Predictive factors and management of urinary tract infections after kidney transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infectious complications in kidney transplant recipients. The aims of our study were to identify possible predictive factors for UTI and advocate for the management of UTI after kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2018, 182 adult patients with end-stage kidney disease who underwent KT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who had urinary symptoms and positive urine culture were diagnosed with UTI. The types of urinary bacteria causing UTIs were also examined. RESULTS: UTIs occurred in forty-one patients (25.1%), and the median time to UTI onset (UTI-free survival) after KT was 189 days. The Cox hazard regression analysis showed that the predictive factors for UTI onset were as follows: posttransplant urinary catheterization, including indwelling urinary catheterization and clean intermittent catheterization; a maximum bladder capacity before KT of less than 150 ml; and a low serum albumin level at 1 month after KT. The most common causative agent was Escherichia coli (56.6%), followed by Enterococcus spp. (15.6%) and Klebsiella spp. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplant recipients with prolonged postoperative malnutrition, posttransplant voiding dysfunction and/or urinary storage disorder had an increased risk of UTI. Bladder function tests, such as uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine tests, and urodynamic tests, were needed to predict UTI. For patients with malnutrition, care should be taken to ensure sufficient calorie intake. Kidney transplant recipients who develop UTI should be treated as complicated UTI patients.

Clinical outcomes in donors and recipients of kidney transplantations involving medically complex living donors - a retrospective study.

We retrospectively compared the post-transplantation graft survival and the donor's estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) following living donor kidney transplantations (LDKTs) involving medically complex living donors (MCLDs) (the elderly and patients with obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or reduced renal function) and standard living donors (SLDs). The clinical data on patients who underwent LDKTs at our institution from 2006-2019, including 192 SLDs and 99 MCLDs, were evaluated. Regarding recipients, the log-rank test and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses showed a higher incidence of overall and death-censored graft loss in the recipients who received kidneys from MCLDs (Hazard ratio = 2.16 and 3.25, P = 0.015 and 0.004, respectively), after adjusting for recipient-related variables including age, sex, duration of dialysis, ABO compatibility, and donor-specific antibody positivity. Regarding donors, a linear mixed model showed significantly lower postdonation eGFRs (-2.25 ml/min/1.73 m2 , P = 0.048) at baseline in MCLDs than SLDs, but comparable change (difference = 0.01 ml/min/1.73 m2 /year, P = 0.97). In conclusion, although kidneys from MCLDs are associated with impaired graft survival, the donation did not adversely affect the MCLDs' renal health in at least the short-term. LDKTs involving carefully selected MCLDs would be an acceptable alternative for recipients with no SLDs.

The efficacy of axitinib as a first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

AIM: To evaluate predictive factors which associated with oncological outcomes to first-line axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted patients who had been treated with axitinib as first-line therapy for the treatment of mRCC from September 2013 to February 2018. Axitinib was given by single daily oral administration at a dose of 10 mg, which was reduced according to adverse events (AEs). We investigated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and AEs. RESULTS: Thirty-eight mRCC patients were enrolled. The median follow-up duration of axitinib treatment was 11.3 months (range = 1.0-56.9). ORR was 28.9%. Median PFS and OS was 12.8, and 17.9 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil, corrected calcium (Ca), platelets (Plt) and time from diagnosis were selected as potential predictive factors. Multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model analysis showed that the number of risk factors were associated with PFS (P = 0.03) and OS (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Baseline LDH, neutrophil, Ca, Plt and time from diagnosis are predictive factors for both PFS and OS in first-line treatment with axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Sunitinib versus sorafenib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with renal impairment before the immune-oncology therapy era.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and safety of sunitinib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with renal impairment remains poorly documented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the efficacy and safety of sunitinib and sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 by reviewing the medical records of patients treated at Jichi Medical University Hospital, Japan, between May 2008 and August 2016. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated with sunitinib and 14 with sorafenib. Median progression-free survival in sunitinib- and sorafenib-treated patients was comparable, at 6.6 vs 5.8 months, respectively (HR, 1.618; 95% CI, 0.689-3.798; P = 0.2691). Median overall survival was also comparable, at 65.9 vs 58.0 months (HR, 0.985; 95% CI, 0.389-2.479; P = 0.9748). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were significantly more frequent in the sunitinib-treated than sorafenib-treated patients (P = 0.0357). Compared to pre-treatment values, estimated glomerular filtration rate at the discontinuation of treatment was not decreased in either group. In contrast, estimated glomerular filtration rate was decreased on long-term treatment, particularly in previously nephrectomized patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib and sorafenib had similar efficacy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and severe renal impairment. Although renal function was not markedly impaired in either group, close attention to decreased renal function may be necessary in previously nephrectomized patients on long-term treatment.