Insulin Requirements During Severe COVID-19 Were Relatively Low in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Two Case Reports.

The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused myriad adverse effects on the pathology of other diseases. Numerous studies on COVID-19 have reported that, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who have contracted severe COVID-19, glucose metabolism is exacerbated by multiple factors, such as severe inflammation, beta-cell dysfunction caused by the SARS-CoV-2 infection itself, corticosteroid therapy, vasopressor administration, and enteral or parenteral nutrition. Very high doses of insulin are often required in the acute phase of such patients; however, the factors that affect insulin requirements and to what extent remain unclear. A 50-year-old Japanese woman and a 67-year-old Japanese man, both with T2DM and obesity, were admitted to our hospital with severe COVID-19. Both patients required mechanical ventilation and were treated with dexamethasone and tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor monoclonal antibody. Subcutaneous insulin injections failed to control the patients' hyperglycemia, requiring up to 1.83 and 1.81 units/kg/day of intravenous insulin, respectively. Insulin requirements were rapidly decreased with improvement of the respiratory condition, termination of dexamethasone, and discontinuation of tube feeding. Both patients were discharged with oral antidiabetic agents alone. We experienced two Japanese patients who achieved satisfactory glycemic control with a lower intravenous insulin dose than previous reports. Comparing the clinical factors with the previous literature, ethnic differences in insulin sensitivity and the administration of IL-6 receptor antibodies may have been related to the relatively low insulin requirements.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy with S-1 plus Cisplatin for Patients with Stage III Gastric Cancer After Curative Resection.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus low-dose cisplatin for stage IIIB and stage IIIC gastric cancer patients after D2 gastrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group comprised of 52 patients. In the first cycle, S-1 (80 mg/m2) was administered daily for 3 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest; low-dose cisplatin (10 mg) was administered on days 1-5 and 8-12. In the second and third cycles, S-1 was administered alone. RESULTS: Overall survival was 47.0 months for stage IIIB patients and 24.0 months for stage IIIC (p=0.038). Disease-free survival was 17.0 and 16.0 months respectively (p=0.739). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 20 patients (38.5%). Multivariate analysis identified stage IIIC as independent prognostic factor for survival. CONCLUSION: Our treatment was manageable and safe for stage IIIB or stage IIIC patients. Stage IIIC gastric cancer portends an especially poor prognosis following D2 gastrectomy.

Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage After Pancreatic Surgery in Patients Receiving Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Agents.

Background Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a serious complication after pancreatic surgery. In this study, we evaluated PPH and thromboembolic complications after pancreatic surgery in patients with perioperative antithrombotic treatment. Methods Medical records of patients undergoing pancreatic surgery were reviewed retrospectively. Patients receiving thromboprophylaxis were given either bridging therapy with unfractionated heparin or continued on aspirin as perioperative antithrombotic treatment according to clinical indications and published recommendations. The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of PPH was used. Risk factors associated with PPH were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results Thirty-four of 158 patients received perioperative antithrombotic treatment; this group had a significantly higher PPH rate (29.4% vs 6.5%, P = .001) and mortality (11.8% vs 2.4%, P = .039) than patients not receiving thromboprophylaxis. Multivariate analysis revealed that perioperative antithrombotic treatment was the only independent risk factor for PPH after pancreatic surgery (odds ratio 4.77; 95% CI 1.61-14.15; P = .005). Conclusions Perioperative antithrombotic treatment is an independent risk factor for PPH in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery, although this treatment effectively prevents postoperative thromboembolic events.

[A case of small intestinal cancer in the upper intestine after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy].

We report a case of small intestinal cancer that arose in the upper intestine 16 years after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy( PPPD). An 84-year-old man, who had undergone PPPD for benign biliary tract disease 16 years previously, was found to have a primary small intestinal tumor in the upper intestine by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and primary intestinal cancer in the upper intestine was finally diagnosed. We performed partial resection of the upper small intestine and stomach and partial colectomy of the transverse colon to account for direct invasion. Histopathologically, the primary lesion was diagnosed as a moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Small intestinal cancer in the upper intestine after PPPD is extremely rare.