Challenging authority during a life-threatening crisis: the effect of operating theatre hierarchy.

BACKGROUND: Effective operating theatre (OT) communication is important for team function and patient safety. Status asymmetry between team members may contribute to communication breakdown and threaten patient safety. We investigated how hierarchy in the OT team influences an anaesthesia trainee's ability to challenge an unethical decision by a consultant anaesthetist in a simulated crisis scenario. METHODS: We prospectively randomized 49 postgraduate year (PGY) 2-5 anaesthesia trainees at two academic hospitals to participate in a videotaped simulated crisis scenario with a simulated OT team practicing either a hierarchical team structure (Group H) or a non-hierarchical team structure (Group NH). The scenario allowed trainees several opportunities to challenge their consultant anaesthetist when administering blood to a Jehovah's Witness. Three independent, blinded raters scored the performances using a modified advocacy-inquiry score (AIS). The primary outcome was the comparison of the best-response AIS between Groups H vs NH. Secondary outcomes included the comparison of best AIS by PGY and the percentage in each group that checked and administered blood. RESULTS: The AIS did not differ between the groups (P=0.832) but significantly improved from PGY2 to PGY5 (P=0.026). The rates of checking blood (92% vs 76%, P=0.082) and administering blood (62% vs 57%, P=0.721) were high in both groups but not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show a significant effect of OT team hierarchical structure on trainee's ability to challenge authority; however, the results are concerning. The challenges were suboptimal in quality and there was an alarming high rate of blood checking and administration in both groups. This may reflect lack of training in appropriately and effectively challenging authority within the formal curriculum with implications for patient safety.

Predictive value of lymphocytic infiltration and character of invasive margin following total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for the high-risk carcinoma of the rectum.

PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors, especially histological parameters of new Jass classification, following sphincter-sparing total mesorectal excision (TME) for high-risk rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients treated with curative intent in 1998-1999 due to rectal cancer in Dukes stage B and C were studied prospectively. All of them underwent anterior resection with TME technique. Prognostic value was evaluated by the impact on five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) in uni- and multivariate analysis. Only factors significant in univariate analysis entered the multivariate regression model. P value <0.05 was stated as a significance limit. RESULTS: Regarding traditional clinico-pathological factors patient age, tumor site, differentiation grade, mucinous histology and the extent of direct tumor penetration did not significantly affect survival rates. Only the lymph nodes status was associated with prognosis with statistical importance (negative vs positive, RFS: 53.8 +/- 10.0% vs 26.3 +/- 10.4%, respectively). Considering the additional parameters of Jass classification the character of invasive margin of the tumor did not reveal the important predictive value although the lymphocytic tumor infiltration was significantly related to patient outcome (presence vs absence, RFS: 63.6 +/- 15.2% vs 37.5 +/- 8.7%, respectively). In multivariate analysis the only one statistically important and independent predictive parameter was the lymph nodes status. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph nodes metastases remain the most important prognostic factor after anterior resection with TME for Dukes B and C rectal cancer. From variables included into Jass classification the absence of lymphocytic infiltration of the tumor can be helpful to identify patients with enhanced risk of oncological relapse.