Diagnostic Accuracy of Platelet-Derived Parameters in Prognostication in Neurosurgery.

Introduction. Platelets (PLT) are key mediators in thrombotic and inflammatory processes. Their activity increases with size, so the mean platelet volume (MPV) can be a potential predictor of perioperative complications. The aim of the study was to assess the suitability of platelet parameters in predicting the risk of hospital death in neurosurgery. Methods. Retrospective observation covered 452 patients undergoing surgery in the period March 2018−August 2018. High-risk patients accounted for 44% (i.e., ASA-PS class III+) and 9% (i.e., ≥1 Shoemaker criterion), respectively, and 14% of procedures were performed in the urgent mode. The preoperative platelet parameters that were assessed and analysed were: total platelet count (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), plateletcrit (PCT) and platelet distribution width (PDW). The end point of the study was a hospital death. Results. Before discharge from the hospital, 13 patients died. The medians (IQR) PLT, MPV PDW and PCT were, respectively: 230 × 106 L−1 (182−279); 9.2 fL (8.3−10.1); 14% (12.5−16.3); and 21% (17−26). PLT, PCT and PDW were not useful in the risk assessment. MPV was lower in patients who died (9.3 vs. 8.3 fL, p < 0.01) and predicted death occurred in 76% (AUC = 0.76, 95%CI 0.72−0.80, p < 0.01). Further, after adjustment for confounders, MPV remained a significant predictor of in-hospital death (logOR[MPV] = 0.31, AUC = 0.94, 95%CI 0.92−0.96, p = 0.02). Conclusion. The reduction in the average volume of platelets is associated with a worse prognosis in neurosurgical patients.

Usefulness of Selected Peripheral Blood Counts in Predicting Death in Patients with Severe and Critical COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Immune dysregulation and hypoxemia are two important pathophysiological problems in patients with COVID-19 that affect peripheral blood count parameters. We hypothesized that assessment of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and red blood cell distribution width index (RDW-SD) could predict death in patients with severe and critical COVID-19. METHODS: Seventy patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for COVID-19 acute respiratory failure were included in the study. RDW-SD and NLR on the day of ICU admission and peak values during the entire hospitalization were assessed. The primary endpoint was death before ICU discharge. RESULTS: Patients who died had higher NLR on admission (20.3, IQR 15.3-30.2 vs. 11.0, IQR 6.8-16.9; p = 0.003) and higher RDW-SD (48.1 fL; IQR 43.1-50.5 vs. 43.9 fL; IQR 40.9-47.3, p = 0.01) than patients discharged from the ICU. NLR and RDW-SD values on ICU admission accurately predicted death in 76% (AUC = 0.76; 95%CI 0.65-0.86; p = 0.001; cut-off > 14.38) and 72% of cases (AUC = 0.72; 95%CI 0.60-0.82; p = 0.003; cut-off > 44.7 fL), respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed that NLR > 14.38 on the day of ICU admission was associated with a 12-fold increased risk of death (logOR 12.43; 95%CI 1.61-96.29, p = 0.02), independent of other blood counts, clinical and demographic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio determined on the day of ICU admission may be a useful biomarker predicting death in patients with severe and critical COVID-19.

