Prognostic factors in patients with terminal stage lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death.(1) Accurate prediction of survival in the terminal stage is important, because it may help patients make a rational decision. Although several prognostic scores have been described as effective indicators of outcome, these scores were intended for patients with other types of cancers. There is no prognostic score for patients with terminal-stage lung cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors for patients with terminal-stage lung cancer. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Patients in our palliative care unit (PCU) were selected retrospectively and divided into two independent groups, training and testing. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on data from the training group to detect independent prognostic factors, while data from patients in the testing group were analyzed to validate whether these prognostic factors predicted near-term death. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (69 in the training group and 24 in the testing group) were included in the analyses. Multivariate analysis showed that fatigue, anorexia, desaturation, hyponatremia, and hypoalbuminemia were independent prognostic factors in the training group. Mean survival time in patients who had more than three of these five factors was 9.2±2.6 days (p=0.012). In the testing group, the presence of more than three of these five factors predicted death within two weeks, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 75%. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that fatigue, anorexia, desaturation, hyponatremia, and hypoalbuminemia may be short-term prognostic factors in terminally ill lung cancer patients. In particular, the presence of more than three of these factors predicted death within two weeks.

[Endobronchial ultrasonic-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for lung cancer diagnosis].

BACKGROUND: Although bronchoscopy has an important role in the diagnosis of lung cancer, more invasive procedures, such as CT-guided biopsy or surgery, are needed when transbronchial approaches fail. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the usefulness of endobronchial ultrasonic-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for lung cancer diagnosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 122 cases who were finally diagnosed to have lung cancer from among 388 cases who underwent bronchoscopy because of abnormal shadows on their chest X-ray or CT. When bronchoscopic approaches were possible, conventional transbronchial lung biopsy or cytology (conventional approaches) were done. EBUS-TBNA was added whenever mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes enlarged to more than 1 cm in diameter, or if there were lesions attached to the lower respiratory tract. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional approaches and EBUS-TBNA were assessed. RESULTS: The number of cases diagnosed as lung cancer by conventional approaches was 79 cases (64.8%) among the 122 cases examined. Of the 43 cases undiagnosed by these procedures, 27 cases were diagnosed as lung cancer by EBUS-TBNA. Thus, 106 cases (86.9%) were diagnosed as lung cancer using conventional approaches plus EBUS-TBNA. No severe complications were observed in all the subjects. CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA is a safe and useful approach for the diagnosis of lung cancer together with staging.