Development and initial validation of a disease-specific instrument to measure health-related quality of life in hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

Rationale and objective: Disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments enable us to capture domains that are most relevant to specific patient populations and are useful when a more individualised approach to patient assessment is desired. In this study, we assessed the validity and reliability of the first instrument specifically developed to measure HRQOL in hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Methods: A 39-item HP-HRQOL instrument and several anchors were collected from a cohort of patients with HP. Exploratory factor analysis and item reduction were utilised to construct a shortened version of the instrument. Several validity and reliability analyses were conducted on this version of the HP-HRQOL. Measurements and main results: 59 patients with HP completed the study. The revised HP-HRQOL instrument comprises 15 items composing two factors (domains): 1) impacts on daily life; and 2) mental wellbeing. Internal consistency reliability was strong for Factor 1 (Cronbach's α=0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96) and Factor 2 (Cronbach's α=0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.94). Test-retest reliability was strong (ICC 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.97). The HP-HRQOL strongly correlated with other validated patient-reported outcome measures and moderately correlated with % predicted forced vital capacity. The HP-HRQOL distinguished between those with different severities of HP as determined by lung function and supplemental oxygen use. Conclusions: The HP-HRQOL, the first patient-reported outcome instrument specific to adults with HP, possesses strong validity and reliability characteristics for measuring disease-specific HRQOL and distinguishes among patients with different severities of disease.

Interstitial Lung Disease Patients' Global Impressions of Symptoms, Severity Ratings, and Meaningfulness of Changes Over Time.

RATIONALE: In interstitial lung disease (ILD), symptoms drive impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) can assess whether interventions change symptom severity. The meaningfulness of change in a PRO's score is estimated by anchoring it to a related variable for which meaningful change has been previously established. Patient global impressions of severity (PGIS) are single item PROs that may make trustworthy anchors, but for ILD, the meaningfulness of change in PGIS items for shortness of breath, cough, and fatigue/low energy are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To improve understanding of how patients with ILD rate and categorize symptoms; how differing levels of symptom severity affect lived experiences; and how patients derive and apply meaningfulness to change in symptoms. METHODS: We used one-on-one interviews and an electronic survey to collect data from patients with various forms of ILD. Interviews were conducted to provide richness and context to survey responses. We conducted certain analyses with respondents stratified by oxygen use. RESULTS: Interviewees (N=18) confirmed shortness of breath (SOB), cough and fatigue/low energy are the most bothersome symptoms of ILD. Among 298 survey respondents, on a PGIS for SOB with a 0 to 4 numeric rating scale, on average, those who used O2 had more severe SOB than non-users, and most respondents considered a 2-point change meaningful for worsening (45.5%) or improvement (47.2%). On a PGIS with a 5-option ordinal response scale, for SOB, most considered a 1-category change meaningful for worsening (49.8%) and a 2-category change meaningful for improvement (42.3); for cough frequency, most respondents considered a 1-category change on the 5-option ordinal response scale meaningful for worsening (48.2%) or improvement (45.0%). Survey responses for how SOB is now compared to 3 months ago (patient global impressions of change or PGIC) were biased toward the present state. CONCLUSIONS: PGIS's can be used as anchors for meaningful change analyses of PRO's that assess SOB or cough in patients with ILD. PGIC's demonstrate present state bias and should not be used. Patients' descriptions paint a vivid picture of lived experience with varying levels of symptom severity and can help contextualize change scores.

Integrating the assessment of quality of life in care and research in pulmonary fibrosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) negatively influences health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Patients living with PF have voiced the desire for a focus on symptoms and HRQOL in both disease monitoring and treatment decisions. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently available disease modifying treatments do little to impact HRQOL. Newer studies evaluating pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies targeting symptoms and HRQOL in PF have been conducted with some promising results. There is increasing recognition of the importance of incorporating HRQOL as a higher tier endpoint in clinical trials. Disease-specific measure of HRQOL have been developed for those living with PF, and there is ongoing work to better understand the validity and reliability characteristics of these tools. In addition to research, there is recognition of the potential benefits of measuring HRQOL and symptoms in clinical practice in facilitate integrating patient perspective into care and allow for more personalized treatment approaches. SUMMARY: There is increased momentum to discover treatments that impact HRQOL in PF. More work is desperately needed to identify better treatment targets, and to incorporate HRQOL and symptoms as higher tier endpoints in clinical trials. Further work is also needed to address the practicalities of integrating HRQOL measurement into clinical care.

