A Randomized Clinical Trial of Catheter Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Suppression of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: The VANISH2 Trial.

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with prior myocardial infarction is associated with adverse quality of life and clinical outcomes, despite the presence of implanted defibrillators (ICDs). Suppression of recurrent VT can be accomplished with antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation. The Ventricular Tachycardia Antiarrhythmics or Ablation In Structural Heart Disease 2 (VANISH2) trial is designed to determine whether ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line therapy for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT. The VANISH2 trial enrolls patients with prior myocardial infarction and VT (with one of: ≥1 ICD shock; ≥3 episodes treated with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and symptoms; ≥5 episodes treated with ATP regardless of symptoms; ≥3 episodes within 24 hours; or sustained VT treated with electrical cardioversion or pharmacologic conversion). Enrolled patients are classified as either sotalol-eligible, or amiodarone-eligible, and then are randomized to either catheter ablation or to that antiarrhythmic drug therapy, with randomization stratified by drug-eligibility group. Drug therapy, catheter ablation procedures and ICD programming are standardized. All patients will be followed until two years after randomization. The primary endpoint is a composite of mortality at any time, appropriate ICD shock after 14 days, VT storm after 14 days, and treated sustained VT below detection of the ICD after 14 days. The outcomes will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle using survival analysis techniques. The results of the VANISH2 trial are intended to provide data to support clinical decisions on how to suppress VT for patients with prior myocardial infarction. Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02830360.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure With Reduced vs Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Catheter ablation is associated with reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalization and death in select patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the benefit in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain. Objective: To investigate whether catheter ablation for AF is associated with reduced HF-related outcomes according to HF phenotype. Data Source: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central was conducted among studies published from inception to September 2023. Study Selection: Parallel-group randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing catheter ablation with conventional rate or rhythm control therapies in patients with HF, New York Heart Association functional class II or greater, and a history of paroxysmal or persistent AF were included. Pairs of independent reviewers screened 7531 titles and abstracts, of which 12 RCTs and 4 substudies met selection criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were abstracted in duplicate according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects Mantel-Haenszel models. Interaction P values were used to test for subgroup differences. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was HF events, defined as HF hospitalization, clinically significant worsening of HF, or unscheduled visits to a clinician for treatment intensification. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 12 RCTs with 2465 participants (mean [SD] age, 65.3 [9.7] years; 658 females [26.7%]) were included; there were 1552 participants with HFrEF and 913 participants with HFpEF. Compared with conventional rate or rhythm control, catheter ablation was associated with reduced risk of HF events in HFrEF (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48-0.72), while there was no benefit in patients with HFpEF (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.32) (P for interaction = .03). Catheter ablation was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular death compared with conventional therapies in HFrEF (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.70) but a differential association was not detected in HFpEF (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.46-1.79) (P for interaction = .12). Similarly, no difference in the association of catheter ablation with all-cause mortality was found between HFrEF (RR vs conventional therapies, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.86) and HFpEF (RR vs conventional therapies, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.39-2.30) groups (P for interaction = .39). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that catheter ablation for AF was associated with reduced risk of HF events in patients with HFrEF but had limited or no benefit in HFpEF. Results from ongoing trials may further elucidate the role of catheter ablation for AF in HFpEF.

Relationship between sex, body size, and cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit: A patient-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Women might benefit more than men from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and do so at shorter QRS durations. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to determine whether sex-based differences in CRT effects are better accounted for by height, body surface area (BSA), or left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD). METHODS: We analyzed patient-level data from CRT trials (MIRACLE, MIRACLE ICD, MIRACLE ICD II, REVERSE, RAFT, COMPANION, and MADIT-CRT) using bayesian hierarchical Weibull regression models. Relationships between QRS duration and CRT effects were examined overall and in sex-stratified cohorts; additional analyses indexed QRS duration by height, BSA, or LVEDD. End points were heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Compared with men (n = 5628), women (n = 1439) were shorter (1.62 [interquartile range, 1.57-1.65] m vs 1.75 [1.70-1.80] m; P < .001), with smaller BSAs (1.76 [1.62-1.90] m2 vs 2.02 [1.89-2.16] m2; P < .001). In adjusted sex-stratified analyses, the reduction in HFH or death was greater for women (hazard ratio, 0.54; credible interval, 0.42-0.70) than for men (hazard ratio, 0.77; credible interval, 0.66-0.89; Pinteraction = .009); results were similar for all-cause mortality even after adjustment for height, BSA, and LVEDD. Sex-specific differences were observed only in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The effect of CRT on HFH or death was observed at a shorter QRS duration for women (126 ms) than for men (145 ms). Indexing QRS duration by height, BSA, or LVEDD attenuated sex-specific QRS duration thresholds for the effects of CRT on HFH or death but not on mortality. CONCLUSION: Although body size partially explains sex-specific QRS duration thresholds for CRT benefit, it is not associated with the magnitude of CRT benefit. Indexing QRS duration for body size might improve selection of patients for CRT, particularly with a "borderline" QRS duration. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT00271154, NCT00251251, NCT00267098, NCT00180271.

