A pilot study of the implementation of WHO surgical checklist in Finland: improvements in activities and communication.

BACKGROUND: World Health Organisation (WHO) has introduced a surgical safety checklist that has reduced post-operative morbidity and mortality. Prior to national checklist implementation, we assessed its possible impact on the operating room (OR) process, safety-related issues and communication among surgical staff in a high-income country. METHODS: In four university and teaching hospitals, a structured questionnaire was delivered to OR personnel involved in consecutive operations over 4-6 weeks before and after the checklist implementation. The questionnaire resembled the WHO checklist and comprised multiple-choice questions relating to performance of safety checks and communication. Anaesthesiologists (A), surgeons (S) and circulating nurses (CN) answered the questions independently. The WHO checklist was modified for national needs. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned from 1748 operations, 901 before and 847 after the checklist. Patient's identity was more often confirmed (A: 62.7% vs. 84.0%, S: 71.6% vs. 85.5%, CN: 81.6% vs. 94.2%, P < 0.001) and knowledge of names and roles among team members (A: 65.7% vs. 81.8%, S: 71.1% vs. 83.6%, CN: 87.7% vs. 93.2%, P < 0.01) improved with the checklist. Anaesthesiologists and surgeons discussed critical events pre-operatively (A: 22.0% vs. 42.6%, S: 34.7% vs. 46.2%, P < 0.001) more frequently after the checklist. In addition, fewer communication failures (43 vs. 17, P < 0.05) were reported with checklist. CONCLUSIONS: The checklist increased OR teams' awareness of patient-related issues, the procedure and expected risks. It also enhanced team communication and prevented communication failures. Our findings support use of the WHO checklist in various surgical fields.

Towards better patient safety: WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in otorhinolaryngology.

OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organisation has developed a Surgical Safety Checklist to improve patient safety during surgery. This checklist has reduced postoperative morbidity and mortality. Prior to checklist implementation, we wanted to evaluate how it would fit into the process of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery and whether it would have an impact on the awareness of safety-related issues. DESIGN: A structured questionnaire was addressed to the operating room team after consecutive operations during a 1-month period before and after checklist implementation. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was conducted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the Helsinki University Central Hospital as a part of a multicentre study. Responses were received regarding 288 operations before and 412 after checklist implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The questions concerned patient-related safety checks, teamwork and communication. RESULTS: The checklist improved verification of the patient's identity (P<0.001). Awareness of the patient's medical history, medication and allergies increased (P<0.001). Knowledge of the names and roles among the team members improved. The otolaryngologists and anaesthesiologists discussed possible critical events more often (P<0.001), and postoperative instructions were better recorded after use of the checklist. In addition, the checklist enhanced communication between operation team members. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that the Surgical Safety Checklist fits well into the surgical working process in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery improving the sharing of patient-related medical information between team members. Development of a specific checklist for otolaryngology calls for further study.

Gene expression of pulmonary cytokines after sevoflurane or thiopentone anaesthesia in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Volatile anaesthetics have diverse inflammatory effects on the lungs. They increase gene expression of some pro-inflammatory cytokines in alveolar macrophages whereas in alveolar type II cells they seem to decrease secretion and gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. We have previously detected increased leukotriene C4, nitrate and nitrite concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after sevoflurane anaesthesia. In the current study, we measured gene expression of inflammatory cytokines in the lung tissue and plasma concentrations of cytokines in pigs after thiopentone or sevoflurane anaesthesia. METHODS: Sixteen pigs were randomly selected to receive either a continuous thiopentone infusion (control group, n = 8) or sevoflurane (n = 8) at 4.0% inspiratory concentration (1.5 MAC) in air for 6 h. Tissue samples were collected at the end of the study for measurement of gene expression of inflammatory cytokines. Blood samples were collected during anaesthesia for measurement of plasma cytokine concentrations. RESULTS: Compared with thiopentone anaesthesia, lower gene expression of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) in lung tissue was observed after sevoflurane anaesthesia. Of measured cytokines IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 only plasma concentrations of IL-6 could be measured during the study without a difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Lower gene expression of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta was found in the intact porcine lung tissue after sevoflurane anaesthesia compared with thiopentone anaesthesia. Clinical significance of this finding is unknown.