A first look at the reliability, validity and responsiveness of L-PF-35 dyspnea domain scores in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea impairs quality of life (QOL) in patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP). The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF) assesses symptoms, their impacts and PF-related QOL in patients with any form of PF. Its scores have not undergone validation analyses in an FHP cohort. METHODS: We used data from the Pirfenidone in FHP trial to examine reliability, validity and responsiveness of the L-PF-35 Dyspnea domain score (Dyspnea) and to estimate its meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) threshold for worsening. Lack of suitable anchors precluded conducting analyses for other L-PF-35 scores. RESULTS: At baseline, Dyspnea's internal consistency (Cronbach's coefficient alpha) was 0.85; there were significant correlations with all four anchors (University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire scores r = 0.81, St. George's Activity domain score r = 0.82, percent predicted forced vital capacity r = 0.37, and percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide r = 0.37). Dyspnea was significantly different between anchor subgroups (e.g., lowest percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) vs. highest, 33.5 ± 18.5 vs. 11.1 ± 9.8, p = 0.01). There were significant correlations between changes in Dyspnea and changes in anchor scores at all trial time points. Longitudinal models further confirmed responsiveness. The MWPC threshold estimate for worsening was 6.6 points (range 5-8). CONCLUSION: The L-PF-35 Dyspnea domain appears to possess acceptable psychometric properties for assessing dyspnea in patients with FHP. Because instrument validation is never accomplished with one study, additional research is needed to build on the foundation these analyses provide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The data for the analyses presented in this manuscript were generated in a trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; the identifier was NCT02958917.

First ever characterisation of the effects of short telomeres in a Singapore interstitial lung disease cohort.

BACKGROUND: Differences in disease behaviour and genotypes are described in Asian and Western interstitial lung disease (ILD) cohorts. Short leukocyte telomere length (LTL) correlates with poor outcomes in Western ILD cohorts but its significance in Asian populations is unknown. We aim to characterise the burden and clinical implications of short LTL in Singaporean ILD patients. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ILD at Singapore General Hospital were prospectively recruited and compared against 36 healthy controls. The primary outcome was transplant-free survival. Genomic DNA from peripheral blood was extracted and LTL measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay (qPCR). RESULTS: Amongst 165 patients, 37% had short LTL. There was a higher proportion of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) patients with short LTL (n = 21, 34.4% vs n = 16, 15.4%; p < 0.001). Short LTL patients had reduced survival at 12-, 24- and 36-months and median survival of 24 months (p < 0.001) which remained significant following adjustment for smoking, GAP Stage and radiological UIP pattern (Hazard Ratio (HR), 2.74; 95%CI:1.46, 5.11; p = 0.002). They had increased respiratory-related mortality and acute exacerbation incidences. Despite similar baseline lung function, short LTL patients had a faster decline in absolute forced vital capacity (FVC) of -105.3 (95% CI: 151.4, -59.1) mL/year compared to -58.2 (95% CI: 82.9, -33.6) mL/year (p < 0.001) in normal LTL patients. CONCLUSION: Short LTL correlated with increased mortality and faster lung function decline in our Singaporean ILD cohort with a magnitude similar to that in Western ILD cohorts. Further research is needed to integrate LTL assessment into clinical practice.

Meaningful Endpoints for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Clinical Trials: Emphasis on 'Feels, Functions, Survives'. Report of a Collaborative Discussion in a Symposium with Direct Engagement from Representatives of Patients, Investigators, the National Institutes of Health, a Patient Advocacy Organization, and a Regulatory Agency.

