Trends in the use of ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacements in Australia over the past 20 years.

BACKGROUND: End stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) is debilitating. Surgical management consists of either ankle arthrodesis (AA) or a total ankle replacement (TAR). The purpose of this study is to assess the trends in operative intervention for end stage ankle OA in an Australian population. METHODS: This is a retrospective epidemiological study of 15,046 surgeries. Data were collected from publicly available national registries including the Australian Medicare Database and Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registrar from 2001 to 2020. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in all ankle surgeries performed across the period of interest. AA remained the more commonly performed procedure throughout the course of the study (11,946 cases, 79.4%) and was never surpassed by TAR (3100, 20.6%). The overall proportions demonstrated no significant changes from 2001 to 2020. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ankle surgeries continues to increase with the ageing and increasingly comorbid population of Australia. Despite demonstrating no significant overall change in the ratio of TAR and AA in our study population and period, there are noticeable trends within the timeframe, with a recent surge favouring TAR in the last 5 years.

Rate of Infection and Causative Organisms in a Lateral Approach Total Ankle Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Although the rate of both superficial and deep infection in total ankle replacement (TAR) can reach up to 13% as reported in the literature, there is little information on the causative organisms, especially in laterally implanted prosthesis. This study aims to identify organisms causing infections to ultimately guide to better antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS: Between September 2016 and April 2021, we retrospectively reviewed patients who had an infection after a lateral TAR. Cause of the infection, causative organisms, and implant survival were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 130 patients, 10 of 130 patients (7.6%) had a superficial infection whereas 3 of 130 patients (2.3%) had a deep infection. Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas species were found to be the most common. No significant difference was found between the type of plate used for fibula fixation regarding wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Infection after lateral TAR is generally polymicrobial in nature with Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas species being the most common. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case Series.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Hand Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a dramatic impact on individual and societal behaviors, as well as on health care systems. It confers a unique opportunity to examine the relationship among disease, policies, and patterns of activity, as well as their impacts on surgical unit functionality. This study aims to compare the distribution and patterns of injury at a tertiary hand surgery trauma center before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients presenting to the Royal North Shore Hospital hand surgery service in the 5-week period from March 16 to April 21 in 2019 and 2020 was undertaken, forming 2 cohorts for comparison. Demographic, injury, and operative data were collected and compared descriptively using comparative statistics. RESULTS: There were 114 primary operative presentations during the 5-week period in 2020, representing a 27.4% decrease from the 157 presentations during the equivalent period in 2019. There was an increase in the proportion of emergency presentations from 73.9% in 2019 to 85.1% in 2020 (P = .03), with a corresponding decrease in elective presentations during 2020. The incidence of sporting injuries and motor vehicle accidents decreased in 2020, whereas falls and accidents involving knives and tools remained relatively constant. Operating times decreased in 2020, whereas the length of hospital stay remained constant. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and consequent restrictions of activity have had substantial impacts on the patterns of hand trauma and its management. These insights have implications for staff and resource management during times of social disruption in the future.

Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Results: CROSSBAT (Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery vs No Surgery for Type B Ankle Fracture Treatment).

