Mismatch Repair Screening of Gastrointestinal Cancers: The Impact on Lynch Syndrome Detection and Immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (MMR IHC) or microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is now routinely performed in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) to select those requiring Lynch syndrome testing. MMR IHC is also carried out on CRC and upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers to select patients for immunotherapy. We review the Royal Marsden Hospital's pathway of molecular to germline testing for Lynch syndrome in the context of NICE guidance and the National Test Directory. METHODS: We conducted (i) a retrospective audit of adherence to NICE guidance DG27 for patients diagnosed with CRC March 2017-August 2018 and (ii) a retrospective service evaluation of MMR IHC/Lynch syndrome testing in patients diagnosed with upper GI cancers January 2019-2020. RESULTS: Of 394 patients with CRC, 346 (87.8%) had MMR IHC testing. Thirty-eight of 346 (10.9%) were MMR deficient (MMR-D) and 5 (1.4%) were found to have pathogenic germline variants causing Lynch syndrome. Of 405 patients with upper GI cancers, 221 (54.6%) had MMR IHC testing. Ten of 221 (4.5%) were MMR-D and 1 (0.5%) had a pathogenic germline variant causing Lynch syndrome. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the small but significant number of patients, with CRC or upper GI cancers, which were caused by Lynch syndrome. It also highlights weaknesses in our testing pathway that limit access to germline testing. As MMR testing increases, it is important that clinicians are aware that patients with MMR-D tumours require reflex somatic testing or referral for germline testing. We have incorporated the guidelines into a pathway for use in clinics and multidisciplinary teams.

Continued loss of asthma control following epidemic thunderstorm asthma

BACKGROUND: Epidemic thunderstorm asthma (ETSA) severely affected Melbourne, Australia in November 2016. There is scant literature on the natural history of individuals affected by ETSA. OBJECTIVE: A multicentre 12-month prospective observational study was conducted assessing symptomatology and behaviors of ETSA-affected individuals. METHODS: We used a structured phone questionnaire to assess asthma symptom frequency, inhaled preventer use, asthma action plan ownership and healthcare utilization over 12 months since the ETSA. Analysis of results included subgroup analyses of the “current,” “past,” “probable,“ and “no asthma” subgroups defined according to their original 2016 survey responses. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-two questionnaires were analyzed. Eighty percent of individuals reported ongoing asthma symptoms at follow-up, of which 28% were affected by asthma symptoms at least once a week. Risk of persistent asthma symptoms was significantly higher in those with prior asthma diagnosis, current asthma, and probable undiagnosed asthma (all p < 0.01). Of 442 respondents, 53% were prescribed inhaled preventers, of which 51% were adherent at least 5 days a week. Forty-two percent had a written asthma action plan and 16% had sought urgent medical attention for asthma in the preceding year. CONCLUSIONS: Following an episode of ETSA, patients experience a pivotal change in asthma trajectory with both loss of asthma control and persistence of de novo asthma. Suboptimal rates of inhaled preventer adherence and asthma action plan ownership may contribute to asthma exacerbation risk and susceptibility to future ETSA episodes. Longer-term follow-up is needed to determine the extent and severity of this apparent change.