Impact of nonmalignant ascites on outcomes of open inguinal hernia repair in the USA.

PURPOSE: Studies on inguinal hernia repair in patients with ascites are limited, small, and inconsistent, exacerbating a challenging clinical dilemma for surgeons. To fill this gap in the literature, this retrospective cohort study used a national US database to examine the impact of ascites on the outcomes of open inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Patients who underwent open inguinal herniorrhaphy between 2005 and 2019 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Two groups were defined by the presence or absence of nonmalignant preoperative ascites. Ascites patients were propensity matched 1:10 with non-ascites patients. Surgical outcomes at 30 days for the matched groups, stratified by electiveness of procedure, were compared, with the primary end points of mortality and the NSQIP composite outcome "serious complication". RESULTS: The study included 682 patients with ascites. Compared to matched controls, those with ascites had significantly increased odds of mortality (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.5-7.0) after elective repair, but not after nonelective repair. Ascites was associated with increased odds of serious complication after both elective (OR 1.7, 1.2-2.3) and nonelective (OR 2.0, 1.3-3.0) surgery. Among ascites patients, age ≥ 65 years was associated with increased mortality (risk-adjusted OR 3.8, 1.2-14.4) and serious complication (OR 2.2, 1.2-3.9). CONCLUSION: In this largest study to date on patients with ascites undergoing open inguinal herniorrhaphy, ascites increased the odds of mortality after elective repair and of serious complication after elective and nonelective repair. Age ≥ 65 was a risk factor for poor outcome. Inguinal herniorrhaphy is fraught with complications in this population.

Complications of 761 short-term intrathecal macrocatheters in obstetric patients: a retrospective review of cases over a 12-year period.

BACKGROUND: A continuous spinal catheter is a reliable alternative to standard neuraxial techniques in obstetric anesthesia. Despite the potential advantages of intrathecal catheters, they remain underutilized due to fear of infection, nerve damage or post-dural puncture headache. In our tertiary care center, intrathecal catheters are either placed intentionally in high-risk obstetric patients or following inadvertent dural puncture using a 19-gauge macrocatheter passed through a 17-gauge epidural needle. METHODS: A retrospective review of 761 intrathecal catheters placed from 2001 to 2012 was conducted. An institutional obstetric anesthesia database was used to identify patients with intrathecal catheters. Medical records were reviewed for procedural details and complications. RESULTS: There were no serious complications, including meningitis, epidural or spinal abscess, hematoma, arachnoiditis, or cauda equina syndrome, associated with intrathecal catheters. The failure rates were 2.8% (3/108) for intentional placements and 6.1% (40/653) for placements following accidental dural puncture. The incidence of post-dural puncture headache was 41% (312/761) and the epidural blood patch rate was 31% (97/312). CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that intrathecal catheters are dependable and an option for labor analgesia and surgical anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Serious long-lasting complications are rare.