Infective Endocarditis as a Cause of Critical Illness, In-hospital Mortality, and Complications.

Background: Critical illness due to infective endocarditis (IE) has high in-hospital mortality. Besides being a cause of sepsis, this disease has the potential nature to affect multiple organs. Patients and methods: Data for 84 patients managed at the critical care medicine unit at Cairo University for 7 years were surveyed for IE using modified Dukes criteria. Among the patient group with a verified diagnosis of IE, patient characteristics (age and comorbidities), the grade of diagnosis, the blood culture result, echocardiographic findings, minor diagnostic signs (fever, presence of prosthetic valves and pacemaker, vascular phenomena, immunologic phenomena) and clinical complications (heart failure, septic shock, neurologic complications renal failure) were studied regarding their association to in-hospital mortality. Incidence of clinical complications was compared to the control group with sepsis due to other causes. Results: The mortality rate in the IE group is 18.8%. Factors showing significant association to in-hospital mortality are; septic shock p = 0.01, neurological complications p = 0.025 (especially cerebral hemorrhage p = 0.025), indicated non-performed surgery p = 0.008, and presence of underlying heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), p = 0.002. Incidence of clinical complications showed no significant difference in IE patients and patients with other causes of sepsis except heart failure which showed significantly increased incidence in the IE group, p = 0.004. Conclusion: Septic shock, neurological complications, indicated nonperformed surgery, and presence of underlying HFrEF are in-hospital mortality risk factors in critically ill patients due to IE. In-hospital mortality and clinical complication incidence (except heart failure) are similar to other causes of sepsis. How to cite this article: Ayad RD, Andraos AW, Taema KAE, Attia IM, Yehia M. Infective Endocarditis as a Cause of Critical Illness, In-hospital Mortality, and Complications. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(8):930-934.

Carbapenems consumption and Klebsiella resistance in intensive care units in Egypt: A study to evaluate the effect of an antimicrobial stewardship program.

Background: The high prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella imposes optimizing antibiotic consumption. We aimed to evaluate the impact of antibiotic stewardship program on carbapenem consumption and the Klebsiella resistance. Method: We retrospectively evaluated critically ill patients with isolated Klebsiella species from Elaraby hospital, Egypt during the period from April 2017 to January 2019. We collected data related to carbapenems consumption and Klebsiella clinical isolates with their antimicrobial susceptibility. Based on susceptibility, Klebsiella isolates were classified into sensitive, extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producer, and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella (CRK), respectively. Our primary outcome was the change in carbapenems consumption after implementing the program, while the secondary outcomes were the changes in the incidence of CRK. Results: The study included 205 patients with isolated Klebsiella species during the study period. The antibiotic stewardship program started in March 2018. Out of the 205 patients, 61 patients (29.8%) represented the pre-intervention sample, and 144 patients (70.2%) represented the post-intervention sample. Applying the antibiotic stewardship program was associated with a significant decrease in the carbapenems consumption from 38.9 to 26.6 defined daily dose/1000 patient-days (p = 0.02). The incidence of CRK was decreased from 85.25% of total Klebsiella isolates to 48.6% (p < 0.001). Klebsiella species were more likely to be in a lower category of resistance after applying the program with an odds ratio of 6.3 (2.88-13.73) using ordinal logistic regression. Conclusion: Applying the antibiotic stewardship program could reduce the unnecessary carbapenems use in the ICU with a subsequent decrease in the emergence of the Klebsiella-resistant strains.

Clinical evaluation of pregnant women with SARS-COV2 pneumonia: a real-life study from Egypt.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the outcome of COVID-19 on pregnant women is so important. The published literature on the outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 is confusing. The aim of this study was to report our clinical experience about the effect of COVID-19 on pregnant women and to determine whether it was associated with increased mortality or an increase in the need for mechanical ventilation in this special category of patients. METHODS: This was a cohort study from some isolation hospitals of the Ministry of Health and Population, in eleven governorates, Egypt. The clinical data from the first 64 pregnant women with COVID-19 whose care was managed at some of the Egyptian hospitals from 14 March to 14 June 2020 as well as 114 non-pregnant women with COVID-19 was reviewed. RESULTS: The two groups did not show any significant difference regarding the main outcomes of the disease. Two cases in each group needed mechanical ventilation (p 0.617). Three cases (4.7%) died among the pregnant women and two (1.8%) died among the non-pregnant women (p 0.352). CONCLUSIONS: The main clinical outcomes of COVID-19 were not different between pregnant and non-pregnant women with COVID-19. Based on our findings, pregnancy did not exacerbate the course or mortality of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Utility of Lung Ultrasound in Decision-making to Prioritize Hospital Admission for COVID-19 Patients: A Developing Country Perspective.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the midst of this pandemic, planning the prioritization of hospital admissions for patients affected with COVID-19 should be of prime concern, particularly in healthcare settings with limited resources. Thus, in this study, we aimed to develop a novel approach to triage COVID-19 patients and attempt to prioritize their hospital admission using Lung Ultrasonography (LUS). The efficacy of LUS in triaging suspected COVID-19 patients and assessing the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia was evaluated; the findings were then compared with those obtained by chest computed tomography (CT). METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional study comprised 243 COVID-19 patients who presented to the emergency department in 3 major university hospitals in Egypt. LUS was performed by an experienced emergency or chest physician, according to the local protocol of each hospital. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were then collected from each patient. Each patient was subjected to chest CT scans and LUS. RESULTS: The mean age of the 243 patients was 46.7 ± 10.4 years. Ground-glass opacity, subpleural consolidation, translobar consolidation, and crazy paving were reported in the chest CT scans of 54.3%, 15.2%, 11.1%, and 8.6% of the patients, respectively. B-line artifacts were observed in 81.1% of the patients (confluent pattern, 18.9%). The LUS findings completely coincided with the CT findings (Kappa agreement value, 0.77) in 197 patients (81.1%) and offered a diagnostic sensitivity of 74%, diagnostic specificity of 97.9%, positive predictive value of 90.2%, and negative predictive value of 93.6% for the COVID-19 patients. Following the addition of O2 saturation to the lung imaging findings, the ultrasound method was able to demonstrate 100% sensitivity and specificity in accurately differentiating between severe and non-severe lung diseases. CONCLUSION: LUS with oxygen saturation might prove to be effective in prioritizing the hospital admission of COVID-19 patients, particularly in healthcare settings with limited resources.

