Adjunctive use of celecoxib with anti-tuberculosis drugs: evaluation in a whole-blood bactericidal activity model.

COX-2 inhibition may be of benefit in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) through a number of pathways including efflux pump inhibition (increasing intracellular TB drug levels) and diverse effects on inflammation and the immune response. We investigated celecoxib (a COX-2 inhibitor) alone and with standard anti-tuberculosis drugs in the whole-blood bactericidal activity (WBA) model. Healthy volunteers took a single dose of celecoxib (400 mg), followed (after 1 week) by a single dose of either rifampicin (10 mg/kg) or pyrazinamide (25 mg/kg), followed (after 2 or 7 days respectively) by the same anti-tuberculosis drug with celecoxib. WBA was measured at intervals until 8 hours post-dose (by inoculating blood samples with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and estimating the change in bacterial colony forming units after 72 hours incubation). Celecoxib had no activity alone in the WBA assay (cumulative WBA over 8 hours post-dose: 0.03 ± 0.01ΔlogCFU, p = 1.00 versus zero). Celecoxib did not increase cumulative WBA of standard TB drugs (mean cumulative WBA -0.10 ± 0.13ΔlogCFU versus -0.10 ± 0.12ΔlogCFU for TB drugs alone versus TB drugs and celecoxib; mean difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.00; p = 0.16). The lack of benefit of celecoxib suggests that efflux pump inhibition or eicosanoid pathway-related responses are of limited importance in mycobacterial killing in the WBA assay.

Coadministration of Allopurinol To Increase Antimycobacterial Efficacy of Pyrazinamide as Evaluated in a Whole-Blood Bactericidal Activity Model.

Coadministering pyrazinamide (PZA) with the xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol increases systemic levels of the active metabolite, pyrazinoic acid (POA), but the effects on bactericidal activity against tuberculosis are unknown. We randomized healthy volunteers to take a single dose of PZA (either 10 or 25 mg/kg of body weight) at the first visit and the same dose 7 days later, coadministered with allopurinol (100 mg daily; 2 days before to 1 day after the PZA dose). Blood was drawn at intervals until 48 h after each PZA dose, and drug levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Whole-blood bactericidal activity (WBA) was measured by inoculating blood samples with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and estimating the change in bacterial CFU after 72 h of incubation. Allopurinol increased the POA area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8) (18.32 h · µg/ml versus 24.63 h · µg/ml for PZA alone versus PZA plus allopurinol) (P < 0.001) and its peak plasma concentration (Cmax) (2.81 µg/ml versus 4.00 µg/ml) (P < 0.001). There was no effect of allopurinol on mean cumulative WBA (0.01 ± 0.02 ΔlogCFU versus 0.00 ± 0.02 ΔlogCFU for PZA alone versus PZA plus allopurinol) (P = 0.49). Higher systemic POA levels were associated with greater WBA levels (P < 0.001), but the relationship was evident only at low POA concentrations. The lack of an effect of allopurinol on WBA despite a significant increase in blood POA levels suggests that host-generated POA may be less effective than POA generated inside bacteria. Coadministration of allopurinol does not appear to be a useful strategy for increasing the efficacy of PZA in clinical practice. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02700347.).

Activity of faropenem with and without rifampicin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: evaluation in a whole-blood bactericidal activity trial.

Background: Faropenem has in vitro activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and shows synergy with rifampicin. We tested this in a whole-blood bactericidal activity (WBA) trial. Methods: We randomized healthy volunteers to receive a single oral dose of faropenem (600 mg) with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (500/125 mg) ( n = 8), rifampicin (10 mg/kg) ( n = 14) or the combination rifampicin + faropenem + amoxicillin/clavulanic acid ( n = 14). Blood was drawn at intervals to 8 h post-dose. Drug levels were measured using LC-tandem MS. WBA was measured by inoculating blood samples with Mtb and estimating the change in bacterial cfu after 72 h. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02393586). Results: There was no activity in the faropenem + amoxicillin/clavulanic acid group (cumulative WBA 0.02 Δlog cfu; P = 0.99 versus zero change). There was a suggestion of a trend favouring the rifampicin + faropenem + amoxicillin/clavulanic acid group at 8 h (cumulative WBA -0.19 ±âŸ0.03 and -0.26 ±âŸ0.03 Δlog cfu in the rifampicin and rifampicin + faropenem + amoxicillin/clavulanic acid groups, respectively; P = 0.180), which was significant in the first hour post-dose ( P = 0.032). Faropenem C max and AUC were 5.4 mg/L and 16.2 mg·h/L, respectively, and MIC for Mtb H37Rv was 5-10 mg/L. Conclusions: Faropenem is not active when used alone, possibly due to inadequate plasma levels relative to MIC. However, there was a suggestion of modest synergy with rifampicin that may merit further testing in clinical trials.

