Assessment of the systemic immune-inflammation index in type 2 diabetic patients with and without dry eye disease: A case-control study.

Background: The inflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology of type-2 diabetes progression, and the mechanism remains unclear. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a novel inflammatory marker for type 2 diabetes patients and integrates multiple indicators in complete blood counts and routine blood tests. Aim: Since there is no international diagnostic standard for dry eye disease (DED), this study uses low-cost inflammatory blood biomarkers to investigate the correlation between SII and DM2-DED and determine the diagnosis indices of other biomarkers in DM2-DED. Methodology: A case-control retrospective analysis of totel patients n = 293 randomly selected and categorized into four groups: DED, DM2, DM2-DED, and healthy subjects. Demographic and blood biomarker variables were classified as categorical and continuous variables. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocytes-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and SII were calculated platelet count multiply by NLR and analyzed for their correlation for all groups. Results: Focusing on DM2-DED patients was more common in females, 59.6%, than in males, 40.2%. The mean ages were 60.7 ± 11.85 years, a statistically significant difference with all groups. In the study group DM2-DED, there was an increase in all blood markers compared to all remaining groups except PLR. Only neutrophil, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and fasting blood sugar levels were statistically significant differences in DM2-DED patients (p > 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively) compared to all groups. There was a positive correlation between HbA1c and PLR, HbA1c and NLR, and HbA1c and SII (r = 0.037, p = 0.705; r = 0.031, p = 0.754; and r = 0.066, p < 0.501, respectively) in the DM2-DED group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that elevated SII values were linked to elevated HbA1c in DM2-DED patients. The potential of SII and HbA1c as early diagnostic indicators for ocular problems associated with diabetes mellitus is highlighted by their favorable connection in diagnosing DM2-DED.

The Evaluation of Diabetic Patients' Awareness of Diabetic Retinopathy and Its Complications in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.

Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia. Globally, 382 million people have diabetes mellitus, and 90% of these patients suffer from type 2 diabetes. Saudi Arabia has the second-highest prevalence of diabetes among all Middle Eastern countries. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a significant complication of diabetes; early detection and proper intervention are important for its management and prognosis. Aim This study aims to assess the awareness of diabetic patients of diabetic retinopathy symptoms and complications in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Methods This is a cross-sectional study in which a convenience sampling technique was implemented for collecting data from all patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria within the timeframe between February 2022 and October 2022 among diabetic patients at the National Guard Health Affairs in the western region. We included both type 1 and type 2 diabetic participants who are older than 18 years of age and have at least one visit to any outpatient ophthalmology clinic. Results This study involved 259 participants. The mean age of the participants is 46.69 (standard deviation {SD}: 15.59). Type 2 was more prevalent among the applicants (58.3%). A total of 242 (93%) participants were aware that diabetes could affect their eyes. Surprisingly, 130 (50.2%) do not know about diabetic retinopathy therapy options. The most significant obstacle to being examined early for ophthalmological diseases among diabetic patients was the deficient knowledge of diabetic retinopathy. Also, a significant statistical relationship was found between the year of diagnosis and the level of awareness regarding eye complications. Conclusion Despite the high level of awareness of diabetic retinopathy among diabetic patients shown in our study, it did not correspond to a high level of self-awareness on the importance of preventive measures such as annual diabetic retinopathy screening.

Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Graves' ophthalmopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The traditional standard of care for Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) is glucocorticoid therapy, which is associated with many long-term side effects. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the traditional therapy to novel monoclonal antibodies (e.g. rituximab [RTX], teprotumumab, and tocilizumab [TCZ]). METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different monoclonal antibodies (e.g. RTX, teprotumumab, and TCZ) with glucocorticoids or placebo in patients with GO. We evaluated the clinical activity score (CAS), proptosis, subjective diplopia using the Gorman score, quality of life (QoT), adverse events, change in lid fissure, NOSPECS score, and TSH receptor antibody (TRAb) levels. The odds ratio (OR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes. The continuous outcomes were represented as standardized mean difference (SMD). Data were pooled using the inverse variance weighting method. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. RESULTS: Six (n = 571) RCTs were deemed eligible. The different monoclonal antibodies were significantly more efficacious than glucocorticoid/placebo in terms of reduction in CAS (SMD = -1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.91--0.97, P < 0.00001, I2 = 74%), change in proptosis (SMD = -4.96, 95% CI: -8.02--1.89, P = 0.002, I2 = 99%), QoL (SMD = 2.64, 95% CI: 0.50-4.79, P = 0.02, I2 = 97%), and Gorman score for diplopia (OR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.62-7.22, P = 0.001, I2 = 8%). However, monoclonal antibodies have shown higher rates of adverse events (OR = 2.91, 95% CI: 1.12-7.56, P = 0.03, I2 = 62%). No significant difference was found with respect to lid fissure, NOSPECS, and TRAb levels. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that monoclonal antibodies were associated with more favorable clinical outcomes than standard steroid therapy or placebo, especially with regard to CAS, change in proptosis, diplopia, and QoL, with teprotumumab being superior. In addition, only minor safety concerns were identified with monoclonal antibodies though less worrisome than using traditional steroids.