The validity of the static-charge-sensitive bed in the detection of fentanyl-induced respiratory depression.

BACKGROUND: Only a few methods for the measurement of breathing are non-invasive and do not interfere with measured parameters. The static-charge-sensitive bed (SCSB) could be such a monitor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the SCSB compared with the respiratory inductive plethysmograph (RIP) using a fentanyl-induced respiratory depression model. METHODS: Eight healthy male volunteers were infused with intravenous (i.v.) fentanyl (15 microg/kg/h) until a decrease in SpO2 below 90% for 1 min emerged. Breathing was continuously and simultaneously measured with SCSB and RIP. Oxygenation, hemodynamics, arterial blood gas analysis, and subjective opioid-related effects were monitored. Fentanyl concentration was measured from an arterial blood sample. The respiratory rate data of the SCSB (automated analysis and manual calculation) were compared with the corresponding RIP data, using analysis of variance for repeated measures. The validity of the SCSB compared with RIP was evaluated using an intra-class correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Mean fentanyl dose was 629 microg. A statistically significant association was found between the RIP and SCSB data in the manual SCSB analysis (P < 0.0001), but not in the automated SCSB analysis (P = 0.91). After adjusting for the effect of time and the SCSB method, an intra-class correlation coefficient between the manually calculated SCSB values and the RIP values was 0.66. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant changes in respiratory rate were detected with the SCSB, but the results had to be analyzed manually. The SCSB best suits situations, where comprehensive data are needed. It is not suitable for on-line respiratory monitoring, as the automated analysis did not calculate the respiratory rate correctly.

Pulmonary inflammatory mediators after sevoflurane and thiopentone anaesthesia in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Volatile anaesthetics have been shown to affect the release of pulmonary inflammatory mediators and exacerbate pulmonary injury after experimental aspiration. Thus, in theory, volatile anaesthetics may worsen inflammatory pulmonary injury and disease. We have previously described that no significant changes in alveolar ultrastructure are seen after sevoflurane anaesthesia. However, this does not exclude any possible physiological alterations. The aim of our study was to evaluate pulmonary inflammatory mediators in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) after sevoflurane and thiopentone anaesthesia in pigs with intact lungs. METHODS: Sixteen pigs were randomly selected to receive either a continuous thiopentone infusion (control group, n = 8) or sevoflurane (n = 8) at 4.0% inspiratory concentration (1.5 MAC) in air for 6 h. Bronchoalveolar lavage samples were collected at the end of the study to determine pulmonary inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Compared with thiopentone anaesthesia, significant increases in BAL leukotriene C4 (LTC4), NO3-, and NO2- levels were observed after sevoflurane anaesthesia. In addition, there was a significant decrease in total blood leukocyte count in sevoflurane-treated animals. CONCLUSION: We conclude that sevoflurane increases pulmonary LTC4, NO3-, and NO2- production in pigs, indicating an inflammatory response.

Alveolar integrity and ultrastructure in pigs remain undamaged after exposure to sevoflurane.

Previous studies have shown that both halothane and isoflurane have adverse but reversible effects on alveolar physiology. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that also sevoflurane may affect alveolar integrity. Fifteen pigs were randomly selected to receive either thiopentone infusion (control group, n=8) or sevoflurane (n=7) at 4.0% inspiratory concentration (1.5 MAC) in air for 6 h. Tissue samples from the lungs were obtained at the end of the experiment. Both histopathological light microscopy and electron microscopy were used to assess the structural integrity of the alveoli. Pulmonary hemodynamics were comparable in both groups. Light microscopy showed no difference between the groups in the amount of alveolar macrophages, red blood cells or edema. Electron microscopy showed minor changes such as moderate local swelling of alveolar epithelium in both study groups. Alveolar type II cells were ultrastructurally unaltered in both study groups. We conclude that long-term, high concentration exposure to sevoflurane has no detrimental effect on the alveolar integrity in pigs.