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) carries significant mortality and unpredictable progression, with limited therapeutic options. Designing trials with patient-meaningful endpoints, enhancing the reliability and interpretability of results, and streamlining the regulatory approval process are of critical importance to advancing clinical care in IPF. Methods: A landmark in-person symposium in June 2023 assembled 43 participants from the US and internationally, including patients with IPF, investigators, and regulatory representatives, to discuss the immediate future of IPF clinical trial endpoints. Patient advocates were central to discussions, which evaluated endpoints according to regulatory standards and the FDA's 'feels, functions, survives' criteria. Results: Three themes emerged: 1) consensus on endpoints mirroring the lived experiences of patients with IPF; 2) consideration of replacing forced vital capacity (FVC) as the primary endpoint, potentially by composite endpoints that include 'feels, functions, survives' measures or FVC as components; 3) support for simplified, user-friendly patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as either components of primary composite endpoints or key secondary endpoints, supplemented by functional tests as secondary endpoints and novel biomarkers as supportive measures (FDA Guidance for Industry (Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials) available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/162416/download). Conclusions: This report, detailing the proceedings of this pivotal symposium, suggests a potential turning point in designing future IPF clinical trials more attuned to outcomes meaningful to patients, and documents the collective agreement across multidisciplinary stakeholders on the importance of anchoring IPF trial endpoints on real patient experiences-namely, how they feel, function, and survive. There is considerable optimism that clinical care in IPF will progress through trials focused on patient-centric insights, ultimately guiding transformative treatment strategies to enhance patients' quality of life and survival.

Deep Learning Classification of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Predicts Outcomes.

Rationale: Computed tomography (CT) enables noninvasive diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), but enhanced image analyses are needed to overcome the limitations of visual assessment. Objectives: Apply multiple instance learning (MIL) to develop an explainable deep learning algorithm for prediction of UIP from CT and validate its performance in independent cohorts. Methods: We trained an MIL algorithm using a pooled dataset (n = 2,143) and tested it in three independent populations: data from a prior publication (n = 127), a single-institution clinical cohort (n = 239), and a national registry of patients with pulmonary fibrosis (n = 979). We tested UIP classification performance using receiver operating characteristic analysis, with histologic UIP as ground truth. Cox proportional hazards and linear mixed-effects models were used to examine associations between MIL predictions and survival or longitudinal FVC. Measurements and Main Results: In two cohorts with biopsy data, MIL improved accuracy for histologic UIP (area under the curve, 0.77 [n = 127] and 0.79 [n = 239]) compared with visual assessment (area under the curve, 0.65 and 0.71). In cohorts with survival data, MIL-UIP classifications were significant for mortality (n = 239, mortality to April 2021: unadjusted hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96-4.91; P < 0.001; and n = 979, mortality to July 2022: unadjusted hazard ratio, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.66-4.97; P < 0.001). Individuals classified as UIP positive by the algorithm had a significantly greater annual decline in FVC than those classified as UIP negative (-88 ml/yr vs. -45 ml/yr; n = 979; P < 0.01), adjusting for extent of lung fibrosis. Conclusions: Computerized assessment using MIL identifies clinically significant features of UIP on CT. Such a method could improve confidence in radiologic assessment of patients with interstitial lung disease, potentially enabling earlier and more precise diagnosis.

Deep Learning-based Fibrosis Extent on Computed Tomography Predicts Outcome of Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease Independent of Visually Assessed Computed Tomography Pattern.

Rationale: Radiologic pattern has been shown to predict survival in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease. The additional prognostic value of fibrosis extent by quantitative computed tomography (CT) is unknown. Objectives: We hypothesized that fibrosis extent provides information beyond visually assessed CT pattern that is useful for outcome prediction. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of chest CT, demographics, longitudinal pulmonary function, and transplantation-free survival among participants in the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. CT pattern was classified visually according to the 2018 usual interstitial pneumonia criteria. Extent of fibrosis was objectively quantified using data-driven textural analysis. We used Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards and linear mixed-effects models to evaluate the relationships between CT-derived metrics and outcomes. Results: Visual assessment and quantitative analysis were performed on 979 enrollment CT scans. Linear mixed-effect modeling showed that greater baseline fibrosis extent was significantly associated with the annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity. In multivariable models that included CT pattern and fibrosis extent, quantitative fibrosis extent was strongly associated with transplantation-free survival independent of CT pattern (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.05; P < 0.001; C statistic = 0.73). Conclusions: The extent of lung fibrosis by quantitative CT is a strong predictor of physiologic progression and survival, independent of visually assessed CT pattern.

