex, operative time, intraoperative or postoperative complications, total wound length, and length of hospital stay length after operation were analyzed.Overall, 30 children aged between 9 months and 16 years (mean 9.0 years) underwent surgical procedures: 15 were treated by OA and 15 were treated by LA. The only statistically significant variable was the operative time. Furthermore, we reanalyzed the age distributions of the older children (aged ≥10 years). In this group, no significant difference in the operative time between OA and LA was observed; however, there was a statistically significant difference in the total wound length.Our review indicated that LA required longer operative time than OA without any cosmetic advantage. However, in older children (aged ≥10 years), the difference in the operative time was not significant; moreover, LA provided greater cosmetic advantage. LA is recommended for older children (aged ≥10 years) because of its cosmetic advantage.

Real-Time Fluorescence Vessel Navigation Using Indocyanine Green During Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence technique is known to help visualize blood vessels. The efficacy of real-time fluorescence vessel navigation (FVN) using ICG for ligation of the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and left colic artery (LCA) during laparoscopic left colorectal cancer surgery was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants were 59 patients who underwent laparoscopic left colorectal cancer surgery from February 2017 to November 2018, and were divided into groups: i) with FVN (FVN+, n=21) and ii) without FVN (FVN-, n=38). Groups were compared for the time it took to ligate their IMV and LCA. RESULTS: The results are expressed as median values. The time to ligate the IMV and LCA was significantly shorter for FVN+ (230 seconds; range 126-346) than for FVN- (417.5 seconds; range 137-1327) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Real-time FVN using ICG shortened the times for IMV and LCA ligation. This was enabled by clear visualization of the direction of the bloodstream flow inside the vessels. This technique simplifies vessel ligation and safer laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer.

Reevaluation of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Clinical T3 Lower Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Collaborative Retrospective Clinical Study.

AIM: This study aimed to re-evaluate the usefulness of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for clinical T3 lower rectal cancers without lateral lymph node metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, 132 patients with clinical T3 lower rectal cancer without lateral lymph node metastasis, 80 years of age or younger, who underwent curative resection at four Jikei University Hospitals were enrolled into this retrospective study. Of these, 22 patients received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) before surgery, 16 patients received intensive chemotherapy after surgery without preoperative CRT, and 94 patients underwent neither preoperative CRT nor intensive chemotherapy after surgery including 47 patients with postoperative oral chemotherapy for pathological diagnosis of stage III. RESULTS: The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of the 22 patients who received preoperative CRT was 95.5%, whereas that of the 94 patients who received neither preoperative CRT nor intensive chemotherapy was 72.0% (p=0.024). However, there was no significant difference in 5-year DFS between the two groups. No significant difference was identified in DFS between the 22 patients who received preoperative CRT and the 16 patients who received intensive chemotherapy after surgery without preoperative CRT. CONCLUSION: Intensive chemotherapy after surgery seems to yield a similar prognosis to preoperative CRT in patients with clinical T3 lower rectal cancer without lateral lymph node metastasis.

Safety and Efficacy of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Hydrochloride Oral Combination (TAS-102) in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Cancer.

AIM: To retrospectively examine efficacy and safety of oral combination of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) as the second-line therapeutic agent for unresectable colorectal cancer. PATIENT AND METHODS: Treatment outcomes of 17 patients who had received TAS-102 at our Institution from January 2015 to January 2017 were analyzed. The indications for second-line TAS-102 treatment were intolerance to other multi-drug combination (four patients) or patient refusal of the standard second-line therapy (13 patients). RESULTS: Among 17 patients who received TAS-102 as second-line therapy, partial response was observed in two (12%) and stable disease in two (12%). Outcomes of TAS-102 given as second-line therapy were: median overall survival of 5 months, response rate of 12% and disease control of 24%. Overall, no adverse events other than neutropenia were noted. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a beneficial role of TAS-102 in second-line therapy for unresectable colorectal carcinoma.

Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?

