RESUMO
Synchronous primary malignancies are a rare finding which can be difficult to diagnose. We present the case of a 57-year-old patient with a high prostate specific antigen who was found to have prostate cancer on subsequent magnetic resonance imaging. A skeletal metastasis was also identified at the time, although no osteoblastic activity or sclerosis was identified on skeletal scintigraphy or computed tomography, respectively. The patient was started on hormonal therapy and follow-up imaging revealed the prostate cancer to have reduced in volume. Despite this, the skeletal metastasis appeared unchanged on magnetic resonance imaging and an F18-choline positron emission tomography study was negative. A computed tomography guided bone biopsy was organized and this demonstrated metastatic leiomyosarcoma. As a result, an F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography study was performed to find the primary lesion which demonstrated a large malignant tumor within the calf. Subsequently, the patient was referred to a tertiary sarcoma unit. This case highlights the challenges involved in diagnosing and managing synchronous malignancies.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: There is an increased reliance on online referral systems (ORS) within neurosurgical departments across the UK. Opinions of neurosurgeons on ORS are extensively reported but those of referrers have hardly been sought. Our study aims at ascertaining our referring colleagues' views on our ORS and its impact on patient care, their opinions on neurosurgeons and how to improve our referral process. SETTING: 14 district general hospitals and one teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 641 healthcare professionals across a range of medical and surgical specialties including doctors of all grades, nurses and physiotherapists. Survey responses were obtained by medical students using a smartphone application. RESULTS: Although 92% of respondents were aware of the ORS, 74% would routinely phone the on-call registrar either before or after making referrals online. The majority (44%) believed their call to relate to a life-threatening emergency. 62% of referrers considered the ORS helpful in informing patients' care and 48% had a positive opinion of their interaction with neurosurgical registrars. On ways to improve the ORS, 50% selected email/text confirmation of response sent to referrers and 16% to referring consultants. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that referrers feel that using our ORS positively impacts patient care but that it remains in need of improvement in order to better suit our colleagues' needs when it comes to managing neurosurgical patients. We feel that the promotion of neurosurgical education and mitigation of the effects of adverse workplace human factors are likely to achieve the common goal of neurosurgeons and referrers alike: a high standard in patient care.