Long-Term Outcomes of Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT) showed a greater benefit with respect to mortality at 5 years among patients who received cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT) than among those who received implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). However, the effect of CRT on long-term survival is not known. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% or less, and an intrinsic QRS duration of 120 msec or more (or a paced QRS duration of 200 msec or more) to receive either an ICD alone or a CRT defibrillator (CRT-D). We assessed long-term outcomes among patients at the eight highest-enrolling participating sites. The primary outcome was death from any cause; the secondary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, heart transplantation, or implantation of a ventricular assist device. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 1798 patients, of whom 1050 were included in the long-term survival trial; the median duration of follow-up for the 1050 patients was 7.7 years (interquartile range, 3.9 to 12.8), and the median duration of follow-up for those who survived was 13.9 years (interquartile range, 12.8 to 15.7). Death occurred in 405 of 530 patients (76.4%) assigned to the ICD group and in 370 of 520 patients (71.2%) assigned to the CRT-D group. The time until death appeared to be longer for those assigned to receive a CRT-D than for those assigned to receive an ICD (acceleration factor, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.92; P = 0.002). A secondary-outcome event occurred in 412 patients (77.7%) in the ICD group and in 392 (75.4%) in the CRT-D group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a reduced ejection fraction, a widened QRS complex, and NYHA class II or III heart failure, the survival benefit associated with receipt of a CRT-D as compared with ICD appeared to be sustained during a median of nearly 14 years of follow-up. (RAFT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00251251.).

Benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy among older patients: A patient-level meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) and mortality for guideline-indicated patients with heart failure (HF). Most patients with HF are aged ≥70 years but such patients are often under-represented in randomized trials. METHODS: Patient-level data were combined from 8 randomized trials published 2002-2013 comparing CRT to no CRT (n = 6,369). The effect of CRT was estimated using an adjusted Bayesian survival model. Using age as a categorical (<70 vs ≥70 years) or continuous variable, the interaction between age and CRT on the composite end point of HFH or all-cause mortality or all-cause mortality alone was assessed. RESULTS: The median age was 67 years with 2436 (38%) being 70+; 1,554 (24%) were women; 2,586 (41%) had nonischemic cardiomyopathy and median QRS duration was 160 ms. Overall, CRT was associated with a delay in time to the composite end point (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.75, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.66-0.85, P = .002) and all-cause mortality alone (aHR of 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.96, P = .017). When age was treated as a categorical variable, there was no interaction between age and the effect of CRT for either end point (P > .1). When age was treated as a continuous variable, older patients appeared to obtain greater benefit with CRT for the composite end point (P for interaction = .027) with a similar but nonsignificant trend for mortality (P for interaction = .35). CONCLUSION: Reductions in HFH and mortality with CRT are as great or greater in appropriately indicated older patients. Age should not be a limiting factor for the provision of CRT.