Hemodynamic Monitoring by Smartphone-Preliminary Report from a Comparative Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced hemodynamic monitoring supports making therapeutic decisions in critically ill patients. New technologies, including mobile health, have been introduced into the hemodynamic monitoring armamentarium. However, each monitoring method has potential limitations-content, technical and organizational. The aim of this study was to assess the comparability between measurements obtained with two arterial pressure cardiac output methods: Capstesia™ smartphone hemodynamic software (CS) and LiDCO Rapid™ uncalibrated hemodynamic monitor (LR). METHODS: The initial analysis included 16 patients in the period 06-09 2020 without limitations that could make the results obtained unreliable. Eighty pairs of cardiac output measurements were obtained. The comparability of cardiac output results obtained with both methods was assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (R), the intra-class correlation (CCC) and the Bland-Altman curves analysis (B-A). RESULTS: The median (IQR) cardiac output measured with CS and LR were 4.6 (3.9-5.7) and 5.5 (4.6-7.4) L min-1, respectively. In the B-A analysis, CS cardiac output values were on average 1.2 (95% CI -2.1-4.4) L min-1 lower than LR values. The correlation between cardiac output with CS and LR was moderate (r = 0.5; p = 0.04). After adjusting for the presence of the dicrotic notch on the pulse waveform, in the group of eight patients with a visible dicrotic notch, the CS and LR results differed by only 0.1 (95% CI -0.8-1.1) L min-1, the correlation between CS and LR was close to complete (r = 0.96; p < 0.001), and the percentage error was 40%, with a CCC-CS of 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The CapstesiaTM smartphone software can provide an alternative method of cardiac output assessment in patients meeting arterial pressure cardiac output evaluation criteria with a clearly discernible dicrotic notch on the arterial pulse pressure waveform. It is necessary to confirm the obtained observations on a larger group of patients; however, it may potentially make objective hemodynamic measurements ubiquitous in patients with invasive arterial pressure monitoring with a clearly discernible dicrotic notch.

Fluid Therapy in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Bumpy Road Towards Individualized Management.

Prudent intraoperative fluid replacement therapy, inotropes, and vasoactive drugs should be guided by adequate hemodynamic monitoring. The study aimed to evaluate the single-centre practice on intraoperative fluid therapy in abdominal surgery (AS). The evaluation, based on a review of medical files, included 235 patients (103 men), aged 60 ± 15 years who underwent AS between September and November 2017. Fluid therapy was analyzed in terms of quality and quantity. There were 124 high-risk patients according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Classification (ASA Class 3+) and 89 high-risk procedures performed. The median duration of procedures was 175 (IQR 106-284) min. Eleven patients died post-operatively. The median fluids volume was 10.4 mL/kg/h of anaesthesia, including 9.1 mL/kg/h of crystalloids and 2.7 mL/kg/h of synthetic colloids. Patients undergoing longer than the median procedures received significantly fewer fluids than those who underwent shorter procedures. The volume of fluids in the longer procedures depended on the procedural risk classification and was significantly greater in high-risk patients undergoing high-risk surgery. Patients who died received significantly more fluids than survivors. In all patients, a non-invasive blood pressure monitoring was used and only six patients had therapy guided by metabolic equilibrium. The fluid therapy used was liberal but complied with the recommendations regarding the type of fluid and risk-adjusted dosing. Hemodynamic monitoring was suboptimal and requires modifications. In conclusion, the optimization of intraoperative fluid therapy requires a balanced and standardized approach consistent with treatment procedures.

Validation of APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores in in-hospital and one year mortality prediction in a mixed intensive care unit in Poland: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are several scores used for in-hospital mortality prediction in critical illness. Their application in a local scenario requires validation to ensure appropriate diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, their use in assessing post-discharge mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors has not been extensively studied. We aimed to validate APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores in short- and long-term mortality prediction in a mixed adult ICU in Poland. APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores, with corresponding predicted mortality ratios, were calculated for 303 consecutive patients admitted to a 10-bed ICU in 2016. Short-term (in-hospital) and long-term (12-month post-discharge) mortality was assessed. RESULTS: Median APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores were 19 (IQR 12-24), 67 (36.5-88) and 44 (27-56) points, with corresponding in-hospital mortality ratios of 25.8% (IQR 12.1-46.0), 18.5% (IQR 3.8-41.8) and 34.8% (IQR 7.9-59.8). Observed in-hospital mortality was 35.6%. Moreover, 12-month post-discharge mortality reached 17.4%. All the scores predicted in-hospital mortality (p < 0.05): APACHE II (AUC = 0.78; 95%CI 0.73-0.83), APACHE III (AUC = 0.79; 95%CI 0.74-0.84) and SAPS II (AUC = 0.79; 95%CI 0.74-0.84); as well as mortality after hospital discharge (p < 0.05): APACHE II (AUC = 0.71; 95%CI 0.64-0.78), APACHE III (AUC = 0.72; 95%CI 0.65-0.78) and SAPS II (AUC = 0.69; 95%CI 0.62-0.76), with no statistically significant difference between the scores (p > 0.05). The calibration of the scores was good. CONCLUSIONS: All the scores are acceptable predictors of in-hospital mortality. In the case of post-discharge mortality, their diagnostic accuracy is lower and of borderline clinical relevance. Further studies are needed to create scores estimating the long-term prognosis of subjects successfully discharged from the ICU.

