Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.

PURPOSE: Patient response to hematopoietic progenitor-cell mobilizing regimens seems to vary considerably, making comparison between regimens difficult. To eliminate this inter-patient variability, we designed a cross-over trial and prospectively compared the number of progenitors mobilized into blood after granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) days 1 to 12 plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 7 to 12 (regimen G) with the number of progenitors after cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF days 3 to 14 (regimen C) in the same patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were randomized to receive either regimen G or C first (G1 and C1, respectively) and underwent two leukaphereses. After a washout period, patients were then crossed over to the alternate regimen (C2 and G2, respectively) and underwent two additional leukaphereses. The hematopoietic progenitor-cell content of each collection was determined. In addition, toxicity and charges were tracked. RESULTS: Regimen C (n = 50) resulted in mobilization of more CD34(+) cells (2.7-fold/kg/apheresis), erythroid burst-forming units (1.8-fold/kg/apheresis), and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (2.2-fold/kg/apheresis) compared with regimen G given to the same patients (n = 46; paired t test, P<.01 for all comparisons). Compared with regimen G, regimen C resulted in better mobilization, whether it was given first (P =.025) or second (P =.02). The ability to achieve a target collection of > or =2x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg using two leukaphereses was 50% after G1 and 90% after C1. Three of the seven patients in whom mobilization was poor after G1 had > or =2x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg with two leukaphereses after C2. In contrast, when regimen G was given second (G2), seven out of 10 patients failed to achieve the target CD34(+) cell dose despite adequate collections after C1. Thirty percent of the patients (nine of 29) given regimen C were admitted to the hospital because of neutropenic fever for a median duration of 4 days (range, 2 to 10 days). The higher cost of regimen C was balanced by higher CD34(+) cell yield, resulting in equivalent charges based on cost per CD34(+) cell collected. CONCLUSION: We report the first clinical trial that used a cross-over design showing that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF results in mobilization of more progenitors then GM-CSF plus G-CSF when tested in the same patient regardless of sequence of administration, although the regimen is associated with greater morbidity. Patients who fail to achieve adequate mobilization after regimen G can be treated with regimen C as an effective salvage regimen, whereas patients who fail regimen C are unlikely to benefit from subsequent treatment with regimen G. The cross-over design allowed detection of significant differences between regimens in a small cohort of patients and should be considered in design of future comparisons of mobilization regimens.

Autologous CD34+ cell transplantation for patients with advanced lymphoma: effects of overnight storage on peripheral blood progenitor cell enrichment and engraftment.

In order to demonstrate the feasibility of mobilization, enrichment and engraftment of autologous peripheral blood CD34+ cells in patients with relapsed lymphoma, 59 peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections from 21 patients were enriched for CD34+ cells using CEPRATE SC (CellPro, Bothell, WA, USA) immunoaffinity column. Following high-dose chemotherapy, a mean of 17 x 10(8) (range, 3-34) nucleated cells/kg containing 8.7 x 10(6) (0.3-26) CD34+ cells/kg were re-infused. Blood cell recovery in these patients was compared to engraftment capacity of unenriched PBPCs in a cohort of lymphoma patients treated with an identical high-dose chemotherapy regimen. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was rapid in both groups including five patients who received < or = 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. After infusion of CD34+ enriched cells, neutrophils exceeded 0.5 x 10(9)/l in 11 (8-14) days and platelets exceeded 20 x 10(9)/l (untransfused) in 15 (9-39) days. In order to optimize the immunoaffinity column utilization we stored the first PBPC collections overnight at 4 degrees C and combined them with the next day's collection prior to the CD34+ enrichment procedure in 11 patients. This maneuver resulted in a significant decrease in the CD34+ cell recovery (resulting in reinfusion of a mean of 42% less CD34+ cells). Although overnight storage did not affect neutrophil engraftment, platelet engraftment was prolonged in this group of patients even when > 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were re-infused. The overnight storage procedure should be further evaluated for its effects on the CD34+ immunoaffinity enrichment procedure, megakaryocyte progenitors and platelet engraftment. We conclude that CD34+ cells enriched from peripheral blood result in rapid engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with advanced lymphoma that is comparable to that of patients receiving unenriched PBPCs.