Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Dermatol ; 50(5): 656-663, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585749

RESUMO

Radiation dermatitis, limited to the irradiated site, is the most common cutaneous adverse reaction due to radiotherapy. There are scattered reports of erythema multiforme-like rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with radiotherapy. Some of these reports include cases without remarkable drug history, which suggests rashes induced by radiotherapy. The lack of a large cohort study, however, makes it difficult to ascertain the time course, severity, and outcome of the cases. We aimed to evaluate the potential association between radiotherapy and erythema multiforme-like rash in a larger sample of patients. We examined the records of patients at our institute who received radiotherapy and developed a rash from 2010 to 2021. We present 30 patients with erythema multiforme-like rash, which arose during or after radiotherapy. We describe the background, details of radiotherapy, and clinical course of the patients including the cutaneous and extracutaneous symptoms. Radiotherapy was the most likely cause of rash, and in most cases, the rash was relieved by conservative management and radiation could be continued. When erythema multiforme-like rash arises in patients under cancer treatment, radiotherapy should be considered a potential trigger.


Assuntos
Eritema Multiforme , Exantema , Neoplasias , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Eritema Multiforme/diagnóstico , Eritema Multiforme/etiologia , Exantema/diagnóstico , Exantema/etiologia , Tratamento Conservador , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiologia
2.
J Dermatol ; 50(3): 357-363, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36258256

RESUMO

In recent years, the development of combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and cytotoxic anticancer drugs has radically changed the management of diverse malignancies and significantly improved patient outcomes. Several clinical trials have shown that skin rash caused by combination therapy with ICIs and cytotoxic drugs may be more frequent and severe than that developing after administration of ICIs alone or cytotoxic drug monotherapy. However, most reports provide little information on severity, treatment, post-diagnosis course, and recurrence of rashes on drug rechallenges. We aimed to describe the experience of skin rashes developing within 2 weeks from the first administration of combination therapy with ICIs and cytotoxic drugs in 11 patients visiting our dermatology department. This study included seven men and four women, and the patients' median age was 52 years. The primary disease was non-small-cell lung cancer in eight patients, cervical cancer in two patients, and esophageal cancer in one patient. Nine patients had a maculopapular rash and two patients developed erythema multiforme-like eruptions. The skin rash was often accompanied by extracutaneous symptoms, such as fever (n = 9), mucositis (n = 4), and liver dysfunction (n = 2). In all cases, the symptoms improved with topical steroid therapy alone, with no patients exhibiting severe symptoms requiring systemic steroids or immunosuppressive agents. In addition, when the causative drugs were re-administered after recovery from the rash, only two patients relapsed with accompanying systemic symptoms, and all patients except one were able to continue treatment using the same drug regimen. Although it was suggested that the rash caused by the combination therapy of ICIs and cytotoxic drugs may be more prominent than that caused by each agent alone, comprehensive judgment, including histopathological examination, may indicate the feasibility of continuing the treatment regimen for cancer.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Exantema , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Exantema/induzido quimicamente , Exantema/diagnóstico , Exantema/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos
3.
J Anesth ; 34(5): 719-722, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32681449

RESUMO

The aim of this special article is to introduce Perianesthesia Nurses (PANs) who play an essential role in assisting anesthesiologists to ensure the safety of patients undergoing anesthesia and to improve the quality of anesthetic care. In Japan, there is no national license for nurse anesthesia providers. Therefore, most of the tasks related to anesthesia are performed by the anesthesiologists. Due to the size and complexity of the aging population, higher quality perioperative care is needed. In search of a solution, PANs were introduced to improve anesthetic care in Japan, enabling anesthesiologists to delegate some of their tasks to PANs who work within the scope of registered nurse's policies. They are a new type of anesthesia care provider in Japan, and different from Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists in the United States. Currently, six schools provide 2-year master's degree perianesthesia nursing programs, and graduates are now providing anesthetic care both inside and outside of the operating room under the direct supervision of anesthesiologists. PANs not only assist anesthesiologists and help to reduce anesthesiologists' workload, but also contribute to the expansion of anesthesia services. They ensure patient safety and improve the quality of patient care before, during, and after the patient undergoing anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia , Anestesiologia , Idoso , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesiologistas , Humanos , Japão , Enfermeiros Anestesistas , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...