Antipsychotic Drugs in Prevention of Postoperative Delirium-What Is Known in 2020?

Delirium is one of the most frequently reported neuropsychiatric complications in the perioperative period, especially in the population of elderly patients who often suffer from numerous comorbidities undergoing extensive or urgent surgery. It can affect up to 80% of patients who require hospitalization in an intensive care setting postoperatively. Delirium increases mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and cost of treatment. An episode of delirium in the acute phase may lower the general quality of life and increases the risk of cognitive decline long-term. Since pharmacological treatment of delirium is not highly effective, focus of research has shifted towards developing preventive strategies. We aimed to perform a review of the topic based on the most recent literature. We conclude that, based on the available data, it seems impossible to make strong recommendations for using antipsychotic drugs in prophylaxis. Further research should answer the question what, if any, benefit patients receive from the pharmacological prevention of delirium, and which agents should be used.

Clinical practice on intra-operative fluid therapy in Poland: A point prevalence study.

Intra-operative fluid therapy (IFT) is the cornerstone of peri-operative management as it may significantly influence the treatment outcome. Therefore, we sought to evaluate nationwide clinical practice regarding IFT in Poland.A cross-sectional, multicenter, point-prevalence study was performed on April 5, 2018, in 31 hospitals in Poland. Five hundred eighty-seven adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery were investigated. The volume and type of fluids transfused with respect to the patient and procedure risk were assessed.The study group consisted of 587 subjects, aged 58 (interquartile range [IQR] 40-67) years, including 142 (24%) American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status (ASA-PS) class III+ patients. The median total fluid dose was 8.6 mL kg h (IQR 6-12.5), predominantly including balanced crystalloids (7.0 mL kg h, IQR 4.9-10.6). The dose of 0.9% saline was low (1.6 mL kg h, IQR 0.8-3.7). Synthetic colloids were used in 66 (11%) subjects. The IFT was dependent on the risk involved, while the transfused volumes were lower in ASA-PS III+ patients, as well as in high-risk procedures (P < .05).The practice of IFT is liberal but is adjusted to the preoperative risk. The consumption of synthetic colloids and 0.9% saline is low.

Non-Anaesthetic Effects of Volatile Anaesthetics: A Short Trip on the Sea of Translational Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Volatile Anaesthetics (VA) are commonly used worldwide for induction and/or maintenance of general anaesthesia. They act in the central nervous system to reduce sensation and motor response during surgical and invasive diagnostic procedures. VAs also have some non-anaesthetic properties in the brain when administrated to patients at the extremes of age. Their biological impact on other organs should be taken into account during administration of anaesthesia. OBJECTIVE: In this review we summarize the recent knowledge on the non-anaesthetic effects of inhaled halogenic ethers on cells and tissues. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Exposure to VAs may promote lasting neuro-behavioural deficits in the brains of developing children and deterioration in cognitive performance in elderly individuals. Preconditioning with VAs can prevent or minimise tissue ischaemia in the heart and brain. VAs act as an antiinflammatory in response to tissue damage during surgery and may attenuate both local and systemic inflammatory response. Further research is needed to elucidate a link between laboratory findings and their possible effects in humans. Because many questions remain unanswered in this field, translational medicine should be more focused on safety in anaesthesia for the improvement public health.