Validity of FibroScan values for predicting hepatic fibrosis stage in patients with chronic HCV infection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the FibroScan system compared with liver histology and serum markers for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis. We also tried to determine the cut-off levels and assess the feasibility of using FibroScan values to predict the fibrosis stage. METHODS: In 44 patients with HCV infection, liver stiffness was evaluated by FibroScan, serum fibrosis markers and a liver biopsy. Associations between these indices were also analyzed. RESULTS: FibroScan values showed a good correlation with serum levels of type IV collagen, hyaluronic acid and procollagen-III-peptide, and with the platelet count. Compared with liver histology, the FibroScan values increased proportionally with the progression of the histological fibrosis stage. Advanced fibrosis (F3 or F4) could be efficiently predicted by a FibroScan cut-off value of 15 kPa. The FibroScan sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 100%, 73.9%, 77.8%, 100%, and 86.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FibroScan values gave a good correlation with various markers of fibrosis and increased proportionally with the progression of the hepatic fibrosis stage. A FibroScan value of 15 kPa was found to be a significant separation limit for differentiating advanced fibrosis stages (F3 and F4) from the milder stages (F0-F2). FibroScan values are clinically useful for predicting the fibrosis stages and helpful in managing interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Early decline of the HCV core antigen can predict SVR in patients with HCV treated by Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy is now a popular treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C; however, the reported sustained virologic response (SVR) rate remains at nearly 50% in genotype 1b infected patients. Therefore, it is of clinical benefit to be able to predict the effect of combination therapy on individual patients earlier in the treatment. We estimated the predictive serum HCV core antigen levels for SVR in the early therapeutic stage of combination therapy. METHODS: The HCV core antigen in patients with high-level HCV viremia, in whom standard PEG-IFNalpha2b plus RBV combination therapy had been completed, was measured at baseline and at 3, 7, 14, 28 and 84 days of treatment, and their SVR was determined at 24 weeks after treatment. Sixty genotype 1b- and 30 genotype 2-infected patients were included. RESULTS: Thirty (50%) genotype 1b and 27 (90%) genotype 2 patients achieved a SVR. In genotype 1b patients the decline of HCV core antigen levels was statistically different between the SVR and non-SVR groups. When we defined a separation level at 500 fmol/L, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for SVR at day 7 was 79.4%, 88.5%, 90%, 76.7%, and 83.3%, respectively. In genotype 2 patients, there was no significant difference in the HCV core antigen values between the SVR and non-SVR groups. CONCLUSION: In genotype 1b patients, 500 fmol/L of HCV core antigen level at day 7 was the best predictor for therapeutic response in the early stage of treatment.

Nutritional investigation of non-obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the significance of dietary cholesterol.

OBJECTIVE: The onset and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) seem to be affected by nutritive intake; however, detailed examinations have not been performed in non-obese NAFLD patients. The purpose of this study was to identify potential nutritive factors that affect NAFLD and its related nutritional problems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated the distribution of abdominal fat, dietary intake, and biochemical data in patients with NAFLD and compared non-obese with obese patients. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with diabetes or dyslipidemia between the obese and non-obese groups. Waist circumference, total abdominal fat levels, and subcutaneous fat levels were significantly higher in the obese group, while visceral fat levels were not significantly different between the two groups. Immunoreactive insulin (IRI) and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were significantly lower in the non-obese group, suggesting that the non-obese patients were not overtly insulin resistant. Although serum adiponectin and TNF-alpha levels were similar in both groups, leptin levels were significantly higher in the obese group. Total energy and carbohydrate intake tended to be higher in the obese group. A characteristic feature was that dietary cholesterol intake was significantly higher, while the intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) was significantly lower in the non-obese group. CONCLUSIONS: In non-obese NAFLD patients: 1) although visceral fat was increased, insulin resistance and/or dysregulated secretion of adipocytokines was not necessarily shown; 2) intakes of total energy and carbohydrates were not excessive, although dietary cholesterol was superabundant and dietary PUFAs were significantly lower compared with those in obese patients; and 3) characteristic fat intake may be associated with the formation of NAFLD.

The significance of differences in fatty acid metabolism between obese and non-obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered to be associated with metabolic syndrome; however, a number of NAFLD patients are not obese. To explore any differences in lipid metabolism between obese and non-obese patients, we determined the expression of fatty acid metabolism-related genes. Expression levels of target genes were quantified by real-time PCR using liver biopsy samples from NAFLD patients and normal controls. Serum adipocytokine levels were also determined. The expression of genes related to fatty acid synthesis and uptake was generally up-regulated in NAFLD patients; however, no significant difference was seen between obese and non-obese groups. Most of the genes tested related to fatty acid and reactive oxygen species (ROS) elimination, were overexpressed in NAFLD and the levels were significantly higher in non-obese patients. As an exception, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha expression was suppressed in NAFLD and the levels were lower in the obese group. Triglyceride synthesis-related genes were up-regulated and lipolytic enzymes were decreased in NAFLD, but there was no significant difference between the obese and non-obese groups. In NAFLD, increased de novo synthesis and uptake of fatty acids led to further hepatocyte accumulation of fatty acids. The up-regulation of fatty acid oxidation and the antioxidant pathway and the suppression of lipolysis seemed to be involved in this process. Expression of genes related to fatty acid oxidation and ROS elimination were higher in the non-obese group than in the obese group, which contributes to the trend of more severe liver injury, insulin resistance and steatosis in obese patients.

Atypical manifestations of pancreatitis with autoimmune phenomenon in an adolescent female.

We report a case of an adolescent girl with atypical manifestations of pancreatitis with autoimmune phenomenon presenting with epigastralgia and back pain. While no abnormalities were detected on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, apart from the absence of peripancreatic spread, laboratory and serological findings, such as hypergammaglobulinemia, a high titer of immunoglobulin G, a high titer of immunoglobulin G4, slight positivity for antinuclear antibodies, and positivity for autoantibodies to lactoferrin, were suggestive of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography imaging (MRCP) visualized only the main pancreatic duct (MPD) in the pancreas head region. Proteoclastic enzyme inhibitor treatment was ineffective but the patient responded well to oral prednisolone. The patient and her family did not consent to endoscopic retrograde pancreatography or biopsy/histopathological examination. The case could not be diagnosed as AIP due to lack of typical diagnostic criteria, and thus the final diagnosis was considered pancreatitis with autoimmune phenomenon. We considered that the MRCP finding of partly visible MPD was due to diffuse irregular narrowing of the MPD. This case suggests that while MRCP imaging of the MPD may be helpful in the diagnosis of pancreatitis with autoimmune phenomenon, a negative result does not preclude such diagnosis.