Large-scale mortality gap between SLE and control population is associated with increased infection-related mortality in lupus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to analyse the incidence, prevalence, mortality and cause of death data of adult SLE patients and matched controls in a full-populational, nationwide, retrospective study. METHODS: This non-interventional study was based on database research of the National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary. A total of 7888 patients were included in the analyses, within which two subgroups of incident patients were created: the 'All incident SLE patients' group consisted of all incident SLE patients (4503 patients), while the 'Treated SLE patients' group contained those who received relevant therapy in the first 6 months after diagnosis (2582 patients). RESULTS: The median age of the SLE population was found to be 46.5 years (women 85%). The incidence rate was 4.86 and 2.78 per 100 000 inhabitants in the 'All incident SLE patients' and 'Treated SLE patients' groups, respectively. The standardized mortality ratio was 1.63 and 2.09 in the 'All incident SLE patients' and 'Treated SLE patients' groups, respectively. Overall survival was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in both groups than in the general population, with hazard ratio = 2.17 in the 'All incident SLE patients' group and hazard ratio = 2.75 in the 'Treated SLE patients' group. There was no significant difference between SLE and control deaths regarding cerebrovascular conditions as the cause of death. Generally, cancer-related deaths were less common, while haematological cancer and infection-related deaths were more common in SLE patients. CONCLUSION: Infections, especially sepsis, had the largest positive effect on top of the extra mortality of SLE. This highlights that SLE patients are at increased risk of infection-related death.

Failure of anti-TNF treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: The pros and cons of the early use of alternative biological agents.

The five TNF inhibitors currently approved for the treatment of RA are characterised by differences in their molecular structures, half-lives, administration routes, dosing intervals, immunogenicity, and use in women who wish to become pregnant. TNF inhibitors still represent the first biologic after conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) in the majority of patients according to registry data. This was possibly because they were historically the first biological agents available (biological DMARDS with a different mechanism of action or targeted synthetic DMARDs did not become available until 2006s), and so switching from one to another was frequent in the case of an inadequate response and/or side effects. TNF inhibitors are also efficacious for other inflammatory joint and spine diseases, and have been approved for inflammatory bowel disease, uveitis and psoriasis. In addition, national registries have provided long-term safety data and demonstrated their beneficial effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, approximately 30-40% of patients discontinue anti-TNF treatment because of primary failure, secondary loss of response, or intolerance. The options for managing anti-TNF treatment failures include switching to an alternative anti-TNF (cycling) or to another class of targeted drug with a different mechanism of action (swapping). The aim of this review is to evaluate the pros and cons of whether it is more appropriate to choose a second anti-TNF biological agents after the failure of the first or swap treatment early.

[Rheumatological manifestations in primary immunodeficiency diseases]. / Primer immundeficientiák reumatológiai vonatkozásai.

Primary immune deficiencies (PIDs) are characterized by quantitative and/or functional abnormalities of the immune system elements. Bone and joint abnormalities are not rare in patients with immunodeficiencies. Joint manifestations, of which arthritis is the most common, occur mainly in humoral PIDs (X-linked agammaglobulinemia, common variable immunodeficiency, and IgA deficiency) and occasionally in defects of the phagocyte system (chronic granulomatous disease, glicogen storage diseases). Monoarthritis or oligoarthritis is the usual pattern, caused by Mycoplasma, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pneumococcus or Haemophilus species. These bacteria can provoke not only synovial infections, but also aseptic arthritogenic inflammatory responses. Infectious arthritis or osteomyelitis must be diagnosed and treated with antimicrobial therapy at the earliest. Bone lesions are far less common and usually present as infectious complications in humoral PID. Larger bone manifestations occur in hyper-IgE syndrome and spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia. Short stature is the most common in reticular dysgenesis, in autoimmune polyendocrinopathy candidiasis ectodermal dysplasia and in DNA repair disorders. Knowledge of PID syndromes both enhances the diagnostic capabilities of physicians and provides understanding the pathophysiology of bone and joint abnormalities associated with immune dysfunction. In children and occasionally in adults, a combination of bone and/or joint manifestations and hypogammaglobulinemia may be the first sign of PID. When lymphoproliferative disease or infection can not be proved, investigations for PID should be accomplished. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(23): 918-928.