Early Use of Norepinephrine Improves Survival in Septic Shock: Earlier than Early.

BACKGROUND: The timing of initiation of Norepinephrine (NEP) in septic shock is controversial. AIM OF THE STUDY: We evaluated the impact of early NEP simultaneously with fluids in those patients. METHODS: We randomized 101 patients admitted to the emergency department with septic shock to early NEP simultaneously with IV fluids (early group) or after failed fluids trial (late group). The primary outcome was the in-hospital survival while the secondary outcomes were the time to target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg, lactate clearance and resuscitation volumes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the baseline characteristics. NEP infusion started after 25 (20-30) and 120 (120-180) min in the early and late groups (p = 0.000). MAP of 65 mmHg was achieved faster in the early group (2 [1-3.5] h vs. 3 [2-4.75] h, p = 0.003). Serum lactate was decreased by 37.8 (24-49%) and 22.2 (3.3-38%) in both groups respectively (p = 0.005). Patients with early NEP were resuscitated by significantly lower volume of fluids (25 [18.8-28.7] mL/kg vs. 32.5 [24.4-34.6] mL/kg) in the early and late groups (p = 0.000). The early group had survival rate of 71.9% compared to 45.5% in the late group (p = 0.007). NEP started after 30 (20-120 min) in survivors vs. 120 (30-165 min) in non-survivors (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that early Norepinephrine in septic shock might cause earlier restoration of blood pressure, better lactate clearance and improve in-hospital survival.

Continuous infusion of furosemide versus intermittent boluses in acute decompensated heart failure: Effect on thoracic fluid content.

INTRODUCTION: The administration of loop diuretics in the management of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) whether IV boluses or continuous infusion is still controversial. We intended to evaluate differences between the two administration routes on the thoracic fluid content (TFC) and the renal functions. METHODS: Sixty patients with ADHF admitted to the critical care medicine department (Cairo University, Egypt) were initially enrolled in the study. Twenty patients were excluded due to EF > 40%, myocardial infarction within 30 days, and baseline serum creatinine level > 4.0 mg/dL. Furosemide (120 mg/day) was given to the remaining 40 pts who continued the study after 1:1 randomization to either continuous infusion (group-I, 20 pts) or three equal intermittent daily doses (group-II, 20 pts). Subsequent dose titration was allowed after 24 h, but not earlier, according to patient's response. No other diuretic medications were allowed. All patients were daily evaluated for NYHA class, urine output, TFC, body weight, serum K+, and renal chemistry. RESULTS: The median age (Q1-Q3) was 54.5 (43.8-63.8) years old with 24 (60%) males. Apart from TFC which was significantly higher in group-I, the admission demographic, clinical, laboratory and co-morbid conditions were similar in both groups. There was statistically insignificant tendency for increased urine output during the 1st and 2nd days in group-I compared to group-II (p = .08). The body weight was decreased during the 1st day by 2 (1.5-2.5) kg in group-I compared to 1.5 (1-2) kg in group-II, (p = .03). These changes became insignificant during the 2nd day (p = .4). The decrease of TFC was significantly higher in group-I than in group-II [10 (6.3-14.5) vs 7 (3.3-9.8) kΩ-1 during the first day and 8 (6-11) vs 6 (3.3-8.5) kΩ-1 during the second day in groups-I&II respectively, P = .02 for both]. There was similar NYHA class improvement in both groups (p = .7). The serum creatinine was increased by 0.2 (0.1-0.5) vs 0 (-0.1 to 0.2) mg% and the CrCl was decreased by 7.4 (4.5-12.3) vs 3.1 (0.2-8.8) ml/min in groups-I&II respectively (p = .009 and .02 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that continuous furosemide infusion in ADHF might cause greater weight loss and more decrease in TFC with no symptomatic improvement and possibly with more nephrotoxic effect.