Efficacy and safety of supraclavicular and pectoralis nerve blocks as primary peri-procedural analgesia for cardiac electronic device implantation: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are routinely implanted using intravenous drugs for sedation. However, some patients are poor candidates for intravenous sedation. OBJECTIVE: We present a case series demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a novel, ultrasound-guided nerve block technique that allows for pre-pectoral CIED implantation. The targets are the supraclavicular nerve (SCN) and pectoral nerve (PECS1). METHODS: We enrolled 20 patients who were planned for new CIED implantation. Following US-localization of the SCN and PECS1, local anesthetic (LA) was instilled at least 30-60 min pre-procedure. Successful nerve block was determined if < 5 mL of intraprocedural LA was used, along with lack of sensation with skin and deep tissue pinprick. Optional sedation was offered to patients' pre-procedure if discomfort was reported. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (85%) had a successful periprocedural nerve block, with only three patients exceeding 5 mL of LA. SCN and PECS1 success occurred in 19 (95%) and 18 (90%) patients, respectively. The overall success of nerve block by fulfilling all the criteria was demonstrated in 17 out of 20 patients (85%). Patients who reported no pain (VAS score = 0) were distributed as follows: 13 patients (65%) in the immediate post-procedure interval, 18 patients (90%) at the 1 h post-implant interval, and 14 patients (70%) at the 24 h post- implant interval. The median cumulative VAS score was 0 (IQR = 0 - 1). There were no reported significant adverse effects. CONCLUSION: SCN and PECS1 nerve blocks are safe and effective for patients undergoing CIED implantation to minimize or eliminate the use of intravenous sedation.

Achieving bi-directional conduction block during catheter ablation is not enough to prevent recurrence of cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependant atrial flutter: Role of subclinical conduction.

BACKGROUND: Achieving bi-directional conduction block, as assessed by differential pacing and change in activation along tricuspid annulus (TA), across the cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI), is considered a satisfactory end point during catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFL). AIM: To assess role of subclinical conduction by observing polarity reversal of local bipolar signals from RS to QR pattern lateral to the line of ablation, in predicting recurrence of CTI dependant AFL after ablation in patients with bidirectional conduction block. METHOD AND RESULTS: Of 683 patients undergoing ablation of CTI dependent AFL, 73 (10.6%) patients underwent redo flutter ablation and were evaluated further. The mean age was 60.8 years and 51% were males. Evidence of bidirectional block by differential pacing and change is activation along multipolar catheter and reversal of local bipolar signals from RS to QR pattern lateral to the line of ablation, during the 1st and subsequent procedure, were studied. 60% patients had confirmed bidirectional block of which 71% had lack of voltage reversal, at the end of 1st procedure. All patients with bidirectional block with lack of reversal of bipolar signals, after the first procedure had recurrence of AFL whereas only 3/11 (27%) people with bidirectional block and with absence of subclinical conduction had recurrence of AFL. CONCLUSION: Achieving bidirectional conduction block is not sufficient to prevent recurrence of AFL after CTI ablation. Reversal of local bipolar signals, from RS to QR pattern along with achieving bidirectional conduction delay would reduce recurrence of AFL, post ablation.

Influence of the Social Environment on Ideal Cardiovascular Health.

