FGF1 Suppresses Allosteric Activation of ß3 Integrins by FGF2: A Potential Mechanism of Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Thrombotic Action of FGF1.

Several inflammatory cytokines bind to the allosteric site (site 2) and allosterically activate integrins. Site 2 is also a binding site for 25-hydroxycholesterol, an inflammatory lipid mediator, and is involved in inflammatory signaling (e.g., TNF and IL-6 secretion) in addition to integrin activation. FGF2 is pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic, and FGF1, homologous to FGF2, has anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic actions, but the mechanism of these actions is unknown. We hypothesized that FGF2 and FGF1 bind to site 2 of integrins and regulate inflammatory signaling. Here, we describe that FGF2 is bound to site 2 and allosterically activated ß3 integrins, suggesting that the pro-inflammatory action of FGF2 is mediated by binding to site 2. In contrast, FGF1 bound to site 2 but did not activate these integrins and instead suppressed integrin activation induced by FGF2, indicating that FGF1 acts as an antagonist of site 2 and that the anti-inflammatory action of FGF1 is mediated by blocking site 2. A non-mitogenic FGF1 mutant (R50E), which is defective in binding to site 1 of αvß3, suppressed ß3 integrin activation by FGF2 as effectively as WT FGF1.

The heparin-binding domain of VEGF165 directly binds to integrin αvß3 and VEGFR2/KDR D1: a potential mechanism of negative regulation of VEGF165 signaling by αvß3.

VEGF-A is a key cytokine in tumor angiogenesis and a major therapeutic target for cancer. VEGF165 is the predominant isoform of VEGF-A, and it is the most potent angiogenesis stimulant. VEGFR2/KDR domains 2 and 3 (D2D3) bind to the N-terminal domain (NTD, residues 1-110) of VEGF165. Since removal of the heparin-binding domain (HBD, residues 111-165) markedly reduced the mitogenic activity of the growth factor, it has been proposed that the HBD plays a critical role in the mitogenicity of VEGF165. Here, we report that αvß3 specifically bound to the isolated VEGF165 HBD but not to VEGF165 NTD. Based on docking simulation and mutagenesis, we identified several critical amino acid residues within the VEGF165 HBD required for αvß3 binding, i.e., Arg123, Arg124, Lys125, Lys140, Arg145, and Arg149. We discovered that VEGF165 HBD binds to the KDR domain 1 (D1) and identified that Arg123 and Arg124 are critical for KDR D1 binding by mutagenesis, indicating that the KDR D1-binding and αvß3-binding sites overlap in the HBD. Full-length VEGF165 mutant (R123A/R124A/K125A/K140A/R145A/R149A) defective in αvß3 and KDR D1 binding failed to induce ERK1/2 phosphorylation, integrin ß3 phosphorylation, and KDR phosphorylation and did not support proliferation of endothelial cells, although the mutation did not affect the KDR D2D3 interaction with VEGF165. Since ß3-knockout mice are known to show enhanced VEGF165 signaling, we propose that the binding of KDR D1 to the VEGF165 HBD and KDR D2D3 binding to the VEGF165 NTD are critically involved in the potent mitogenicity of VEGF165. We propose that binding competition between KDR and αvß3 to the VEGF165 HBD endows integrin αvß3 with regulatory properties to act as a negative regulator of VEGF165 signaling.

FGF9, a Potent Mitogen, Is a New Ligand for Integrin αvß3, and the FGF9 Mutant Defective in Integrin Binding Acts as an Antagonist.

FGF9 is a potent mitogen and survival factor, but FGF9 protein levels are generally low and restricted to a few adult organs. Aberrant expression of FGF9 usually results in cancer. However, the mechanism of FGF9 action has not been fully established. Previous studies showed that FGF1 and FGF2 directly bind to integrin αvß3, and this interaction is critical for signaling functions (FGF-integrin crosstalk). FGF1 and FGF2 mutants defective in integrin binding were defective in signaling, whereas the mutants still bound to FGFR suppressed angiogenesis and tumor growth, indicating that they act as antagonists. We hypothesize that FGF9 requires direct integrin binding for signaling. Here, we show that docking simulation of the interaction between FGF9 and αvß3 predicted that FGF9 binds to the classical ligand-binding site of αvß3. We show that FGF9 bound to integrin αvß3 and generated FGF9 mutants in the predicted integrin-binding interface. An FGF9 mutant (R108E) was defective in integrin binding, activating FRS2α and ERK1/2, inducing DNA synthesis, cancer cell migration, and invasion in vitro. R108E suppressed DNA synthesis and activation of FRS2α and ERK1/2 induced by WT FGF9 (dominant-negative effect). These findings indicate that FGF9 requires direct integrin binding for signaling and that R108E has potential as an antagonist to FGF9 signaling.

