Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 33(1): 50-7, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18852676

RESUMO

The distinction between benign and malignant cartilaginous tumors of bone is one of the most difficult subjects in surgical pathology. The grading of chondrosarcoma also seems to vary considerably among pathologists. However, clinical management differs. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate interobserver variability in histological diagnosis and grading of central cartilaginous tumors and (2) to assess the diagnostic value of defined histologic parameters in differentiating enchondroma and central grade I chondrosarcoma. The interobserver variability was assessed using a set of 16 cases evaluated by 18 specialized pathologists. Subsequently, 20 enchondromas and 37 central grade I chondrosarcomas diagnosed in a multidisciplinary team with full clinical, radiologic, and pathologic data available with 10 years of follow-up were collected. Cytologic and tissue-architectural features were assessed to find an optimal set of parameters to differentiate enchondroma from central grade I chondrosarcoma. We demonstrate considerable variation in the histologic assessment of cartilaginous tumors (weighted kappa=0.78). The distinction between enchondroma and grade I chondrosarcoma was shown to be the most disconcordant (kappa coefficient=0.54), and also the differentiation between grade I and grade II chondrosarcoma was subjected to variation (kappa coefficient=0.80). The application of a combination of 5 parameters (high cellularity, presence of host bone entrapment, open chromatin, mucoid matrix quality, and age above 45 y) allowed optimal differentiation between enchondromas and central grade I chondrosarcomas. With a classification tree based on 2 parameters (mucoid matrix degeneration more than 20% and/or host bone entrapment present), 54 of the 57 (94.7%) cases were assessed correctly (sensitivity 95% and specificity 95%). Our study confirms the low reliability of the diagnosis and grading of central chondrosarcoma. However, these classifications guide therapeutic decision making in daily practice. Therefore, we propose a classification model that, combined with a tailored radiologic assessment, may improve reliability of the diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/classificação , Condroma/classificação , Condroma/patologia , Condrossarcoma/classificação , Condrossarcoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Condroma/epidemiologia , Condrossarcoma/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador
2.
J Bone Miner Res ; 24(1): 70-7, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18767926

RESUMO

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a benign bone tumor with a shown clinical behavior of local recurrences and rare distant metastases. GCTB is composed of uniformly distributed osteoclastic giant cells, thought to originate from the fusion of monocyte-macrophage lineage cells, in a background consisting of mononuclear rounded cells and spindle-shaped cells. Several reports showed the specific expression of markers, such as CD14 on the mononuclear rounded cell population, however, lacking osteoclastic giant cells. Blood monocytes that were CD14+, CD33+, or CD14+/CD33+ have also been shown to be programmed as pre-osteoclasts. The macrophage marker CD33 is expressed earlier than CD14 in macrophage maturation, whereas CD14 is expressed longer than CD33. The aim of this study was to investigate CD14/CD33 expression profiles in GCTB. Nineteen GCTB tumor samples of 19 patients were studied. Immunofluorescent analyses were performed with monoclonal antibodies against CD14, CD33, RANK, and CD51. To unambiguously further prove the expression of these molecules, quantitative RT-PCR was used with subsequent sequencing of its products. All samples showed similar immunoreactivity profiles. The mononuclear rounded cell population was positive for RANK, CD51, CD14, and CD33. The osteoclastic giant cell population expressed RANK and CD51, as well as CD33, but was consistently negative for CD14 expression. The CD14 and CD33 profiles were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. These RT-PCR products were sequence verified. Osteoclasts in GCTB are the result of fusion of CD33-expressing pre-osteoclasts that further fuse with CD14+ mononuclear cells. Although these results reflect a static rather than a dynamic spectrum, we strongly believe that osteoclastogenesis seems not to be the exclusive result of fusion of intratumoral CD14+ mononuclear cells. Moreover, CD33-modulated osteoclastogenesis opens up the possibility for novel therapeutic directions.