Background The environment plays a large role in the health of individuals; however, more research is needed to better understand aspects of the environment that most influence health. Specifically, our study examines how the social environment influences cardiovascular health (CVH). Methods and Results The social environment was characterized using measures of belonging and life and work stress in individuals, as well as nationally derived measures of marginalization, deprivation, economic status, and community well-being in neighborhoods. CVH was defined by the American Heart Association's Cardiovascular Health Index-a summed score of 7 clinical and behavioral components known to have the greatest impact on CVH. Data were obtained from the Canadian Community Health Survey 2015 to 2016 and multiple national data sources. Multilevel regression models were used to analyze the associations between CVH and the social environment. Overall, 27% of Canadians reported ideal CVH (6-7 score points), 68% reported intermediate CVH (3-5 score points), and 5% reported poor CVH (0-2 score points). The neighborhood environment contributed up to 7% of the differences in CVH between individuals. Findings indicated that residing in a neighborhood with greater community well-being (odds ratio [OR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.26-1.41]) was associated with achieving higher odds of ideal CVH, while weaker community belonging (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62-0.72]) and residing in a neighborhood with greater marginalization (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.82-0.91]) and deprivation (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.64-0.69]) were associated with achieving lower odds of ideal CVH. Conclusions Aspects of individual-level social environment and residing in a neighborhood with a more favorable social environment were both independently and significantly associated with achieving ideal CVH.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Delay But Not Right Bundle Branch Block: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) varies by QRS characteristics; individual randomized trials are underpowered to assess benefit for relatively small subgroups. METHODS: The authors analyzed patient-level data from pivotal CRT trials (MIRACLE [Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation], MIRACLE-ICD [Multicenter InSync ICD Randomized Clinical Evaluation], MIRACLE-ICD II [Multicenter InSync ICD Randomized Clinical Evaluation II], REVERSE [Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction], RAFT [Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure], BLOCK-HF [Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients with Atrioventricular Block], COMPANION [Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure], and MADIT-CRT [Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial - Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy]) using Bayesian Hierarchical Weibull survival regression models to assess CRT benefit by QRS morphology (left bundle branch block [LBBB], n=4549; right bundle branch block [RBBB], n=691; and intraventricular conduction delay [IVCD], n=1024) and duration (with 150-ms partition). The continuous relationship between QRS duration and CRT benefit was also examined within subgroups defined by QRS morphology. The primary end point was time to heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death; a secondary end point was time to all-cause death. RESULTS: Of 6264 patients included, 25% were women, the median age was 66 [interquartile range, 58 to 73] years, and 61% received CRT (with or without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator). CRT was associated with an overall lower risk of HFH or death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [credible interval (CrI), 0.65 to 0.84]), and in subgroups of patients with QRS ≥150 ms and either LBBB (HR, 0.56 [CrI, 0.48 to 0.66]) or IVCD (HR, 0.59 [CrI, 0.39 to 0.89]), but not RBBB (HR 0.97 [CrI, 0.68 to 1.34]; Pinteraction <0.001). No significant association for CRT with HFH or death was observed when QRS was <150 ms (regardless of QRS morphology) or in the presence of RBBB. Similar relationships were observed for all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: CRT is associated with reduced HFH or death in patients with QRS ≥150 ms and LBBB or IVCD, but not for those with RBBB. Aggregating RBBB and IVCD into a single "non-LBBB" category when selecting patients for CRT should be reconsidered. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00271154, NCT00251251, NCT00267098, and NCT00180271.

Is Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm of Value in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently co-exist, with the prevalence of AF increasing in patients with more advanced HF symptoms. When present, AF increases morbidity and mortality in patients with HF. The purpose of this review is to examine emerging evidence addressing the value of restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with HF. RECENT FINDINGS: Earlier trials comparing a rhythm control strategy with antiarrhythmic drugs have failed to demonstrate benefit in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction. More recent trials, including the recently published RAFT-AF, utilizing catheter ablation for rhythm control, have shown greater promise, possibly due to reduced medication-related side effects and higher efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm. A strategy of sinus rhythm maintenance with catheter ablation appears to improve mortality, reduce HF events and improve quality of life in patients with AF and HF.

Hemodynamically Tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia With Mildly Impaired Ejection Fraction: Do These Patients Have VT/VF Recurrence and ICD Therapies?

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia (VT) and minimally reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remain a group that presents a prognostic and therapeutic dilemma. METHODS: We studied patients from our implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) database who received ICDs for hemodynamically tolerated VT and mildly reduced LVEF (36%-49%) at time of implant between May 2015 and December 2019. Time to appropriate ICD therapy was assessed. Clinical features associated with recurrent VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) with ICD therapies were explored using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 2037 ICDs placed between May 2015 and December 2019, 64 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the study group was 68 ± 12 years, and 58 (90.6%) subjects were male. Average ejection fraction was 40% ± 4.4 (range 36%-49%). Twenty-two (34%) subjects received antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for VT at 229 ± 265 days after ICD placement. Fifteen (23%) subjects received appropriate ICD shocks 305 ± 321 days after implant. The rate of recurrent VT/VF among the 37 patients with ICD therapy was 195 ± 39 beats per minute (bpm). This was significantly more rapid than initial presenting VT rates before ICD placement (183 ± 27 bpm) (P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis showed no factors independently associated with recurrent VT/VF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mildly impaired LV function and hemodynamically tolerated VT receive appropriate ICD therapies over the 3 years following implant. This patient group warrants further investigation, as their recurrent VT/VF rates can be much more rapid, and 23% go on to receive appropriate ICD shocks.