FGF9, a potent mitogen, is a new ligand for integrin αvß3, and the FGF9 mutant defective in integrin binding acts as an antagonist.

FGF9 is a potent mitogen and survival factor, but FGF9 protein level is generally low and restricted to a few adult organs. Aberrant expression of FGF9 usually results in cancer. However, the mechanism of FGF9 action has not been fully established. Previous studies showed that FGF1 and FGF2 directly bind to integrin αvß3 and this interaction is critical for signaling functions (FGF-integrin crosstalk). FGF1 and FGF2 mutants defective in integrin binding were defective in signaling, whereas the mutants still bound to FGFR, and suppressed angiogenesis and tumor growth, indicating that they act as antagonists. We hypothesize that FGF9 requires direct integrin binding for signaling. Here we show that docking simulation of interaction between FGF9 and αvß3 predicted that FGF9 binds to the classical ligand-binding site of αvß3. We showed that FGF9 actually bound to integrin αvß3, and generated an FGF9 mutants in the predicted integrin-binding interface. An FGF9 mutant (R108E) was defective in integrin binding, activating FRS2α and ERK1/2, inducing DNA synthesis, cancer cell migration, and invasion in vitro. R108E suppressed DNA synthesis induced by WT FGF9 and suppressed DNA synthesis and activation of FRS2α and ERK1/2 induced by WT FGF9 (dominant-negative effect). These findings indicate that FGF9 requires direct integrin binding for signaling and that R108E has potential as an antagonist to FGF9 signaling.

The heparin-binding domain of VEGF165 directly binds to integrin αvß3 and plays a critical role in signaling.

VEGF-A is a key cytokine in tumor angiogenesis and a major therapeutic target for cancer. VEGF165 is the predominant isoform and is the most potent angiogenesis stimulant. VEGFR2/KDR domains 2 and 3 (D2D3) bind to the N-terminal domain (NTD, residues 1-110) of VEGF165. Since removal of the heparin-binding domain (HBD, residues 111-165) markedly reduced the mitogenic activity of VEGF165, it has been proposed that the HBD plays a critical role in the mitogenicity of VEGF165. Integrin αvß3 has been shown to bind to VEGF165, but the role of integrin αvß3 in VEGF165 signaling are unclear. Here we describe that αvß3 specifically bound to the isolated HBD, but not to the NTD. We identified several critical amino acid residues in HBD for integrin binding (Arg-123, Arg-124, Lys-125, Lys-140, Arg-145, and Arg-149) by docking simulation and mutagenesis, and generated full-length VEGF165 that is defective in integrin binding by including mutations in the HBD. The full-length VEGF165 mutant defective in integrin binding (R123A/R124A/K125A/K140A/R145A/R149A) was defective in ERK1/2 phosphorylation, integrin ß3 phosphorylation, and KDR phosphorylation, although the mutation did not affect KDR binding to VEGF165. We propose a model in which VEGF165 induces KDR (through NTD)-VEGF165 (through HBD)-integrin αvß3 ternary complex formation on the cell surface and this process is critically involved in potent mitogenicity of VEGF165.

Virtual Screening of Protein Data Bank via Docking Simulation Identified the Role of Integrins in Growth Factor Signaling, the Allosteric Activation of Integrins, and P-Selectin as a New Integrin Ligand.

