RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Screening electrocardiography (ECG) for athletes is both controversial and rapidly evolving. While identifying an abnormal ECG could detect a serious cardiovascular disease, falsely interpreting a benign ECG pattern as abnormal can lead to unnecessary testing, cost, and anxiety. Though recent refinements of athlete screening ECG criteria have significantly improved its accuracy, in clinical practice physician adherence to these criteria may vary. METHODS: We analyzed physician adherence to contemporary athlete ECG criteria in a large, national athlete screening registry. 1577 consecutive screening ECGs were independently re- interpreted to assess for physician adherence to Seattle Criteria or International Criteria, respective to the criteria in place when the screening was performed. We further determined the most common ECG interpretations that deviated from these criteria, and analyzed physician characteristics for independent predictors of adherence to published ECG criteria. RESULTS: Though overall adherence to contemporary criteria was high, 60.4% of ECGs interpreted as abnormal did not meet athlete ECG criteria for pathology when independently re- read. The most common ECG patterns misinterpreted as abnormal were isolated left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and non-pathologic T-wave inversions (TWI). Multivariate regression identified three independent predictors of adherence to athlete ECG criteria: participating in a screening overseen by the organization's medical leadership, electrophysiology specialists and adult cardiologists. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the need for quality control measures and continued clinician education in a controversial and rapidly evolving field. Clinician education for athlete screening ECG criteria should emphasize the recent changes in how TWI and LVH voltage criteria should be interpreted in this patient population.
