Hospital clinicians' psychosocial well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Hospital clinicians report poor psychosocial well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Few studies have reported data at more than one time point. AIMS: To compare psychosocial well-being among hospital clinicians at two different time points during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. METHODS: Participants included doctors, nurses, midwives and allied health clinicians at a multi-site, public health service in Melbourne, Australia. Data were collected via two cross-sectional, online surveys: May to June (wave 1; n = 638) and October to December 2020 (wave 2; n = 358). The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) assessed psychological well-being in the past week. Investigator-devised questions assessed COVID-19 concerns and perceived work impacts. General linear models were used to assess impact of wave on psychological distress. RESULTS: There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. Both positive (e.g. learning experience) and negative (e.g. risk of getting COVID-19) impacts were reported. In both waves, staff were most concerned about health risks to family members. Wave 2 respondents were significantly more likely than wave 1 respondents to indicate concerns about colleagues having COVID-19, increased workloads, leave cancellation and increased conflict at work (all P < 0.001). Adjusting for sex, age, self-rated health and discipline group, depression, anxiety and stress scores were significantly higher for respondents in the second than the first wave (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological well-being of hospital clinicians was significantly worse during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic than the first. Sustained occupational and psychosocial support is recommended even when immediate COVID-19 concerns and impacts resolve.

Maternity connect: Evaluation of an education program for rural midwives and nurses.

BACKGROUND: Rural and regional health services often find it difficult to maintain their maternity service and skills of their maternity workforce and enable women to give birth close to home. The Maternity Connect Program is a professional development initiative aimed at supporting and upskilling rural and regional maternity workforces to meet their maternity population care needs. AIM: To evaluate the Maternity Connect Program from the perspectives and experiences of participating midwives/nurses and health services. METHODS: A retrospective audit of data routinely collected as part of the Maternity Connect Program: initial needs assessments (baseline survey), and one month and six months post-placement surveys completed by participants, placement health services and base health services. The main outcome measures were: participants' (midwives and health services) level of satisfaction with the Program; and changes in midwives'/nurses' perceived level of confidence in performing key midwifery skills after participating in the program. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 97 midwives/nurses; n = 23 base health services; n = 4 placement health services) were satisfied with the program and there was an increase in midwives/nurses' confidence when providing specific aspects of maternity care (birthing, neonatal and postnatal). Midwives/nurses report transferring skills learnt back to their base health service. CONCLUSION: The Maternity Connect Program appears to be a successful educational model for maintaining and increasing clinician confidence in rural and regional areas.