RESUMO
Castleman disease is a rare disorder of the lymphoid system which can be classified into two clinical groups, monocentric disease versus multicentric disease, and two histological types, the hyaline vascular form versus the plasma cell form. We report three cases of monocentric Castleman disease. The first one is a classical form of Castleman's disease. The second one is characterized by an uncommon radiological presentation, with a calcification within the tumor. The third one is a plasma cell form with monoclonal proliferation associated with a monoclonal gammapathy. These three cases highlight the polymorphic clinical and radiological features of Castleman disease. They underlie the difficulty of surgical resection due to the tumor vascularization. Other diagnosis hypothesis and associated diseases will also be discussed (HIV, Kaposi's sarcoma, POEMS syndrome).
Assuntos
Hiperplasia do Linfonodo Gigante/diagnóstico , Mediastino/patologia , Adulto , Hiperplasia do Linfonodo Gigante/cirurgia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Mediastino/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Doenças Raras , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Toracotomia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To establish the radiation dose level for single- and dual-source thoracic CT scans in daily practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dose levels delivered during 634 consecutive examinations over a period of 2 months were recorded. The CT scans were performed using: (a) a standard protocol (single source, single energy [group 1]: n=266; dual source, single energy [group 2]: n=276; (b) with prospective ECG synchronisation [group 3]: n=13; or (c) with dual energy [group 4]: n=79. All the acquisitions included kilovoltage selection depending on the weight and automatic milliamperage modulation. RESULTS: The mean DLP of the standard protocols was 97.12 mGycm (group 2; BMI=23.1kg/m(2)) and 211.1 mGycm (group 1; BMI=27.3kg/m(2)), the choice of protocol depending on the diameter of the thorax relative to the diameter of the field of the second source, and therefore on the patient's morphotype. When imaging included examination of the proximal and middle coronary arteries (group 3), the mean DLP was 105.5 mGycm. Morphological and functional imaging (group 4) was obtained with a mean DLP of 404.3 mGycm. CONCLUSION: Depending on the objective of the protocol, the mean DLP varied from 97.12 to 404.3 mGycm.