RESUMO
Management of circulatory unstable pelvic fracture in Greenland - from a remote village to Level 1 Trauma center. This case report depicts the transportation of an unstable patient in a rural area, where transportation of the critically ill patient is inherently difficult due to infrastructure. The case report brings knowledge to the reader of logistic conditions in Greenland, which differ greatly from those in Denmark. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of knowledge of damage control surgery and of great intercollegiate cooperation.
Assuntos
Sistema Cardiovascular , Fraturas Ósseas , Humanos , Estado Terminal , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Groenlândia , Pelve , Masculino , AdultoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether minimally access spine surgery (MASS) is less morbid than open surgery (OS) in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 49 MSCC patients were included in the trial. The outcome measures were bleeding (L), operation time (min), re-operations and prolonged wound healing. RESULTS: The median age was 67 years (range=42-85 years) and 40% were men. The peri-operative blood loss in the MASS-group was significantly lower than that in the OS-group; 0.175L vs. 0.500L, (p=0.002). The median operation time for MASS was 142 min (range=72-203 min) vs. 103 (range=59-435 min) for OS (p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning revision surgery or delayed wound healing. CONCLUSION: The MASS technique in MSCC patients is associated with less blood loss, but a longer operation time when compared to the OS technique.