Integrins were originally identified as receptors for extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell-surface molecules (e.g., VCAM-1 and ICAM-1). Later, we discovered that many soluble growth factors/cytokines bind to integrins and play a critical role in growth factor/cytokine signaling (growth factor-integrin crosstalk). We performed a virtual screening of protein data bank (PDB) using docking simulations with the integrin headpiece as a target. We showed that several growth factors (e.g., FGF1 and IGF1) induce a integrin-growth factor-cognate receptor ternary complex on the surface. Growth factor/cytokine mutants defective in integrin binding were defective in signaling functions and act as antagonists of growth factor signaling. Unexpectedly, several growth factor/cytokines activated integrins by binding to the allosteric site (site 2) in the integrin headpiece, which is distinct from the classical ligand (RGD)-binding site (site 1). Since 25-hydroxycholesterol, a major inflammatory mediator, binds to site 2, activates integrins, and induces inflammatory signaling (e.g., IL-6 and TNFα secretion), it has been proposed that site 2 is involved in inflammatory signaling. We showed that several inflammatory factors (CX3CL1, CXCL12, CCL5, sPLA2-IIA, and P-selectin) bind to site 2 and activate integrins. We propose that site 2 is involved in the pro-inflammatory action of these proteins and a potential therapeutic target. It has been well-established that platelet integrin αIIbß3 is activated by signals from the inside of platelets induced by platelet agonists (inside-out signaling). In addition to the canonical inside-out signaling, we showed that αIIbß3 can be allosterically activated by inflammatory cytokines/chemokines that are stored in platelet granules (e.g., CCL5, CXCL12) in the absence of inside-out signaling (e.g., soluble integrins in cell-free conditions). Thus, the allosteric activation may be involved in αIIbß3 activation, platelet aggregation, and thrombosis. Inhibitory chemokine PF4 (CXCL4) binds to site 2 but did not activate integrins, Unexpectedly, we found that PF4/anti-PF4 complex was able to activate integrins, indicating that the anti-PF4 antibody changed the phenotype of PF4 from inhibitory to inflammatory. Since autoantibodies to PF4 are detected in vaccine-induced thrombocytopenic thrombosis (VIPP) and autoimmune diseases (e.g., SLE, and rheumatoid arthritis), we propose that this phenomenon is related to the pathogenesis of these diseases. P-selectin is known to bind exclusively to glycans (e.g., sLex) and involved in cell-cell interaction by binding to PSGL-1 (CD62P glycoprotein ligand-1). Unexpectedly, through docking simulation, we discovered that the P-selectin C-type lectin domain functions as an integrin ligand. It is interesting that no one has studied whether P-selectin binds to integrins in the last few decades. The integrin-binding site and glycan-binding site were close but distinct. Also, P-selectin lectin domain bound to site 2 and allosterically activated integrins.

CD40L Activates Platelet Integrin αIIbß3 by Binding to the Allosteric Site (Site 2) in a KGD-Independent Manner and HIGM1 Mutations Are Clustered in the Integrin-Binding Sites of CD40L.

CD40L is expressed in activated T cells, and it plays a major role in immune response and is a major therapeutic target for inflammation. High IgM syndrome type 1 (HIGM1) is a congenital functional defect in CD40L/CD40 signaling due to defective CD40L. CD40L is also stored in platelet granules and transported to the surface upon platelet activation. Platelet integrin αIIbß3 is known to bind to fibrinogen and activation of αIIbß3 is a key event that triggers platelet aggregation. Also, the KGD motif is critical for αIIbß3 binding and the interaction stabilizes thrombus. Previous studies showed that CD40L binds to and activates integrins αvß3 and α5ß1 and that HIGM1 mutations are clustered in the integrin-binding sites. However, the specifics of CD40L binding to αIIbß3 were unclear. Here, we show that CD40L binds to αIIbß3 in a KGD-independent manner using CD40L that lacks the KGD motif. Two HIGM1 mutants, S128E/E129G and L155P, reduced the binding of CD40L to the classical ligand-binding site (site 1) of αIIbß3, indicating that αIIbß3 binds to the outer surface of CD40L trimer. Also, CD40L bound to the allosteric site (site 2) of αIIbß3 and allosterically activated αIIbß3 without inside-out signaling. Two HIMG1 mutants, K143T and G144E, on the surface of trimeric CD40L suppressed CD40L-induced αIIbß3 activation. These findings suggest that CD40L binds to αIIbß3 in a manner different from that of αvß3 and α5ß1 and induces αIIbß3 activation. HIGM1 mutations are clustered in αIIbß3 binding sites in CD40L and are predicted to suppress thrombus formation and immune responses through αIIbß3.

The C-type lectin domain of CD62P (P-selectin) functions as an integrin ligand.