Randomized Ablation-Based Rhythm-Control Versus Rate-Control Trial in Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Results from the RAFT-AF trial.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist and can be challenging to treat. Pharmacologically based rhythm control of AF has not proven to be superior to rate control. Ablation-based rhythm control was compared with rate control to evaluate if clinical outcomes in patients with HF and AF could be improved. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label trial with blinded outcome evaluation using a central adjudication committee. Patients with high-burden paroxysmal (>4 episodes in 6 months) or persistent (duration <3 years) AF, New York Heart Association class II to III HF, and elevated NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) were randomly assigned to ablation-based rhythm control or rate control. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and all HF events, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction, 6-minute walk test, and NT-proBNP. Quality of life was measured using the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and the AF Effect on Quality of Life. The primary analysis was time-to-event using Cox proportional hazards modeling. The trial was stopped early because of a determination of apparent futility by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee. RESULTS: From December 1, 2011, to January 20, 2018, 411 patients were randomly assigned to ablation-based rhythm control (n=214) or rate control (n=197). The primary outcome occurred in 50 (23.4%) patients in the ablation-based rhythm-control group and 64 (32.5%) patients in the rate-control group (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.49-1.03]; P=0.066). Left ventricular ejection fraction increased in the ablation-based group (10.1±1.2% versus 3.8±1.2%, P=0.017), 6-minute walk distance improved (44.9±9.1 m versus 27.5±9.7 m, P=0.025), and NT-proBNP demonstrated a decrease (mean change -77.1% versus -39.2%, P<0.0001). Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire demonstrated greater improvement in the ablation-based rhythm-control group (least-squares mean difference of -5.4 [95% CI, -10.5 to -0.3]; P=0.0036), as did the AF Effect on Quality of Life score (least-squares mean difference of 6.2 [95% CI, 1.7-10.7]; P=0.0005). Serious adverse events were observed in 50% of patients in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high-burden AF and HF, there was no statistical difference in all-cause mortality or HF events with ablation-based rhythm control versus rate control; however, there was a nonsignificant trend for improved outcomes with ablation-based rhythm control over rate control. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01420393.

Evaluating Polygenic Risk Scores in "Lone" Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Polygenic scores incorporating varying numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been demonstrated to exert a prominent role in atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to compare the relative discriminatory capacities of 2 previously validated polygenic scores in "lone" AF. METHODS: A total of 186 lone AF cases of European ancestry underwent SNP genotyping. A genome-wide polygenic score (GPS) and polygenic risk score (PRS) involving 6,730,541 and 1168 SNPs, respectively, were calculated for 186 cases and 423 controls of European ancestry from the 1000 Genomes (1KG) Project. The distribution of the polygenic scores was compared between the cases and controls and their discriminatory capacities were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: A total of 34.4% of patients with lone AF had GPS scores greater than the top 10th percentile of 1KG controls, corresponding to a 4.64-fold increased odds (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.99-7.18; P < 0.001) for AF. A PRS score in the top 10th percentile of 1KG controls was observed in 26.3% of cases, which equated to a 3.16-fold increased odds (95% CI, 2.01-4.98; P < 0.001) for AF. Comparison of C-statistics from ROC curves indicated improved discriminatory capacity of the GPS (0.76) relative to the PRS (0.70) (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our study evaluating 2 polygenic scores for AF suggests that the GPS, containing more than 6.7 million SNPs, exhibits an improved discriminatory capacity in lone AF compared with a PRS possessing 1168 SNPs. Our findings suggest that genetic risk scores for AF that maximally leverage genomic data may provide improved predictive power.