Assuntos
Antígenos CD/biossíntese , Antígenos de Diferenciação Mielomonocítica/biossíntese , Neoplasias Ósseas/metabolismo , Tumores de Células Gigantes/metabolismo , Receptores de Lipopolissacarídeos/biossíntese , Osteoclastos/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Integrina alfaV/biossíntese , Leucócitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Receptor Ativador de Fator Nuclear kappa-B/biossíntese , Lectina 3 Semelhante a Ig de Ligação ao Ácido Siálico
3.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 28(5): 561-4, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18580373

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Histological examination of bone tumors is one of the most difficult subjects in pathology. In this manuscript, correctness of initial histological diagnosis in pediatric bone tumors and tumorlike lesions was investigated. PROCEDURE: All 262 bone tumor specimens of children up to the age of 19 years reviewed from 1999 to 2003 by the Netherlands Committee on Bone Tumors were included. Initial diagnosis and diagnosis after review were compared. RESULTS: Only 60% of original diagnoses proved to be correct. After classification according to the main categories of the World Health Organization classification, only 75% of tumors were correctly categorized. Thirteen of the 60 malignant tumors were not recognized as malignant. Seven of 198 benign lesions were reclassified as malignant. Kappa values were indicative for good agreement in the (by the Ministry of Health designated) bone tumor centers. For nondesignated hospital kappa values, a substantial lower level of agreement was noted. Agreement was almost perfect in Ewing/primitive neuroectodermal tumors. For cartilaginous, osteogenic, and fibrous tumors, agreement was lower. Adamantinomas were not recognized in non-bone tumor centers. For the remaining group composed of miscellaneous tumors, poor levels of agreement were noted. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that correct diagnosis of childhood bone tumors requires review by a multidisciplinary team of experts. Specifically in non-bone tumor centers, the correctness of the initial diagnosis can be questioned.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Países Baixos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
4.
J Pathol ; 205(4): 476-82, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15685701

RESUMO

Enchondromas and conventional central chondrosarcomas are, respectively, benign and malignant hyaline cartilage-forming tumours that originate in the medulla of bone. In order to gain a better understanding of the molecular process underlying malignant transformation of enchondroma, and to investigate whether there is a biological difference between conventional central cartilaginous tumours and those of enchondromatosis or with phalangeal localization, a series of 64 enchondromas (phalanx, n = 21; enchondromatosis, n = 15) and 89 chondrosarcomas (phalanx, n = 17; enchondromatosis, n = 13) was collected. Indian Hedgehog (IHH)/parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTHrP) signalling, an important pathway in chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation within the normal growth plate, was studied by immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of PTHrP, PTHR1, Bcl-2, p21, cyclin D1, and cyclin E. Quantitative real-time PCR for IHH, PTCH, SMO, and GLI2 was performed on a subset of tumours. The data show that IHH signalling is absent in enchondromas and central chondrosarcomas, while PTHrP signalling is active. There was no difference in the expression of any of the molecules between 35 enchondromas and 26 grade I central chondrosarcomas, indicating that PTHrP signalling is not important in malignant transformation of enchondroma. Higher expression of PTHR1 and Bcl-2 was associated with increasing histological grade in chondrosarcoma, suggesting involvement in tumour progression. No difference was found between samples from enchondromatosis patients and solitary cases, suggesting no difference in PTHrP signalling. A small subset of phalangeal chondrosarcomas demonstrated down-regulation of PTHrP, which may be related to its more indolent clinical behaviour. Thus, in both enchondromas and central chondrosarcomas, PTHrP signalling is active and independent of IHH signalling, irrespective of the presence or absence of enchondromatosis.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Condrossarcoma/patologia , Encondromatose/patologia , Proteína Relacionada ao Hormônio Paratireóideo/análise , Transdução de Sinais/fisiologia , Transativadores/análise , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/química , Transformação Celular Neoplásica/patologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Condrossarcoma/química , Encondromatose/metabolismo , Feminino , Dedos/patologia , Proteínas Hedgehog , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , RNA Mensageiro/análise , RNA Neoplásico/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA