ERbeta impedes prostate cancer EMT by destabilizing HIF-1alpha and inhibiting VEGF-mediated snail nuclear localization: implications for Gleason grading.

High Gleason grade prostate carcinomas are aggressive, poorly differentiated tumors that exhibit diminished estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) expression. We report that a key function of ERbeta and its specific ligand 5alpha-androstane-3beta,17beta-diol (3beta-adiol) is to maintain an epithelial phenotype and repress mesenchymal characteristics in prostate carcinoma. Stimuli (TGF-beta and hypoxia) that induce an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) diminish ERbeta expression, and loss of ERbeta is sufficient to promote an EMT. The mechanism involves ERbeta-mediated destabilization of HIF-1alpha and transcriptional repression of VEGF-A. The VEGF-A receptor neuropilin-1 drives the EMT by promoting Snail1 nuclear localization. Importantly, this mechanism is manifested in high Gleason grade cancers, which exhibit significantly more HIF-1alpha and VEGF expression, and Snail1 nuclear localization compared to low Gleason grade cancers.

Metabolic stress induces the lysosomal degradation of neuropilin-1 but not neuropilin-2.

The neuropilins-1 and -2 (NRP1 and NRP2) function as receptors for both the semaphorins and vascular endothelial growth factor. In addition to their contribution to the development of the nervous system, NRP1 and NRP2 have been implicated in angiogenesis and tumor progression. Given their importance to cancer and endothelial biology and their potential as therapeutic targets, an important issue that has not been addressed is the impact of metabolic stress conditions characteristic of the tumor microenvironment on their expression and function. Here, we demonstrate that hypoxia and nutrient deprivation stimulate the rapid loss of NRP1 expression in both endothelial and carcinoma cells. NRP2 expression, in contrast, is maintained under these conditions. The lysosomal inhibitors chloroquine and bafilomycin A1 prevented the loss of NRP1 expression, but proteasomal inhibitors had no effect. The hypothesis that NRP1 is degraded by autophagy is supported by the findings that its expression is lost rapidly in response to metabolic stress, prevented with 3-methyladenine and induced by rapamycin. Targeted depletion of NRP2 using small hairpin RNA revealed that NRP2 can function in the absence of NRP1 to mediate endothelial tube formation in hypoxia. Studies aimed at assessing NRP function and targeted therapy in cancer and angiogenesis should consider the impact of metabolic stress.

Intrinsic signaling functions of the beta4 integrin intracellular domain.

A key issue regarding the role of alpha6beta4 in cancer biology is the mechanism by which this integrin exerts its profound effects on intracellular signaling, including growth factor-mediated signaling. One approach is to evaluate the intrinsic signaling capacity of the unique beta4 intracellular domain in the absence of contributions from the alpha6 subunit and tetraspanins and to assess the ability of growth factor receptor signaling to cooperate with this domain. Here, we generated a chimeric receptor composed of the TrkB extracellular domain and the beta4 transmembrane and intracellular domains. Expression of this chimeric receptor in beta4-null cancer cells enabled us to assess the signaling potential of the beta4 intracellular domain alone or in response to dimerization using brain-derived neurotrophic factor, the ligand for TrkB. Dimerization of the beta4 intracellular domain results in the binding and activation of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 and the activation of Src, events that also occur upon ligation of intact alpha6beta4. In contrast to alpha6beta4 signaling, however, dimerization of the chimeric receptor does not activate either Akt or Erk1/2. Growth factor stimulation induces tyrosine phosphorylation of the chimeric receptor but does not enhance its binding to SHP-2. The chimeric receptor is unable to amplify growth factor-mediated activation of Akt and Erk1/2, and growth factor-stimulated migration. Collectively, these data indicate that the beta4 intracellular domain has some intrinsic signaling potential, but it cannot mimic the full signaling capacity of alpha6beta4. These data also question the putative role of the beta4 intracellular domain as an "adaptor" for growth factor receptor signaling.