CONTEXTE: Il a été démontré que des scores polygéniques intégrant un nombre variable de polymorphismes mononucléotidiques (PMN) jouent un rôle important en ce qui concerne la fibrillation auriculaire (FA). Nous avons comparé le potentiel discriminatoire relatif de deux scores polygéniques déjà validés dans la FA idiopathique. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Au total, 186 sujets d'ascendance européenne atteints de FA idiopathique ont été soumis à un génotypage des PMN. Un score polygénique génomique (SPG) et un score de risque polygénique (SRP) comprenant respectivement 6 730 541 et 1 168 PMN ont été calculés pour les 186 sujets et pour 423 témoins d'ascendance européenne dont les données sont tirées du projet 1000 Genomes (1KG). Les distributions des scores polygéniques des sujets et des témoins ont été comparées, et leur potentiel discriminatoire a été évalué au moyen des courbes caractéristiques de la performance d'un test (courbes ROC, de l'anglais Receiver Operating Characteristic). RÉSULTATS: Au total, 34,4 % des patients atteints de FA idiopathique avaient un SPG supérieur à celui des témoins du 10e centile supérieur du projet 1KG, ce qui représente une probabilité de FA 4,64 fois plus élevée (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 2,99 à 7,18; p < 0,001). Un SRP situé dans le 10e centile supérieur des témoins du projet 1KG a été observé chez 26,3 % des patients atteints de FA, soit une probabilité de FA 3,16 fois plus élevée (IC à 95 % : 2,01 à 4,98; p < 0,001). Les résultats de la comparaison des statistiques C des courbes ROC indiquent que le SPG (0,76) a un potentiel discriminatoire supérieur à celui du SRP (0,70) (p = 0,002). CONCLUSIONS: Les résultats de notre étude de deux scores polygéniques relatifs à la FA indiquent que le potentiel discriminatoire du SPG, qui comprend plus de 6,7 millions de PMN, pour prédire une FA idiopathique est supérieur à celui du SRP, qui comprend 1 168 PMN. Ces résultats indiquent que les scores de risque génétique de FA qui exploitent pleinement les données génomiques pourraient avoir un pouvoir prédictif supérieur.

Para-Hisian Pacing During Sinus Rhythm: Establishing Threshold Values to Distinguish Nodal From Septal Pathway Conduction.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify minimum threshold values below which conduction over the atrioventricular (AV) node would be unexpected. BACKGROUND: Para-Hisian pacing is used to evaluate for the presence of a septal accessory pathway (AP); however, threshold values to differentiate nodal from AP conduction are unknown. METHODS: The authors performed high- and low-output para-Hisian pacing during sinus rhythm to capture the His and para-Hisian ventricular myocardium (H+V) and para-Hisian ventricular myocardium (V) alone, respectively. The change in stimulation (stim)-to-atrial electrogram interval after loss of His bundle capture in patients with (AP+) and without (AP-) a septal AP was evaluated. Stim-to-proximal coronary sinus (PCS) and stim-to-high right atrium (HRA) intervals were measured and within-patient differences (△) for V and H+V capture were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 23 AP+ and 45 AP- patients were evaluated. The difference in stimulus to earliest atrial signal in the high right atrial catheter seen with the loss of His bundle capture (△-stim-HRA) (21 ms; interquartile range [IQR]: 3 to 43 ms vs. 64 ms; IQR: 56 to 73 ms; p < 0.001) and difference in stimulus to earliest atrial signal in the proximal coronary sinus catheter seen with the loss of His Bundle capture (△-stim-PCS) (11 ms; IQR: 0 to 30 ms vs. 61 ms; IQR: 52 to 72 ms; p < 0.001) were shorter in AP+ patients. The shortest △-stim-PCS and △-stim-HRA in AP- patients were 37 ms and 32 ms, respectively, whereas the longest corresponding intervals in AP+ patients were 51 ms and 75 ms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A △-stim-PCS <37 ms or △-stim-HRA <32 ms confirmed the presence of a septal AP, whereas a value >51 ms for △-stim-PCS or >75 ms for △-stim-HRA excluded it. Alternatively, the minimum △-stim-PCS with loss of His capture compatible with AV nodal conduction in isolation was 37 ms, and a △-stim-PCS >51 ms effectively ruled out the presence of a septal AP.

A simple maneuver to determine if septal accessory pathway ablation requires a left atrial approach.

INTRODUCTION: Septal accessory pathway (AP) ablation can be challenging due to the complex anatomy of the septal region. The decision to access the left atrium (LA) is often made after failure of ablation from the right. We sought to establish whether the difference between ventriculo-atrial (VA) time during right ventricular (RV) apical pacing versus the VA during tachycardia would help establish the successful site for ablation of septal APs. METHODS: Intracardiac electrograms of patients with orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) using a septal AP with successful catheter ablation were reviewed. The ∆VA was the difference between the VA interval during RV apical pacing and the VA interval during ORT. The difference in the VA interval during right ventricular entrainment and ORT (StimA-VA) was also measured. RESULTS: The median ∆VA time was significantly less in patients with a septal AP ablated on the right side compared with patients with a septal AP ablated on the left side (12 ± 19 vs. 56 ± 10 ms, p < .001). The StimA-VA was significantly different between the two groups (22 ± 14 vs. 53 ± 9 ms, p < .001). The ∆VA and StimA-VA were always ≤ 40 ms in patients with non-decremental septal APs ablated from the right side and always greater than 40 ms in those with septal APs ablated from the left. CONCLUSION: ΔVA and StimA-VA values identified with RV apical pacing in the setting of ORT involving a septal AP predict when left atrial access will be necessary for successful ablation.