Dyslipidemia in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Cardiovascular disease is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Accelerated atherosclerosis is related to traditional (age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, smoking, and positive family history) and non-traditional, disease-related factors. Traditional risk factors are still more prominent in patients with lupus, as both hypertension and hypercholesterinemia were independently associated with premature atherosclerosis in several SLE cohorts. In this work, the authors summarize the epidemiology of dyslipidemia in lupus patients and review the latest results in the pathogenesis of lipid abnormalities. The prevalence of dyslipidemia, with elevations in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglyceride (TG), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and a reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels are about 30% at the diagnosis of SLE rising to 60% after 3 years. Multiple pathogenetic mechanism is included, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) can suppress HDL and increase TG, auto-antibodies can cause the injury of the endothelium, lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity can be reduced by circulating inflammatory mediators and antibodies, and increased oxidative stress may trigger a wide range of pro-atherogenic lipid modifications. As a major risk factor, dyslipidemia should be treated aggressively to minimize the risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. Randomized controlled trials with statins are controversial in the detention of atherosclerosis progression, but can be favorable by inhibiting immune activation that is the arterial wall and by decreasing lupus activity.

[Recent advances in the treatment of large vessel vasculitides]. / Nagyérvasculitisek korszeru kezelése.

Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis classified to large vessel vasculitides have similar histopathology in the vascular wall proposing that these entities can be different phenotypes on a spectrum of a single disorder. Glucocorticoids are the mainstay of therapy combined with cyclophosphamide, azatioprine and mycofenolate mofetil, when it is required. However, a significant proportion of patients are glucocorticoid-dependent despite of the conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and suffer from serious side effects of the steroids, therefore alternate options for more effective disease management are needed. The article reviews the advances in the treatment of large vessel vasculitides. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors seem to be effective in Takayasu arteritis, but have a little benefit in giant cell arteritis. Interleukin-6 inhibitor appears very promising in both refractory giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis as well. Abatacept and ustekinumab also seem to be a good choice for the therapy. Orv. Hetil., 2017, 158(1), 5-12.

[Clinical guideline for the treatment of lupus nephritis and single-centre results of mycofenolate mofetil among patients with lupus nephritis in the National Institute of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy, Budapest]. / A lupus nephritis kezelésének irányelvei, valamint a mycofenolat mofetil hatékonyságának bemutatása intézetünk lupus nephritises betegeinek körében.

The authors present the latest guideline for the treatment of lupus nephritis and their own single-centre results with mycofenolate mofetil treated lupus nephritis. Lupus nephritis and mainly its proliferative form is a frequent and potentially life-threatening manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus that can lead to end-stage renal disease. The treatment of lupus nephritis greatly improved in the last decades; mycofenolate mofetil has become an alternative of cyclophosphamide both in remission induction and as a maintenance regimen as well in the treatment of Class III and IV glomerulonephritis. The authors ordered mycofenolate mofetil for 25 patients with lupus nephritis so far. Histologically most of them had Class III (A/C) or IV (A) glomerulonephritis (30-30%), and only 16% of the patients had renal impairment at that time. Mycofenolate mofetil given after glucocorticoid and cyclophosphamide induction therapy reduced the daily proteinuria from 3.18 grs to 1.06 grs. Complete remission could be achieved in 24% and partial remission in 48% of the patients. The authors conclude that mycofenolate mofetil is effective in the therapy of lupus nephritis. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(35), 1385-1393.

[Recent advances in the treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitides]. / Antineutrofil citoplazmatikus antitest asszociált vasculitisek korszeru kezelése.

The authors review the nomenclature of vasculitides and the classification of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitides and present the method of measuring disease activity (Five-factor Score, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score) and its role in defining therapeutical needs. They discuss the treatment algorithm of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitides, present the sometimes equipotential medications used during the induction therapy followed by a maintenance regimen, and outline their usage and possible side-effects that may require medical attention. They point out the importance of plasmapheresis as an adjunctive treatment in some cases, as well as indications and possible outcome of kidney transplantation in therapy-resistant cases. Finally, they review several ongoing clinical studies, as their outcome will probably influence therapeutical opportunities of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitides in the next few years.