BACKGROUND: Isolated Weber B, AO (Association for the Study of Internal Fixation) type 44B ankle fractures with no fracture to the medial side are the most common type of ankle fracture and may be treated with internal fixation or without surgery.This study aimed to determine if surgery is superior to nonsurgical management for the treatment of these fractures after a minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Design: A pragmatic, multicenter, single-masked, randomized controlled trial with minimum 5-year follow-up. Setting/participants/interventions: Participants between 18 and 65 years with AO type 44B ankle fracture and minimal talar shift were recruited from 22 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Participants willing to be randomized were randomly allocated to undergo surgical fixation followed by mobilization in a walking boot for 6 weeks. Those treated nonsurgically were managed in a walking boot for 6 weeks. Outcome assessors were masked for the treatment allocation. Primary outcomes: Patient-reported ankle function using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire (FAOQ) and the physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-12v2 General Health Survey at 12 months postinjury and at minimum 5 years post injury. Primary analysis was intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Of the 160 (80 surgical, 80 nonoperative) randomized patients included in the CROSSBAT analysis, 77 (40 surgical, 37 nonoperative) were followed up for repeat analysis at minimum 5-year follow-up (mean 7.3 years, range 5.1-8.9). This cohort demonstrated that surgery was not associated with clinically or statistically significant differences compared to nonoperative management for the FAOQ (51.7 vs 49.6; mean difference 2.1, 95% CI -2.1 to 6.2, P = .95), or the PCS (51.5 vs 49.1; mean difference 2.3, 95% CI -2.0 to 6.7, P = .54). The surgical cohort had a higher rate of any adverse events (odds ratio 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-11.6, P = .04). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that surgical management is not superior to nonsurgical management in type B ankle (fibula) fractures with minimal talar shift over a 5-year period and is associated with increased adverse events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, randomized clinical trial.

Temporal trends in the management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in the 21st century: an analysis of Australian population-based data.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the hand, specifically the metacarpals and phalanges, are a common injury. Whilst many of these fractures can be treated non-operatively, a number of advances have led to the increase in popularity of surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to assess and describe trends in management of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures in Australia over the last two decades. METHODS: A review was conducted of the Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS), specifically querying the item numbers pertaining to the management of metacarpal and phalanx fractures. Data was recorded as the incidence per 100 000 patients. RESULTS: Overall, there was a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of closed reduction of metacarpal and phalanx fractures, with a converse statistically significant increase in open reduction internal fixation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that over the last 20 years, there has been a decrease in closed reduction of intra- and extra-articular phalangeal and metacarpal fractures, with a converse but smaller increase in open reduction and fixation. These trends are likely multi-factorial in aetiology, and should be monitored to guide resource allocation and health provision in the future.

The Impact of Concomitant Ipsilateral Knee Pain on Functional Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

In end-stage ankle arthritis, little is known about the impact of concomitant knee pathology, including the impact of ipsilateral knee pain on total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of ipsilateral preoperative knee pain in patients undergoing TAA and analyze its impact on patient-reported functional outcome measures (PROMs). A retrospective review was performed on the Vancouver End Stage Ankle Arthritis Database at a single institution. In total, 114 patients were studied, with patient demographics collected preoperatively, including the presence or absence of knee pain. Postoperative follow-up was performed at 5 years, primarily analyzing disease-specific PROMs, including the Ankle Osteoarthritis Score (AOS) and Ankle Arthritis Score (AAS). Multivariate mixed-effects linear regression models compared the scores between the groups. In total, 31 patients (27.2%) presented with concomitant ipsilateral knee pain. Despite more females in the knee pain group (64.5% vs 36.1%) there were no other significant differences at baseline between the knee pain and no knee pain groups in terms of demographics or baseline primary disease specific PROMs. At 5 years, the patients with knee pain had significantly worse AAS (37.9 ± 23.8 vs 21.2 ± 16.3, P = .004) and AOS total scores (38.1 ± 24.1 vs 21.9 ± 15.5, P = .005) compared with the no-knee pain group. Both groups improved significantly from baseline across all outcome measures; however, the magnitude of improvement was less in the knee pain group. Our study demonstrated that over one-quarter of patients with end-stage ankle arthritis undergoing TAA present with ipsilateral concomitant knee pain. If present, it is associated with worse functional outcomes at the 5-year mark. Further studies are needed to evaluate if knee pain influences complications, implant failure rates, and survival.Levels of Evidence: Level III.

