Applicability and Durability of Valve-Sparing Tetralogy of Fallot Repair.

BACKGROUND: Although valve-sparing repair remains ideal for patients with tetralogy of Fallot, the durability of valve-sparing repair and which patients may have been better served with a transannular patch remain unclear. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of tetralogy of Fallot operations at our institution from January 2008 to December 2018. Standard demographic data were collected, including echocardiographic parameters, operative details, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed comparing the transannular patch and valve-sparing repair groups. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients underwent tetralogy of Fallot repair with a median age of 4.5 (3.2-6.0) months and weight of 5.8 (5.2, 6.7) kg. Seventeen (25%) patients underwent transannular patch repair and 50 (75%) patients underwent valve-sparing repair. There was no difference in age or weight between patients who underwent a transannular patch repair and those who underwent a valve-sparing repair. At last follow-up (median 42 months), there was a trend of a higher peak pulmonary valve/right ventricular outflow tract gradient (P = .06) in the valve-sparing group, but no difference in the pulmonary valve annulus z-scores. Additionally, the pulmonary valve z-scores in the valve-sparing group decreased from -2.3 ± 1.0 on predischarge echocardiogram of to -1.2 ± 1.6 on last follow-up, with the peak gradient on predischarge 23 (0-37) mm Hg remaining stable on last follow-up at 18 (0-29) mm Hg. There was one reoperation: pulmonary valve replacement six years after a transannular patch. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining a postrepair pulmonary valve z-score of -2 yields satisfactory, stable valve-sparing repair with pulmonary valve growth, acceptable gradients, minimal regurgitation, and high freedom from reintervention during follow-up.

24-Year Results of Nonfenestrated Extracardiac Fontan Including Fontan Conversions.

BACKGROUND: There is active debate regarding the optimal method of Fontan palliation. In light of this, we reviewed our experience with the nonfenestrated extracardiac Fontan including Fontan conversion. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all nonfenestrated extracardiac Fontan and Fontan conversion operations at our institution from December 1, 1994 to December 31, 2018. Standard demographic data were collected, including underlying anatomy, preoperative ventricular and valvular function, operative details, perioperative data, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analysis included comparison between initial extracardiac Fontan patients and Fontan conversions, as well as analysis of risk factors for adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There were 341 patients with an overall operative mortality of 4 patients (1.2%). Of these, 193 were extracardiac nonfenestrated Fontan completion operations (57%) and 148 were Fontan conversions (43%). Length of stay was 11 days (SD, 6 days) with ventilator duration of 28 hours (SD, 26 hours). Six of the completion Fontan patients (3%) required Fontan takedown at a median time of 2.5 days. Upon multivariable analysis, risk factors associated with adverse events (mortality, Fontan takedown, and/or transplant) included increased cardiopulmonary bypass time, preoperative decreased dominant ventricular function, and length of stay. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that mild or greater preoperative ventricular dysfunction decreased survival as well as freedom from adverse events for both initial extracardiac Fontan and Fontan conversion patients. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 24 years, our strategy of nonfenestrated extracardiac Fontan has achieved low operative mortality for both initial Fontan and Fontan conversion. There is a steady attrition of Fontan patients to cardiac transplantation; the key risk factor is preoperative ventricular dysfunction.