The efficacy and safety of varenicline nasal spray for the management of dry eye signs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is caused by a persistently unstable tear film leading to ocular discomfort and is treated mainly with tear supplementation. There is emerging evidence that nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonists (e.g., varenicline and simpinicline) nasal sprays are effective for DED. Our systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of varenicline nasal spray (VNS) for DED treatment. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of VNS versus placebo were included. The efficacy endpoint was the mean change in the anesthetized Schirmer test score (STS), a measure of basal tear production, from baseline. The safety endpoints were serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs). The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous outcomes, while the risk ratio (RR) was used to demonstrate dichotomous variables. The certainty of the evidence was rated utilizing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. RESULTS: Three RCTs (n = 1063) met the eligibility criteria. All RCTs had a low risk of bias. The meta-analysis found a statistically significant increase in the mean STS change from baseline on day 28. The pooled analysis found no significant difference between VNS and placebo in the frequency of SAEs and ocular AEs. However, VNS had a significant effect on developing nasal cavity-related AEs. CONCLUSION: VNS caused a highly significant improvement regarding the efficacy endpoint but caused an increased frequency of some nasal cavity-related AEs (i.e., cough and throat irritation). However, it caused neither SAEs nor ocular AEs. Included studies had a low risk of bias.

Public awareness about glaucoma, cataract, and diabetic retinopathy in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To identify the public level of knowledge about the common ophthalmological conditions in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL for relevant literature. We included questionnaire-based cross-sectional studies performed in Saudi Arabia assessing the public awareness and attitude about general knowledge, causes/risk factors, signs/symptoms, disabilities/consequences, and relieving/management measures of the common ophthalmological conditions including glaucoma, cataract, and diabetic retinopathy (DR). The meta-analysis was performed on outcomes reported in ≥ 2 studies utilizing the random-effects model. Quality assessment was done using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) tool. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review. A total of 72 questions were reported in ≥ 2 studies and were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of participants was 14,408. The meta-analysis estimated that 57.63% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56.87-60.07%), 69.90% (95% CI 67.02-76.07%), and 68.65% (95% CI 65.94-71.23%) of the Saudi public have you ever heard or read about glaucoma, cataract, and DR, respectively. Of the public surveyed in the included studies, 43.68% (95% CI 41.54-45.85%), 55.43% (95% CI 54.03-56.82%), and 63% (95% CI 60.8-65.1%) believed that glaucoma, cataract, and DR could be treated. CONCLUSION: This systematic review showed that the level of knowledge among the Saudi population about the common ophthalmological conditions was the highest with respect to cataract, followed by DR and glaucoma. The areas of unsatisfactory level of awareness about the common ophthalmological conditions included risk factors, signs/symptoms, complications, and management options. These areas need to be addressed appropriately by future educational interventions.

Prevalence of Myopia and Its Associated Risk Factors Among Children Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study serves as a tool for optometrists and ophthalmologists to reinforce adherence to several preventive factors, which may decrease the incidence of myopia, and avoidance of risk factors by multiple means including education during hospital visits. It also provides insight into who should be screened and tailored screening programs for children. BACKGROUND: While studies assessing the prevalence of myopia in Saudi Arabia have contradicting results, only a few studies have evaluated the risk factors of myopia and the effect of using electronic devices on its occurrence. Thus, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of myopia and associated risk factors, among children attending an ophthalmology clinic in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. METHODS:  A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 182 patients aged < 14 years were selected using convenient sampling. Direct assessment of the refraction was performed in the clinic, and a questionnaire was completed by the child's parent. RESULTS: Of 182 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 40.7% had myopia. Myopia was more common in boys (56.8%) than in girls (43.2%), with a median age of 8.7 years. Using multivariate regression analysis, only age (eight years and above) (OR=2.15, CI=1.12-4.12, P= 0.03), and family history of myopia (OR= 5.83, CI= 2.82-12.05, P= 0.001) were significant predictors of myopia in children. Other variables (e.g., sex, and use of laptops, computers, smartphones/tablets, or TV) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show a statistically significant association between using electronic devices and the onset and progression of myopia among children. Studies with a larger sample size are required to further investigate this association and assess other potential risk factors.

Relationship Between Screen Time and Dry Eye Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Pediatric Population of the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.