Assessment of root uptake and systemic vine-transport of Salmonella enterica sv. Typhimurium by melon (Cucumis melo) during field production.

Among melons, cantaloupes are most frequently implicated in outbreaks and surveillance-based recalls due to Salmonella enterica. There is limited but compelling evidence that associates irrigation water quality as a significant risk of preharvest contamination of melons. However, the potential for root uptake from water and soil and subsequent systemic transport of Salmonella into melon fruit is uncharacterized. The aim of this work was to determine whether root uptake of S. enterica results in systemic transport to fruit at high doses of applied inoculum through sub-surface drip and furrow irrigation during field production of melons. Cantaloupe and honeydew were grown under field conditions, in a silt clay loam soil using standard agronomic practices for California. An attenuated S. enterica sv. Typhimurium strain was applied during furrow irrigation and, in separate plots, buried drip-emitter lines delivered the inoculum directly into the established root zone. Contamination of the water resulted in soil contamination within furrows however Salmonella was not detected on top of the beds or around melon roots of furrow-irrigated rows demonstrating absence of detectable lateral transfer across the soil profile. In contrast, positive detection of the applied isolate occurred in soil and the rhizosphere in drip injected plots; survival of Salmonella was at least 41 days. Despite high populations of the applied bacteria in the rhizosphere, after surface disinfection, internalized Salmonella was not detected in mature melon fruit (n=485). Contamination of the applied Salmonella was detected on the rind surface of melons if fruit developed in contact with soil on the sides of the inoculated furrows. Following an unusual and heavy rain event during fruit maturation, melons collected from the central area of the beds, were shown to harbor the furrow-applied Salmonella. Delivery of Salmonella directly into the peduncle, after minor puncture wounding, resulted in detection of applied Salmonella in the sub-rind tissue below the fruit abscission zone. Results indicate that Salmonella internalization from soil and vascular systemic transport to fruit is unlikely to occur from irrigation water in CA production regions, even if substantially above normal presumptive levels of contamination. Although contaminated irrigation water and subsequently soil in contact with fruit remains a concern for contamination of the external rind, results suggest an acceptable microbial indicator threshold and critical limit for the presence of Salmonella in applied water may be possible by defining appropriate microbiological standards for melon irrigation in California and regions with similar climate, soil texture, and crop management practices.

Potentiation of IL-19 expression in airway epithelia by IL-17A and IL-4/IL-13: important implications in asthma.

BACKGROUND: IL-17A and IL-19 are highly expressed in chronic inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis and asthma. IL-19 plays a significant role in the enhancement of T(H)2 cytokine secretion in allergic diseases, but its cellular source in asthmatic patients remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to determine whether the epithelium is a major source of airway mucosal IL-19 and to elucidate the mechanism of gene expression regulation. METHODS: Immunofluorescent staining was used to determine IL-19 protein expression in tracheal tissue sections of various airway diseases. Well-differentiated primary human bronchial epithelial cultures and a corresponding cell line were used as in vitro models to study gene regulation. RESULTS: We found significantly higher IL-19 expression in airway epithelia of asthmatic patients than in epithelia of patients with other diseases. Using a cytokine panel, we demonstrated the upregulation of IL-19 expression in cultures by two T(H)2 cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13, in addition to the previously found T(H)17 cytokine IL-17A. Moreover, cotreatment of IL-17A and IL-4/IL-13 synergistically upregulated IL-19 expression. Using siRNA and chemical inhibitor approaches, we demonstrated a transcriptional regulation of IL-19 by nuclear factor kappaB and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 6. The addition of IL-13 to IL-17A stimulation triggers a shift from nuclear factor kappaB-dependent transcriptional regulation to one that is STAT6 based. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we demonstrated the presence of STAT6-binding elements in the IL-19 promoter region. CONCLUSION: We propose that an IL-17A- and IL-13-induced synergism in IL-19 stimulation in airway epithelia occurs through a STAT6-dependent pathway.