Effects of nintedanib on symptoms in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnoea and cough can have a profound impact on the lives of patients with pulmonary fibrosis. We investigated the effects of nintedanib on the symptoms and impact of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) in the INBUILD trial using the Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire. METHODS: Patients had a fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) (other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) of >10% extent on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and met criteria for ILD progression within the prior 24 months. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive nintedanib or placebo. Changes in L-PF questionnaire scores from baseline to week 52 were assessed using mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: In total, 663 patients were treated. Compared with placebo, there were significantly smaller increases (worsenings) in adjusted mean L-PF questionnaire total (0.5 versus 5.1), symptoms (1.3 versus 5.3), dyspnoea (4.3 versus 7.8) and fatigue (0.7 versus 4.0) scores in the nintedanib group at week 52. L-PF questionnaire cough score decreased in the nintedanib group and increased in the placebo group (-1.8 versus 4.3). L-PF questionnaire impacts score decreased slightly in the nintedanib group and increased in the placebo group (-0.2 versus 4.6). Similar findings were observed in patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT and in patients with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT. CONCLUSION: Based on changes in L-PF questionnaire scores, nintedanib reduced worsening of dyspnoea, fatigue and cough and the impacts of ILD over 52 weeks in patients with PPF.

Reliability and responsiveness of the D12 and validity of its scores as a measure of dyspnoea severity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) affects a substantial minority of patients with RA, inducing life-altering symptoms, impairing quality of life (QOL) and forcing patients to confront the potential for shortened survival. Dyspnoea is the predominant respiratory symptom of RA-ILD and a strong driver of QOL impairment in patients with it. The D12 is a 12-item questionnaire that assesses the physical and affective components of dyspnoea. It was one of a battery of patient-reported outcomes used in the double-blind, placebo-controlled TRAIL 1 trial of pirfenidone for RA-ILD. There is little information on the reliability, validity or responsiveness of the D12 in RA-ILD. METHODS: In accordance with COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) methodology, we conducted analyses on data from the TRAIL 1 trial to assess the measurement properties of the D12. RESULTS: Internal consistency (α=0.95, 0.95, 0.95, 0.95 and 0.96 at baseline, 13, 26, 39 and 52 weeks) and test-retest reliability 0.85 (0.71 to 0.92) exceeded acceptability criteria. Well over the 75% benchmark of hypotheses (43/46=93%) around D12 measurement properties were confirmed. Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences between subgroups of patients with differing levels of dyspnoea (eg, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Activity score ≥50 vs <50, 9.36 (1.27) points, p<0.0001, with a large effect size=1.7) and physiological impairment at baseline. Longitudinal validity was supported by significant associations between D12 and anchor scores over time (eg, at 52 weeks, correlation between D12 change and SGRQ Activity change was 0.54, p<0.0001; between D12 change and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) Functioning Component was 0.41, p<0.0001). A battery of analyses confirmed the responsiveness of D12 scores for capturing change in dyspnoea over time. We estimated the minimal within-patient change threshold for worsening as 3 points. CONCLUSIONS: D12 scores possess acceptable measurement properties in RA-ILD, such that it can be used with confidence in this population to assess dyspnoea severity defined by its physical and affective components. As validation is an ongoing process, and never accomplished in a single study, additional research on the psychometric properties of the D12 in RA-ILD is encouraged.

Is it time to include oxygen needs as an endpoint in clinical trials in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease? If so, how?

Many patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (fILD) will need to use supplemental oxygen (O2) to maintain normoxia at some point in their illness. If it is not needed at the time of diagnosis, then if fILD progresses-or if a comorbid condition like pulmonary hypertension develops-O2 will become necessary, often, initially, during exertion and all-too-often, eventually, at rest as well. But presumably, if all else remains stable, if fILD progression is halted or slowed, O2 needs follow in parallel. Despite perceived or unnoticed benefits of O2, and prescribers' good intentions to improve patients' sense of well-being, patients with fILD generally view O2 with frustration and fear, as it threatens their already-impaired quality of life. Because of how meaningful and impactful O2 is to the lives of patients with fILD, 'O2 need' is a critically important-and perhaps the most-patient-centred metric that should be considered for incorporation as an endpoint in therapeutic trials. It is unclear how this should be done, but in this paper, we offer some possible approaches that merit consideration.