Objective To measure the prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) and study the relationship between screen time and dry eye symptoms in the pediatric population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Methods In this descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study, our survey included the pediatric population, ages 1 to 18 years, of both genders, who attended outpatient clinics of two main hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Collected data included age, gender, dry eye symptoms, and common DED risk factors, followed by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, which consists of 12 items graded on a five-point scale (0 = never to 4 = all the time). Results A total of 329 pediatric participants were included, with more than half of the participants (56.1%) males and 58.5% aged 12-18 years. The most frequently reported symptoms (reported as often or always) were decreased vision (23.0%) and itchy eyes (22.1%). Environmental factors have an effect on developing DED symptoms, as some participants (21.8%) have reported being uncomfortable in windy weather and 15.8% have reported this in places with air conditioners. Based on the OSDI diagnostic criteria, 250 (76.1%) participants had DED. Furthermore, in terms of severity, 44 (13.3%) participants had mild DED, 62 (18.8%) participants had moderate DED, and 145 (43.9%) participants had severe DED. We found that prolonged exposure to mobile screens for two to three hours or four hours or more was associated with a higher DED incidence compared to those exposed for shorter periods. Older age categories were more likely to experience DED (80.8% and 78.2% in age categories 12-18 and 7-12, respectively, versus 57.6% in the youngest age category (p = 0.001)). Additionally, DED was independently associated with participants with a previous history of eyeglasses prescription and those experiencing dry eyes while using electronic devices. Conclusion Since many children use electronic devices for education and entertainment, we found that symptoms of DED due to prolonged screen time have increased among the pediatric population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, awareness efforts should be directed to reduce the rate of controllable risk factors like personal computer use. In addition, educational campaigns are warranted to provide all possible preventive measures against DED, especially to children with uncontrollable risk factors for developing DED.

Amniotic membrane transplantation and conjunctival autograft combined with mitomycin C for the management of primary pterygium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Pterygium is a common ocular surface disease. Recurrence is the greatest concern in the treatment of pterygium. Thus, a standardized and effective treatment modality with minimal risk for complications is needed for the management of pterygium. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate different tissue grafting options, including conjunctival autograft (CAG) with mitomycin C (MMC), CAG alone, and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT), for the management of primary pterygium. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for relevant studies. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which CAG + MMC and AMT were compared with surgical excision with CAG alone for the treatment of primary pterygium. The rates of recurrence and adverse events reported in the studies were also evaluated. Risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes. The data were pooled using the inverse variance weighting method. The quality of the evidence derived from the analysis was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Results: Twelve RCTs (n = 1144) were deemed eligible and included for analysis. Five RCTs had a low risk of bias, five had some concerns, and two had a high risk of bias. Subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in the rate of pterygium recurrence after CAG + MMC (RR = 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.63). This outcome was rated as high-quality evidence according to the GRADE criteria. There were insignificant differences between the rates of recurrence after AMT and CAG (RR = 1.51; 95% CI, 0.63-3.65). However, this result was rated as low-quality evidence. Regarding adverse events, patients treated using AMT showed significantly lower rates of adverse events than those treated using CAG (RR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.95). However, this finding was rated as low-quality evidence as well. CAG + MMC showed a safety profile comparable to that of surgical excision with CAG alone (RR = 1.81; 95% CI, 0.40-8.31). This result was also rated as low-quality evidence. Conclusion: A single intraoperative topical application of 0.02% MMC during excision of pterygium followed by CAG has significantly shown to decrease the rate of pterygium recurrence to 1.4% with no severe complications.

Bell's palsy in a patient after contracting COVID-19 with signs of aberrant nerve regeneration.

Purpose: To report a 56-year-old male in Saudi Arabia who developed signs of aberrant facial nerve regeneration after recovering from Bell's palsy associated with COVID-19 infection. Observations: The patient presented, months following recovery from Bell's palsy associated with COVID-19, with symptoms of aberrant seventh nerve regeneration in the form of tearing with eating "crocodile tears" and synchronous right eyelid closure with the jaw movement. Conclusions and Importance: Case reports of Bell's palsy associated with COVID-19 are emerging, but association does not mean causation. That said, we need to report these cases to draw attention to the possible neuroinvasive propensity of this virus. It is also imperative to recognize Bell's palsy as a possible symptom of COVID-19.

Intravitreal Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Laser photocoagulation and/or intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections constitute the current standard treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF monotherapy for ROP treatment using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy (e.g., bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and pegaptanib) with laser photocoagulation in preterm infants with ROP. We evaluated the rates of recurrence, treatment switching, retreatment, adverse events, and mortality. The risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes. Data were pooled using the inverse variance weighting method. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. Results: Seven RCTs (n = 579; 1,158 eyes) were deemed eligible. Three RCTs had an overall low risk of bias, three had some concerns, and one had an overall high risk of bias. The pooled effect estimate showed a statistically significant reduction in adverse events in favor of anti-VEGF monotherapy [RR = 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.44]. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the anti-VEGF and laser groups in terms of recurrence rate (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.23-10.54), treatment switching (RR = 2.92, 95% CI 0.40-21.05), retreatment (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.35-6.96), and mortality rate (RR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.48-3.41). Conclusion: Overall, intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy was associated with fewer adverse events than laser therapy, rated as high quality of evidence according to the GRADE criteria. Pooled analysis revealed no significant difference between the two arms with respect to the recurrence rate, treatment switching, retreatment, and mortality rate, with quality of evidence ranging from moderate to very low as per the GRADE approach. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails], identifier [CRD42021270077].