The impact of COVID-19 on spinal cord injuries and trauma at a tertiary referral centre in Sydney.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has yielded far-reaching consequences for individual health systems as well as society. Although several studies have investigated epidemiological trends due to the pandemic-associated restrictions in patients requiring surgery for general surgical, trauma and orthopaedic aetiologies, there has been no assessment of the impact on spinal trauma and surgery in Australia. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine these changes at an Australian level one tertiary referral spinal cord injury (SCI) centre. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to this institution with spinal injuries requiring surgery, from two time periods [one prior to the pandemic, and one during]. We analysed demographics, injury mechanism and characteristics, and surgical factors to identify significant differences between the cohorts. Results: There were 7.3% fewer spinal operations performed in the COVID-19 affected period. Although patient demographics were unchanged, the total number of emergency operations performed for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident decreased by 44% compared to the pre-COVID cohort (P=0.049). The median number of spinal levels affected by injury decreased, and there was a 30% decrease in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) type A injuries during the pandemic (P=0.006), with a corresponding increase in ASIA B injuries (P=0.032). Conclusions: The pandemic (and its associated social restrictions) has influenced the patterns of spinal injuries treated at this tertiary level institute during this time. We observed an overall reduction in the volume of emergency procedures performed during the pandemic. There was no change in the proportion of spinal cord injuries when compared to the pre-pandemic period; however, the severity of spinal cord injuries was diminished during the pandemic.

Impact of COVID-19-related social restrictions on orthopaedic trauma in a level 1 trauma centre in Sydney: the first wave.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected communities worldwide. This study examines the impact that public health measures to control viral spread have had on orthopaedic trauma presenting to an Australian level 1 trauma centre. We hypothesized that the volume of orthopaedic trauma in the period of social distancing would decrease, and the mechanisms of injury differ, compared to pre-pandemic times. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients requiring emergency orthopaedic surgery between 16 March and 21 April 2020 (the period after social distancing and lockdown commenced), and compared it to the group of patients from the same period in 2019. We collected demographic data, as well as injury type, anatomical location, mechanism of injury and surgical logistics. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 period, total emergency operations performed decreased by 15.6% compared to the same period in 2019. Orthopaedic admissions decreased by 30.8%. Demographics of the groups were unchanged. Anaesthetic time decreased, but total time spent in the operating theatre was unchanged. Road trauma comprised a similar proportion of cases overall; however, cycling-related accidents increased significantly, making up 11% of presentations during COVID-19. Sporting injuries, work-related injuries and multi-traumas reduced during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The impact of COVID-19-related lockdown measures and social distancing on orthopaedic trauma in Australia has been an overall decrease in volume of cases, combined with significant changes in the mechanisms of injury necessitating surgery.

Management of lower limb fractures in patients with spinal cord injuries.

BACKGROUND: Low-energy fractures of the lower limb in patients post spinal cord injury (SCI) present significant management challenges. This is the first Australian study to review the experience from a tertiary referral SCI centre and aims to identify trends and suggest therapeutic options. METHODS: Retrospective review over a 5-year period in patients with SCI treated for a lower limb fragility fracture. Patient demographics, spinal injury severity scores, fracture characteristics and treatment were assessed. Time to union, length of stay and treatment-related complications were also examined. RESULTS: A total of 38 SCI patients with 42 lower extremity fractures met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 55.7 years and mean duration post-SCI at fracture was 22.5 ± 12.7 years. The femur (73.8%) was more commonly fractured than the lower leg (26.2%), with extra-articular distal femoral fractures most prevalent (35.7%). A total of 25 (60%) fractures were managed operatively, and 17 (40%) non-operatively. The majority of femoral fractures were managed with intramedullary nailing. Tibial fractures were more commonly managed non-operatively. Eight cases (19.1%) experienced complications, with a significant difference between frequency of complications in non-operative (35.3%) and operative (8.0%) groups; P = 0.045. All fractures united except one; time to union was shorter in patients treated surgically (13.6 ± 6.4 weeks) compared to those managed non-operatively (19.1 ± 8.1 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Lower limb fragility fractures in patients with SCI can be managed successfully via either operative or non-operative measures. In this series, fewer complications and shorter time to union were found in patients managed operatively.