Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(8)2024 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38673707

RESUMO

We read with great interest the study titled "Radiological Outcomes of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Treatment of Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis-A Multicenter Study" by Grabala and colleagues [...].

2.
Spine Deform ; 12(2): 489-499, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37950830

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Spring Distraction System (SDS) is a novel "growth-friendly" implant for the treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS). This prospective study aims to determine the evolution of the "24-Item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire" (EOSQ-24) scores during 2-year follow-up after SDS surgery. Secondary aims include investigating the relation between EOSQ-24 scores and EOS etiology, and evaluating the impact of an unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) on HRQoL. METHODS: All SDS patients with at least 2-year follow-up were included. Caregivers completed the EOSQ-24 pre-operatively, post-operatively, and at 6, 12, and 24 month follow-up. Mean total and -domain scores were graphed over time. Repeated-measures ANOVA analyzed the influence of etiology on EOSQ-24 scores. Multiple regression analyzed associations between UPRORs and EOSQ-24 scores. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included. Mean total EOSQ-24 scores decreased from 70 pre-operatively to 66 post-operatively, then gradually increased to 75 (24 months). Most domains exhibited changes over time, with initial declines, but eventually surpassing pre-operative levels after 2-year follow-up. Neuromuscular/Syndromic patients had lower scores, but showed similar improvements over time compared with other etiologies. Multiple regression showed lower Parental Burden domain score (- 14 points) in patients with UPRORs, although no significant reductions were found in total score, or in other domains. CONCLUSION: HRQoL decreases immediately following SDS surgery but quickly recovers and exceeds pre-operative levels at 2-year follow-up in all domains. Neuromuscular/Syndromic patients have lower initial scores, but progress similarly over time. UPRORs do not influence EOSQ-24 scores, except for a negative impact on the Parental Burden domain in the short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Escoliose , Humanos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Próteses e Implantes
3.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 20, 2023 Jan 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36627616

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) is a progressive spinal deformity in children, and a potentially life-threatening disease. "Growth-friendly" surgical techniques aim to control the deformity, while allowing the spine and trunk to maintain growth. Current "growth-friendly" systems such as the traditional growing rod (TGR) and magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) have limitations that reduce their efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Recently, two "growth-friendly" systems have been developed that mitigate many of these limitations, the Spring Distraction System (SDS) and the One Way Self-Expanding Rod (OWSER). The purpose of the multicenter BiPOWR trial is to investigate, describe and compare the 1-year limited-efficacy and -safety of both strategies in the treatment of neuromuscular EOS. METHODS: After informed consent, 28 neuromuscular EOS patients will be randomized to receive either the SDS or the OWSER. Patients and caregivers will be blinded to allocation until after surgery. Primary outcomes will be maintenance of coronal curve correction and the occurrence of serious adverse events. In addition, spinal growth, implant lengthening, and perioperative findings are recorded systematically. At each follow-up moment, the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. All outcomes will be compared between groups. DISCUSSION: The BiPOWR trial is the first randomized controlled trial that compares two specific "growth-friendly" implants in a specified EOS population. It will determine the 1-year limited-efficacy and safety of the SDS and OWSER implants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04021784 (13-06-2019). CCMO registry: NL64018.041.17 (06-05-2019).


Assuntos
Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Escoliose , Criança , Humanos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto
4.
J Clin Med ; 11(13)2022 Jun 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35807030

RESUMO

Background: The Spring Distraction System (SDS) is a dynamic growth-friendly implant to treat early onset scoliosis (EOS). Previous SDS studies showed promising results in terms of curve correction and complication profile. Nevertheless, complications did occur, which led to modifications in the implant design. The main iterations were a larger rod diameter and a more sagittal stable sliding mechanism. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of these iterations. Methods: All patients treated with the modified SDS and >1 year follow-up were included. Radiographic outcomes, severe adverse events (SAEs), unplanned returns to the operating room (UPRORs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were investigated. Results: Seventeen EOS patients (three congenital, four idiopathic, nine neuromuscular, one syndromic) were included. Mean age at surgery was 9.5 ± 2.5 years. Similar to the first generation SDS, about 50% initial correction was achieved and maintained, and spinal growth was near physiological. Most importantly, SAEs and UPRORs were diminished and favorable with 0.10/patient/year. In addition, HRQoL increased during the first year postoperatively, indicating the implant was well accepted. Conclusion: These preliminary results indicate that the iterations of the SDS are effective in terms of reducing SAEs and UPRORs and increasing HRQoL in patients with EOS.