INTRODUCTION: The ideal surgical technique for large incisional hernia repair has not yet been identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes of standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh (sIPOM) versus fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM-Plus) for large incisional hernia repair. METHODS: Of 49 patients who underwent laparoscopic incisional hernia repair between November 2005 and December 2016, 26 cases with large incisional hernia (transverse diameter ≥10 cm) were examined to compare surgical outcomes between sIPOM (n = 12) and IPOM-Plus (n = 14). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: We compared sIPOM with IPOM-Plus for similar hernia types during median follow-up periods of 53 and 21 months, respectively. The operation time was 150 min for sIPOM and 148 min for IPOM-Plus (P = 0.6220). Early postoperative complications including seroma formation were observed in four sIPOM patients (33%) and three IPOM-Plus patients (21%) (P = 0.6652). Significantly more mesh bulged with sIPOM than with IPOM-Plus (50% vs 0%; P = 0.0082). Chronic pain lasting 3 months after the operation was found in two cases of IPOM-Plus (14%), but this was not statistically significant. Postoperative hospital stay was longer for sIPOM patients than for IPOM-Plus patients. Only one recurrence was observed in the sIPOM group (8%), but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: For large incisional hernia repair, IPOM-Plus seems to be more effective than sIPOM in terms of reducing mesh bulging.

Risk Factors for Early Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate risk factors for small bowel obstruction (SBO) in early postoperative period after anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent anterior resection (AR) [high AR (HAR) or low AR (LAR)] for rectal cancer between January 2009 and April 2016 were enrolled into the study after fulfilling selection criteria. In included patients, risk factors for early postoperative SBO (EPSBO) were analyzed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. Cases with perioperative major complications other than intestinal obstruction and with simultaneous resection of other organs were excluded. The same analyses were also performed for cases of redo surgery due to EPSBO. EPSBO was defined as clinically and radiologically confirmed SBO that developed after resuming oral intake within 30 days following surgery. The logistic regression method was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: In enrolled 180 patients, EPSBO occurred in 23 (12.8%). In univariate analysis, male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.17, 95% CI = 0.82-6.84, p < 0.0001], previous abdominal surgery (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.03-0.73, p = 0.0117), low tumor (OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.28-8.13, p = 0.0140), LAR (OR = 17.25, 95% CI = 3.49-312.55, p < 0.0001), D3 node dissection (OR = 13.61, 95% CI = 2.75-246.69, p = 0.0002), defunctioning ileostomy (DI) formation (OR = 9.88, 95% = 3.80-29.14, p < 0.0001), and prolonged operation time (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.01, p = 0.0122) were significantly related to EPSBO. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that D3 node dissection (OR = 10.93, 95% CI = 1.94-208.23, p = 0.0038) and DI formation (OR = 5.82, 95% CI = 1.55-25.31, p = 0.0083) were independent risk factors for EPSBO. Four cases (17.4%) with EPSBO required re-operation because conservative therapies failed; all were laparoscopic DI formation cases. In three of those four cases, stenosis of stoma at the level of the posterior sheath of rectus abdominis muscle was the reason of SBO, and in one case it was kinking of the stomal limb. CONCLUSIONS: D3 lymph node dissection and DI formation are independent risk factors for EPSBO in AR.

Laparoscopic surgical challenge for T4a colon cancer.

For patients with T4a colon cancer, the risk of peritoneal dissemination after surgery remains unclear. Seven hundred and eleven patients with T3 or T4a colon cancer, 80 years of age or younger, underwent curative resection (open surgery in 512 and laparoscopic surgery in 199) at the four Jikei University hospitals between 2006 and 2012. Their risk factors for peritoneal dissemination after surgery were evaluated retrospectively. Number of lymph node metastases, postoperative liver metastases and postoperative peritoneal dissemination events in the T4a group were significantly greater than the number in the T3 group. Peritoneal dissemination after surgery developed in four patients (0.7%) in the T3 group and in six patients (5%) in the T4a group. Risk factors for peritoneal dissemination consisted of macroscopic type (P = 0.016), serosal invasion (P = 0.017) and number of lymph node metastases (P = 0.009) according to the Cox proportional hazards regression model. However, tumor diameter and surgical approach (laparoscopic vs open) were not significant factors for peritoneal dissemination. There were no significant differences between the postoperative relapse-free survival rates for each surgical approach within the T3 or T4a group. Because of comparable postoperative peritoneal dissemination in T3 and T4a colon cancer by the surgical approach (laparoscopic or open), laparoscopic surgery for patients with T4a colon cancer seems justified.

Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair with 2-point anchoring and zigzag tacking of Parietex™ Parastomal Mesh technique.

BACKGROUND: The ideal mesh and mesh fixation technique for laparoscopic Sugarbaker (SB) parastomal hernia repair have not yet been identified. METHODS: Sixteen patients with parastomal hernia who underwent laparoscopic modified SB repair (LSB) between June 2012 and October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. LSB was performed using a developed standardized 2-point anchoring and zigzag tacking of Parietex™ Parastomal Mesh (PCO-PM) technique. RESULTS: Out of 16 cases, 14 were primary and 2 recurrent hernias; 13 were para-end colostomy and 3 were para-ileal conduit (PIC) hernias. The median longitudinal and transverse diameters of the hernia orifice were 5 cm (2.5-7 cm) and 4.2 cm (2-6 cm), respectively. Five cases had a concomitant midline incisional hernia, which was simultaneously repaired. In all cases, the mesh was placed without deflection. The median operation time was 193 (75-386) min. Perioperative complications occurred in two cases (13 %) with PIC, one intra-operatively and the other postoperatively. The intra-operative complication was enterotomy close to the ureteroenteric anastomosis of the ileal conduit; it was repaired through a mini-laparotomy. LSB was accomplished without any subsequent postoperative complications. The postoperative complication was ureteral obstruction that required creation of nephrostomy. Mini-laparotomy was necessary in those two cases (13 %) because of intra-operative enterotomy and severe intra-abdominal adhesions. The median postoperative length of stay was 9 (5-14) days. No recurrence was observed with a median follow-up of 14.5 (2-41) months. CONCLUSIONS: Our LSB using standardized mesh fixation technique is safe and feasible, and the PCO-PM seems to be the most optimal prosthesis.

Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.

The laparoscopic technique for repairing ventral and incisional hernias (VIH) is now well established. However, several issues related to laparoscopic VIH repair, such as the high recurrence rate for hernias with large fascial defects and in extremely obese patients, are yet to be resolved. Additional problems include seroma formation, mesh bulging/eventration, and non-restoration of the abdominal wall rigidity/function with only bridging of the hernial orifice using standard laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (sIPOM). To solve these problems, laparoscopic fascial defect closure with IPOM reinforcement (IPOM-Plus) has been introduced in the past decade, and a few studies have reported satisfactory outcomes. Although detailed techniques for fascial defect closure and handling of the mesh have been published, standardized techniques are yet to be established. We reviewed the literature on IPOM-Plus in the PubMed database and identified 16 reports in which the recurrence rate, incidence of seroma formation, and incidence of mesh bulging were 0-7.7, 0-11.4, and 0 %, respectively. Several comparison studies between sIPOM and IPOM-Plus seem to suggest that IPOM-Plus is associated with more favorable surgical outcomes; however, larger-scale studies are essential.

["Let's become the surgeon" the present status of the medical course beside teaching in Department of surgery, Daisan Hospital the Jikei University School of medicine: based on the experience OF clinical Clark ship for 5 years].

In Department of Surgery, Daisan Hospital, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Clinical Clark ship (C.C.) is positively taken in the bedside teaching of the medical course fifth and sixth grader from April, 2010. We think that the C.C. is a good opportunity to tell the charm of the surgeon to the students. We introduce a bedside teaching going in our Department, based on the experience of the C.C. for 5 years. In the bedside teaching of our department, there are many tasks not to advance before when students do not have discussion with preceptors, about participation in surgery, presentation of the preoperative conference, visiting of outpatient care and night practice. Moreover, students decide the theme about submitting report and research presentation. For our department which built a bedside teaching with on the job training as a concept from 2010, "students in the C.C." is welcome and beneficial for the doctors, the students itself and the patients. When C.C. will be introduced into all Department of our university in earnest from 2016, we have to examine the merits and demerits in future so that C.C. functions going well.