Recognition of integrins by CD62P has not been reported and this motivated a docking simulation using integrin αvß3 as a target. We predicted that the C-type lectin domain of CD62P functions as a potential integrin ligand and observed that it specifically bound to soluble ß3 and ß1 integrins. Known inhibitors of the interaction between CD62P-PSGL-1 did not suppress the binding, whereas the disintegrin domain of ADAM-15, a known integrin ligand, suppressed recognition by the lectin domain. Furthermore, an R16E/K17E mutation in the predicted integrin-binding interface located outside of the glycan-binding site within the lectin domain, strongly inhibited CD62P binding to integrins. In contrast, the E88D mutation that strongly disrupts glycan binding only slightly affected CD62P-integrin recognition, indicating that the glycan and integrin-binding sites are distinct. Notably, the lectin domain allosterically activated integrins by binding to the allosteric site 2. We conclude that CD62P-integrin binding may function to promote a diverse set of cell-cell adhesive interactions given that ß3 and ß1 integrins are more widely expressed than PSGL-1 that is limited to leukocytes.

Itraconazole Repolarizes Tumor-associated Macrophages and Suppresses Cervical Cancer Cell Growth.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Itraconazole (ITZ), an antifungal agent, has been reported to have anti-tumor effects in patients with multiple cancer types. We investigated the involvement of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in its tumor-agnostic mechanism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: M1 and M2 macrophages were established from human monocyte leukemia cell line (THP-1) and their phenotypes were determined morphologically. Cell membrane antigens and secreted proteins were evaluated by western blots and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. The proteomic profiling of cells was done by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and analyzed. Viability of cervical cancer cells (CaSki) was evaluated after addition of the supernatant of M2 macrophages and during co-culture with M2 macrophages, with or without 10-5 M ITZ. RESULTS: Co-culture of M1 macrophages inhibited the proliferation of CaSki cells (p=0.012), while that of M2 macrophages promoted their proliferation (p<0.0001). After treatment of M2 macrophages with ITZ for 24 h, they changed into M1-like shape with decreased expression of cluster of differentiation 163 (CD163) and chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18). The M1-like shape was maintained for 7 weeks of ITZ treatment and reverted to original after ITZ removal. Proteomic analysis of ITZ treated-M2 macrophages also demonstrated M1-like signature including the elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related proteins. After treatment with ITZ, both the supernatant of the M2 macrophages and the co-culture with M2 macrophages significantly inhibited the proliferation of CaSki cells (each, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: ITZ repolarized M2 macrophages to M1 type and suppressed cervical cancer cell growth demonstrating TAM-mediated anti-cancer activity of ITZ.

Pro-Inflammatory Chemokines CCL5, CXCL12, and CX3CL1 Bind to and Activate Platelet Integrin αIIbß3 in an Allosteric Manner.

Activation of platelet integrin αIIbß3, a key event for hemostasis and thrombus formation, is known to be mediated exclusively by inside-out signaling. We showed that inflammatory chemokines CX3CL1 and CXCL12 in previous studies, and CCL5 in this study, bound to the allosteric binding site (site 2) of vascular integrin αvß3, in addition to the classical ligand binding site (site 1), and allosterically activated integrins independent of inside-out signaling. Since αIIbß3 is exposed to inflammatory chemokines at increased concentrations during inflammation (e.g., cytokine/chemokine storm) and platelet activation, we hypothesized that these chemokines bind to and activate αIIbß3 in an allosteric activation mechanism. We found that these chemokines bound to αIIbß3. Notably, they activated soluble αIIbß3 in 1 mM Ca2+ by binding to site 2. They activated cell-surface αIIbß3 on CHO cells, which lack machinery for inside-out signaling or chemokine receptors, quickly (<1 min) and at low concentrations (1-10 ng/mL) compared to activation of soluble αIIbß3, probably because chemokines bind to cell surface proteoglycans. Furthermore, activation of αIIbß3 by the chemokines was several times more potent than 1 mM Mn2+. We propose that CCL5 and CXCL12 (stored in platelet granules) may allosterically activate αIIbß3 upon platelet activation and trigger platelet aggregation. Transmembrane CX3CL1 on activated endothelial cells may mediate platelet-endothelial interaction by binding to and activating αIIbß3. Additionally, these chemokines in circulation over-produced during inflammation may trigger αIIbß3 activation, which is a possible missing link between inflammation and thrombosis.