Suvorexant for Reduction of Delirium in Older Adults After Hospitalization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Delirium is common among older hospitalized adults. In addition to presenting immediate management issues, delirium can increase the long-term risk of dementia, institutionalization, and mortality. Delirium is associated with disrupted sleep, and prior studies suggest that some specific sleep-promoting agents may reduce delirium. Objective: To evaluate the orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant for reducing delirium in older adults at high risk for delirium after hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 50 hospitals in Japan between October 22, 2020, and December 23, 2022. The study population included Japanese adults aged 65 to 90 years who were at high risk for delirium (mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia, history of delirium at prior hospitalization, or both) and had been hospitalized for acute disease or elective surgery. Data analysis was performed between January 23 and March 13, 2023. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to suvorexant (15 mg) or placebo taken at bedtime for up to 7 days while in the hospital. Main Outcomes and Measures: Delirium, the primary end point, was diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria while participants were hospitalized. The treatment difference in the proportion of participants with delirium was analyzed. Results: This study included 203 participants: 101 were treated with suvorexant (mean [SD] age, 81.5 [4.5]; years; 52 men [51.5%] and 49 women [48.5%]) and 102 received placebo (mean [SD] age, 82.0 [4.9] years; 45 men [44.1%] and 57 women [55.9%]). There were 17 participants with delirium (16.8%) in the suvorexant group compared with 27 (26.5%) in the placebo group (difference, -8.7% [95% CI, -20.1% to 2.6%]; P = .13). Adverse events were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of suvorexant in older adults at high risk for delirium after hospitalization, fewer participants taking suvorexant had delirium compared with placebo, but the difference was not statistically significant. Further studies are needed to determine whether suvorexant may be useful for reducing delirium, particularly delirium with a hyperactive component, in this population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04571944.

Real-World Effectiveness of Ramelteon and Suvorexant for Delirium Prevention in 948 Patients With Delirium Risk Factors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of ramelteon and suvorexant for delirium prevention in real-world practice. It explored whether ramelteon and/or suvorexant would affect delirium prevention among both patients at risk for but without delirium (patients at risk) and those with delirium the night before a consultation. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted by trained psychiatrists at consultation-liaison psychiatric services from October 1, 2017, to October 7, 2018. Patients who were aged 65 years or older and hospitalized because of acute diseases or elective surgery, had risk factors for delirium, and had insomnia or delirium on the night before the consultation were prescribed ramelteon and/or suvorexant. The decision to take medication was left to the discretion of each patient. The primary outcome was incidence of delirium based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, during the first 7 days. RESULTS: Among 526 patients at risk, those taking ramelteon and/or suvorexant developed delirium significantly less frequently than those who did not, after control for the effects of risk factors on the estimate of an independent association between the effects of ramelteon and/or suvorexant and the outcome of developing delirium (15.7% vs 24.0%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.48;, 95% CI, 0.29-0.80; P = .005). Similar results were found among 422 patients with delirium (39.9% vs 66.3%; OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.59; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Ramelteon and suvorexant appear to be effective for delirium prevention in real-world practice.

Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Delirium in Patients With Cancer: A Preliminary Study.

To compare the efficacy of antipsychotics (APs) for delirium treatment in patients with cancer, 27 patients treated with 1 of the 4 APs, haloperidol (HPD), risperidone (RIS), olanzapine (OLZ), and quetiapine (QTP), were divided into 2 groups: long half-life (T1/2; HPD, RIS, and OLZ) versus short T1/2 (QTP) or the multiacting receptor-targeted APs (MARTAs; OLZ and QTP) versus the non-MARTA (HPD and RIS). The symptom severity was evaluated by the memorial delirium rating scale (MDAS) on days 0, 3, and 7 following intervention. Significant improvements in total MDAS scores were found in all groups on day 3. However, on day 7, only the short T1/2 group and MARTA group showed significant improvement. Consideration of an AP's pharmacological properties may be helpful for improving the outcomes of pharmacological delirium intervention in patients with cancer.

Antipsychotics for delirium in the general hospital setting in consecutive 2453 inpatients: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Attention to risk of antipsychotics for older patients with delirium has been paid. A clinical question was whether risk of antipsychotics for older patients with delirium would exceed efficacy of those even in the general hospital setting. METHODS: A prospective observational study proceeded over a 1-year period at 33 general hospitals, where at least one psychiatrist worked full time. Subjects were patients who developed delirium during their admission due to acute somatic diseases or surgery, and who received antipsychotics for delirium. The primary outcome was rates and kinds of serious adverse events. RESULTS: Among 2834 patients who developed delirium, 2453 patients received antipsychotics, such as risperidone (34%), quetiapine (32%), and parenteral haloperidol (20%), for delirium. Out of 2453 patients, 22 serious adverse events (0.9%) were reported. Aspiration pneumonia was the most frequent (17 patients, 0.7%), followed by cardiovascular events (4 patients, 0.2%) and venous thromboembolism (1 patient, 0.0%). There was no patient with a fracture or intracranial injury due to a fall. No one died because of antipsychotic side effects. The mean Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale score was 2.02 (SD 1.09). Delirium was resolved within 1 week in more than half of the patients (54%). CONCLUSIONS: In the general hospital setting under management including fine dosage adjustment and early detection of side effects, risk of antipsychotics for older patients with delirium might be low, in contrast to antipsychotics for dementia in the nursing home or outpatient settings. A point may be not how to avoid using antipsychotics but how to monitor their risk.

Successful use of intravenous clomipramine in depressive-catatonic state associated with corticosteroid treatment.

We report two female patients who deteriorated to depressive-catatonic state after interepisode recovery from a hypomanic episode induced by corticosteroid treatment. Their symptoms developed during maintenance treatment with a low dose of prednisolone in Case 1 and after discontinuation of betamethasone in Case 2. Intravenous clomipramine successfully relieved their symptoms including reduction in contact and reactivity, immobility and mutism. These two patients showed no schizophrenic symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions. Corticosteroid-induced mood disorder can deteriorate into depressive stupor, severe depressive episode with catatonic features in DSM-IV. Clomipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant with relatively stronger serotonin reuptake inhibition, is one of the useful treatment options for corticosteroid-induced depression even in severe cases.