5.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 47(7): E312-E318, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34798645

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the morphology of intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies during growth in asymptomatic children and adolescents. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Earlier studies demonstrated that spinal growth occurs predominantly in vertebral bodies. This axiom introduced a vertebral-body-focus for unravelling etiological questions and achieve growth-modulation in young spinal deformity patients. Recent studies show the importance of the intervertebral discs in the early phases and possible etiology of pediatric spinal deformities. There is presently a paucity of 3D morphometric data of spinal elements during growth. METHODS: A database of 298 patients aged 0 to 21 that have received a computed tomography scan for indications not related to the spine was analyzed. Custom made software was used to semi-automatically measure intervertebral disc and vertebral body morphology, corrected for orientation in all 3 planes. RESULTS: Vertebral body height increased from birth up to adulthood, from 4-to-14 mm in the cervical, 6 to 20 mm in the thoracic, and 9 to 28 mm in the lumbar spine. This increase was 0.70 mm/year in males, more pronounced than females with 0.62 mm/year (P = 0.001). Lumbar discs increased throughout growth from 4.4 to 9.0 mm, whereas thoracic discs only increased from 3.5 to 4.9 mm at age 4 and remained stable afterwards, similarly for cervical discs. The disc transverse surface area increased greatly and consistently throughout growth. Disc slenderness was stable in the lumbar spine during growth, but decreased in the thoracic and cervical spine. Overall, discs were more slender in females, especially around early adolescence. CONCLUSION: The spine grows predominantly in the vertebral bodies. Thoracic discs increase in height only during the first years, whereas the transverse surface area continues to increase throughout growth, thus discs slenderness decreases. Relatively, female discs remained slenderer around growth-spurt. These measurements may assist future studies on the role of disc morphology in the etiology and treatment of spinal deformity.Level of Evidence: 4.


Assuntos
Disco Intervertebral , Corpo Vertebral , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Região Lombossacral , Masculino , Adulto Jovem
6.
Spine Deform ; 9(6): 1679-1689, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34156666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) offer non-invasive distractions in Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS). However, implant-related complications are common, reducing its cost-effectiveness. To improve MCGRs functionality and cost-effectiveness, we often combine a single MCGR with a contralateral sliding rod (hybrid MCGR). Recently, we developed the spring distraction system (SDS) as an alternative, which provides continuous distraction forces through a helical spring. This study aims to identify complication rates and failure modes of EOS patients treated with either of these innovative systems. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study included EOS patients treated with a (hybrid) MCGR or SDS between 2013 and 2018. Baseline demographics, and data regarding complications and implant growth were measured. Complication rate, complication profile, complication-free survival and implant growth were compared between groups. RESULTS: Eleven hybrid- and three bilateral MCGR patients (4.1-year follow-up) and one unilateral, eleven hybrid and six bilateral SDS patients (3.0-year follow-up) were included. Groups had similar age, sex, aetiology distribution, and pre-operative Cobb angle. Complication rate was 0.35 complications/patient/year for MCGR patients and 0.33 complications/patient/year for SDS patients. The most common complications were failure to distract (MCGR-group; 8/20 complications) and implant prominence (SDS-group; 5/18 complications). Median complication-free survival was 2.6 years, with no differences between groups (p = 0.673). Implant growth was significantly higher in the SDS-group (10.1 mm/year), compared to the MCGR-group (6.3 mm/year). CONCLUSION: (Hybrid) MCGR and SDS patients have similar complication rates and complication-free survival. Complication profile differs between the groups, with frequent failure to distract leading to significantly reduced implant growth in (hybrid) MCGR patients, whereas SDS patients frequently exhibit implant prominence and implant kyphosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Assuntos
Cifose , Escoliose , Humanos , Próteses e Implantes , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escoliose/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...