Phase II study of everolimus and temozolomide as first-line treatment in metastatic high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for metastatic high-grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms when Ki-67 ≤55% is unknown. A prospective multi-centre phase 2 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus and temozolomide as first-line treatment for these patients. METHODS: Patients received everolimus 10 mg daily continuously and temozolomide 150 mg/m2 for 7 days every 2 weeks. Endpoints included response, survival, safety and quality of life (QoL). Histopathological re-evaluation according to the 2019 WHO classification was performed. RESULTS: For 37 eligible patients, the primary endpoint with 65% disease control rate (DCR) at 6 months (m) was reached. The response rate was 30%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) 10.2 months and the median overall survival (OS) 26.4 months. Considering 26 NET G3 patients, 6 months DCR was 77% vs. 22% among nine NEC patients (p = 0.006). PFS was superior for NET G3 vs. NEC (12.6 months vs. 3.4 months, Log-rank-test: p = 0.133, Breslow-test: p < 0.001). OS was significantly better for NET G3 (31.4 months vs. 7.8 months, p = 0.003). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported in 43% and 38%. QoL remained stable during treatment. CONCLUSION: Everolimus and temozolomide may be a treatment option for selected GEP-NET G3 patients including careful monitoring. Toxicity did not compromise QoL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NTC02248012).

Mutational Signature and Transcriptomic Classification Analyses as the Decisive Diagnostic Tools for a Cancer of Unknown Primary.

PURPOSE: Cancer of unknown primary is a group of metastatic tumors in which the standard diagnostic workup fails to identify the site of origin of the tumor. The potential impact of precision oncology on this group of patients is large, because actionable driver mutations and a correct diagnosis could provide treatment options otherwise not available for patients with these fatal cancers. This study investigated if comprehensive genomic analyses could provide information on the origin of the tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Here we describe a patient whose tumor was misdiagnosed at least three times. Next-generation sequencing, a patient-derived xenograft mouse model, and bioinformatics were used to identify an actionable mutation, predict resistance development to the targeted therapy, and correctly diagnose the origin of the tumor. Transcriptomic classification was benchmarked using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). RESULTS: Despite the lack of a known primary tumor site and the absence of diagnostic immunohistochemical markers, the origin of the patient's tumor was established using the novel bioinformatic workflow. This included a mutational signature analysis of the sequenced metastases and comparison of their transcriptomic profiles to a pan-cancer panel of tumors from TCGA. We further discuss the strengths and limitations of the latter approaches in the context of three potentially incorrectly diagnosed TCGA lung tumors. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive genomic analyses can provide information on the origin of tumors in patients with cancer of unknown primary.

Estimation of absorbed dose to the kidneys in patients after treatment with 177Lu-octreotate: comparison between methods based on planar scintigraphy.

BACKGROUND: Lu-[DOTA0, Tyr3]-octreotate (177Lu-octreotate) is used to treat neuroendocrine tumors with high somatostatin-receptor expression. 177Lu-octreotate is mainly excreted via the kidneys, but to some extent, accumulates in the kidney cortex due to, e.g., tubular reabsorption. Renal toxicity is one of the main limiting factors in 177Lu-octreotate treatment. Further knowledge of the biodistribution and dosimetry of 177Lu-octreotate in individual patients is needed. The aim of this study was to estimate the absorbed dose to the kidneys and compare the results obtained with planar imaging and different dosimetric methods: (1) conjugate-view (CV) method using patient-specific kidney sizes, (2) PA method, based on posterior images only, (3) CV method with reduced number of time points (CVreduced data), and (4) CV method using standard kidney sizes (CVstandard size). METHODS: Totally, 33 patients each received 3.4 to 8.2 GBq of 177Lu-octreotate up to five times, with infusion of lysine and arginine to block the renal uptake. Whole-body planar gamma camera images were acquired on days 0, 1, 2, and 7. The 177Lu concentration in the kidneys was determined by the CV method, and the absorbed dose was estimated with patient-specific organ sizes. Comparison to the CV method was made using posterior images only, together with the influence of the number of time points and with standard organ sizes. RESULTS: Large interindividual variations were found in the time-activity curve pattern and in the absorbed dose to the kidneys using the CV method: 0.33 to 2.4 Gy/GBq (mean = 0.80 Gy/GBq, SD = 0.30). In the individual patient, the mean deviation of all subsequent kidney doses compared to that of the first administration was 1% (SD = 19%) and 5% (SD = 23%) for the right and left kidneys, respectively. Excluding data for day 7 resulted in large variations in the absorbed dose. CONCLUSION: Large interindividual variations in kidney dose were found, demonstrating the need for patient-specific dosimetry and treatment planning.