Prediction of heart failure hospitalizations based on the direct measurement of intrathoracic impedance.

AIMS: OptiVol fluid index was developed as a transthoracic impedance-based indicator of short-term risk for heart failure hospitalization (HFH). OptiVol is calculated as the accumulating difference between daily impedance (measured impedance) and long-term average impedance (reference impedance). Measured impedance alone was thought to have limited prognostic utility; however, measured impedance has the advantage of being simple, direct, and possibly additive to OptiVol fluid index in establishing long-term HFH risk. We tested the hypothesis that directly measured impedance has independent prognostic value in predicting long-term HFH risk and that changes in measured impedance result in a change in predicted long-term HFH risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of 1719 patients studied in PARTNERS-HF, FAST, and RAFT studies was performed. Baseline measured impedance was determined using daily values averaged over 1 month, from Month 6 to 7 post implant; change in measured impedance was determined from values averaged over 1 month, from Month 7 to 8 post implant compared with baseline. The predictive value of baseline measured impedance for HFHs was assessed beginning 7 months post implant. The predictive value of a change in measured impedance for a change in HFHs was assessed beginning 8 months post implant. Baseline measured impedance successfully predicted HFHs. For example, 3 year HFH rate for low baseline impedance < 70 Ω was 23%; for high baseline impedance ≥ 70 Ω was 15% (P < 0.001). Changes in measured impedance resulted in changes in predicted HFHs. For example, when a baseline impedance of ≥70 fell during follow-up to <70 Ω, the subsequent HFHs were 15% compared with 4% in patients with measured impedance that remained >70 Ω (P = 0.004). In addition, when baseline measured impedance fell during follow-up by >1%, 2%, or 3%, subsequent HFHs increased to 13%, 17%, or 18%, respectively. Finally, the prognostic value of measured impedance was additive to the prognostic value of the OptiVol fluid index. CONCLUSIONS: Direct measurements of intrathoracic impedance using an implanted device can be used to stratify patients at varying risk of long-term HFH. These direct measurements of impedance have practical clinical appeal because they are simple, continuous, and ambulatory.

Quality of Life and Health Care Utilization in the CIRCA-DOSE Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the impact of contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation versus cryoballoon ablation on quality of life and health care utilization. BACKGROUND: Traditional outcome parameters, such as arrhythmia-free survival, are insufficient to evaluate the clinical impact of atrial fibrillation (AF), as it fails to the capture patient- and health system-level differences in treatment approaches. METHODS: The CIRCA-DOSE (Cryoballoon Vs. Contact-Force Atrial Fibrillation Ablation) study randomly assigned 346 patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF to contact force-guided radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) was assessed at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months post-ablation using a disease-specific and generic HRQOL instruments. Health care utilization (hospitalization, emergency department visits, and cardioversion) and antiarrhythmic drug use for the 12 months preceding ablation was compared with the 12 months following ablation. RESULTS: Disease-specific and generic HRQOL was moderately to severely impaired at baseline and improved significantly at 6 and 12 months of follow-up (median improvement in AFEQT [Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy of Life] score 32.4 [interquartile range: 17.7 to 48.9]). When compared with the 12 months pre-ablation, the proportion and absolute number of cardioversions decreased significantly (41.1% vs. 10.1% of patients, 137 vs. 35 events; p < 0.0001). Similar significant reductions in emergency department visits (66.7% vs. 25.1% of patients, 224 vs. 87 events; p < 0.0001), and hospitalizations (25.5% vs. 14.5% of patients, 86 vs. 50 events; p < 0.001) were observed. There were no significant differences between randomized groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter randomized trial, catheter ablation with advanced-generation technologies resulted in a significant improvement in HRQOL and a significant reduction in health care utilization in the year following AF ablation. (Cryoballoon vs. Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation [CIRCA-DOSE]; NCT01913522).