Granulomatosis with polyangiitis presenting as multiple renal masses: A case report with MRI findings.

It is extremely rare for granulomatosis with polyangiitis to form masses in the kidneys. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of renal masses caused by this disease have been infrequently reported. In this study, we report a case of renal masses caused by granulomatosis with polyangiitis with different findings. While on steroid treatment for a recently diagnosed granulomatosis with polyangiitis, a man in his 60s underwent computed tomography for a hepatic dysfunction. Computed tomography showed incidental findings of a 40 mm × 35 mm mass in the left kidney and two 8 mm × 8 mm masses in the right kidney; all masses were hypovascular. On magnetic resonance imaging, the left renal mass showed a hyperintense signal with slightly hypointense signal rim on T2-weighted imaging. The left renal mass showed a strong hypointense signal where the mass abutted the renal capsule. On diffusion-weighted imaging, the left renal mass showed an isointense signal with a hyperintense signal rim. Both right renal masses showed an isointense signal with slightly hypointense signal rim on T2-weighted imaging and hyperintense signal on diffusion-weighted imaging. Suspecting renal masses caused by the disease, the patient was then treated with steroids and methotrexate. After 6 months of treatment, both right renal masses resolved; however, the left renal mass shrank but abnormal signal remained. Based on the treatment course, it is conceivable that the renal masses were caused by granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Usefulness of peripherally inserted central catheter port system (PICC-PORT) implantation in the sitting position: a new technique for cases unsuitable for conventional implantation.

PURPOSE: Totally implantable central venous access port implantation is typically performed in the supine position. However, some patients cannot adopt the supine position due to severe pain and/or dyspnea. The present study evaluated the technical feasibility of peripherally inserted central catheter port system (PICC-PORT) implantation in the sitting position in such cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the sitting position method, PICC-PORT implantation was performed with the patients seated on a videofluoroscopy chair positioned between the limbs of an angiographic C-arm and the operative upper arm positioned on an arm stand. From January 2019 to September 2021, eight patients underwent PICC-PORT implantations using this sitting method. We also evaluated 251 consecutive patients with conventional supine position PICC-PORT implantation as controls. Differences in technical success, procedure time and complications were retrospectively assessed between the two groups. RESULTS: Procedural success rates were 100% in both groups. Median procedure times in the sitting and conventional groups were 42 and 44 min, respectively. No complications were observed in the sitting group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in procedure time (p = 0.674) and complications (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Implantation of PICC-PORT in the sitting position is technically feasible and useful.

Pure ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate protruding into the prostatic urethra: A case report of MRI findings and literature review.

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate (DCa) is the histological variant of prostatic carcinoma. The macroscopic finding of DCa arising from primary duct by urethroscopy is papillary excrescences in the prostatic urethra. But the finding of MRI remains poorly understood, since there is no coherent report on the MRI finding of DCa arising from primary duct. We herein report a case of DCa arising from primary duct and forming papillary excrescences in the prostatic urethra. The patient was a male in his 70s and presented with gross hematuria a few days ago. Blood test showed elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA). Prostate MRI was performed. There were two lesions in the prostatic urethra and the right transition zone (TZ). On T 2-weighted image (T2WI), the lesion in the prostatic urethra was identifiable, but the lesion in the right TZ was difficult to identify. On diffusion-weighted image (DWI), both lesions showed hyperintense signal and could be identified, and there was continuity between them. Urethroscopy was performed, there was the lesion with papillary excrescences developing from the right dorsal side of prostatic urethra. Transurethral resection of the prostate was performed. The pathological diagnosis was DCa (pure type). A review of previous literature showed that DCa had a slightly hypointense signal on T2WI. It may be difficult to identify DCa in the TZ because DCa and the TZ show similar signals on T2WI. DWI may be useful to accurately assess DCa arising from primary duct.