Value of Knowing: Health-Related Behavior Changes following Amyloid PET Results Disclosure in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence supports the clinical utility of amyloid PET, however, whether patients at risk for dementia use knowledge of their brain amyloid status to alter their health behaviors remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To explore the effect of amyloid PET results disclosure on self-reported health behaviors in patients with mild cognitive impairment. DESIGN: Self-reported health behaviors were a secondary outcome of the Return of Amyloid Imaging Scan Results (RAISR) randomized clinical trial of amyloid PET results disclosure for individuals with mild cognitive impairment. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: RAISR study participants included 82 patients with mild cognitive impairment who were 92% non-Hispanic white, 59% male, and, on average, 73 ± 8.61 years old with 16.25 ± 2.49 years of education. INTERVENTION: Participants were assigned to a scan group with the opportunity to have an amyloid PET scan and learn their results or to a control group consisting only of a mild cognitive impairment education session and no opportunity for an amyloid PET scan. MEASUREMENTS: A 14-item health behavior questionnaire supplemented with qualitative data from the open-ended text entries to describe "other" health behaviors and follow-up semi-structured interviews. Baseline assessments were conducted prior to group assignment. For the present analysis, 71 participants had available data and scan group participants were divided by amyloid status, creating three groups for comparison: amyloid positive, amyloid negative, and control (no scan). RESULTS: Over 12 months of follow-up, no significant differences were observed in lifestyle, vitamin/supplement use, stress reduction activities, cognitive stimulation, or advance directive completion. Amyloid-negative participants were less likely than controls to consider long-term care insurance (63.6% vs. 89.2%; P = .025), and to endorse behaviors classified as "other" (36.4% vs. 64.9%; P = 0.037). After adjusting for education level, gender, and Mini-Mental State Exam score, logistic regression showed that amyloid-negative patients were 74% less likely than controls to report "other" behaviors (OR = 0.26, 95% CI [0.08, 0.85], P = 0.025), and 78% less likely to consider long-term care insurance (OR= 0.22, 95% CI [0.06, 0.86], P = 0.03). Qualitative analysis of open-ended questionnaire data and supplemental interviews with scan group participants revealed "other" activities to include changes in areas like employment, driving, and residential status, and engagement in other non-medical activities (e.g., pursuing bucket lists). CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory analysis of health-related behavior changes following amyloid PET disclosure suggests that the value of knowing one's brain amyloid status may differ by scan result and encompass actions that focus more on maximizing quality of life than promoting cognitive health.

Ambulatory blood pressure responses and the circumplex model of mood: a 4-day study.

BACKGROUND: The relation between mood or emotions and concurrent ambulatory blood pressure responses holds both fundamental and clinical interest. METHODS: The primary sample consisted of 69 normotensive or borderline hypertensive but otherwise healthy adult males. The validation sample consisted of 85 healthy male undergraduate college students. Both samples underwent half-hourly 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements on four separate workdays, 1 week apart. At each ambulatory measurement, subjects recorded their behavior, environment, and mood. The circular mood scale, a circular visual analogue scale based on the circumplex model of mood, was used to reflect the totality of a participant's affective state space. Longitudinal random effects regression models were applied in the data analysis. RESULTS: The results for both samples were quite similar. Sleep and posture had the greatest influence on ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate. The effects of the environmental setting, social setting, and consumption were modest but statistically significant. Independent of these covariates, mood exerted a significant effect on blood pressure and heart rate. Relative to the "mellow" default category, blood pressure increased both for "anxious/annoyed" and "elated/happy" and decreased during "disengaged/sleepy" mood. The range of mood-related blood pressure estimates was 6.0/3.7 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of blood pressure responses suggests that they were related to the degree of engagement of a mood rather than the degree of unpleasantness. The hypothesis that posits that negative affect-related cardiovascular reactivity mediates the observed correlation between negative affect and disease risk should be reconsidered.

Neither awake nor sleep blood pressures better predict target-organ effect.

We sought to assess the strengths of commonly used ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) parameters as predictors of transmitral flow/velocity ratio (E/A) and the dimensions that govern the left ventricular (LV) mass index. ABP, E/A, and LV dimensions were assessed in 47 subjects, with inclusion of 45 in the final data analysis. The results of four weekly (96 h total) ABP studies were averaged for each subject. No single ABP parameter immerged as a "best predictor." Furthermore, casual blood pressures taken at the beginning of the echo examination had predictive strength for LV mass which was similar to that of the ambulatory data. In the present study, neither awake nor sleep ABPs differed significantly with respect to correlations with indices of LV structure.