Digital outcome measures in pulmonary clinical trials.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We highlight recent advances in the development and use of digital outcome measures in clinical trials, focusing on how to select the appropriate technology, use digital data to define trial endpoints, and glean important lessons from current experiences with digital outcome measures in pulmonary medicine. RECENT FINDINGS: A review of emerging literature demonstrates that the use of digital health technologies, particularly pulse oximeters, remote spirometers, accelerometers, and Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes, has surged in both pulmonary practice and clinical trials. Lessons learned from their use can help researchers to design the next generation of clinical trials leveraging digital outcomes to improve health. SUMMARY: In pulmonary diseases, digital health technologies provide validated, reliable, and usable data on patients in real-world environments. More broadly, digital endpoints have accelerated innovation in clinical trial design, improved clinical trial efficiency, and centered patients. As investigators adopt digital health technologies, it is important to follow a framework informed by both the opportunities and challenges of digitization. Successful use of digital health technologies will transform clinical trials by improving accessibility, efficiency, patient-centricity, and expanding opportunities for personalized medicine.

Pirfenidone in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a double-blind, randomised clinical trial of efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) is an irreversible lung disease with high morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate the safety and effect of pirfenidone on disease progression in such patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in adults with FHP and disease progression. Patients were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either oral pirfenidone (2403 mg/day) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the mean absolute change in the per cent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS, time to a relative decline ≥10% in FVC and/or diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), acute respiratory exacerbation, a decrease of ≥50 m in the 6 min walk distance, increase or introduction of immunosuppressive drugs or death), change in FVC slope and mean DLCO%, hospitalisations, radiological progression of lung fibrosis and safety. RESULTS: After randomising 40 patients, enrolment was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no significant between-group difference in FVC% at week 52 (mean difference -0.76%, 95% CI -6.34 to 4.82). Pirfenidone resulted in a lower rate of decline in the adjusted FVC% at week 26 and improved PFS (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.60). Results for other secondary end points showed no significant difference between groups. No deaths occurred in the pirfenidone group and one death (respiratory) occurred in the placebo group. There were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The trial was underpowered to detect a difference in the primary end point. Pirfenidone was found to be safe and improved PFS in patients with FHP. TRIAL REGISTRATION MUMBER: NCT02958917.

Validity and Reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in a Real-World Interstitial Lung Disease Cohort.

Rationale: Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom for people living with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Studies on fatigue in ILD are limited, and little headway has been made toward developing interventions targeting the alleviation of fatigue. A barrier to progress is a lack of knowledge around the performance characteristics of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess fatigue in patients with ILD. Objectives: To assess the validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) for measuring fatigue in a national cohort of patients with ILD. Methods: FSS scores and several anchors were measured in 1,881 patients from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Anchors included the Short Form 6D Health Utility Index (SF-6D) score and a single vitality question from the SF-6D; the University of California, San Diego, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire; FVC; DlCO; and 6-minute-walk distance. Internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, and known-groups validity were assessed. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Measurements and Main Results: The FSS demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96). There were moderate to strong correlations between FSS score and patient-reported anchors (vitality question from the SF-6D [r = 0.55] and University of California, San Diego, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire total score [r = 0.70]) and weak correlations between FSS score and physiological measures (FVC [r = -0.24], percentage predicted DlCO [r = -0.23], and 6-minute-walk distance [r = -0.29]). Higher mean FSS scores, indicating greater fatigue, were observed among patients using supplemental oxygen, those prescribed steroids, and those with lower percentage predicted FVC and percentage predicted DlCO. The confirmatory factor analysis results suggest that the nine questions of the FSS reflect one dimension of fatigue. Conclusions: Fatigue is an important patient-centered outcome in ILD that is poorly correlated with physiological measures of disease severity, including lung function and walk distance. These findings further support the need for a reliable and valid measure of patient-reported fatigue in ILD. The FSS possesses acceptable performance characteristics for assessing fatigue and distinguishing different degrees of fatigue among patients with ILD.

Serum antibodies to peptidylarginine deiminase-4 in rheumatoid arthritis associated-interstitial lung disease are associated with decreased lung fibrosis and improved survival.

OBJECTIVE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a leading cause of mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly in those with the usual interstitial pneumonia subtype (RA-UIP). Serum antibodies to peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4), particularly a subset that cross-react with PAD3 (PAD3/4XR), have been associated with imaging evidence of ILD. We aimed to determine the specificity of anti-PAD4 antibodies in RA-ILD and to examine associations with markers of ILD severity. METHODS: 48 RA-ILD and 31 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients were identified from the National Jewish Health Biobank. RA-ILD subtype was defined by imaging pattern on high-resolution chest computed tomography (CT), and serum was tested for anti-PAD4 and anti-PAD3/4XR antibodies. Antibody prevalence, measures of ILD severity (% predicted forced vital capacity, FVC; % predicted diffusion capacity carbon monoxide, DLCO; quantitative CT fibrosis) and mortality were compared between groups. RESULTS: Anti-PAD4 antibodies were present in 9/48 (19%) subjects with RA-ILD and no subjects with IPF. Within RA-ILD, anti-PAD4 antibodies were found almost exclusively in RA-UIP (89%). Within RA-UIP subjects, % predicted FVC was higher in anti-PAD4+ subjects, and this finding was most strongly associated with anti-PAD3/4XR antibodies. In addition, quantitative CT fibrosis score was lower in anti-PAD4+ RA-UIP subjects, including those with mono-reactive anti-PAD4 antibodies and anti-PAD3/4XR antibodies. Anti-PAD4+ RA-UIP subjects also exhibited decreased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the presence of serum anti-PAD4 antibodies in a subset of patients with RA-UIP that were notably associated with better lung function, less fibrosis and decreased mortality.

Safety and Efficacy of Combined Resveratrol and Sirolimus in Lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

BACKGROUND: A critical need exists to develop remission-inducing therapies for lymphangioleiomyomatosis. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the addition of resveratrol safe and more efficacious than sirolimus alone in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a phase 2, dose-escalating, open-label trial of resveratrol in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis receiving a stable regimen of sirolimus. Resveratrol was started at 250 mg/d and escalated every 8 weeks to maximum dose of 1,000 mg/d over 24 weeks. The primary outcome was ≥ 42% decline in serum vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) levels on combined therapy compared with baseline VEGF-D levels on sirolimus. Secondary objectives included an assessment of the safety profile and the effect on lung function and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Longitudinal change in outcome measures was assessed using linear mixed models. Adverse effects were tabulated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis with a median age of 51 years were enrolled. Pulmonary function parameters at study inclusion were: FEV1: median absolute, 1.72 L; 64% predicted; FVC: median absolute, 2.99 L; 96% predicted; and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide: median absolute, 14.68 mL/mm Hg/min; 37% predicted. The median serum VEGF-D value at baseline was 617 pg/mL. Patients entered the study with a median sirolimus dose of 2 mg/d with median trough level of 6.3 ng/mL. Despite some GI side effects, the addition of resveratrol was well tolerated. Although the primary outcome was not met, a statistically significant reduction in serum VEGF-D levels and improvement in HRQOL during the study was found. INTERPRETATION: The addition of resveratrol was safe and well tolerated in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis taking sirolimus and was associated with modest improvement in HRQOL. Larger controlled trials of this combination might be warranted to assess definitively the usefulness of resveratrol as an additive therapy in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03253913; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Responsiveness and meaningful change thresholds of the Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire Dyspnoea and Cough scores in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases.

BACKGROUND: The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire assesses symptoms and quality of life in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Its Dyspnoea and Cough domains, whose items' responses are based on a 24-hour recall, have scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. We evaluated the ability of these domain scores to detect change and estimated their meaningful change thresholds in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs. METHODS: The INBUILD trial enrolled subjects with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The L-PF questionnaire was completed at baseline and week 52. The responsiveness of the Dyspnoea and Cough scores was evaluated by comparing changes in these scores with 52-week changes in three anchors: forced vital capacity % predicted and two self-reported items, one for global physical health and one for global quality of life. We used a triangulation approach including anchor-based and distribution-based methods to estimate meaningful change thresholds. RESULTS: The analyses included 542 subjects with an L-PF Dyspnoea score at baseline and week 52, and 538 subjects with an L-PF Cough score at baseline and week 52. The L-PF Dyspnoea and Cough scores were responsive to change over 52 weeks. Triangulation of anchor-based and distribution-based estimates resulted in meaningful change thresholds of 6 to 7 points for the L-PF Dyspnoea score and 4 to 5 points for the L-PF Cough score to differentiate subjects who were stable or improved from those who deteriorated. CONCLUSION: These analyses support the responsiveness, one aspect of validity, of the L-PF Dyspnoea and Cough domains scores as measures of symptom severity in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs. Estimates for meaningful change thresholds in these domain scores may be of value in interpreting the effects of interventions in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02999178.

Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the DEG, a Three-Item Dyspnea Measure.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a common and debilitating symptom that affects many different patient populations. Dyspnea measures should assess multiple domains. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of an ultra-brief, multi-dimensional dyspnea measure. DESIGN: We adapted the DEG from the PEG, a valid 3-item pain measure, to assess average dyspnea intensity (D), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and dyspnea burden with general activity (G). PARTICIPANTS: We used data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial among outpatients with heart failure. MAIN MEASURES: We evaluated reliability (Cronbach's alpha), concurrent validity with the Memorial-Symptom-Assessment-Scale (MSAS) shortness-of-breath distress-orbothersome item and 7-item Generalized-Anxiety-Disorder (GAD-7) scale, knowngroups validity with New-York-Heart-Association-Functional-Classification (NYHA) 1-2 or 3-4 and presence or absence of comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), responsiveness with the MSAS item as an anchor, and calculated a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using distribution methods. KEY RESULTS: Among 312 participants, the DEG was reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.92). The mean (standard deviation) DEG score was 5.26 (2.36) (range 0-10) points. DEG scores correlated strongly with the MSAS shortness of breath distress-or-bothersome item (r=0.66) and moderately with GAD-7 categories (ρ=0.36). DEG scores were statistically significantly lower among patients with NYHA 1-2 compared to 3-4 [mean difference (standard error): 1.22 (0.27) points, p<0.01], and those without compared to with comorbid COPD [0.87 (0.27) points, p<0.01]. The DEG was highly sensitive to change, with MCID of 0.59-1.34 points, or 11-25% change. CONCLUSIONS: The novel, ultra-brief DEG measure is reliable, valid, and highly responsive. Future studies should evaluate the DEG's sensitivity to interventions, use anchor-based methods to triangulate MCID estimates, and determine its prognostic usefulness among patients with chronic cardiopulmonary and other diseases.

A Phase-2 Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial of INOpulse in Patients with Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Requiring Oxygen.

Rationale: Patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease often progress to the point of requiring supplemental oxygen. This is invariably accompanied by an impaired quality of life and limitations on activities of daily living. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the improvement in physical activity in patients with interstitial lung disease requiring supplemental oxygen treated with pulsed inhaled nitric oxide via INOpulse (Bellerophon Therapeutics). In addition, it sought to explore the safety and clinical benefits of INOpulse on multiple patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Ambulatory patients with fibrotic lung disease on supplemental oxygen were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to inhaled nitric oxide at 45 µg/kg ideal body weight/h (iNO45) or placebo for 4 months (3 months after baseline) of blinded treatment. The study assessed multiple exploratory efficacy endpoints, including moderate to vigorous physical activity as measured by actigraphy and patient-reported outcomes using the University of California San Diego shortness of breath questionnaire and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Results: A total of 44 patients (30 iNO45 and 14 placebo) were enrolled. A placebo-corrected clinical benefit of 12.3 min/d increase in MVPA was observed in the iNO45 group. Clinically meaningful beneficial trends were observed for the University of California San Diego shortness of breath questionnaire (6.05 points) and the SGRQ total (3.75) scores, as well as the SGRQ activity (5.84), and SGRQ impact (6.30) domains. Conclusions: INOpulse was well tolerated and associated with maintenance of physical activity and improved symptomatology in patients with interstitial lung disease who require supplemental oxygen. Further validation of this beneficial effect warrants further study in a phase-3 trial that is currently underway.