Effects of simvastatin versus gemfibrozil on lipids and glucose control in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. NIDDM Study Group.

The objective of this study was to compare the lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin with that of gemfibrozil in hypercholesterolemic patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The study was a 24-week, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial conducted at clinics and hospitals in the United States, Austria, Germany, Brazil, and New Zealand. The study population included 168 men and women aged 34 to 78 years with NIDDM and primary hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] level at screening was > or = 4.9 mmol/L with no other risk factor or > or = 4.1 mmol/L with one or more other risk factors). All patients had been under moderate-to-good diabetic control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] < or = 10.0%) for at least 6 months with diet alone, oral hypoglycemic agents, or insulin therapy. Patients meeting eligibility criteria were randomized to receive either simvastatin 10 mg (titrated up to 40 mg to achieve an LDL-C level < 3.4 mmol/L) once in the evening or gemfibrozil 600 mg twice daily. There were 81 patients in the simvastatin group and 87 patients in the gemfibrozil group. After 17 weeks of treatment, simvastatin significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) by approximately 25%, 33%, and 20%, respectively (P < or = 0.001), and triglycerides by about 9% (P < or = 0.05). The drug increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels by about 6% (P < 0.01). Gemfibrozil significantly reduced total cholesterol, VLDL-C, and triglyceride levels by approximately 8%, 38%, and 27%, respectively (P < 0.001); it significantly increased HDL-C values by about 12% (P < 0.001). Gemfibrozil lowered LDL-C levels by 4% but not significantly. The decreases in total cholesterol and LDL-C were significantly greater (P < 0.001) in the simvastatin group, and decreases in VLDL-C and triglycerides were significantly greater in the gemfibrozil group (P < 0.01). The changes in HDL-C were not significantly different between groups. LDL-C values of < 3.4 mmol/L were achieved in 60% of the simvastatin patients and 14% of the gemfibrozil patients. There were no significant between-group differences in fasting serum glucose or HbA1c at any time point. Glycemic profiles (performed at baseline and after 17 weeks of treatment) and glucose area under the curve (at baseline and after 17 weeks of treatment) were not significantly different between treatment groups. Both drugs were generally well tolerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Influence of age and gender on the plasma profiles of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitory activity following multiple doses of lovastatin and simvastatin.

The effects of age and of gender on the plasma profiles of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors following separate once-a-day dosage regimens (17 days) of lovastatin (80 mg/day) and simvastatin (40 mg/day) were studied in hypercholesterolemic patients. In general, plasma concentrations of active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were higher in elderly individuals (age, 70 to 78 years) and in females for both drugs. However, the Tmax of these inhibitors was not significantly affected by either age or gender. Following the last dose of lovastatin, the mean steady-stage plasma concentrations of total and active HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were 30-60% higher in the elderly than in young individuals (age, 19 to 30 years). Also, the mean plasma concentrations were 20-50% higher in female than in male patients. Similarly, following the last dose of simvastatin, the mean plasma concentrations of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were 40-60% higher in the elderly than in young patients and were 20-50% higher in female than in male patients. These age- and gender-related differences do not appear to be large enough to warrant modification of dosage regimens, because plasma concentrations of these inhibitors are not necessarily indicative of efficacy and the therapeutic windows for lovastatin and simvastatin are broad.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of 14C-lovastatin in chronic renal failure.

An open study on the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin was conducted in six patients with chronic renal failure (mean creatinine clearance, 0.40 ml/sec; range, 0.20 to 0.65 ml/sec) and seven healthy subjects. Plasma levels of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme reductase inhibitory activity (total and active) and total radioactivity were determined over 168 hours after a single dose of 80 mg 14C-lovastatin. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve for active inhibitors were 606 +/- 346 and 282 +/- 138 ngEq.hr/ml (p = 0.04) in patients and control subjects, respectively. Total inhibitors in plasma and total radioactivity were similarly elevated in patients with chronic renal failure. Results indicate that patients with severe renal dysfunction have altered elimination kinetics of lovastatin. Current ongoing clinical studies in patients with renal dysfunction will allow better assessment of the pharmacodynamic meaning of our observations.

Antiarrhythmic effects of intravenous timolol in supraventricular arrhythmias.

The antiarrhythmic effect of timolol was investigated in 160 subjects with supraventricular arrhythmias. In our double-blind, randomized, parallel, multiclinic study, subjects received timolol, 1 mg iv, or matching placebo as a starting dose, followed by a second and third dose of 1 mg each (or matching placebo) at 20-min intervals if the arrhythmia did not convert to sinus rhythm. Subjects in whom the sinus rhythm returned or the ventricular rate decreased to less than 100 bpm were transferred to a dosing regimen of timolol in 10-mg tablets twice a day by mouth, 1 hr after the last intravenous dose. Data indicated that the mean decrease in heart rate was 44 bpm after timolol and 7 bpm after placebo. The overall proportion of responders (either conversion to sinus rhythm or a decrease in ventricular rate to less than 100 bpm) was 68% after timolol and 7% after placebo. The proportions of responders after timolol were significantly higher than the proportions after placebo for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (26 of 32 subjects and two of 38 subjects), atrial fibrillation (17 of 29 subjects and three of 32 subjects), and atrial flutter (seven of 11 subjects and one of nine subjects). The most common adverse effects were bradycardia and hypotension.